Author

Topic: Cointerra insider investor comments (Read 3183 times)

sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
September 01, 2013, 06:56:27 PM
#9
No kidding about the Mickey Mouse comparison!  Cheesy

How apt. However, it looks like the only way to get into Disneyland right now is to buy pre-order E-tickets.  Wink  Cheesy

You do have to admit that some of the Wild West aspect does make it exciting. It def. reminds me of the early days of the web circa Netscape Navigator when we had a hint, but no idea that the Web was going to grow so massively.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
September 01, 2013, 04:45:10 PM
#8
Thanks for taking the time to delineate why you think KnC deserves the top spot as far as reputation. The market's getting big enough that there's room for more then 2 or 3 mfgs. at the top. Again, it's just my opinion, but I'm also basing this on how I think the market perceives them as well. AM is shipping product in volume & hasn't pissed off their community. They deserve that top spot (and I'm not running any of their hardware ATM).

While I'll be running a HashFast Co-op with a lil help from some friends, I'm not a fanboy of any hardware and find all of that to be silly. At the end of the day: delivery time, performance, cost, and reliability rules and everything else drools. While I'm not a chip specialist, I'm an IT specialist with a design hat & I do support chip designers on a day to day basis (close to tapeout ourselves for one of our one chips in our niche industry). I've been watching the tech industry for about 30 some years, invested in the tech industry for about 20 years, and also have about 10 years of proto IT hardware & network design exp. myself for the DoD and state DOT so I'm not just some snot nosed kid that plays Xbox Live. Smiley

I appreciate your concerns about HF's MPP, I'm presuming this plan passed Legal. If not, well, someone's gonna be looking for a new job!  Cheesy
As far as market impact: IMHO HashFast's MPP has had a much greater impact then KnC's reseller program (which is something I signed up for) which has failed miserably from what I can see.


Yeah I've had reservations about ASICminers pricing, but I'm hard pressed to find anyone complaining that purchased, Friedcat certainly know how to play a shrewd game, and after what we've seen by Bitsyncom, I've stepped back from giving Friedcat a hard time. At least people have a solid choice to make there.

I don't think the reseller program can be compared to be fair, I'll add it to my sig once KnC have a proven device, I'm certainly not planning to profit from uncertainty, by that I'm certain they will deliver a quality product, but only then will I personally be comfortable having any commercial affiliation.

You would think MPP passed legal, but considering Hashfast did not check their privacy before pasting it (allegedly - they said they used a template and forgot to check it stated they would resell people's personal information, which is crazy and very unprofessional), followed by other questionable marketing that looks like it's purposely created to not hold them accountable to delays whilst stating they intend to deliver Oct 20-30th, which I cannot believe is true. We'll see, if they've raised funds under false pretence they will be torn apart. It's staring to look that way, and with shennanigans other manufacturers have played here, some appear to feel they are above the law; BFL and Bitsyncom, it's making pre-order trust a complete nightmare. Fact is though you cannot be unregulated and mentioning 'return on investment', that makes it a financial product and FinCEN will be all over that. They should pay very close attention to Bitsyncom, because a combination of deceit to raise investment, almost certain delays they already knew would occur, and promising financial returns they are not legally allowed to, will result in litigation, especially with the prices they are charging. Still I've given up pointing out their shortfalls in their thread, I just get attacked for having ulterior motives, in any case they're grown men, so they can wear their big boy pants and deal with the repercussions as, and when, they arise.

Anyway, fingers crossed and all that. I can't say I've ever seen companies run like this, for the most part it's completely Mickey Mouse, hence as much as I want to support Bitcoin, and have distain for traditional fonacial products, with respect to pre-order payments; it's strictly third party liability supported credit card, or products in hand, that makes, or breaks a legitimate ASIC manufacturer for me. Unfortunately, yet understandably, product in hand comes with a significant premium.

Cointerra appear to sing from the right hymn sheet, although I'm angry they promised Paypal and priced well out of Paypal's terms. Either they lied, or knew nothing about what they were promising. I don't buy they understand Bitcoin to the extent they claim, but marketing dictates you have to play that card, and the video on their site, as pretty as it is visually, is sleep inducing. The narrator literally has the most monotone somnolent voice ever. Not that that makes, or breaks a deal; their pricing and timing does, the video just does them no favours either.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
September 01, 2013, 04:22:33 PM
#7
Thanks for taking the time to delineate why you think KnC deserves the top spot as far as reputation. The market's getting big enough that there's room for more then 2 or 3 mfgs. at the top. Again, it's just my opinion, but I'm also basing this on how I think the market perceives them as well. AM is shipping product in volume & hasn't pissed off their community. They deserve that top spot (and I'm not running any of their hardware ATM).

While I'll be running a HashFast Co-op with a lil help from some friends, I'm not a fanboy of any hardware and find all of that to be silly. At the end of the day: delivery time, performance, cost, and reliability rules and everything else drools. While I'm not a chip specialist, I'm an IT specialist with a design hat & I do support chip designers on a day to day basis (close to tapeout ourselves for one of our one chips in our niche industry). I've been watching the tech industry for about 30 some years, invested in the tech industry for about 20 years, and also have about 10 years of proto IT hardware & network design exp. myself for the DoD and state DOT so I'm not just some snot nosed kid that plays Xbox Live. Smiley

I appreciate your concerns about HF's MPP, I'm presuming this plan passed Legal. If not, well, someone's gonna be looking for a new job!  Cheesy
As far as market impact: IMHO HashFast's MPP has had a much greater impact then KnC's reseller program (which is something I signed up for) which has failed miserably from what I can see.

But from these cheap seats...hey, I'm rooting for KnC too. Competition is good for all & will only add to better performing cheaper hardware for all of us.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
September 01, 2013, 06:40:44 AM
#6
Great points! I overlooked/forgot about the PayPal promise.

Yeah, us miners: Once you f up with us, you have to do *a lot* to get back in our good graces. I think most of all you need to admit you screwed up & be humble for the business you do/did get.

If I had to list the top 3 or 4 ASIC manufacturers by reputation it would be:

1. ASIC Miner - yes, they were/are the most expensive but at least you get it! [Disclaimer: AM shareholder 1.14 shares currently held by John K. as collateral ATM]
2. Bitfury - shipping in Europe. Hooray!
3. HashFast - That Miner Protection Plan made me go from: "Hmm, what should I do" to Full GB Coordinator mode even though I never tried to operate a BTC mining co-op before. [Disclaimer: 1/4th owner and primary remote admin of a HF Baby Jet]
4. KnC - Sorry Bitcoinorama, they may move to #3 IMHO if they meet that Sept. delivery date & unveil some new price points and/or Miner Protection Plan to match HF & CT.

Hey that's cool, you are welcome to whatever opinion you want, but in my mind Hashfast have done nothing to appear on that list, and this has nothing to do with my choice in KnC. I for myself continue to research future companies to back, but;

Hashfast have constantly changed terms and remove any accountability AFTER inviting funding.

They have no real refund option. They have very likely lied about delivery dates, knowing full well they cannot honour them to acquire cash and lock your funds to a more realistic January (they have, according to themselves, only just taped out, over two weeks past their original promised date! in that time delivery of 20-30th Oct changed to 'anticipated' AFTER they secured funds, refund window changed to Jan 1st-14th AFTER they secured funds (also after they will have spent them, and NO third party honouring them). You can only receive tape out as and when you have the funds together to pay for production, TSMC won't release it prior. We know it's taken them that long to sell their inventory. Even hotlot runs likely place them beyond October. If they have wantonly claimed otherwise to acquire funds knowing full well they cannot deliver in that time, easily provable at a later date, that is fraud.

You do realise MPP may well 1). Be illegal as you cannot legally mention 'investment/ROI' if you are not a regulated financial services company, I'm sure FinCEN would have something to say about this, again note the difference in Cointerra's wording, there is a significant reason behind this, 2) you do realise chips are graded in terms of quality, they are not all uniform, no where does the MPP promise you any degree of certainty there, just a physical chip, irrespective of usefulness, not to mention the time taken to assemble that chip into something useful is out of their hands, but directly affects any miners renumeration, let alone the additional costs involved in further assembly. Anyone purchasing needs to factor in additional costs will likely be required and time will very much be a factor.

Both Cointerra and Hashfast's estimates are based in best case simulations, KnC's are based on pessimistic worst case. KnC's 400gh/s for Jupiter is worst case. Hashfast, and Cointerra's 400 and 500 Gh/s are best case. You need to be able to read between the lines of marketing. Hashfast and Cointerra cannot afford to state pessimistic values and under promise, over deliver as they are late to the party and need to encourage you to open rightfully sceptical wallets, also presumably they don't understand the value in this as a real marketing tool, over marketing BS.

Here is something else to consider, at least Cointerra are making less power intensive chips. The theoretical limit of 28nm chips exceed far beyond 500gh/s. You could have a 2 Th/s chip if you could control the heat generated by the silicon, fact is you can't affordably do so. Hashfast's chips are going to be running hot, v.hot. They claim you can overclock their chips, you have to understand they are overclocking and water cooling them themselves, hence a meagre 10 day warranty. Err no thanks, if that's how much confidence they have in their open product. Blaming people wanting to OC is BS you can easily design in temp regulators and means of determining whether chips have been abused to offer a worthwhile warranty, but the reason their warranty is 10 days is they are abusing their chip themselves to meet the marketing they have spun. MPP does not cover dead chips outside a 10 day warranty, only whether you ROI within 90 days, which again, I don't think they can legally promise. KnC has a year long warranty and real payment protection if they do not deliver in an acceptable timeframe for a reason. They have refused no one a refund, and few have requested one, despite the trolls attempts to force their hand. Why do you think Hashfast have ignored all calls for Paypal. In 45 days alone you'd know if Hashfast were delivering in time. Coincidence?

Finally, I think, honestly, no fanboy crap, KnC are aiming well and truly for the top spot. They really want to over deliver and keep promises. They want repeat long term business, they want customers to be happy, and they do get Bitcoin. They are über geeks. My background is in disruptive finance and venture capital amongst other things professionally, and engineering by education from one of the UK's most renowned engineering universities (a top 6 when I studied there), and a direct competitor to Simon Barber's. I know how to research and spot a legitimate business and engineering firm. I've not really pushed that on this forum before, as part of me wants to remain modest as to my own background in case there are unexpected delays no one could foresee in June, i'd rather not personally deal with fallout i'd have no direct hand in, but with all due respect I know my shit when it comes to what I look for in Engineering Design which is why I can stomach that shill and fanboy nonsense. KnC's development team is far more than one guy, perhaps I didn't give true credit beyond Marcus at the Openday, they have a lot more bodies involved and they are very well connected in the industry. There's been a lot I cannot talk about, no NDA's were signed, those are worthless anyway unless it's between two people, you'll rarely be able to prove an NDA was broken, just integrity on my part, and an understanding that this is someones business and passion, but KnC went out of their way to prove public ally they are legit and exist, and even further in private to me. They will reveal more for sure after they ship.

KnC have chosen massively over engineered surrounding components to limit any issues regarding power and heat, and taken a very safety orientated approach to the IC design to ensure speed to market and fingers crossed minimal issues regarding chip once in hand, and remained tight lipped and totally pessimistic with regards to true specs on purpose so as not to let anyone down, and moreso reveal a welcome set of true specs on the day, all because they understand timing is everything. Again we will have to wait and see what that delivers with regards to true performance, but people focusing on the w/Gh/s and overall Gh/s of competing companies have to understand the competing companies quote best case, and KnC are quoting worst case.

On top of which they have gone out of their way to tick all boxes legally with respect to tax laws in each EU country and choose payment methods with real payment protection with respect to pre-orders.

Really don't think you've considered any of that above, but I'm happy for you to have a welcome surprise, just bare in mind true engineering is based on facts not marketing, and I think you need to read between the lines of claims. Wink

For what it's worth I'll happily change my tune if proven otherwise, but there's so far only one of those three companies that's gone out of their way to err on the side of caution, provide achievable targets and honestly protect their customers funds by bending over backwards to appease Paypal, and that's KnC, by a country mile. Furthermore if they deliver on time their customers will likely profit considerably more, as time to market is the only thing that matters between the three, pricing will undoubtedly become more competitive from November onwards.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
August 31, 2013, 09:16:34 PM
#5
I am hopeful they will be more forthcoming about their chips and help the small pcb designers with board development. A 500gh/s barebones board would be very nice, and hopefully come in at a price per a gh/s lower than cointerra itself. Overclocking would be another advantage to a custom designed pcb, possibly later underclocking if the difficulty ever gets sky high.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
August 31, 2013, 07:01:54 PM
#4
Great points! I overlooked/forgot about the PayPal promise.

Yeah, us miners: Once you f up with us, you have to do *a lot* to get back in our good graces. I think most of all you need to admit you screwed up & be humble for the business you do/did get.

If I had to list the top 3 or 4 ASIC manufacturers by reputation it would be:

1. ASIC Miner - yes, they were/are the most expensive but at least you get it! [Disclaimer: AM shareholder 1.14 shares currently held by John K. as collateral ATM]
2. Bitfury - shipping in Europe. Hooray!
3. HashFast - That Miner Protection Plan made me go from: "Hmm, what should I do" to Full GB Coordinator mode even though I never tried to operate a BTC mining co-op before. [Disclaimer: 1/4th owner and primary remote admin of a HF Baby Jet]
4. KnC - Sorry Bitcoinorama, they may move to #3 IMHO if they meet that Sept. delivery date & unveil some new price points and/or Miner Protection Plan to match HF & CT.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
August 31, 2013, 05:14:08 PM
#3
Also they promised Paypal, and then immediately set a price point way above Paypal's transaction threshold, so clearly they either had no intention, or just wanted to appease their audience by telling they what they thought they would like to hear.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 500
August 31, 2013, 05:11:27 PM
#2
good point. the issue i think to most is that 1) noone knows what difficulty will be like in december - too far away 2) because of 1 noone knows what the correct price should be. basically if their current price point guaranteed ROI and made sense they would have large orders regardless of only having high end models
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
August 31, 2013, 04:48:13 PM
#1
Don't think this was mentioned here or if it was, I think it was buried under a landslide of mud.

I found this alleged Cointerra investor's comments interesting and found an explanation as to why there's no Cointerra IIs or IIIs available for preorder yet. Regardless of their CT IV price point or product launch so far, I thought he has some interesting insights and opinions.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1l0plk/an_insiders_take_on_cointerra_the_bitcoin_mining/

What do you make of his assertion that there's no CT II or III because of the additional complexity involved?

Seems to me that they didn't design any modularity that would allow *any* downward mobility availability in their initial design specs. Which I, as a fellow prototype IT hardware designer who's worked on or in support of advanced technologies at low TRL levels for about 10 years, would consider to be poor planning.

I seriously think they've hurt their pre-order sales by not having a low end or even mid range option available at the get go. I'd say pre-sales have been underwhelming so far from these cheap seats. I'd love for them to change some opinions with new offerings & better price points.
Jump to: