coinvalidation doesnt want private keys.
stop reading fud from news articles and chinese whispers from reddit. try reading the source material
Topic: CoinValidation is scam (Read 1097 times)
yifu runs avalon, the only asic manufacturer that did stick to most of its promises.. now if coinvalidation was being run by josh zerlan then id agree with your statement.
Slight correction: KNC pulled through as well
You submit your private keys to CoinValidation and they remove coins from unvalidated addresses and escrows them until the sender validates, automatic in the case you use coinbase.
LOL I you sooo stupid to do it you deserve to lose all you bitcoin one more scam nothing more.... why there is no warnig abaut it on Bitcoin talk .
glue sniffers please put delusions aside. atleast read the proper information and stop forming dreamed up theories based on conversations from others in a chinese whisper network of ill informed people.
coin validation are purely business advisors. they are there to help BUSINESSES that deal with fiat (EG exchanges) to ensure they comply with regulations.
these businesses found to fully comply will have their business accredited by them and their bitcoin addresses listed as trusted addresses doing legitimate business.
that way other exchanges can trust them more to possibly allow deposits from these trusted businesses to be accepted with a lower confirm requirement.
EG.
imagine bitstamp got coinvalidation accredited also note another exchange EG: BTC-E which requires 3 confirms before balance shows up.
imagine it if BTC-E had a system that if funds came from an accredited exchange like bitstamp. they would accept the funds with no confirm requirements.
imagine starbucks accepting payments from bitstamp without confirms.
Coinvalidation is not making a database of every users bitcoin address. only those addresses belonging to businesses.
No. They are trying to centralize everything. 3 man control everything. That is ridiculous. If they do succed in this they will ruin BitCoin. coin validation are purely business advisors. they are there to help BUSINESSES that deal with fiat (EG exchanges) to ensure they comply with regulations.
these businesses found to fully comply will have their business accredited by them and their bitcoin addresses listed as trusted addresses doing legitimate business.
that way other exchanges can trust them more to possibly allow deposits from these trusted businesses to be accepted with a lower confirm requirement.
EG.
imagine bitstamp got coinvalidation accredited also note another exchange EG: BTC-E which requires 3 confirms before balance shows up.
imagine it if BTC-E had a system that if funds came from an accredited exchange like bitstamp. they would accept the funds with no confirm requirements.
imagine starbucks accepting payments from bitstamp without confirms.
Coinvalidation is not making a database of every users bitcoin address. only those addresses belonging to businesses.
you are over exaggerating. you are either sniffing glue or hearing things from chinese whispers instead of reading the facts from the source. please research harder and stop creating fud.
lol what?
coin validation wants poeple to give them their private keys?
and you are calling poeple glue sniffers, because this set off red flags for 90% of the bitcoiners.
your a funny guy.
i had been thinking Coinvalidation might not be such a bad thing, who wants glue sniffers and the likes in their community anyway right.
but asking for private keys, for wtv reason, crosses some kind of line, don't you think?
does everyone think everyone else is retarded and wont care about the complete centralization of bitcoin? really? wtf!
yifu shouldn't be associated with any decent bitcoin business until he returns all the money he scammed from people. stop defending a known scammer
yifu runs avalon, the only asic manufacturer that did stick to most of its promises.. now if coinvalidation was being run by josh zerlan then id agree with your statement.
to me coinvalidation is not a threat, they just want to ensure exchanges meet all the FIAT rules when dealing with the fiat side of business. this would help to ensure banks dont freeze accounts and also that all the exchanges ran by mysterious basement dwelling teenagers start to disappear.
what i do find more worrying are the protocol changes that mike hearn and luke_jr wish to implement which will change how transactions are processed.
coinvalidation does not touch the protocol, it just advises businesses. learn to research.
oh and from what i believe yifu is a 'client' of coinvalidation, getting business advice from them. he isnt a partner.. ( as far as i can tell )
to me coinvalidation is not a threat, they just want to ensure exchanges meet all the FIAT rules when dealing with the fiat side of business. this would help to ensure banks dont freeze accounts and also that all the exchanges ran by mysterious basement dwelling teenagers start to disappear.
what i do find more worrying are the protocol changes that mike hearn and luke_jr wish to implement which will change how transactions are processed.
coinvalidation does not touch the protocol, it just advises businesses. learn to research.
oh and from what i believe yifu is a 'client' of coinvalidation, getting business advice from them. he isnt a partner.. ( as far as i can tell )
coinvalidation being run by a known scammer yifu. yipeeee
glue sniffers please put delusions aside. atleast read the proper information and stop forming dreamed up theories based on conversations from others in a chinese whisper network of ill informed people.
coin validation are purely business advisors. they are there to help BUSINESSES that deal with fiat (EG exchanges) to ensure they comply with regulations.
these businesses found to fully comply will have their business accredited by them and their bitcoin addresses listed as trusted addresses doing legitimate business.
that way other exchanges can trust them more to possibly allow deposits from these trusted businesses to be accepted with a lower confirm requirement.
EG.
imagine bitstamp got coinvalidation accredited also note another exchange EG: BTC-E which requires 3 confirms before balance shows up.
imagine it if BTC-E had a system that if funds came from an accredited exchange like bitstamp. they would accept the funds with no confirm requirements.
imagine starbucks accepting payments from bitstamp without confirms.
Coinvalidation is not making a database of every users bitcoin address. only those addresses belonging to businesses.
No. They are trying to centralize everything. 3 man control everything. That is ridiculous. If they do succed in this they will ruin BitCoin. coin validation are purely business advisors. they are there to help BUSINESSES that deal with fiat (EG exchanges) to ensure they comply with regulations.
these businesses found to fully comply will have their business accredited by them and their bitcoin addresses listed as trusted addresses doing legitimate business.
that way other exchanges can trust them more to possibly allow deposits from these trusted businesses to be accepted with a lower confirm requirement.
EG.
imagine bitstamp got coinvalidation accredited also note another exchange EG: BTC-E which requires 3 confirms before balance shows up.
imagine it if BTC-E had a system that if funds came from an accredited exchange like bitstamp. they would accept the funds with no confirm requirements.
imagine starbucks accepting payments from bitstamp without confirms.
Coinvalidation is not making a database of every users bitcoin address. only those addresses belonging to businesses.
you are over exaggerating. you are either sniffing glue or hearing things from chinese whispers instead of reading the facts from the source. please research harder and stop creating fud.
glue sniffers please put delusions aside. atleast read the proper information and stop forming dreamed up theories based on conversations from others in a chinese whisper network of ill informed people.
coin validation are purely business advisors. they are there to help BUSINESSES that deal with fiat (EG exchanges) to ensure they comply with regulations.
these businesses found to fully comply will have their business accredited by them and their bitcoin addresses listed as trusted addresses doing legitimate business.
that way other exchanges can trust them more to possibly allow deposits from these trusted businesses to be accepted with a lower confirm requirement.
EG.
imagine bitstamp got coinvalidation accredited also note another exchange EG: BTC-E which requires 3 confirms before balance shows up.
imagine it if BTC-E had a system that if funds came from an accredited exchange like bitstamp. they would accept the funds with no confirm requirements.
imagine starbucks accepting payments from bitstamp without confirms.
Coinvalidation is not making a database of every users bitcoin address. only those addresses belonging to businesses.
No. They are trying to centralize everything. 3 man control everything. That is ridiculous. If they do succed in this they will ruin BitCoin. coin validation are purely business advisors. they are there to help BUSINESSES that deal with fiat (EG exchanges) to ensure they comply with regulations.
these businesses found to fully comply will have their business accredited by them and their bitcoin addresses listed as trusted addresses doing legitimate business.
that way other exchanges can trust them more to possibly allow deposits from these trusted businesses to be accepted with a lower confirm requirement.
EG.
imagine bitstamp got coinvalidation accredited also note another exchange EG: BTC-E which requires 3 confirms before balance shows up.
imagine it if BTC-E had a system that if funds came from an accredited exchange like bitstamp. they would accept the funds with no confirm requirements.
imagine starbucks accepting payments from bitstamp without confirms.
Coinvalidation is not making a database of every users bitcoin address. only those addresses belonging to businesses.
Well they are trying to centralize a decentralized currency. In my book that is evil. There are already a lot of decentralized currencies out there and they all have some flaws, let this one try it's own fate. But no, they want to be a Central Bank, control everything.
glue sniffers please put delusions aside. atleast read the proper information and stop forming dreamed up theories based on conversations from others in a chinese whisper network of ill informed people.
coin validation are purely business advisors. they are there to help BUSINESSES that deal with fiat (EG exchanges) to ensure they comply with regulations.
these businesses found to fully comply will have their business accredited by them and their bitcoin addresses listed as trusted addresses doing legitimate business.
that way other exchanges can trust them more to possibly allow deposits from these trusted businesses to be accepted with a lower confirm requirement.
EG.
imagine bitstamp got coinvalidation accredited also note another exchange EG: BTC-E which requires 3 confirms before balance shows up.
imagine it if BTC-E had a system that if funds came from an accredited exchange like bitstamp. they would accept the funds with no confirm requirements.
imagine starbucks accepting payments from bitstamp without confirms.
Coinvalidation is not making a database of every users bitcoin address. only those addresses belonging to businesses.
coin validation are purely business advisors. they are there to help BUSINESSES that deal with fiat (EG exchanges) to ensure they comply with regulations.
these businesses found to fully comply will have their business accredited by them and their bitcoin addresses listed as trusted addresses doing legitimate business.
that way other exchanges can trust them more to possibly allow deposits from these trusted businesses to be accepted with a lower confirm requirement.
EG.
imagine bitstamp got coinvalidation accredited also note another exchange EG: BTC-E which requires 3 confirms before balance shows up.
imagine it if BTC-E had a system that if funds came from an accredited exchange like bitstamp. they would accept the funds with no confirm requirements.
imagine starbucks accepting payments from bitstamp without confirms.
Coinvalidation is not making a database of every users bitcoin address. only those addresses belonging to businesses.
Well, probably not a "scam" in the defrauding customers sense.
But it's an absolutely terrible idea nonetheless.
But it's an absolutely terrible idea nonetheless.
Lol ridicolous.
If they have this in their agreement or not I don't like them. They are collecting data of all users and just that makes it wrong. This is like willingling allowing your money to be counted and told this is ok, this is not.
Imagine if they collected "unvalidated" coins and decided all of a suddent to validate them...themselves.
Imagine if they collected "unvalidated" coins and decided all of a suddent to validate them...themselves.
You submit your private keys to CoinValidation and they remove coins from unvalidated addresses and escrows them until the sender validates, automatic in the case you use coinbase.
LOL I you sooo stupid to do it you deserve to lose all you bitcoin one more scam nothing more.... why there is no warnig abaut it on Bitcoin talk .So where did you got that quote?
You submit your private keys to CoinValidation and they remove coins from unvalidated addresses and escrows them until the sender validates, automatic in the case you use coinbase.
LOL I you sooo stupid to do it you deserve to lose all you bitcoin one more scam nothing more.... why there is no warnig abaut it on Bitcoin talk . Jump to: