Topic: Comparing two best wagering strategies so far. (Read 223 times)

I am glad many people got what I am meaning here so I am locking this thread now, I know many people may want to try and for those suggesting that dice is better trust me it is not, it can increase your level faster but at a brutal cost of low return for wager as I said. My strategy needs at least 50 dollars in the balance and a minimum bet of 0.02 dollars to a maximum of 0.10 dollars depending on how fast you want to grind, trust me it will make wagering much more efficient than that wagering dice strategy everyone is using so far. Of course I repeat once again, never play money you cannot afford to lose in such type of strategies as with these strategies money it will be lost in the end yet you should look at how much you have wagered for this 50 dollars which should be a good amount I assume.

Thanks for sharing @OP.

Although I can't verify the legitimacy of your strategy by playing low risk plinko, but I do agree if playing dice with 1.01x is sucks, the risk is quite high even though the chance to lose is just 2%.

I think playing dice would be worth it if we play with 1.10x - 1.25x odds, the return and risk is quite fair.

I remember those dice games when I was new to the crypto gambling business. At that time I read something that said if you lose on a dice roll, just make the bet amount you lost x3 until you win, then go back to x1 again.

I made this strategy; in the early days I was still winning, and I was happy with the results I was making. And when I saw that my balance was increasing because of the dice games, I felt disgusted with playing. Until the few days that I only won, in the end I still lost because at that time I was still overcome by greed. So I stopped it at that time because I saw that self-discipline or control over ourselves is still needed.

I will try this later. Thank you for sharing it.

I have been playing casino games and Dice has always been the most suggested when it comes to increasing the wagering requirement I also have doubted that because I tried the 98 percent too and all I can say is I lost more money in the process.
This Plinko strategy though might work because I have played the risk style of Plinko in the past and I can say it just gives the money back and forth for a long time but at those moments I was looking for profits so I hated the slow movement. I will give it a try now.

I know the strategy is to increase your level at the casino but not targetting the profit but i think OP strategy cannot be used for every people because the results is depend on people luck theirself and previously i have tried similar strategy which OP said that i was playing plinko with using automatic bets and low risk option and from 100 automatic bets total i was reach to 0.5x streak quite often so this makes my balance dried quickly before i can reach my wagering target

For me if i want to increase my level at the casinos i think dice is the right game and recently i have make an experiment to increase my level at the casino and at that time i was set the payout to 98% and initial bet to $0.1 and to reach $250 total wager it took only spend approximately $0.8 so in my opinion this strategy is more successfull for me than playing plinko

I don't know I'm not actively playing at Plingko, I've tried all the lines but the return is not worth it, losing 50% of what I throw. Limbo and Crash are favorites even in Crash I was lucky enough to play the smallest capital. You share a good way to play at Plingko, I really like it but maybe it takes momentum to try it again. You must know when a gambler who is disappointed from 1 game doesn't make him come back for a long time. Besides, I'm not chasing VIP Level, so a little freedom without having a target.

As far as I know, the algorithm takes individual bets into count and assigns them a 98% chance to win.
So if you have played 100 bets, it doesn't mean that there will be only be 2 lost bets because all bets are individual.
The first bet will have  a 98% chance to win, the second will again have 98% chance to win and so on.
This is why there is no assurity of how many losses you will have because your bet can occur in the 2% loss more than 2 times as well.
This was my understanding though, not saying that what you are saying is wrong or something.

Gambling actually has two very different sides, on the one hand, we will feel the tremendous thrill and excitement of a victory even with the numbered winning a small amount, but as you say, on the other hand there are often losses we often ignore even though the amount is very large.

For me personally, gambling is nothing more than fun and entertainment so I will set a limit for the finances that I spend in gambling, Because after all it is very important that we always have full awareness of the risks when engaging in gambling, so that at least gambling will not affect to other aspects from our lives, such as our personal finances, family or social relationships later.

You have gotten it all wrong. I can understand that you can assume that they are nearly equal the same yet I never have been able to make 20 dollars translated in a wagered amount of near 13.000 dollars which yesterday with Plinko I did and I was fascinated by that which is the main reason of this post. Most people think that dice is the fastest way and it is but the cost of dice is with 20 dollars you can wager max 2500-3000 dollars because the multiplier is always 1.01 with 98% chance while in Plinko 16 rows low risk it is just one tab of 0.5x and all others are 1x or more, that is where the catch is and it is not an illusion. Of course in the end both these are wagering strategies meaning you will lose your money in the end but the best is the one who can increase your VIP levels faster.

Yes I agree with you, people say they have won a large amount of winnings, but the question is can they count the amount of losses they have experienced while playing? of course not, and even I personally think that their winnings are not enough to return the amount of losses they experienced.
But of course we don't have a problem with losses if we do gamble using money that we can afford to lose, yes although I do not deny that when we accumulate it all then it can be very large. Therefore some people never remember how much they have spent on gambling.

You can conclude to this because Plinko can give a chance to win different multiplier based on your luck compared to dice game that only 1 multiplier and the other is loss. But if you will use same house edge Plinko and dice game then you will still have close result in the end.

Plinko can give you chance of winning but that doesn’t mean you will keep experiencing that pace compared to dice game that you will just lose fewer times on 100 tries.

I think they are the same when it comes to accumulating wager safely. I think the chance of winning higher multiplier is what gives you an illusion that Plinko is better since it’s hard to be on green side with dice game farming.

I am not talking about profit here, it is about increasing your VIP level and this is a strategy just for that, it is inevitable to not lose money in the long run by using this yet with this as I said it is geared toward all the people having difficulties increasing their rank. I tried the bonuses yesterday as I don't put money on my own anymore in order to increase the level and also get a nice weekly bonus next week so I don't lose my bonuses for a bit of time without depositing anything of my own. It was very good yesterday as I got to 6% Gold from 0.05% with just 20 dollars and that in wagered amount was about near 13.000 dollars so a really good one strategy I would say, Plinko I am talking, in dice I never increase the bet as it can hit you horribly bad.

Good thing if it does work for you but just like on what others been saying that we are talking about gambling that strategies might worked out for pretty some time but in the end it will bust you up.
Speaking about wagering and trying out to reach levels then if this one do able to get that rank with less amount that had been used then its not that bad to test it out. The main problem you will really be having on here is your patience since we are talking about small amounts on which will definitely get bored easily with this kind of rolling up bets but if you can be able to hold up yourself on having this way of gambling just for the sake on trying out to raise your vip level with lesser risk then might do but if you cant be able to wait up then you can always consider on betting up huge amount and wager accordingly.

If i understand correct, the OP is talking about increasing VIP level by lots of bets. It is not about guaranteed profit but about decreasing costs for reaching high levels of VIP.

As for me - my opinion is still belongs to maths, i`d prefer 98% wins. I don`t ready to discuss about real win rate, i never tried to calculate it, but i think that difference would be small enough.
Anyway i thanks the OP for such research, that surely can help someone.

In fact, it doesn't matter what your probability of winning is if the odds of your winning are so small that they can't compensate for your losses. And you will have to compensate not only for all your losses with your winnings, but also compensate for the bookmaker's commission, and you will also have to make some profit on top. This is incredibly difficult and is in fact no different in result from a 50% probability of winning in sports betting with odds of 2. In simple terms, the higher the probability of your winning, the proportionally smaller the result and in the end, over the long term, you will still lose money, because 1 big loss, although rare, can destroy about a hundred of your small winnings.

I think that is pretty sound thinking. VIP is great and all but honestly if you were to hit some huge multiplier and get the benefits from that it completely outweights a lot of smaller benefits that are spread out with the VIP.

Its a good thing for those people who would like to reach the number of activity and their bets because we know how does the people really want to reach the VIP because of the perks and it seems a good strategy too, but personally id enjoy too if I win a large scale of money upon playing plinko but base on my experience I just rare to get a large multiplier with the game.

Nice strategy especially the 0.05% bankroll on every bet. It shows well-thought of risk management strategy. And I didn't know that this is what is likely to get you the VIP ladder. What I thought about the VIP ladders is that they are people who bet huge amount of money per game. For instance, like instead of a low percentage of their bankroll per bet like (0.05%), they rather go for a high percentage of their bankroll per bet (20%). Ultimately, the goal is to develop patience like you have mentioned and a lot of self-discipline. I am not a big fan of  Plinko but I like the strategy and it is applicable to all games even in my favourite slot. Although there are people who would go above the 0.05% to like 1%, 2% or even more, the goal is to remain consistent in small bets per time of your bankroll.

Thank you for sharing your experience and insight OP. When it comes to provably fair games and luck-based games I usually prefer playing dice. However after reading your post why not give this a try right? When I gamble though leveling up isn't really my goal of course I prefer to win. But if ever I decide to change my strategy I’ll definitely consider your approach.

Increasing the volume of bets with this strategy is nice. I believe that you can do that, maximize the volume, and reach those VIP ranks. The randomness that would affect your plan might be the better outcome. I don't think it will be detrimental to the low-risk bets you are making.

The key to this, I think, is patience and discipline. You could automate it on some websites, no?

I'll probably use this one in the future since one of my accounts is close to hitting the next VIP rank and sports betting isn't giving me that much progress even though the rates are usually doubled or tripled in most casinos.

It's also my go-to strategy and sometimes I adjust it a bit higher (between 1.01 to 1.10) since you're likely losing 4 or more bets in every hundred you've placed.

That's an awesome strategy you just provided above at O.P, as I look forward to giving it a try anything soon to see if I will be able to make profit while applying same strategy on Plinko while betting with a minimum amount of $0.5 for complete 120 rounds. As I'm still skeptical, since the product of the outcome of a slot machine games are always a product of random algorithms.

Thanks for sharing your insights! Comparing the dice 98% strategy to Plinko's 16-row low-risk setup highlights a key difference: while dice offers quick wins, its all or nothing losses can be devastating. Plinko, with only 19.89% of outcomes as losses (0.5x), provides better longevity, making it a more sustainable option for players aiming to maximize wagering.

That said, as you and Agbamoni noted, gambling outcomes rely on luck. Even over millions of rolls or balls, probabilities don’t always align perfectly. Your suggestion of betting 0.05% of your bankroll is excellent for reducing risk and staying in the game longer.

Ultimately, strategies like this should be approached cautiously. Always treat gambling as entertainment, use funds you can afford to lose, and avoid chasing losses. Sharing such strategies adds value, but realistic expectations are key.

For me that dice strategy worked many times in past and its still a good and working strategy for anyone who wants to complete the wagering requirements to rank up in short time. I haven't used that Plinko strategy but that one also seems like a good one I guess.

At the end of the day, gambling is still a game of luck, however experience also goes a long way to determine one's ability to take advantage of opportunities. Sometimes it's also your ability to outsmart the slightest chance availed to the game which also depends on the nature of gambling game you're involved in. As to whether there's an effect of expertise in gambling, it could be answered as yes but not so significant in sight of luck.

I think you can still able to achieve increasing your rank on other games not only on Plinko just make sure to consistently bet with a small amount.
The only difference may be the time spent, as I have experience betting on Super Ace with $0.2 on a consistent basis and switching between Fortune Gems 2 and 3 to achieve a wager of around $60, but it is time consuming.
Your strategy appears to be achievable in a relatively short period of time?

Regardless of the strat that you use, it's still gambling and you are expected to lose in the long run. I am curious about dice and you though. When you take a loss do you increase your bet and try to recover in 1 or 2 bets or keep the same bet the whole way?

Plinko is ok but you'll find a streak of .5 hits that'll tilt ya if you're not careful.

In any dice game in any casino there is so called 98% win chance with odds 1.01 which is considered by many to be the fastest wagering strategy to your next VIP level. I have quit depositing myself and was enjoying these December month bonus which keeps popping up like crazy nowadays and why not using all of them to at least get a nice, very nice weekly bonus next Saturday. However with that dice 98% strategy it is a bad one as you win 1.01x every time and when you lose you lose 100% of the bet while with this Plinko strategy it works better as out of 16 places you only have one place where you lose the 0.5x and when you lose you lose 50% of your bet while every other possibility is either 1x win or more so overall it keeps you playing longer although it is slower, that is the only down thing about this strategy, just wanted to share it for people having trouble increasing their ranks, always only use money you can afford to lose and don't overstretch yourself just to try this strategy.

I am glad you said you tried it, and it worked for you. I will try it in two days when I get some money. In the meantime, I am still skeptical about how certain I am that it is a 98% win on the casino games.

We all know that it is difficult to say there is a best strategy when we are discussing gambling. The lowest odds sometimes have been a barrier to me winning in a lot of bets. My conclusion is still the fact that it is based on luck.

We all know that the best strategies regarding increasing your rank is to play dice 98% win with odds 1.01 and that in theory only 2 rolls out of 100 should be lost bets yet the reality in every single f*cking casino is the same, we see much more than 2 lost bets during 100 rolls, don't even start telling me that it evens out during our game play as I have had enough of idiots telling me that while I have tested millions of rolls in this strategy, anyway that is not the point, the point is that to wager from 0.50 dollars to 60-65 dollars is a nice achievement although with dice it needs like 1 - 1.30 dollars to go there and I have found out that with Plinko 16 rows low risk is much better. It takes like 0.50 or even less to reach it and the reason is because at Plinko 16 rows low risk you only have one 0.5x where you lose money while all other bets are money back or wins, the percentage of 0.5x is 19.89% which in theory it is 1 out of 5 balls to be a lost one, even here these is not reality and does not even out through millions of balls, however this is the best strategy ever to maximize your rank, I have used IDR to tell you that with almost 0.50 dollars spent you can have it wagered at least 60 dollars which is 120x your initial amount and not a bad strategy at all.

I have made this thread because many people are struggling even to reach the first level of VIP ranks, with this Plinko strategy they can do it in no time, they just have to be patient if they want to use IDR or if they use dollars they can reach it much faster. I use 0.05% of my total bankroll as a bet, you can use whatever your like.