False. Wasn't enacted in the UK in any serious manner until 1914. Previously, if I wanted to freely work anywhere in the world, I could.
It was a NATO resolution that makes it illegal in international law to be without state (ie to hold no passport) in the 20th century.
A passport is a proof of 'citizenship' and it is a cattle brand to prove which government owns you, it is a choker collar around your neck.
there weren't mass population movements from undeveloped world to civilised world in 1914 so there was no need for such legislation. usa had very strict controls on non western european immigration until 1960s because the threat of coloured and asian immigration was a real problem. then hippy race mixer equality thought came to prevail and the rest is history.
you must mean united nations not nato
Wherever you find convenient. You are free.
the ability to pick between between 2 employers who both offer the same thing or have nothing isnt freedom
before you answer learn a skill and find better paying job realise someone else must then fill original workers place in the low pay job and nothing is changed. maybe you personally do well from free market but you should understand the majority dont.
You are paid your discounted marginal value product. If your marginal value product, what you produce, is worth $1000, and the pure interest rate is 5%, you'll get $952. If someone is offering less, go to another employer. All that is in the unhampered free market. Once the government intervenes, you get much less, because of taxes. But then you have to blame the government, not employers.
Employees get their discounted marginal value product in the unhampered market. If governments intervene, they get less (or become unemployment), because of taxes.
dont want government intervention obama bullshit welfare spending i want a revolution that kills or exiles the shareholder and landowner who takes most of what i produce.
That's false. You are paid just a bit less than what you produce. If that's not true is because of government interventionism.
wal mart last year 28 billion profit divide that between all their workers the ones who actually created the wealth and its an extra 12k per person. i said landowners as well so remember to give everyone back that much of their rents not needed for property maintenance and repairs. we just increased everyones wages by 75-100% with only the profiteer and landlord losing out
workers on low wages dont pay very much income tax, tax and government is only important to millionaire libertarian who wants to be allowed hold onto more of the wealth he took from workers
Yup UN, my mistake thx. I assert that it was not required not because of labour mobility, which was a non issue, but it became an issue with the introduction of a personal income tax which began at the same time.
As you start to tax the production of people, milk the cows, you need a way to fence them in and make sure people don't steal your cows. So you brand them with citizenship and fence them with control of the flow of labour.
Wow! You want to kill the wealthy? What the fuck?! A libertarian by definition can not take anything from anyone mate. Everything he has is freely traded.
Oh, the revolution you want is called a communist revolution.
