Topic: Connection between blood type and coronavirus mortality has been confirmed (Read 242 times)

I understand that some blood types do not have receptors for the virus, and therefore the virus cannot use their blood to multiply. There also seems to be a possibility that the virus can cause one of the blood types to clump, and this can lead to thrombosis. If I get the time, I'll try to find the reference.

It should be a problem if you have a healthy natural immune system though.

The rise on the mortality rate of those people infected with Coronavirus and have related it to the type or blood group it belongs are confirmed yet there is still in need to conduct thorough studies to support the claim because mostly cases of those infected are said to be on the immuno capacity of the individual to react against the virus on which 0 to 21 age bracket and 60 and up are said to be vulnerable to have this Coronavirus for their bodies are somewhat not capable to easily react because of the age relation on which those brackets have low immuno capacity to resist the infectious virus.

Cases of death poll are being related to people which have medical history of chronic disease that are vulnerable to death mostly among seniors and young children because the development of the antibodies are still to low or running too slow because of the age relation. But those are ideas are still just merely based on observation by the professionals and still the spread and cause of death among infected individuals are still under prior research since it is a new virus that have arise. 

All studies have found an identical result, which is that people with blood from type O are less likely to have Covid-19 than others, and that people with type A are more likely to.
The important study was carried out by the company "www.23andme.com", which is a studies laboratory, and it was found that the blood group plays an important role in infection with Corona virus.
The basic idea, I think, is that some blood groups give the body stronger immunity than other blood groups and this causes resistance for people who carry these bloodier groups to be immune to the Coronavirus.

its a matter of percentages and scale

for instance different blood types have different receptors which latch onto different things.
its why people with types A and B have a higher clotting risk than O
its why O can be a universal donor because they lack the receptors thus treating less things as a threat to latch onto. because they dont have the things to latch onto

however.
people that are immuno surpressed for other reasons are not producing as much antibodies as fast as a healthy person

EG imagine a special forces training base with a high budget and well organised trainers training as many sodliers for war as they can.. vs lil army camps that are just giving minimal training to just a few guys at a time.
obviously a battle has more chance of being won with a good special forces training base

think of the blood type as the troop transport.
aircraft carrier that can haul fighter jets and helicopters and speed boats. vs a land base with just one hanger for limited amount of fighter jet parking and limited on the distance from a base a battle can be defended against

then other immuno surpresion is the difference of having radar surveillance vs waiting for a citizens village(cell) being attached and the citizen reporting they are under attack
a delay in response times can be a factor too

EG having an aircraft carrier with radar can send out the fighters before they reach the village.
vs small land base near the village that waits for the attack and then sends in the troops.. mainly for cleanup missions


other things like heart conditions means while your suffering from oxygen deprevation due to the pneumonia your heart has to pump even harder to try getting more oxygen flowing.
do you want your special forces to go to battle after being awake for 48 hours. or being well rested

thus a bad heart can just give up like a worn out motor

kidney issues/diabetes can slowdown the transportation of nutrients. slow down the excretion of bad stuff. and just make everything sluggish. its like having a aircraft carrier but travelling at half speed to conserve fuel. and also travelling through sludge/ice instead of clear water

but the most important risk
is the viral load.
how much attackers are invading.
if your upclose making out with someone sick and taking in all their saliva for hours is a large invasion.
vs standing at 2 metres in the open air for same time is less of an invasion.. and standing there for only 15 minutes is even less
and just walking passed someone for 3 seconds is even less
thus less of a battle to wage against the small amount of invadors

some great minds are trying to put a 'points score' / rating number to each factor and trying to use math to work out scales of risk

and this is why things like social distancing advice at 2metre has been more notable than facemask at 1metre
but average people dont want to be social distance advice of 2metre. so recently the compromise is facemask at 1metre

but hey idiots will be idiots of not even wanting to wear masks when they get real close. so the next stage is the 'shielding' groups of atrisk health conditions having to stay isolated all so idiots with no respect for personal space can just be ignorant of risks to others due to their own actions

I am more on this side rather than the blood type thing. Comparing the vulnerability of the person with good health condition (with blood type which is assumed to be vulnerable with the virus) vs person with chronic diseases (but with blood type that is thought to be less prone to the virus), I believe the one with chronic disease will contract the disease faster and with devastating impact on his health. There maybe connection with blood type but if you are in your prime health condition, I don't think you have to worry much about this connection.

Having medical preconditions affects the chances of a severe corona infection. Being healthy with a strong immune system is definitely the best way to fight against corona and have only a mild case. For the blood type it's also very important. In Europe they found that highest ratio of severe cases vs mild ones is for patient with blood type A, which is the most common overhere.

 Yes I also heard equivalent news that blood group has little to try to to with it but those that have trouble breathing and have low immunity are more vulnerable to the virus The virus is extremely harmful to them Their immunity is extremely weak. Younger children and therefore the elderly are more affected than adults Also those that smoke because the lungs of smokers become much weaker than before and thus their death rate is higher.

as far as information that I get The most vulnerable people infected with the corona virus are those with chronic diseases, such as diabetes, and diseases that affect the heart and lungs.
if our immune system is in prime condition, it might be difficult for viruses to damage our immune system.

What is a second blood type?  I thought blood types are A, B, AB and 0.
Do you have link to research pdf?

there is no correct and accurate analysis that has been published stating that some of the dangerous blood groups will result from corona. what has actually been feared is that due to old age factors above 55 are very vulnerable to the most dangerous consequences if contracting the infection. coupled with the accompanying disease that already exists in him that is associated with the lungs, the heart is very influential.

now some countries have done a new normal to accept and want to coexist with Corona, so that there are many malls and factories that can work, but with a very strict protocol that must be prepared to run. wear a mask and always wash hands after every activity and are accustomed to not holding around face before hands are clean.

all actions are indeed very vulnerable because if there is no strong discipline from the community it will have a more dangerous impact. but there is no alternative while waiting for drugs and vaccines that will be able to break the chain of transmission, must be tried to be able to run.

Some blood groups contains more oxygen content than the remaining groups but as far as I seen its just been in research and there is no confirmed news about this.And we don't need that research to be done anymore since vaccines are found and are going to be available for public sale towards end of this year.

Everybody is talking from a different standpoint. Very few are on the same page. And it is a good thing, too, because the page might be an incorrect one. All these differences show two basic things:
1. The answers are all wrong, except for a right one by accident;
2. Governments have been and are making a big mistake in not returning their people to a status quo.

Lockdowns and shutdowns are going to kill as many as 20 times any virus could think of killing. There are going to be rebellions that are going to change the structure of governments and nations.


Connecticut public health laboratory confirms nationwide coronavirus tests are flawed...

Not saying that your news site is wrong or anything like that. Site just looks pretty weird and suspicious is all. Usually best to try to link to some sort of reputable news sites

(WSJ, Ny Times, Reuters, BBC, CNN, Fox, etc - Some may argue on the legitimacy of these, but ya know)

Seems like this isn't true though, though your source may be going off of old research or something like that. Here's a source straight from Harvard Medical that says there is no difference in severity of COVID depending on blood type - https://hms.harvard.edu/news/covid-19-blood-type

Ever-changing research though.

But the real question is, whose identification of what the Covid-19/SARS-Cov-2 virus really is, did they use? Do the reports show that they identified the virus, or could they have simply identified some exosomes made by the cells of the patients?

There are those doctors and researchers who show us that the original identification was improperly done, and that they don't really know if they found Covid or something else.

Eighty percent of the SARS virus and the Covid virus are the same. So, how do they even know if they identified Covid, or if they are looking at the SARS virus from back in 2003?

Besides, immune system immunity for SARS will easily transform into Covid immunity. So, what are they missing in the whole process of identification? It might totally be a nutritional deficiency in the blood rather than blood type.

People with the second blood type most often die from complications caused by a coronavirus, believe Iranian scientists. The preprint of their research was published on the MedRxiv portal. Earlier the Chinese and American specialists came to the same conclusion.

The publication specifies that the impact of blood group on the severity of the disease is not associated with any complications or risk factors that were infected.
More: https://livenewsof.com/fox-news-live-stream/ on https://livenewsof.com/.

According to the World Health Organization, more than 8.7 million people in the world were infected with Coronavirus, and more than 461 thousand died. In Russia have revealed 585 thousand cases of COVID-19, about eight thousand people have died, more than 339 thousand have recovered.