[...]
It's not at all clear, which is the larger crowd. The whole blocksize drama was initiated by an army of sockpuppets and shills of Hearn and Ver.
As far as I understood this could be a compromise with some of the Chinese mining pools, who demanded bigger blocks to make more profit. Hopefully I'm wrong and this rumor does not materialize. I'm not happy with a blocksize increase this early. It's premature, because SegWit has just been released for voting and fees are still too low to root out transaction spam. SegWit effectively doubles the amount of storage space, so there is no urgency to increase the blocksize.
A healthy fee market and network decentralization are far more important than capacity alone.
ya.ya.yo!
you do know hearn is part of the blockstream army.. it was subdefuge.. blockstream and hearn are both in the bankers pockets.
as for ver.. sorry but 70-75% of hashrate has not said yes to segwit.. ver only accounts for 9% not 70%..
seems your the one trying to twist things. please atleast be honest. if you cant be honest atleast show stats.. dont just creatively speculate to twist things. segwit is at 25% not 91%.. so its not just ver saying no to segwit.
research harder, your rhetoric sounds like an echo of other peoples spoonfed propaganda. rather than independent insight/understanding
lastly even the segwit fanboys ALSO want more blocksize too, they just argue more about WHO will do it and less about HOW. its not a left or right debate. it should be a middleground where everyone gets what they want.