Author

Topic: Core Verses Unlimited (Read 632 times)

legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
March 26, 2017, 02:26:58 AM
#5
FYI:
BTCC= BIT-CORE COIN
BTU  = BIT-UNLIMITED
Nope. The economic majority has agreed to divide them as follows:
BTC - current Bitcoin.
BTU - Bitcoin Unlimited altcoin.

1.   Who will triggered the Hard Fork First?  
     (Core or Unlimited)
There is nothing in Core that may trigger a HF.

2.   Which Will you Support?
      (BTCC or BTU)
BTU has literally no support from the economy.



If this is what you're voting for, you are a disgrace to everything that Satoshi built.

'Member:
sr. member
Activity: 268
Merit: 250
March 26, 2017, 02:20:22 AM
#4
If you look at current statistics there will not be a hardfork any time soon.

Source: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/current-statistics-core-vs-bu-1842756
legendary
Activity: 4410
Merit: 4788
March 26, 2017, 02:19:40 AM
#3
i'm supporting core no matter what, but unlimited look like will trigger the hard fork first, btw there is no hard fork with core...

i highly doubt the value will fall below $600-700 or even remainign at current level

hard=node and pool vote
soft =only pool vote..

what you dont realise is soft can also cause splits. and hard can also keep the chain united.

for clarity

soft and hard is simply:
soft: pool only vote
hard: nodes and pools vote

below these umbrella terms is what could happen.. in both hard and soft it can either continue as one chain. or bilateral split
softfork: consensus - >94% pools no banning/ignoring of minority. result: small 5% orphan drama then one chain. minority unsynced and dead
softfork: controversial - >50% pools no banning/ignoring of minority. result: long big% orphan drama then one chain. minority unsynced and dead
softfork: bilateral split - intentionally ignoring/banning opposing rules and not including them. result: 2 chains

hardfork: consensus - >94% nodes, then >94% pools no banning/ignoring of minority. result: 5% orphan drama then one chain. minority unsynced / dead
hardfork: controversial - >50% nodes, then >50% pools no banning/ignoring of minority. result: big% orphan drama then one chain. minority unsynced / dead
hardfork: bilateral split - intentionally ignoring/banning opposing rules and not including them. result: 2 chains

go check out cores bip9 orphaning blocks and node to get their 95%=100%.. oh and they can lower the trigger below 95%.
go check out cores UASF orphaning blocks and node to get their 100%.. oh and they can lower the trigger at any level

^ such basic understanding that has been known for over a year and it seems even now some cant grasp it
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
March 26, 2017, 01:53:23 AM
#2
i'm supporting core no matter what, but unlimited look like will trigger the hard fork first, btw there is no hard fork with core...

i highly doubt the value will fall below $600-700 or even remainign at current level
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
March 26, 2017, 01:35:54 AM
#1
Time of a Hard Fork Fast Approaching.

In Your Opinions


1.   Who will triggered the Hard Fork First?  
     (Core or Unlimited)

2.   Which Will you Support?
      (BTCC or BTU)

3.  In your Best Estimate, Price per Coin After they Split.
    BTCC  =  $ ?
    BTU    =  $ ?

 Cool

FYI:
BTCC= BIT-CORE COIN
BTU  = BIT-UNLIMITED
Jump to: