Topic: CORRUPT MODERATION - WHEN WILL IT STOP??? Clear example of one sided mods (Read 930 times)

I refuse to unignore him but I am pretty confident that he used the word "observable" at least once in his reply.

Your post sounds like a great idea. He is currently littering several boards with his mental gibberish. Putting everything in one thread would be the best solution for the entire community.

I’ll agree to take part under a couple of conditions,

1, one point per post this will allow me to refute the point and move on to the next without having to take 2 shits and have 3 pisses as it takes so long to read cryptocunts repetitive nonsense. One point, one paragraph and no tangents Into Lauda or anyone else whilst you debate with me

2 the full post is to be quoted and either refuted with evidence or accepted, none of this FACTS/BULL that you normally post, I will require evidence.

Are these points accepted by you or whichever alter ego your fucked up brain is talking through that day?

I know I'm gonna regret this but...

Dear cryptohunter,

Let us - and I don't mean just me and you but anyone interested - have this open debate that you want so much. On one condition: it is to be conducted in ONE non-self-modded thread in Reputation (or Meta if you can keep it entirely about forum matters but since you often want to discuss personalities I'd say Reputation is more appropriate). If you can keep it in one thread only and not post outside of it for the duration of said debate, including any of your alts, I promise I will read your every post and respond to the best of my abilities, and I hope others will join too. I hope you'll take this offer and help keep this forum clean. Thank you in advance.

--sm.

Starts with a false allegation.

Thenewnobody135246 seems to have ran away from our challenges.  Pops up now to save a low function fool like TMAN from the embarrassment of his own posts filled with swearing and graphic sexual content derived from his deviant family's explicit behaviors we expect. Not to mention the classic question that made us all laugh here.

To help him avoid bumping into the same boring observable truths that clearly demonstrate they are all untrustworthy colluding scum that is impossible to deny.

How about the challenges we set you? Thenewnonachiever135246 ?  You seem to have wimped out, ran off and hidden away?  take us off ignore and meet us in open debate. Now take another look at the challenges and prove us wrong. We are waiting and smiling.

To push for a transparent and fair environment for all, where we all have equal opportunity, is not boring, it is not negative, it is the most net positive posting history since the inception of the board. Right when the board needs it the very most.

Why do you fight against the formation of a fair and transparent environment for all members? that is the real question. All we ask is the SAME rules be enforced for ALL persons. Scammers are labelled scammers and the honest members who present the truth are, yep, you guessed it : Honest members. Not too hard to understand is it?

Just hit the ignore button. All cryptohunter does is repeat the same thing over and over again: Writes a boring dialogue, use "observable"/"proven" at least 15 times, use his own quotes as "evidence". He could use his time/energy on being productive but insteads he chooses to write posts nobody reads, making his entire day revolve around negativity and remain a shanty town inhabitant.

With such overwhelming proof, how can we possibly laugh in your face. Do you not like the 3 little mice?

Sorry but please refrain from swearing and frothing at the mouth. I would not say that "getting into BTC" before me essentially guarantees they are smarter. Although I have doubts many got into btc before we did.  Now contain yourself, then you can have a go at the challenges I set the last idiot before he ran away. You're a funny guy Tman. Please entertain me further

"What the fuck makes you think you are more Inteligent than a shit ton of people who got into BTC before you? " TMAN - doh

You couldn’t challenge a retarded midget lesbian dwarf to a beauty contest. What the fuck makes you think you are more Inteligent than a shit ton of people who got into BTC before you?

Listen my little spastic homeless fuck. I prove that you are a cunt your post above proves you are cryptohunter as well ducky

The garbled word salad above, looks to be the output of malfunctioning pajeet bot. How can it have ever attained any merits? I can only assume any persons awarding it merit previously, have been account farmers and must be looked into.

Easy enough to provoke the emotions of a troll, with a super stupid idea, you feel.
with extraordinary post spamer, now you scream for yourself, don't care about your nonsense.
Your nature war.
Emotions of your character.
Spamer your habits.
Stupid babbling, that's your brain.

Sorry, I'm a little hooked on your troll.

We missed you TMAN.

See how they run when you put the real spotlight on them.

They don't like open challenges?

Run away

Way too much energy wasted on this delusional mental patient ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.

Perhaps I am not accustomed to dealing with people as stupid as you are. I have already stated that your double standards are contained within your posts. Try to read and understand what I am telling you. It has nothing to do with reporting. Your straw men are nothing other than an annoyance.

Theymos has NOT said anything about our behavior. If you are referring to cryptohunters limited interaction with Theymos you will note that Theymos was observably incorrect on several points that can be clearly demonstrated. Unless one has invented a brand new definition of scamming that we are not aware of in relation to lauda and xcoin.  We believe Theymos is not as versed as others here are with the alt section, and is lacking in lots of back ground knowledge on several individuals that now infest meta.

He likely has limited time and is not a real student of this alt board to the level others are. His council to cryptohunter was based upon a metric that is also gamed. The deletion of cryptohunters posts after analysis looked to be a special case (they were not irrelevant or off topic) but could have been wise since he wanted to directly shut down lauda's defamation of hostfat quickly, and preferred not to become embroiled in a highly relevant, on topic debate that hinged on precedents and back ground information that demonstrated laudas claim hostfat should be removed (with no evidence provided by lauda) need to be treated with caution and the reasons as to why that caution would be prudent (plus the evidence and observable instances required) also similar precedents for similar scenarios. We notice cryptohunter raised 3 sensible topics to understand permitted flow after this which nobody was interested in discussing. Cryptohunters posts there without direct intervention by Theymos would have been very beneficial to the reader if he was to gain the optimal insight into the situation. Any debate on that should be conducted elsewhere but we would welcome it.

There is no "behavior" other than pushing for a transparent and fair environment that treats each member equally. That would surely gain Satoshi's blessing. That is far more important than pleasing anyone else that does not want to fight for that kind of environment.

So to just shut you up once and for all  let us place you a few challenges.

1. present the instances of incorrect information that we have presented.
2. present the instances that demonstrate an agenda other than fighting for a fair and transparent system for all members, that you can locate in our own post history.
3. present some instances of your own original thought provoking posts that made any difference to this board since you joined. So we can examine if you are even worth our time. If you are just an low functioning shit poster then please accept you will not have the capacity to fully engage with us in debate.
4. state that when we investigate your own post history we will not find anything that demonstrates you are a liar or a scammer or observably untrustworthy in financial matters ?
5. explain why "the vast majority" of liars , scammers, trust abusers, and their colluding pals seem to all be spamming fortune jack gambling sigs all over the board. (that includes you)
6. why are you such a failure that you need to spam a sig after all of these years or are you just greedy?

After that then get back on topic or leave the thread.

How can you observe "double standards" while you have no insight in what posts I report? As Tman already stated: Theymos doesn't like your behaviour, the moderators don't like your behaviour and nobody, besides your alt accounts, like your behaviour. Have you ever considered that you are the problem here? The only "observable event" is your mental health quickly deteriorating. Get help.

There is no kissing and making up with observable liars and scammers. I am sure OG knows this.  We see no evidence of the claims you are making.  There is no capitulation on our part. We don't befriend scammers and liars for the sake of an easy time here.

We? you do realise that only the loonies are screaming right now? anyone not making a total childish hissy fit isnt being tagged, anyone going about there day and using this forum for knowledge and trading doesnt have issues - fuck even Lauda and OG are kissing and making up..  the tides are turning fuck face and you are the one who is stranded while the rest of the forum matures and moves on.

xxxx go have a power strum with your disgusting clit over that fatty.

All we notice here is a bunch of observable shit posters spamming their sigs.

@TheNewAnon135246

sorry that you're too observably stupid to understand the very sensible explanation we gave you, that you don't seem to be offer a rebuttal too.

When we have an observable instance(s) that clearly demonstrates for example lauda is a liar and scammer, we reserve EVERY right to call them by the title lauda the liar and scammer when ever we see fit, It is OPTIMAL for the reader to view their posts furnished with that highly relevant and important background information.  The same for the sickly double standards smarmacist who loves lecturing on trolling, financially motivated shit posting and other things they have been found guilty of themselves. The same for anyone we choose to rename basis upon observable instances in their post history.

We notice also your double standards that you are not lecturing those people on adjusting peoples usernames with 0 evidence to support their own alterations.  We notice when we pointed it out to you, you tried to divert from the obvious double standards you employ to make some kind of " i don't wish to troll but here i am trolling" kind of moronic public demonstration of your own stupidity.

We notice that you are so fucking dumb and observable bent on sig spamming and colluding with your other observably corrupt fortune jack sig spamming friends, that you don't see to notice other members on this thread using images of disabled people to troll with? 

Can you imagine what a complete loser you obviously must be to need to spam a gambling sig after all the years you have been here?

@tman

We notice the "boss" actually goes as far as to observable "DISTRUST" you and has excluded you from his DT list. So there is some hope for Theoden as yet.

We need no approval from any person that stands against a transparent and fair environment for all.

@yoshie who? - sorry you post isn't clear, that could be likely due to the fact you're not able to convey the small and irrelevant points you embarrass yourself with when trying to beg for merit scraps whilst spamming your sig. Although, usually, if we notice irrelevant merit begging shit posters  (you) "agreeing" I usually notice their support guarantees the point is invalid or completely idiotic.

I agree, trolls can refer to post spammers, with posts formed to create an atmosphere of impression of others to be emotionally provoked for other users, say (trolling for newbies) in this case to corner mod and other members in the discussion debate, the worse is not caring about his own ethics.
Meaning:
1. Trolls can be summarized as a rebel experimental version in the forum, meaning the limit is ignored.
2. Trolls very often challenge suggestions from forums, the purpose of trolls is to apply ideas from them.
3. Trolls can be said to be in a wrong position.
4. Actually trolls really know about this Forum, but it's very difficult to apply to their goals.

For the troll to do something there are many ways he does he doesn't want to give up.
That means:
If the main road will be blocked for certain reasons, then the troll will take another road to reach its destination. ignore one positive thing.

Whatever post made by OP all against forum moderation, trust etc. My question is, if you think everything is corrupted then who are forcing you to stay on forum. It's very bad habit open multiple thread continuously. Better just gather your all complain against the forum or forum system then make a topic. So that it would be easy to handle for admin. If you make post continuously then I don't think admin will read your thread and there is chance ban you due to spam on forum.

OP it’s becausr the mods don’t like you or any other of your accounts. Your proof is the thermos post where he shuts your shit down on the CH account.

So boss doesn’t like you lot, mods are picking on you and 99.786% of the forum think you are a total waste of space. But no you are right and everyone else is wrong?

Grow up

Use the "report to moderator" button if you feel that he is trolling, that's what the button is for. It's much more effective than creating a new thread every 10 minutes.



Having "observable instances of truth" doesn't mean you can act like a 7 year old and use childish nicknames.


Not meaning to troll here, this is a serious concern. Have you been diagnosed or suspected to have schizophrenia? You should seriously consider getting professional help.

Okay, well in that case, we no longer accuse you of double standards.

Opps i did not notice that he is referring you in that picture.
If that was his intention, then it is not right either.  

Haha I see so he can post the picture and infer that is me? I am not allowed to say that is his mother? I see a future DT members here. Great double standards.

Its the comments which you posted with the Picture which i was referring to be disrespectful.   

I agree with you posting pictures of those with genetic issues is very disrespectful. LFC Bitcoin is quite out of his shitposting mind posting that kind of thing here. Then again his other 12000 posts are pure shit so what else can be expected


@malboroza

that seems like an almost reasonable reply, I want to see which mod removed it, because it it were hilarious and co then surely I would not need to report his own post or cabalism13's post since he was quoting it.

why is it not transparent which mods remove the posts? this should be as standard?  when people say you need to PM the mod to ask why? how if you do not know which mod deleted i?

You can argue on which posts are off-topic . Also you have right to fight for the classification of Spam posts or  Mods Behavior but you have no right to disrespect anyone.  I mean you just don't deserve to be here.  

Mods are absolutely one-sided. They're on the side of enforcing the rules of the forum in a somewhat sane (if unreasonably lenient) manner. Obviously that's not the side you're on, but you can't please everyone.

Ok, I forced myself to read topic. Report post and write in comments "off topic reply", there is no need to make thread and drama about every single post you see. Cabalisms post indeed moved topic into different direction. Answer to question why your post was removed while some other are not is because someone reported your post and didn't report other posts. So go to that thread and report all post which are off topic, starting from this one https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.50696752. Or simple send PM to users to remove off topic replies. Be polite while doing that.

LOL - like LFC with his autism and pics of his mother are not trollling? please answer clearly.

Why is referring to them as I deem appropriate trolling, if i can present observable instances of truth to explain if asked?  We notice many members refer to our friend cryptohunter as scunter, cryptocunt(er), etc. We did not notice him crying about trolling? and they could provide 0 evidence to explain their nicknames? that is more possibly trolling. Although not something I am sure he would worry about since it is a nit picking feeble attempt to avoid tackling the valueless content of their posts.

That has no bearing on the initial post.  Notildah may not be nutildah.  I mean it is hard to know which is worse. Is it best that he recognizes that selling his account is EVIL and that he advocates others get red trust for it, then goes on to sell his own in his mind to assist users scamming others?? but nobody was willing to pay 0.3btc for this bunch of shitposting?  or that he sold it and there is a new shitposter impersonating an old evil member according to him ready to scam us all ? Can you prove he IS nutildah? if so produce the conclusive proof?  if you can we will refer to it as nutildah the evil member in future.

Where is your council to the other members that change other members into childish nicknames? and they can not provide any observable instances to demonstrate the names are more suitable or that they insightful in anyway? can you please call out tman, pharmacist and all the others that start changing peoples user names as trolls? I will await you doing this right away in public.

Incorrect anway. I have already told you before that cleverly adapting a persons username to more accurately match with their observable behaviors is not trolling. BUT ONLY if you can provide evidence and observable instances to demonstrate this is true and holds up under scrutiny. You notice we have not given you a pet name. For now we have not observed you to trust abuse, or tell lies, or scam, or to sell your account. If we notice any observable instances of anything majorly untrustworthy then we may assign you a pet name.

For example we notice LFC_Bitcoin is a total shitposter. The VAST majority of his posts are 1 liners and speculations of the price of BTC with some other sports discussion.  I mean looking at his entire post history just sees a mass of 1 liner meaningless junk. We have not yet assigned him a more accurate name like some of the the others.  However,allowing members to believe this person has ever made posts that represent his inflated merit score is laughable. His entire post history is garbage. Go back through it all. There is NO value at all.

Please review his entire post history and pick out 5 original thought inspiring posts ...you will not they are all mostly 1 liner speculation junk, sports gambling drivel, and tales of him making cups of tea for his office bosses before he started a failing clothes business. He has achieved nothing for this community and is a waste of space. He is now a trust abuser, just because he does not like the truth about his meaningless and pointless past here being presented AFTER he attacks us with childish pics of his family and claims of autism ?

Now stop going off topic and just explain why that post was removed and none of the others were?  it was far more funny than the others and it only responded to what we consider to be false and biased opinions of the moderator.

We still await sensible explanation for the removal whilst the other posts of far less value in terms of humor remain.

Changing names into childish nicknames = trolling. Act like an adult and people will start treating you as one.

LFC_Bitcoin please stop posting pictures of your mother on my thread.

@TheNewAnon135246

More trolling about trolling?

Please provide some evidence of the trolling. Oh wait you won't. Just like LFC Bitcoin will not present any evidence of his best original thought inspiring posts. They do not exist. Present the instances of trolling for us to see. Can you not read the initial post ? or just too stupid to understand that your post needs some observable instances to substantiate it or it should not be here? Now present it ? we will wait.

Yes we wait for their explanation of how the above post broke the rules or required deletion when the other posts there quoted remain.

EDIT - WE NOTICE LFC BITCOIN JUST LEFT SOME RED TRUST ABUSE ON OUR ACCOUNT. WELL DONE LFC BITCOIN.  You clearly like assisting us demonstrate DT and the merit systems is a joke.  Obviously does not like being called out as an observable fool in public.

My guess is that most moderators consider you an annoying cunt since you have created a shitload of threads about the same subject and they are getting tired of your trolling.

Sorry to hear you are suffering again.

Read the OP. Try to work things out on your own. If you need assistance to enter the debate then ask your parents or career to help you form a sensible post.

My autism spectrum is going off again. cryptohunter, seriously what do you ever gain from making threads like this?

Same shit, different day.

 

More observable shit posters piling in with zero argument and zero reason to be here other than spamming their sigs.

I said no posting without evidence slobbering ass kisser.

Yogg the trust abuser and colluder with scammers and liars. Can you present the words that you are referring to? We can debate them on another thread. Do not derail this one.  If you maintain you are not a trust abuser, or observably colluding with scammers, liars and other trust abusers then please tell me so I can make another thread in rep for you to air your excuses there, whilst I demonstrate how untrustworthy you are.

Back on topic please. I want explanation of why my post was deleted. It is the funniest post ever quoted on that thread. Far more funny than the 2 others that I quoted there. One of which is just hilarious demonstrating he is not objective or impartial and will insist of proliferating the board with garbage he can not back up when called out. He just runs away. He has no examples of ANY false information that he can present that were contained with in our posts? but how is this possible if all of our posts are trolling and nonsense? 

Mods need to be able to explain post deletes in the full context of the thread. If not this is discrimination and deliberate silencing of observable events they do NOT want presented.

Just don't feed the troll, put it on ignore. 

Seems like you end up making your own definitions for some of the terms your using.
You are soo above all. Aren't you on Mars or something ?

You know even better than us, mere mortals, the definitions of the words you are using.
Keep on with your rants. That's going nowhere.. or maybe going above-all, who knows ? 
It goes above my head, that's for sure.

Ah an observable trust abuser comes to comment, an observable colluder with scammers and liars. Welcome yogg.

AND??  it does not matter if mods are one sided and collude with liars, scammers and members with clear double standards?

thanks for your insight.

And ..?

Local rules - no opinions to be given without supporting examples. Bored of talking with idiots who spout false allegations and then run away when you ask for examples.



More one sided corrupt moderators here colluding with scum bags to help them hide their dirty pasts. Also trying to weaponize the deleted posts gamed metric for getting people banned.  These posts are not off topic, they are relevant (more than their posts) and still they get deleted.This forums slides more into an echo chamber daily.



So we noticed that the "shit posts so bad they are actually funny" thread had become another opportunity for shit posters and corrupt mods to flame honest whistle blowers and take the sides of observable liars and scammers and those with sickening double standards.




We notice the mod that likes to enable observable scammers and liars,probable extortionists,trust abusers , and sneaky greedy racist trolling sig spammers on to DT to positions of trust wants to jump in with his own false accusations and general shit posting. Having this type of person with access to ANY private information is quite worrying. Obviously colluding with the observably untrustworthy bunch on here.



We then quote a shit post that is so bad it is more than funny. I mean you can not actually get more funny that a person calling others evil and demanding they get red trust for selling their accounts that then goes and advertises for sale their own account can you?


deep-seated? perhaps Notildah LOL

this one is hilarious, well not as hilarious as watching hilarious pretend to be objective and impartial. Still pretty funny I hope you all agree.

Nutildah lecturing others on selling their accounts and how untrustworthy and evil it is before trying to sell his own... or did he sell it?





followed by  this posted by the same user in 2016

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16312368

Name:   nutildah
Posts:   2152
Activity:   560
Position:   Hero Member
Date Registered:   April 19, 2014, 11:50:27 AM
Trust:   0: -0 / +0

My posts were frequently contentious and sometimes downright argumentative, but that's because I'm a real person who was genuinely interested in bitcoin and this forum, and I wasn't just trying to build up an account to sell it or do sig campaigns.

Its a completely anonymous account, never been linked to my real identity. I stopped posting for the most part about 6 months ago.

I would like 0.3 BTC for it.

You can get back to me here or via PM. Thanks!


That was very funny this is why he does not like people trolling telling the truth, they need to be banned. Please ban anyone who tells the truth about us. We don't like it. Makes us look foolish and untrustworthy EVIL.