Topic: Could This Be the Next Big Play-to-Earn Game? (Read 257 times)
Money can be both evil and good depending on how you earn it and where you spend it. To give you an example, I periodically win money on the Weiss platform and spend that money on gifts for my family. I think this is a good way to make your loved ones happy
It looks good from first impression. Their website looks intriguing and I will download their app to see what they’ve built. I checked their 𝕏 account as well and it’s impressive to see that they have 400k followers (even thought I think that a majority are bots). For anyone who wants to invest in it, I’d advise you do a lot more research because there’s usually more than what meets the eyes.
Seems like most people have written off P2E, but I've kept an open mind. I also checked their Twitter page, which looks good. I saw some listing partnerships with Bitget, Gate, and as of April 30, their DAA (Daily Active Addresses) has reached 81,152 (+17.35%), with new wallets increasing by +594.3%. I'll probably explore alternative ways to get the token soon.I don’t think that P2E is written off. And I don’t think it’ll easily be written off because games only get better. P2E will seize to exist only if games would stop being created. And that’s not happening, instead we’re steadily advancing in that sector.
Listing partnership doesn’t move me, well, unless it with Binance. I say that because they are just about the top platform that scrutinize really well. And despite how good they do it, they still delist tokens.
True. But I think due to past experiences there's no much enthusiasm on the gaming sector from what I can see here. Well let's watch since Apeiron has a unique approach to players and sustainability.. I really don't wait for partnerships with binance though, cos by then I wont have an early entry edge😀. It's already trading on the cex I mentioned. Now it's time to farm for me.
IMG
When the new CEO Richard stepped in, there was a discussing on how there had been frequent listings. I’m not sure how to got slow as you say but I think it’s better to be slow and certain so they don’t find out a reason to not have listed the coin/token later.
With all the nice developments in crypto world, I'm always on the lookout for projects that truly innovate and push boundaries. Lately, I've been particularly drawn to how some of these projects are tackling real-world problems using blockchain and gamification concepts. That's how I came across Apeiron, and it seems to be tackling a unique issue in the gaming world.
Apeiron describes itself as the world's first NFT-based god game where you get the power to shape and control an entire world like a god, but with the added thrill of action RPG elements and true ownership of the things you create within the game. This ownership is powered by NFTs and built on the Ronin blockchain. It's solving the problem of in-game assets ultimately being controlled by the game developers, giving power back to the players.
The potential here is like a supercharged version of the 'play-to-earn' model, where players can earn through in-game currency and by owning and trading their unique creations on the marketplace. Share your thoughts – is this a problem the crypto gaming space needs solving?
Look if any project is doing something that is benefitting the people in this world then it will surely be a successful project. These kind of projects only needs a minimal marketing and after that they grow on their own because of the use case and problem solving fundamentals they have.Apeiron describes itself as the world's first NFT-based god game where you get the power to shape and control an entire world like a god, but with the added thrill of action RPG elements and true ownership of the things you create within the game. This ownership is powered by NFTs and built on the Ronin blockchain. It's solving the problem of in-game assets ultimately being controlled by the game developers, giving power back to the players.
The potential here is like a supercharged version of the 'play-to-earn' model, where players can earn through in-game currency and by owning and trading their unique creations on the marketplace. Share your thoughts – is this a problem the crypto gaming space needs solving?
This is what we call as marketing based on word of mouth an it's the strongest one. So if any project no matter the one you're taking about or any other else is solving some problem and proposing a unique solution then it'll be successful one for sure.
This isn't only new though and it's a bit late. It goes out when the hype of play-to-earn games is already over. There are many good play-to-earn games in the past, however their success didn't continue this long, but let us see if what this project's luck have in store for them.
It looks good from first impression. Their website looks intriguing and I will download their app to see what they’ve built. I checked their 𝕏 account as well and it’s impressive to see that they have 400k followers (even thought I think that a majority are bots). For anyone who wants to invest in it, I’d advise you do a lot more research because there’s usually more than what meets the eyes.
Seems like most people have written off P2E, but I've kept an open mind. I also checked their Twitter page, which looks good. I saw some listing partnerships with Bitget, Gate, and as of April 30, their DAA (Daily Active Addresses) has reached 81,152 (+17.35%), with new wallets increasing by +594.3%. I'll probably explore alternative ways to get the token soon.I don’t think that P2E is written off. And I don’t think it’ll easily be written off because games only get better. P2E will seize to exist only if games would stop being created. And that’s not happening, instead we’re steadily advancing in that sector.
Listing partnership doesn’t move me, well, unless it with Binance. I say that because they are just about the top platform that scrutinize really well. And despite how good they do it, they still delist tokens.
True. But I think due to past experiences there's no much enthusiasm on the gaming sector from what I can see here. Well let's watch since Apeiron has a unique approach to players and sustainability.. I really don't wait for partnerships with binance though, cos by then I wont have an early entry edge😀. It's already trading on the cex I mentioned. Now it's time to farm for me.
https://i.ibb.co/nQCv3Cz/IMG-20240510-064108.png
It looks good from first impression. Their website looks intriguing and I will download their app to see what they’ve built. I checked their 𝕏 account as well and it’s impressive to see that they have 400k followers (even thought I think that a majority are bots). For anyone who wants to invest in it, I’d advise you do a lot more research because there’s usually more than what meets the eyes.
Seems like most people have written off P2E, but I've kept an open mind. I also checked their Twitter page, which looks good. I saw some listing partnerships with Bitget, Gate, and as of April 30, their DAA (Daily Active Addresses) has reached 81,152 (+17.35%), with new wallets increasing by +594.3%. I'll probably explore alternative ways to get the token soon.I don’t think that P2E is written off. And I don’t think it’ll easily be written off because games only get better. P2E will seize to exist only if games would stop being created. And that’s not happening, instead we’re steadily advancing in that sector.
Listing partnership doesn’t move me, well, unless it with Binance. I say that because they are just about the top platform that scrutinize really well. And despite how good they do it, they still delist tokens.
True. But I think due to past experiences there's no much enthusiasm on the gaming sector from what I can see here. Well let's watch since Apeiron has a unique approach to players and sustainability.. I really don't wait for partnerships with binance though, cos by then I wont have an early entry edge😀. It's already trading on the cex I mentioned. Now it's time to farm for me.
[img]
It appears you have done proper research on them as I can see the confidence and your technique about investing in them. Despite all we are conversing here, that’s what’s most important; investing in something you see a potential to make money from, not because you were told it will be great but because you’ve looked through your own lenses and seen it for yourself. Good luck to you!
I am done with them but if you guys are still optimistic with it, make sure that you are there to earn and then don't forget that there's an expiration for the hype that they're building.
Even in 2017, a lot of gaming projects have been there and I thought that they're there to modify the gaming scene but no, they're all hype and based on the market that they're focusing and targeting with because of the potential revenue that they're about to get.
Afterwards, they're almost forgotten.
Hahah. I understand how you feel!. I am also done with anything that has to do with P2E games. It's just crazy how i would spend hours playing a game and earning crumbs of tokens and at the end of the day the project will not be listed or something else would happen to it. That time i should be using to go about P2E games i can channel them and my resources into a business that would give me good profit so that i can invest in real altcoins and Bitcoin. Even in 2017, a lot of gaming projects have been there and I thought that they're there to modify the gaming scene but no, they're all hype and based on the market that they're focusing and targeting with because of the potential revenue that they're about to get.
Afterwards, they're almost forgotten.
P2E already done.
The HYPE is gone, the train is over we are not the problem cannot be solved is the selling pressure from the token/coin being generated from the game. Every project cannot maintain these and good or created ecosystem circulation coin/token.
I want to agree with this one, but I'll exclude one NFT game and that's Axie Infinity.The HYPE is gone, the train is over we are not the problem cannot be solved is the selling pressure from the token/coin being generated from the game. Every project cannot maintain these and good or created ecosystem circulation coin/token.
It's still an NFT game, but right now, it's like any other games out there that in order for you to become a good player, you must spend dollars to buy the META Axies out there. It's still a play-to-earn because you can still earn some AXS just by playing, and for some it's still worth it because they're good at it, but not for most especially the newbies. I also stopped playing that game already even though I still have my 30+ Axies because it wasn't worth my time, and the stress is just too much for me to at least get some AXS.
All of other P2E games are either dead like you said, or not worth it anymore. Overall, I agree with you that the hype is long gone, but there are still NFT games that are around because there's still a community behind it.
I don't thinks is gonna to be successful.
I also don't think that this project that the OP has shared will be successful. It's just another newbie indirectly advertising another project again like what other newbies are doing. 
With all the nice developments in crypto world, I'm always on the lookout for projects that truly innovate and push boundaries. Lately, I've been particularly drawn to how some of these projects are tackling real-world problems using blockchain and gamification concepts. That's how I came across Apeiron, and it seems to be tackling a unique issue in the gaming world.
Apeiron describes itself as the world's first NFT-based god game where you get the power to shape and control an entire world like a god, but with the added thrill of action RPG elements and true ownership of the things you create within the game. This ownership is powered by NFTs and built on the Ronin blockchain. It's solving the problem of in-game assets ultimately being controlled by the game developers, giving power back to the players.
The potential here is like a supercharged version of the 'play-to-earn' model, where players can earn through in-game currency and by owning and trading their unique creations on the marketplace. Share your thoughts – is this a problem the crypto gaming space needs solving?
Look if any project is doing something that is benefitting the people in this world then it will surely be a successful project. These kind of projects only needs a minimal marketing and after that they grow on their own because of the use case and problem solving fundamentals they have.Apeiron describes itself as the world's first NFT-based god game where you get the power to shape and control an entire world like a god, but with the added thrill of action RPG elements and true ownership of the things you create within the game. This ownership is powered by NFTs and built on the Ronin blockchain. It's solving the problem of in-game assets ultimately being controlled by the game developers, giving power back to the players.
The potential here is like a supercharged version of the 'play-to-earn' model, where players can earn through in-game currency and by owning and trading their unique creations on the marketplace. Share your thoughts – is this a problem the crypto gaming space needs solving?
This is what we call as marketing based on word of mouth an it's the strongest one. So if any project no matter the one you're taking about or any other else is solving some problem and proposing a unique solution then it'll be successful one for sure.
It looks good from first impression. Their website looks intriguing and I will download their app to see what they’ve built. I checked their 𝕏 account as well and it’s impressive to see that they have 400k followers (even thought I think that a majority are bots). For anyone who wants to invest in it, I’d advise you do a lot more research because there’s usually more than what meets the eyes.
Seems like most people have written off P2E, but I've kept an open mind. I also checked their Twitter page, which looks good. I saw some listing partnerships with Bitget, Gate, and as of April 30, their DAA (Daily Active Addresses) has reached 81,152 (+17.35%), with new wallets increasing by +594.3%. I'll probably explore alternative ways to get the token soon.I don’t think that P2E is written off. And I don’t think it’ll easily be written off because games only get better. P2E will seize to exist only if games would stop being created. And that’s not happening, instead we’re steadily advancing in that sector.
Listing partnership doesn’t move me, well, unless it with Binance. I say that because they are just about the top platform that scrutinize really well. And despite how good they do it, they still delist tokens.
True. But I think due to past experiences there's no much enthusiasm on the gaming sector from what I can see here. Well let's watch since Apeiron has a unique approach to players and sustainability.. I really don't wait for partnerships with binance though, cos by then I wont have an early entry edge😀. It's already trading on the cex I mentioned. Now it's time to farm for me.
Seems we already have a lot of trending or hype projects right now, seems NFT or play-to-earn games are outdated. It seems people already learned what happened before.
Maybe or not. I had an nft called guild of guardians. I have a lot left from previous cycle and they will launch on May 15th, since my nfts there are pure profit already, will try my luck once more on p2e if the game will incured good profits. I had nothing to lose here cause ai take out my capital with profits last time, I should have bigger profits but I tend to keep soem for the game now I will see if the p2e is worth it using my nfts. It looks good from first impression. Their website looks intriguing and I will download their app to see what they’ve built. I checked their 𝕏 account as well and it’s impressive to see that they have 400k followers (even thought I think that a majority are bots). For anyone who wants to invest in it, I’d advise you do a lot more research because there’s usually more than what meets the eyes.
Seems like most people have written off P2E, but I've kept an open mind. I also checked their Twitter page, which looks good. I saw some listing partnerships with Bitget, Gate, and as of April 30, their DAA (Daily Active Addresses) has reached 81,152 (+17.35%), with new wallets increasing by +594.3%. I'll probably explore alternative ways to get the token soon.I don’t think that P2E is written off. And I don’t think it’ll easily be written off because games only get better. P2E will seize to exist only if games would stop being created. And that’s not happening, instead we’re steadily advancing in that sector.
Listing partnership doesn’t move me, well, unless it with Binance. I say that because they are just about the top platform that scrutinize really well. And despite how good they do it, they still delist tokens.
~
The potential here is like a supercharged version of the 'play-to-earn' model, where players can earn through in-game currency and by owning and trading their unique creations on the marketplace. Share your thoughts – is this a problem the crypto gaming space needs solving?
currently I only play in gala games and splinterland on hive.io, there are a lot of play to earn games which are currently trash, they just try to commit fraud by claiming their play to earn project is the best and the first, it's all just bullshit, you have to look at who the people behind the project are, if they are not competent then don't ever get involved in their play to earn project, just stay away from the project, it will only deceive you The potential here is like a supercharged version of the 'play-to-earn' model, where players can earn through in-game currency and by owning and trading their unique creations on the marketplace. Share your thoughts – is this a problem the crypto gaming space needs solving?
I am done with them but if you guys are still optimistic with it, make sure that you are there to earn and then don't forget that there's an expiration for the hype that they're building.
Even in 2017, a lot of gaming projects have been there and I thought that they're there to modify the gaming scene but no, they're all hype and based on the market that they're focusing and targeting with because of the potential revenue that they're about to get.
Afterwards, they're almost forgotten.
Even in 2017, a lot of gaming projects have been there and I thought that they're there to modify the gaming scene but no, they're all hype and based on the market that they're focusing and targeting with because of the potential revenue that they're about to get.
Afterwards, they're almost forgotten.
Clearly speaking I think you could understand this market cap and the media speculations very well that most of the projects are being manipulated basically on the gaming projects that's being overhyped like some sorts of specialities are Into it.
Being clearly won, let it be hope that something productive comes out of the projects in quite being aware that hyping can only be a strategy to attract the audience for the developers interests and later on its existence become magically gone so soon like a painful exit of an icon.
I've seen it and became one of those people that have became hype with it and didn't hesitated to buy and with that, I've lost significant amount of money.
That's why if there are still p2e games that are new, I won't invest on them. I might take a look but not gonna invest significant money on it.
It looks good from first impression. Their website looks intriguing and I will download their app to see what they’ve built. I checked their 𝕏 account as well and it’s impressive to see that they have 400k followers (even thought I think that a majority are bots). For anyone who wants to invest in it, I’d advise you do a lot more research because there’s usually more than what meets the eyes.
Seems like most people have written off P2E, but I've kept an open mind. I also checked their Twitter page, which looks good. I saw some listing partnerships with Bitget, Gate, and as of April 30, their DAA (Daily Active Addresses) has reached 81,152 (+17.35%), with new wallets increasing by +594.3%. I'll probably explore alternative ways to get the token soon.
I am done with them but if you guys are still optimistic with it, make sure that you are there to earn and then don't forget that there's an expiration for the hype that they're building.
Even in 2017, a lot of gaming projects have been there and I thought that they're there to modify the gaming scene but no, they're all hype and based on the market that they're focusing and targeting with because of the potential revenue that they're about to get.
Afterwards, they're almost forgotten.
Even in 2017, a lot of gaming projects have been there and I thought that they're there to modify the gaming scene but no, they're all hype and based on the market that they're focusing and targeting with because of the potential revenue that they're about to get.
Afterwards, they're almost forgotten.
Clearly speaking I think you could understand this market cap and the media speculations very well that most of the projects are being manipulated basically on the gaming projects that's being overhyped like some sorts of specialities are Into it.
Being clearly won, let it be hope that something productive comes out of the projects in quite being aware that hyping can only be a strategy to attract the audience for the developers interests and later on its existence become magically gone so soon like a painful exit of an icon.
only P2E backed by big venture capital such as binance labs and is included in their project incubation is the one that gonna give you money, the rest of them not so much.
because people have grown bored of this P2E scheme where nowaday the reward just doesn't justify the fact that you gonna get bored to oblivion by just playing these half baked games.
i'm pretty pessimistic with whatever P2E scheme is offered on my plates.
most of them just won't end well if they don't have big backer, that also means they gonna lack connection to get listed into the big exchange.
you honestly better off doing some airdrop task at this point many of airdrops a lot more beneficial than playing blockchain game that usually just a money making scheme by the devs.
not to generalize all of them but plenty of them literally just reused the same game asset over and over.
because people have grown bored of this P2E scheme where nowaday the reward just doesn't justify the fact that you gonna get bored to oblivion by just playing these half baked games.
i'm pretty pessimistic with whatever P2E scheme is offered on my plates.
most of them just won't end well if they don't have big backer, that also means they gonna lack connection to get listed into the big exchange.
you honestly better off doing some airdrop task at this point many of airdrops a lot more beneficial than playing blockchain game that usually just a money making scheme by the devs.
not to generalize all of them but plenty of them literally just reused the same game asset over and over.
P2E already done.
The HYPE is gone, the train is over we are not the problem cannot be solved is the selling pressure from the token/coin being generated from the game. Every project cannot maintain these and good or created ecosystem circulation coin/token.
I don't thinks is gonna to be successful.
The HYPE is gone, the train is over we are not the problem cannot be solved is the selling pressure from the token/coin being generated from the game. Every project cannot maintain these and good or created ecosystem circulation coin/token.
I don't thinks is gonna to be successful.
I agree.
Much of the liquidity and huge volume we saw at the peak of the Play to earn fever was because the market was being over-bought by people who felt over confidence on their positions in tokens and decentralized assets within the ecosystem of games like Axie Infinity, Plants vs Undead and other games , but it was mostly because of Axie Infinity.
At this stage of the NFT market and the niche of Play to Earn, there is simply not enough hype, volume or liquidity for us to see the same range of prices we see several months ago. I think I even read the creators of Axie Infinity had given up on their model of Play to Earn and had to remove all references to such off their website. The game still works, and so does their wallet and Blockchain, but if they could not pull something as big as Axie was, having so much funding volume, then it sounds pretty much impossible some random game will change the way of thinking of the market again.
Nowadays, investors and those who are lovers of new projects seem to be onto coins which are related to the development of artificial intelligence.
I'm really not sure if the play-to-earn game is still a thing this time, I remember back is the Axie where you could really make some good money.
Seems we already have a lot of trending or hype projects right now, seems NFT or play-to-earn games are outdated. It seems people already learned what happened before.
Seems we already have a lot of trending or hype projects right now, seems NFT or play-to-earn games are outdated. It seems people already learned what happened before.
Apeiron is just usual play to earn with garbage graphic game that built in the ronin network. There's nothing special from this game. it was a game for child and there will be no people who play it without being lured to get airdrop. There's nothing special with it. It has no good backers.
The demand is also very low. The days for P2E have gone since last year when it's not gaining the momentum after how long ROI that can be gotten by the investors of play to earn game.
It won't be the next big play to earn game. Enough is enough as p2e game doesn't have sustainable system. It likes a printing the unlimited tokens to be dumped to the market. No doubt that if it lacks of demand this time.
The demand is also very low. The days for P2E have gone since last year when it's not gaining the momentum after how long ROI that can be gotten by the investors of play to earn game.
It won't be the next big play to earn game. Enough is enough as p2e game doesn't have sustainable system. It likes a printing the unlimited tokens to be dumped to the market. No doubt that if it lacks of demand this time.
Many people are saying that play to earn hype is gone. I agree but also disagree. I remember faintly that play to earn projects were really trendy back then.
It was the ‘it’, if you know what I mean, back then. If you wanted to earn money this was your solution however now I barely hear anything about it. But does this mean it’s gone? I don’t think so. Many projects still have many investors and they continue to use these projects.
It was the ‘it’, if you know what I mean, back then. If you wanted to earn money this was your solution however now I barely hear anything about it. But does this mean it’s gone? I don’t think so. Many projects still have many investors and they continue to use these projects.
It looks good from first impression. Their website looks intriguing and I will download their app to see what they’ve built. I checked their 𝕏 account as well and it’s impressive to see that they have 400k followers (even thought I think that a majority are bots). For anyone who wants to invest in it, I’d advise you do a lot more research because there’s usually more than what meets the eyes.
Until there is a new economic model for P2E projects, I won't be touching it even with a 10ft pole. It's the same thing with Liquidity mining / yield farming in that the available incentive/rewards model is fundamentally flawed. As for Apeiron's concept of using a marketplace for trading of in-game currency, Heroes of Mavia went to the same route and its still early to say whether the experiment has been successful or not because they haven't allowed trading of their in-game tokens to tradable ones with actual market value.
I only see it as a buffer and it's still not as good.
I only see it as a buffer and it's still not as good.
P2E already done.
The HYPE is gone, the train is over we are not the problem cannot be solved is the selling pressure from the token/coin being generated from the game. Every project cannot maintain these and good or created ecosystem circulation coin/token.
I don't thinks is gonna to be successful.
The HYPE is gone, the train is over we are not the problem cannot be solved is the selling pressure from the token/coin being generated from the game. Every project cannot maintain these and good or created ecosystem circulation coin/token.
I don't thinks is gonna to be successful.
I am done with them but if you guys are still optimistic with it, make sure that you are there to earn and then don't forget that there's an expiration for the hype that they're building.
Even in 2017, a lot of gaming projects have been there and I thought that they're there to modify the gaming scene but no, they're all hype and based on the market that they're focusing and targeting with because of the potential revenue that they're about to get.
Afterwards, they're almost forgotten.
Even in 2017, a lot of gaming projects have been there and I thought that they're there to modify the gaming scene but no, they're all hype and based on the market that they're focusing and targeting with because of the potential revenue that they're about to get.
Afterwards, they're almost forgotten.
With all the nice developments in crypto world, I'm always on the lookout for projects that truly innovate and push boundaries. Lately, I've been particularly drawn to how some of these projects are tackling real-world problems using blockchain and gamification concepts. That's how I came across Apeiron, and it seems to be tackling a unique issue in the gaming world.
Apeiron describes itself as the world's first NFT-based god game where you get the power to shape and control an entire world like a god, but with the added thrill of action RPG elements and true ownership of the things you create within the game. This ownership is powered by NFTs and built on the Ronin blockchain. It's solving the problem of in-game assets ultimately being controlled by the game developers, giving power back to the players.
The potential here is like a supercharged version of the 'play-to-earn' model, where players can earn through in-game currency and by owning and trading their unique creations on the marketplace. Share your thoughts – is this a problem the crypto gaming space needs solving?
Apeiron describes itself as the world's first NFT-based god game where you get the power to shape and control an entire world like a god, but with the added thrill of action RPG elements and true ownership of the things you create within the game. This ownership is powered by NFTs and built on the Ronin blockchain. It's solving the problem of in-game assets ultimately being controlled by the game developers, giving power back to the players.
The potential here is like a supercharged version of the 'play-to-earn' model, where players can earn through in-game currency and by owning and trading their unique creations on the marketplace. Share your thoughts – is this a problem the crypto gaming space needs solving?
Jump to: