I think the difference is that I understand what is meant by comorbidity.
Take the following scenario (and I appreciate that for you it is simply a thought experiment, rather than what's actually happening):
A new, deadly respiratory virus appears. If everyone contracts it, then some will survive and some won't.
Now ask yourself what sorts of people are most likely to die from this virus. It will be the old and infirm, and those with existing underlying health conditions. You would agree with this, right?
Consider someone with a chronic lung disease. If they catch the new virus, they will be more likely to die than someone who has no lung problems who catches it, right?
The person with chronic lung disease catches this new virus, and dies. Their existing lung disease is considered a comorbidity. The thing that killed them is the new virus. Their existing condition made them more likely to die when they caught the new virus. If they hadn't caught the new virus, they would have continued to live with their existing condition. It is the new virus that killed them.
I think this is quite straightforward.
Lots of people think they know the definition of lots of things. So, check it out right from the dictionary:
[ kō′môr-bĭd′ĭ-tē ]
n.
A concomitant but unrelated pathological or disease process.
In other words, 94% died from something other than Covid, that just happened to be present at the same time Covid was.
If you overload a camel, and then add the straw that breaks its back... that mean old nasty straw killed the camel, lol.
You're kinda moving out of expressing an opinion, and into Fauci semantics, which are against even what his own CDC says. In other words, a troll for the crooks.