Topic: Country and nation culture is the economic strenght of nation (Read 119 times)

I think this is a bit of a complicated topic and content. I think it would be more accurate to say that if the culture of the country and the nation is directed with the right dynamic, it can contribute to the economic power of the country. For example, if we apply tax regulations for social aid in a society that does not have sharing characteristics, we may get bad results. We can multiply examples like this, but I won't give another example. Also, the US is a 200-year-old country. There are ancient nations in the world. I don't think a 200-year-old country can set an example for ancient civilizations, this is not something that a rational person can accept, maybe you can convince people who are under the influence of Hollywood, but I am not convinced...

Yes, I agree that culture plays an important role in building a country's economic strength. Because a country's culture is often associated with the values of work ethic, discipline and even perseverance. For example, Japan and South Korea, these two countries are considered to have a strong work ethic and high work dedication, thus contributing to high productivity and economic progress.

On the other hand, cultural richness and uniqueness can attract tourists from all over the world to come to certain countries. And Of course this can increase state income through the tourism sector.     and many countries benefit from their cultural heritage attracting tourists. Apart from that, with many tourists visiting a particular country, this will not only increase that country's income, but can also help the progress of MSME players, support entrepreneurship and small businesses can create many business opportunities and jobs.   So this can encourage even better economic growth.

You are right. We are lucky if we are in a country where a culture is mostly good but there are still other things that may hold the development of our country, although I believe they can possibly be worked out or changed for the better, while unfortunately it may not work the same if we are talking about cultures.

Not sure if we can choose to not participate if we dislike our culture but if it's a strict one and not allowed, I guess we still can leave our place there and transfer to a location that has a better culture? Didn't knew India are like that but thanks for the info. That's interesting. All the times I thought it's like the other countries who only have 1 culture and that must be about how they prepare their food.

But, USA's native culture was destroyed slowly and what they have right now is derived one from various countries with a motto of being different and by giving importance to individual's freedom and own rights. Hence, I am not sure role model reputation is coming from old culture and all.

A shared history and culture are what make a nation strong, say others. Yes, that's true. Unity and belonging may stabilize society. Look at Japan: its rich cultural heritage helps societal cohesion. Don't think culture is everything. Consider America and China. Their economies are strong, but not because everyone shares the same culture. More about their ambitious economic initiatives, infrastructural investment, and technology developments

Culture holds a society together, but the economics makes a nation strong. Trade policies, education, and innovation are discussed. These determine a country's worldwide competitiveness. Culture is important, but it's not the sole issue. Focus on the policies, strategy, and technologies that propel a nation ahead to generate economic power

Maybe what you mean is an era where money still doesn't play an important role in the economy because you can still rely on bartering one item for another, so the direction is more towards strengthening culture in order to preserve economic conditions in certain areas at this time. But currently things like that have faded over time because the main focus is how to grow the economy by getting more opportunities to open more businesses and places to do business. As well as having more of the best ways to generate profits without sacrificing the culture that already exists in our respective regions.

Culture and economics basically have equal positions and mutually support each other, culture can act as an economic source for the people of a nation by earning income as actors or those who play a role in performing arts. The government must optimize culture in order to advance the nation's economy and consider it an important asset that can contribute to nation development.
Each country has its own unique culture, this uniqueness can be introduced at important events to attract tourists to visit their country. Utilizing culture is one way to preserve national identity and maintain public interest because it can be used as economic development.

Culture is good when the people are living in love and peace in unity with one another. In my country, I don't think that our culture has improved our economy but rather it has destroyed it. I am saying this from my own experience and everyone also have their own view and experience on the positive or negative impact of culture to their country's economy. It is not all culture that promotes peace, unity, love and development, some cultures are very demonic to the society because it deprives some set of people to benefit from the country.

Greed, self centered, lack of contentmente and power tussle have destroyed so many good things that culture have for us. When the wrong people are in power, they don't respect culture.

Not exactly the strength of the nation but I believe that culture and history plays a part in reminding people what we could've done better in the same situation and that we should be seeing some kind of changes or improvement to the things in the past that was done right. It's a source of pride and if that pride can make someone aim to be a better citizen of that country then it can be argued that culture really is a source of economic strength.

Yes I understand your point. Most people tend to emphasize the importance and significance of culture and how we should preserve it to ensure economic prosperity but some cultural beliefs and practices tend to hinder a country’s growth. For example, traditional countries who do not believe in certain decent human rights may be a reason for one of their backwardness.

There’s nothing wrong with evolving and developing or improving some of the aspects of one’s culture especially if it’s for the greater good. A country should make sure that they are still catching up to other countries.

Everything you describe is about continuity and the stability that it builds. Trust is often the only thing that we have to go on in life, that somebody will not unfairly screw us over for their own benefit - less so with large transactions, but more so in every day transactions. Like having a set of rules of the road, that everyone adheres to because it has evolved over time in order to effectively minimize vehicle accidents or pedestrians getting hurt. It requires visible enforcement and it needs to be fair, because if you can bypass these legal structures completely with money, then corruption will leak out into all kinds of things and create disorder. Having a trusted Royal class, is hopefully just seen as an archaic backup plan for the sometimes useless politicians that every country can vote in occasionally.

China has helped a lot of countries economy by lending them loans that could be hard to get from the world bank, but if these countries fail to repay they get overtaken by the Chinese who get to come in and take hold of whatever collateral that was on ground for the loan.

As for England and their current stand, I think they have a lot on their plate as concerns Brexit and the way it is affecting their economy.
A lot is happening fast and if I get to speak about China and their economy, it is their dedollarization plan which is the BRICS initiative that stands out as an economic solution in this regard.

Be it any country it's culture plays a major role in development or even backwardness of the society hence ei think we shouldn't blindly consider all the cultures are a positive ones as there are some ancient evil practices which still continues these days in some countries hence we cannot relate all the culture as a part of economic growth and moreover there are countries like India where you will find a different language and culture every 25 miles.

Didn't they all trust China that they sent their manufacturing companies to China? These countries also ask for loans from China and provide loans just like the IMF does. They Trusted China.

Each country has culture and traditions but I think most countries that have unique cultures are Asian countries. But the economic strength lies mostly in the population.

Actually the opposite is happening. The world is de-Americanizing little by little as US regime keeps abusing everything, from the financial system to the international organizations like UN.
UK is not even counted as a significant country by the way.

You seem to be stuck in about 100 years ago when it was the British Empire.
Today what you call UK is a tiny country that has no say on the global scale anymore. The days of colonizing are long gone. Even African nations are kicking them out. Today, England is at best a US colony itself that lives to serve United States regime.

That's not to mention that the world has gotten way past dictators that rule over them, people whose only inherited the position and are not suitable or legitimate for it. In today's world people want to elect their leaders not have them inherit the position just because they were born into it.

There is a lot of reasons not trust China but China has proven to be at least more trustworthy than others.

I want to talk about the other aspect when countries have economic power so they can take advantage of everything in terms of resources they have, as well as how they develop and search for new things.

OP, what do you think about the cultural features of Native Americans in America? What do you think about the economy in the Egyptian region? What do you think about the economy in some regions like Tibet? What do you think about the economies of some African regions? What do you think about the economy in some countries in Southeast Asia?... yesterday I read an article about changing to access the global economy as well as adapting to social development association to avoid being isolated.

Anyway, from every perspective, I see everything as perfect, like how some countries can maintain their historical culture, but I see economics will lead it.

But don't you think there are other cultures which are better than others?
I think there are, specifically when comes to the cultural management of wealth creation and the administration of that wealth for the sake of the well being of the average citizen. In my country, we have many natural resources and oil, so in theory it would be easier for us to generate wealth and distribute it to society, but that is not the cases, and the source of the problem is our own culture on management and corruption.
On the other hand, we have other countries, like Japan or south Korea, where there are not as many natural resources like here in my country and still, when the little resources they have managed to exploit, their culture and management have allowed them to reach the status of developed country, where things function as they are supposed to be, where people have access to high quality healthcare and education.

Culture plays a bit role when comes to the destiny of a country. Nobody wanted to visit of even invest in a country in which the culture goes contrary to the economical and investor's growth in the long term.

The culture is more related to the identity of the people. It's something that makes the people different from rest of the world. But the culture we are saving should be positive and acceptable at contemporary time. The culture cannot be an excuse for doing illegal things. For example, marrying a child may be a culture somewhere but it can't be defended and practiced in modern times. A child don't have the capacity to think about what they want in a partner, what family responsibilities are, are not physically mature and don't even have a choice.
Culture enforcing is another serious problem, people of culture, the one who believes their culture is better than others seem to defame or criticize others who don't have similar culture. Culture is a changing topic and with enough interaction and company the culture around the world would keep getting similar.

It would be easier to maintain your culture and history when you are a nation that does not depend on massive importation of almost all the products used in the country because, as these products are shipped and imported into a country, people in the country recognizing that these are foreign goods will become interested in foreign goods and will begin to look for more foreign products, in looking for more foreign products, their own culture and history will be fading away because both foreign cultures will also be imported unknowingly.

If a country can learn to preserve its culture and remember its history making sure that even the younger generation know about its past, the country will turn out to be a very strong Nation because they will not easily be influenced by foreign cultures and practices.

I agree that a strong focus on culture and history inside the country can have positive economic and political impact. People must understand who they are and, when under a threat, realize what they are going to fight for. This requires a strong collective identity, which is often but perhaps not always a national identity. That being said, I don't think imperialism is good in any way, and I believe it's poison that we must collectively overcome. Imperialism is a root cause of military conquests, inequality and disregard of human rights. There should be other ways to become influential that don't threaten global security.

Culture play a very vital role in the economic strength of a country. Before colonialism our culture was what binded us together as one and we all did things in common. We traded goods and services with ease. Culture creates a bond between different ethnic groups thereby coming together to make the country economy stand strong

No matter where the country is, they appreciate whatever culture and history they have. Here in our country, there is a high respect for the culture we have, even if we say that
the tools are high-tech and fully innovated. the systems implemented here. 

Because the culture and history of a country can also help the territory through tourism, which gives tourists the idea to visit each country they want to visit,.

Culture and history are very integral parts of a nation. It could literally bring them all together and bound them for life. Yes, a country can even milk out profits from using their culture and history. But it is not directly related to how an economic development is affected. Some countries are full of culture but they are third world countries.
What do you mean when you say cultures? Do you just mean being rich? China is known to be rich with their exports all over the world and their people being business-minded people.

Royalty is not the only culture there is in the world, mate. China and so does a lot of other countries have their own shares of culture and history. Even without a monarch, people can still feel bounded together by the sheer love for their country.

Countries can develope things and be advanced in business but countries real economic strenghts are the country history the hkstorical buildings the art and the tradions and culture so that very special feeling what connects people together and unite as one with honour respect towards their history and culture.
In times we are now people around the world looking for nation and country who they can trust and who has the role model reputation usa is first and UK are second.
Remember when Queen of UK was Alive it gives enourmous trust and confidence to people around the world and also to UK own people.
So If country or nation don't have enough culture or religion and trations then it can fall.
Nation need that something to feel as one the special feeling and strong culture is what keeps the one country and nation strong.
For example strong countries UK france russia ukraine there is enough of aristrocracy and royalty and rich culture that's what keeps one country strong.
Every liberal movement destroy this and make country weaker that's for sure.
China is predicted to be powerful country but it can never be trusted as UK USA or russia or france becouse there is luck of that royalty that class that culture that phaoronic special feeling and that's why UK france and russia will always be the king of world becouse it's the culture what keeps together countries while UK culture falling the france become on spotlight USA and china become equal with each others USA also If things continue the way they move.
Right now on the world only 2 most dominant with rich culture Are france and russia they are 2 most imperial nations with royalty feeling with rich culture.

If world needs to decide wich side they will move then it would be not question If they go china or usa it's rather question If russia or france.

In Europe the italy and france are most dominant becouse the special culture and not so dominant the liberal mindset yes there is liberal also but not so much.

And Putin knows that he need to restore the great russian peter 1 imperialistic shine becouse that's where the real power and influence come from.

For now only star wich really shines are france it's a rolemodel and new trusted country.

Nations wich focus on only for business and money without right amount of culture and trations of nation will fall or becomes easy victim of other countries who try to manipulate them.
In otherwords when countries don't have that special feeling they fall even If they do economically good.
In Europe countries will go either russia or france side and they become sub countries Under france anyways a lot countries will go in Europe just Under france rule that's the reallity for most countries.