Author

Topic: Craig Wright? - signed Bitcoin message (Read 868 times)

member
Activity: 196
Merit: 67
August 25, 2022, 05:41:40 AM
#56
But here if they can post signatures, then they will be able to calculate Satoshi's block #0 address' private key 1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa and that means that the creator of the OP list has Satoshi's private key.
Creating a random address then signing a message from it doesn't mean anything at all.
Read the website that was used as the message of that signature  Huh

Code:
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
https://news.bitcoin.com/online-sleuths-believe-satoshi-nakamotos-bitcoin-stash-is-a-blockchain-treasure-hunt-meant-to-be-found/
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1s1wZLBTjFZJi8DrN1kogV9ZxRZxwvKQJ
HMoLqUcrjx22an/MrY4uy2z9Nowz4Ag9x3kzsbqz+FaNDSgkH+boXhWUyEkhq4bX8c24Ju+RHwWGltWKopRcg9k=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 10611
August 25, 2022, 12:08:47 AM
#55
But here if they can post signatures, then they will be able to calculate Satoshi's block #0 address' private key 1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa and that means that the creator of the OP list has Satoshi's private key.
Creating a random address then signing a message from it doesn't mean anything at all. People are doing it every single day (200k transactions per day are doing that). Maybe you should try reading that topic and understand the explanations given by others on how starer tried fooling those who don't understand how bitcoin works.
member
Activity: 196
Merit: 67
August 24, 2022, 01:38:45 PM
#54
Here in that thread the same:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.60813049
Code:
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
https://news.bitcoin.com/online-sleuths-believe-satoshi-nakamotos-bitcoin-stash-is-a-blockchain-treasure-hunt-meant-to-be-found/
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1s1wZLBTjFZJi8DrN1kogV9ZxRZxwvKQJ
HMoLqUcrjx22an/MrY4uy2z9Nowz4Ag9x3kzsbqz+FaNDSgkH+boXhWUyEkhq4bX8c24Ju+RHwWGltWKopRcg9k=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
But here if they can post signatures, then they will be able to calculate Satoshi's block #0 address' private key 1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa and that means that the creator of the OP list has Satoshi's private key.
member
Activity: 196
Merit: 67
August 23, 2022, 04:58:01 PM
#53
Yes, they could have the private keys of 1C & 1W addresses too and that would prove nothing more than they (who created the list) own some "ancient" bitcoin, you are right.

But would be cool whoever owns them as they are very old and from the Patoshi pattern.

2 early mined blocks (2009):

1st Bitcoin address in the list
1C7X4UWpSa4GteWHaRBm49fMCC2SNvJQF
Bitcoin block 6629 (03/07/2009)

2nd Bitcoin address in the list
1W7PDetXCcAbXnN6YQyWmAdz65WZecJs5
Bitcoin block 18111 (26/06/2009)
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 7340
Farewell, Leo
August 23, 2022, 04:39:47 PM
#52
But then ... we can be sure that whoever created that list, has the private keys of the first 2 addresses too = has all private keys
No. Simplified equation again: (Bold parts are private keys that are owned by them, or can be calculated by them)

1C7X4UWpSa4GteWHaRBm49fMCC2SNvJQF's public key + 1W7PDetXCcAbXnN6YQyWmAdz65WZecJs5's public key + 1r7VRs5hwFNaqWSMdAGZVoQ7uQhsesRqG's public key + 1i7JYfJiXf5ARAysJaRaECLLcnrx1Gcuw's public key + 1g7nBFZkyET8TPXBoxzBYA83XPJzwDCVT's public key + 1h7djfQ2MjojsRJQdvn6jNuJZZB9oFYLm's public key + 1t7MqxnqwmwooDjKnvV9AFkiktqUvvxkq's public key = 17mZRodKy5ufNqJVsyKg1bEt81AnRkkh9L's public key

==> 1C7X4UWpSa4GteWHaRBm49fMCC2SNvJQF's public key + 1W7PDetXCcAbXnN6YQyWmAdz65WZecJs5's public key + 1r7VRs5hwFNaqWSMdAGZVoQ7uQhsesRqG's public key + 1i7JYfJiXf5ARAysJaRaECLLcnrx1Gcuw's public key + 1g7nBFZkyET8TPXBoxzBYA83XPJzwDCVT's public key + 1h7djfQ2MjojsRJQdvn6jNuJZZB9oFYLm's public key = 17mZRodKy5ufNqJVsyKg1bEt81AnRkkh9L's public key - 1t7MqxnqwmwooDjKnvV9AFkiktqUvvxkq's public key

==> 1C7X4UWpSa4GteWHaRBm49fMCC2SNvJQF's public key + 1W7PDetXCcAbXnN6YQyWmAdz65WZecJs5's public key + 1r7VRs5hwFNaqWSMdAGZVoQ7uQhsesRqG's public key + 1i7JYfJiXf5ARAysJaRaECLLcnrx1Gcuw's public key + 1g7nBFZkyET8TPXBoxzBYA83XPJzwDCVT's public key + 1h7djfQ2MjojsRJQdvn6jNuJZZB9oFYLm's public key = 1LSpmoBBWydsTjanZK9Lk1j43PnSPhRRmL's public key*

They can only prove they own all the addresses listed in OP (or just those with the 50 BTC), if they sign a message from every address except 1. They might as well own 1r, 1i, 1g and 1h; if they don't provide a proof from either 1C or 1W, they don't own anything.

But, let's say they did. Yes. Let's take this hypothetical scenario wherein these fat, loser, no-life scumbags with no ethics did provide a signed message from these old 1C & 1W addresses, for the sake of Craig's majesty. So what? Does that provide a proof of anything other than they own some bitcoin?



*
Code:
(1cdced0646879da917d4d9eba9669329c8feb29425d5b192f722a00eebc0d216, a4969ce2061614087ba4a631618f322cbda3dddaf79205db95bba4d24939701e) - (876ca85b08d1adb23639410084ea4953cfda40c676f8e10be5dd08eefee50655, 27ff2580ee182aa46f1bde2fa3a3c80bde963e7fba24a1e60f4d81d1cf9a03ea) = (da2ab1d2001405f6777c44a2f42abdd454957db48a418acaf97ae7aa01666b59, c1c6badb50fae1358cc593581d645f1fe15f202dc9a1a6840d491e86fd43dccb)
member
Activity: 196
Merit: 67
August 23, 2022, 03:33:42 PM
#51
Assume they can calculate the private keys for the last 5 addresses in the list and post signatures, even then they couldn't calculate the first 2 addresses.

Also, what is this suppose to mean?
Code:
2nd chars of the addresses: CWright

1C7X4UWpSa4GteWHaRBm49fMCC2SNvJQF
1W7PDetXCcAbXnN6YQyWmAdz65WZecJs5
1r7VRs5hwFNaqWSMdAGZVoQ7uQhsesRqG
1i7JYfJiXf5ARAysJaRaECLLcnrx1Gcuw
1g7nBFZkyET8TPXBoxzBYA83XPJzwDCVT
1h7djfQ2MjojsRJQdvn6jNuJZZB9oFYLm
1t7MqxnqwmwooDjKnvV9AFkiktqUvvxkq
But then ... we can be sure that whoever created that list, has the private keys of the first 2 addresses too = has all private keys
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 7340
Farewell, Leo
member
Activity: 196
Merit: 67
August 23, 2022, 02:27:45 PM
#49
Signature:
Signed message:
CWright?
Bitcoin address:
17mZRodKy5ufNqJVsyKg1bEt81AnRkkh9L
Signature:
G/3yr8ouR8jhC+Bv5K+q/vGHuwX/hp9Kx7pQ6Coxt3a/Wmd2yif6e2nf8Srnx/dpR1rIFUpV8qf+rW6B+ktKjTk=

Code:
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
https://news.bitcoin.com/online-sleuths-believe-satoshi-nakamotos-bitcoin-stash-is-a-blockchain-treasure-hunt-meant-to-be-found/
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1t7MqxnqwmwooDjKnvV9AFkiktqUvvxkq
HPzH/JMXVLvl3deEABqpKvwapl5+Wfh06dZURyoQ7fSjIONloxPdgQs0gVyC4jhGLzKunsLbDA6LM7mQlNLUMDA=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----


Also, what is this suppose to mean?
Code:
2nd chars of the addresses: CWright

1C7X4UWpSa4GteWHaRBm49fMCC2SNvJQF
1W7PDetXCcAbXnN6YQyWmAdz65WZecJs5
1r7VRs5hwFNaqWSMdAGZVoQ7uQhsesRqG
1i7JYfJiXf5ARAysJaRaECLLcnrx1Gcuw
1g7nBFZkyET8TPXBoxzBYA83XPJzwDCVT
1h7djfQ2MjojsRJQdvn6jNuJZZB9oFYLm
1t7MqxnqwmwooDjKnvV9AFkiktqUvvxkq
This means the creator can't sign from any of the addresses.
Someone was able to  Huh

Now, we have 2 signatures  Huh
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
August 23, 2022, 07:49:49 AM
#48
Code:
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
https://news.bitcoin.com/online-sleuths-believe-satoshi-nakamotos-bitcoin-stash-is-a-blockchain-treasure-hunt-meant-to-be-found/
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1t7MqxnqwmwooDjKnvV9AFkiktqUvvxkq
HPzH/JMXVLvl3deEABqpKvwapl5+Wfh06dZURyoQ7fSjIONloxPdgQs0gVyC4jhGLzKunsLbDA6LM7mQlNLUMDA=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
full member
Activity: 233
Merit: 253
November 02, 2021, 04:02:05 PM
#47
Does it depend on different/same r?

I haven't confirmed their equation(s), but it seems it doesn't matter what the r values will be.

I found https://billatnapier.medium.com/ecdsa-revealing-the-private-key-from-four-signed-message-two-keys-and-shared-nonces-secp256k1-5758f1258b1d
and there we have two different r values and four signatures.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 7340
Farewell, Leo
November 02, 2021, 03:51:29 PM
#46
Does it depend on different/same r?

I haven't confirmed their equation(s), but it seems it doesn't matter what the r values will be.
full member
Activity: 233
Merit: 253
November 02, 2021, 03:46:23 PM
#45
...
These s, r and z are values that can be derived from an ECDSA signature. As I've said recently;
The signature is consisted of [r, s] and z is the hash of the message we want to sign. The s is created if you combine the message hash (z) and the private key (d).
...

Does it depend on different/same r?
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 7340
Farewell, Leo
November 02, 2021, 03:39:30 PM
#44
For whoever didn't understand interiawp's post, I'll try to simplify it.

These s, r and z are values that can be derived from an ECDSA signature. As I've said recently;
The signature is consisted of [r, s] and z is the hash of the message we want to sign. The s is created if you combine the message hash (z) and the private key (d).

They say that if we have this kind of connection between 3 public keys AND a signed message from EACH public key, it'd be entirely possible to calculate their private keys. Same applies for my example. If I we had a signed message from all 1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa, 1LZtnC7Ck37V9uLGGXFmaVkeaLyzFLvf6W and 1J2jrkkXrHp3To3VFDo6QVQKhWQt3L7nDG we could work out all's private keys.

The problem is that we only have one's private key.
full member
Activity: 233
Merit: 253
November 02, 2021, 03:38:42 PM
#43
no , in this way is enought perform Gauss - Jordan Reduction, lattice LLL and BKZ will not work

If in our case, there were signatures for all addresses, I would think that someone solved it the way you explain it and has the private keys. But we have no outputs. Now I understand your possibility argument with outputs.
full member
Activity: 233
Merit: 253
November 02, 2021, 03:27:05 PM
#42
it is difficult to explain, but I'll try
...
and if you know new K as integer you can recalulate back to the first k used in first pubkey

Is that what you mean
https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/1540.pdf
and
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ssTlSSIJQE

but in our case we don't have all signatures.
full member
Activity: 233
Merit: 253
November 02, 2021, 02:57:27 PM
#41
...  you'll have to describe this better.

... Please tell us how you can determine their private keys.

I wanted to ask the same question, you were faster Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 7340
Farewell, Leo
November 02, 2021, 02:56:02 PM
#40
if they are connected , and if and only iff there are in not less than one output on each address, you can recalculate all privatekeys belongs to them.
Assuming you mean that the public keys have this connection and we do know these public keys, then no. If you know that k1G + k2G = k3G and you know k3, it doesn't mean you also know k1 and k2. Only if you knew another k you could work out every private key.

yes, but I'm talking that there are possibilities take the first privatekey from the first addres, but only then if from rest address are minimal one output:)
This doesn't make a lot of sense and since we're discussing on a topic with proper formulation of every sentence, you'll have to describe this better.
legendary
Activity: 4466
Merit: 3391
November 02, 2021, 02:53:31 PM
#39
if they are connected , and if and only iff there are in not less than one output on each address, you can recalculate all privatekeys belongs to them.

yes, but I'm talking that there are possibilities take the first privatekey from the first addres, but only then if from rest address are minimal one output:)

What do the number of outputs have to do with it?

Don't leave us in suspense. Please tell us how you can determine their private keys.
legendary
Activity: 2030
Merit: 1189
November 02, 2021, 02:51:24 PM
#38
It's a trick, similar to the one in this thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoin-address-linked-to-bitcoin-genesis-address-5367558

I don't know how it is done, but the fact that the second characters of the addresses are "C", "W", "r", "i", "g", "h", "t" means nothing.
I agree. It is not legit and the fact that the addresses has 'C Wright' in it doesn't mean anything just as stated above.

If the guy was really the father of Bitcoin, trust me there wouldn't be the need for years and years to prove so but somehow he still has no definite proof of this. The guy is full of himself, he's a falsifier.
full member
Activity: 233
Merit: 253
November 02, 2021, 02:43:23 PM
#37
1C7X4UWpSa4GteWHaRBm49fMCC2SNvJQF
1W7PDetXCcAbXnN6YQyWmAdz65WZecJs5
1r7VRs5hwFNaqWSMdAGZVoQ7uQhsesRqG
1i7JYfJiXf5ARAysJaRaECLLcnrx1Gcuw
1g7nBFZkyET8TPXBoxzBYA83XPJzwDCVT
1h7djfQ2MjojsRJQdvn6jNuJZZB9oFYLm
1t7MqxnqwmwooDjKnvV9AFkiktqUvvxkq

if they are connected , and if and only iff there are in not less than one output on each address, you can recalculate all privatekeys belongs to them.

They are connected:
The public key sum (ECC calculation) of these addresses leads to the address 17mZRodKy5ufNqJVsyKg1bEt81AnRkkh9L.
And the creator pinned a valid signature to this address.
But pooya87 showed (see my previous post), that it is possible without knowing the private keys of that list.
full member
Activity: 233
Merit: 253
November 02, 2021, 02:01:47 PM
#36
Can you sign a message with that public key?

In the OP example there is a valid signature. That means someone has (or had) the private key for the public key.

You cannot sign messages unless you have the private key (which you do not have in your example).


In the OP example there is a valid signature, as I said. That meant, that the creator has the private key. And we wondered how that is possible.

pooya87 solved it:

Rather simple.
You start in reverse meaning instead of adding random public keys to the starting pubkey, you find the final key and then start working your way backwards by subtracting the pub key (of the private key you already have) from the starting public key (which you don't have the private key of).

...

I will use 3 keys in total to keep the computational cost to minimum since I don't want to waste my time but the idea is the same

...

1. C (from origninal pubkey posted above).
2. W (what we want to get in the mid pubkey). Call this pub2
3. Random letter that doesn't matter.


Code:
LOOP:
  Compute pub2 = pubX - pub1
  Compute address of pub2 and check if it starts with W
    return if true
    change privX to privX+1
END;


In short:

The creator has only the private key for the signature address 17mZRodKy5ufNqJVsyKg1bEt81AnRkkh9L.
All other Bitcoin addresses are calculated with public keys and the creator doesn't have the private keys.
legendary
Activity: 3542
Merit: 1965
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
November 02, 2021, 01:28:37 PM
#35
I think the proof for me is not that he can sign an early address, but that he is trying so hard to be Satoshi Nakamoto.  Wink  Now, we all know Satoshi Nakamoto was clever enough to leave, after Gavin had a meeting with the 3l3tter agency... and we never heard from him again. Why would he suddenly want to reveal his true identity, if the same people will go after him again?

CW is a wannabe and his motives are as clear as glass.... "fame & fortune" ... and this is absolutely the opposite of what Satoshi wanted. (He stayed anonymous and he has not touched a single coins of the almost 1 Million coins he supposedly owns.  Wink
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 6660
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
November 02, 2021, 01:16:56 PM
#34
Can you sign a message with that public key?

In the OP example there is a valid signature. That means someone has (or had) the private key for the public key.

You cannot sign messages unless you have the private key (which you do not have in your example).

Makes sense.  Some of the scammers aren't ready for the charade to end.  They can't come to terms with the fact that they aren't fooling anyone.

I mean, just look at Ayre. I'm semi-regularly bashing him on twitter for wasting his time trolling bitcoin core devs when he's got a billion dollars to play golf, go to galas, get drunk!
legendary
Activity: 3948
Merit: 3191
Leave no FUD unchallenged
November 02, 2021, 11:56:57 AM
#33
Wonders will never cease.
After they lose the battle of hyping their coin which was considered to be officially dead cause people show no interest in it, the next thing is to also fake signed Bitcoin message?
 It's funny how Craig Wright and his group of bandits (that what I presume them to be) always behave foolishly not knowing they have already lost this battle long ago

Makes sense.  Some of the scammers aren't ready for the charade to end.  They can't come to terms with the fact that they aren't fooling anyone.



Please forgive us if you can

They're only sorry that they failed.  Not sorry at all that they were a bunch of lying scum.  Why would anyone forgive that?
hero member
Activity: 2660
Merit: 651
Want top-notch marketing for your project, Hire me
November 02, 2021, 11:02:47 AM
#32
Wonders will never cease.
After they lose the battle of hyping their coin which was considered to be officially dead cause people show no interest in it, the next thing is to also fake signed Bitcoin message?
 It's funny how Craig Wright and his group of bandits (that what I presume them to be) always behave foolishly not knowing they have already lost this battle long ago
legendary
Activity: 3948
Merit: 3191
Leave no FUD unchallenged
November 01, 2021, 08:22:32 PM
#31
Cheap parlour tricks from desperate con-men.  Truly pathetic.  Since it's pastebin, can we know for sure that this is Wright?  Or perhaps just one of their demented supporters thinking they were being clever, but effectively further undermining their own figurehead like an idiot.
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
November 01, 2021, 06:27:25 PM
#30
Just sent 10 USD each to the creator's addresses (except the first two Satoshi's addresses):

1C7X4UWpSa4GteWHaRBm49fMCC2SNvJQF
1W7PDetXCcAbXnN6YQyWmAdz65WZecJs5
1r7VRs5hwFNaqWSMdAGZVoQ7uQhsesRqG
1i7JYfJiXf5ARAysJaRaECLLcnrx1Gcuw
1g7nBFZkyET8TPXBoxzBYA83XPJzwDCVT
1h7djfQ2MjojsRJQdvn6jNuJZZB9oFYLm
1t7MqxnqwmwooDjKnvV9AFkiktqUvvxkq

To the creator:
Post a signature for 1r7VRs5hwFNaqWSMdAGZVoQ7uQhsesRqG

Why a signature? Take the coins, they're yours.


Let me close that "creative burn address generation" thread post with Satoshi's post:
Lost coins only make everyone else's coins worth slightly more.  Think of it as a donation to everyone.
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
October 31, 2021, 08:18:21 AM
#29
To the creator:
To whom your speak to? Aren't you the one who brought this or just read it somewhere?.

source: https://pastebin.com/mNcAPrRv
Posted the link in the first post.


2 early mined blocks (2009):

1st Bitcoin address in the list
1C7X4UWpSa4GteWHaRBm49fMCC2SNvJQF
Bitcoin block 6629 (03/07/2009)

2nd Bitcoin address in the list
1W7PDetXCcAbXnN6YQyWmAdz65WZecJs5
Bitcoin block 18111 (26/06/2009)

This list https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.512.7.pdf contains these two addresses


I am interested in the early days of Bitcoin and am finding such things sometimes.
sr. member
Activity: 966
Merit: 311
October 31, 2021, 07:21:07 AM
#28
Already so much has been said about signing of message. We all know that Craig Wright is Faketoshi, he has done such things many times in the past just to gain attention. We shouldn't give him so much attention since this is what he wants.

Now, if Craig Wright is the rightful owner of that wallet where a great value of Bitcoin can be found, the best thing to do is to use the private keys and move that Bitcoin thereon to another wallet and maybe even sell some millions to a centralized exchange like Binance and then have everything documented via video.

Cant agree more, that's the simple thing he can do to prove that he is the owner of wallet under the custody of Satoshi.
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 5637
Blackjack.fun-Free Raffle-Join&Win $50🎲
October 31, 2021, 06:59:10 AM
#27
and once again we have to talk about faketoshi, doesn't this guy rest? whenever the price goes up a lot, this guy comes up with something

I have written many times that Faketoshi will calm down only when he ends his miserable life - and until then he will do what he has been doing so far, spread lies and deceptions. Unfortunately, there are still a lot of people who believe that he really is Satoshi, and even some of the closest associates of the real Satoshi Nakamoto like the famous Gavin Andresen who has been helping Faketoshi in his crazy intentions for years.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 7340
Farewell, Leo
October 31, 2021, 02:36:23 AM
#26
At the end of the day, you should never trust a person who:

1. Uses these cunning methods of proving his identity other than a straight-forward way.
2. Denies to provide a valid signature from Satoshi's address, but rather convinces others to state that he did sign a message.
3. Changes his blog's post to show that he was working on bitcoin in 2007-08, but web.archive.org says otherwise.
4. Says he is Satoshi.

I mean seriously, don't ever trust a person who says he's Satoshi. This person is long gone and this project is the only thing left by them.
full member
Activity: 233
Merit: 253
October 30, 2021, 08:26:57 PM
#25
If I substract this one with Satoshi's public key I'll get:
Code:
x: bd0b9e81abc8ed978bc0873b9b5d44e00e889983c60bb722354793df732cb849
y: 1ddce6233aea09569c65b37c2cf6e1dc6d8fb721de29c4abc1053c94c2801b28
(1LZtnC7Ck37V9uLGGXFmaVkeaLyzFLvf6W)

Thank you, I've calculated it with other examples and it works.

But that means, that we still don't have the private key for (1LZtnC7Ck37V9uLGGXFmaVkeaLyzFLvf6W) what we publish in the list. So we can say, that if you can sign with (1LZtnC7Ck37V9uLGGXFmaVkeaLyzFLvf6W) then you have the private key of Satoshi's key.

This example I could calculate too:
"sum": we have private key -> signed message
"Satoshi's key": we don't have private key
"subtracted key": we don't have private key; we calculated that key with the public keys of "Satoshi's key" and "sum"


but...


It's a trick, similar to the one in this thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoin-address-linked-to-bitcoin-genesis-address-5367558
I don't know how it is done, but the fact that the second characters of the addresses are "C", "W", "r", "i", "g", "h", "t" means nothing.
Rather simple.
You start in reverse meaning instead of adding random public keys to the starting pubkey, you find the final key and then start working your way backwards by subtracting the pub key (of the private key you already have) from the starting public key (which you don't have the private key of).

Oh duh. That is pretty simple.

You only sign with the summed private key, so that is the only one you actually need to know.

The rest of the addresses are done by finding any public keys that add up to the summed public key (after subtracting the satoshi keys) and have the appropriate second letters in the address.


here I have a question: From which addresses do we have the private keys if we calculate it that way?

In the example we have "C", "W", "r", "i", "g", "h", "t" and the "sum".

"sum": we have private key -> signed message
"C": we don't have private key
"W": we don't have private key
"r": we don't have private key
"i": we don't have private key
"g": we don't have private key
"h": we don't have private key
"t": we don't have private key

Who can answer? [solved]

[edited]
pooya87 had answered
I will use 3 keys in total to keep the computational cost to minimum since I don't want to waste my time but the idea is the same, you keep going backwards (t > h > g > i > r > W > C)
Code:
LOOP:
  Compute pub2 = pubX - pub1
  Compute address of pub2 and check if it starts with W
    return if true
    change privX to privX+1
END;
We calculate the public keys for "t", "h", "g", "i"... but "sum" we can calculate with the private key and modify it, so we can sign the message.

Amazing pooya87!
legendary
Activity: 4466
Merit: 3391
October 30, 2021, 08:01:33 PM
#24
It's a trick, similar to the one in this thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoin-address-linked-to-bitcoin-genesis-address-5367558
I don't know how it is done, but the fact that the second characters of the addresses are "C", "W", "r", "i", "g", "h", "t" means nothing.
Rather simple.
You start in reverse meaning instead of adding random public keys to the starting pubkey, you find the final key and then start working your way backwards by subtracting the pub key (of the private key you already have) from the starting public key (which you don't have the private key of).

Oh duh. That is pretty simple.

You only sign with the summed private key, so that is the only one you actually need to know.

The rest of the addresses are done by finding any public keys that add up to the summed public key (after subtracting the satoshi keys) and have the appropriate second letters in the address.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1048
October 30, 2021, 06:06:23 PM
#23
should we feel amazed and say wow? i think everyone agree that the real bitcoin founder or whoever its called satoshi nakamoto or something are the one who never want to show off and remain invisibly anonymous. even if the real satoshi show in public with fully credential we might ignore it ... as it would break the essential of bitcoin philosophy , anonymity .

lets moving on from all of these craight wright drama , he loved to get an attention.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 18748
October 30, 2021, 04:51:20 PM
#22
Maybe for security reasons. Let's say he wants to communicate with us and wants to sign the messages. For each signature he would need the private key kSat. With the above example he could prove it only once and then use the private key kabs for all signatures. If hacked, he could create a new kabsnew.
Or, far more simply, he could sign a message from 1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa which says "I'm Satoshi, and here is my new PGP key", and then sign all future communication with said PGP key. No need whatsoever to mess around with adding and subtracting public keys, which is exactly the kind of nonsense known fraud CSW would do to try to distract from the fact that he cannot sign a message using the genesis address.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1127
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
October 30, 2021, 04:34:09 PM
#21
and once again we have to talk about faketoshi, doesn't this guy rest? whenever the price goes up a lot, this guy comes up with something

C Wright - signed message - Bitcoin

every year I hear the same thing coming from faketoshi. because he just doesn't spend the bitcoins that everyone will believe him, the price is now too high, he can buy a lot with those bitcoins  Grin
full member
Activity: 233
Merit: 253
October 30, 2021, 04:11:53 PM
#20
That means the creator can't sign with the 'r' key, similar to the 1LZtnC7Ck37V9uLGGXFmaVkeaLyzFLvf6W case.
This means the creator can't sign from any of the addresses. Only from the one whose public key is equal with the sum of the addresses' public keys.

If the creator is Satoshi than he can sign with 2 keys. One key is the 'relative' key and the other one the 'absolute' key.

Let me explain it with 1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa (Satoshi's receiving address for the coinbase transaction of the genesis block).
We assume that the private key for that address is kSat=10000. Satoshi creates a 'relative' key with krel=100, so the 'absolute' key would have the private key kabs=10100. He publishes the 2 public keys ('relative' and 'absolute') with signatures and we can check that they are valid and that he is the owner of 1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa.

In our case (OP) we only have the 'relative' key signature. The second one ('absolute' key signature) is missing.

The good way is to sign a message from 1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa
why not just give you a signed message from the - 1C7X4UWpSa4GteWHaRBm49fMCC2SNvJQF - which supposedly a Satoshi's address?

Maybe for security reasons. Let's say he wants to communicate with us and wants to sign the messages. For each signature he would need the private key kSat. With the above example he could prove it only once and then use the private key kabs for all signatures. If hacked, he could create a new kabsnew.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 18748
October 30, 2021, 02:24:19 PM
#19
Oh wow, I missed this. Was this sent from one of the BTC addresses allegedly owned by Satoshi, or by some other address that CW said was his?
The known identity thief CSW submitted a list of addresses to court of coins and addresses he claimed were his but he could not currently access. Then the true owner of a bunch of those addresses signed this message calling him a lying piece of shit.

Just think this reasonably; if a malicious guy wanted to prove Craig Wright is Satoshi, why not just give you a signed message from the - 1C7X4UWpSa4GteWHaRBm49fMCC2SNvJQF - which supposedly a Satoshi's address?
I'm not exactly a big fan of Ethereum, but Vitalik said this once about the known liar CSW:
Quote
In general, signal theory says if you have a good way of proving something and a noisy way of proving something and you choose the noisy way chances are it's because you couldn't do the good way in the first place.

The good way is to sign a message from 1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa, the receiving address for the coinbase transaction of the genesis block. The noisy way is whatever this absolute nonsense is, along with every other fake signature or fake proof the known fraud CSW has provided in the past.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 7340
Farewell, Leo
October 30, 2021, 12:08:09 PM
#18
To the creator:
To whom your speak to? Aren't you the one who brought this or just read it somewhere?

That means the creator can't sign with the 'r' key, similar to the 1LZtnC7Ck37V9uLGGXFmaVkeaLyzFLvf6W case.
This means the creator can't sign from any of the addresses. Only from the one whose public key is equal with the sum of the addresses' public keys. Just think this reasonably; if a malicious guy wanted to prove Craig Wright is Satoshi, why not just give you a signed message from the - 1C7X4UWpSa4GteWHaRBm49fMCC2SNvJQF - which supposedly a Satoshi's address?

It'll lure more victims to believe that without writing some bullshit about the second letter of seven addresses.
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
October 30, 2021, 11:27:52 AM
#17
So we can say, that if you can sign with (1LZtnC7Ck37V9uLGGXFmaVkeaLyzFLvf6W) then you have the private key of Satoshi's key.
Yeah. If you knew the private key of - 1LZtnC7Ck37V9uLGGXFmaVkeaLyzFLvf6W - you'd be one step far from calculating this sought after Satoshi's address. It's simple elliptic curve maths.

If k1G + k2G = k3G then (k1 + k2)G = k3G  →   k1 + k2 = k3.

Beautiful, isn't it?
... the idea is the same, you keep going backwards (t > h > g > i > r > W > C)...

That means the creator can't sign with the 'r' key, similar to the 1LZtnC7Ck37V9uLGGXFmaVkeaLyzFLvf6W case.

The creator starts with the signature address
17mZRodKy5ufNqJVsyKg1bEt81AnRkkh9L

then calculates the pubkeys for  (t > h > g > i > r > W > C)
but for 'r' =
1r7VRs5hwFNaqWSMdAGZVoQ7uQhsesRqG
the creator doesn't have the private key but can show the public key and the address.

To prove the ownership of satoshi"s private key we would need 2 signatures:
1. for 17mZRodKy5ufNqJVsyKg1bEt81AnRkkh9L (it is posted)
2. for 1r7VRs5hwFNaqWSMdAGZVoQ7uQhsesRqG (not posted)

To the creator:
Post a signature for 1r7VRs5hwFNaqWSMdAGZVoQ7uQhsesRqG


jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 5
October 30, 2021, 10:25:27 AM
#16
That is true, but we have already proved that Faketoshi is not capable of signing any of the addresses he claims to be his - but on the other hand someone else can do it - what more proof does anyone need?

Oh wow, I missed this. Was this sent from one of the BTC addresses allegedly owned by Satoshi, or by some other address that CW said was his?
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 5637
Blackjack.fun-Free Raffle-Join&Win $50🎲
October 30, 2021, 10:19:34 AM
#15
But with all the math being discussed here nobody has come out and said it in this post Craig Wright is NOT Satoshi

I think we shattered that misconception a long time ago, so obviously, no one on the forum sees the need to emphasize this further - he is a pathological liar who uses all legal loopholes to try to prove what will never work.

With enough time you can come up with a lot of bizarre combinations to give some oddball proof that has no real meaning about addresses & keys.

That is true, but we have already proved that Faketoshi is not capable of signing any of the addresses he claims to be his - but on the other hand someone else can do it - what more proof does anyone need?

Code:
"Craig Steven Wright is a liar and a fraud. He doesn't have the keys used to sign this message.

The Lightning Network is a significant achievement. However, we need to continue work on improving on-chain capacity.

Unfortunately, the solution is not to just change a constant in the code or to allow powerful participants to force out others.

We are all Satoshi"



1FbPLPR1XoufBQRPGd9JBLPbKLaGjbax5m G3SsgKMKAOiOaMzKSGqpKo5MFpt0biP9MbO5UkSl7VxRKcv6Uz+3mHsuEJn58lZlRksvazOKAtuMUMolg/hE9WI=
19PYG68GkQ9nY99QeUSyUFy6vWxSyPmXA8 HFjd/SzCNDyXRY/skSjEKusK/adVtBf0ldT1ayvPb+WsLa5Qr0A4seEXjOmtg9K/wcJnv/E3F5TezZNB/ULoZI8=
12cFuwo1i3FMhkmJoCN8D4SjeCeRsXf96q GySQXGlZ+Meq3braDzg3lq7GStteOg+0A9Q5gGKzCcOmET5vnULXo0vsb6anu1wLSL1BnaD0p71U9i+c41Fq48w=
1NWRrbPwHhpp28eQeman5YRV84D2aYe1Yw HDE35UqJUUa8tkjt3NThu+SwF8arV27Lwg6idBTN7lm+epmjdQlvnWvCqUHrOBPCPQ50aK5VhLnUUFIEDE4KXlo=
1MN82eH1Eu3hznewHFkfsAajknhj78Uup5 HAZ+ot0bWlK4t40kTqC9H0tCjVeCa3WCR0xyYNMX94uqAAXTOHITT8X0QzQI4UFlHCzPhfcxsgMgniiTY0FkUHc=
1DYHUEjrVE5gyKAn7P13wuRhs6x9EeijBX G08ZpNNnXNawyvIEpa79QpP4+MjZhBd1+0/nAGCcI5X2DgtqfJDyYVpkVg9VXXy9rG7B/NK8TmdO4ep62QLkvlw=
1KnT26DTvstGKW7P6BxMBEz8QbKa1iix9C HF4BP/4DlRRJ38MlS0zcI9MDNWAfDZo3apmD+wzPPMfdAfuzt0ae0OOrUNW6ye+6mPYSwmnOaUfhR2EqyivCpX4=
1K3Qs6bx1wnxCjLcb6jxfjk5kksSJh1WyK HALVyRQXVIEYRc7lnOTa43ahzcqRUM95Tc1WaXmhR/hCWASbOWa5a3S7gjE9QClW7iqPObTHnzl9hfThd2JmlL8=
1EAGWgwskQB6o3f1GGsbsWShXPr77QiULE GwheMMHzKA7dyNsXavj30y2CYVfgWWnCqYqMLq68jROKdOI2g8Zc0ySKirtxKUedFzyeHJlrmjclLdaaD4QBiuU=
1NVou7bbmdsdVLEphqZadmX2gbR3QCDPAz HAKdwn9TvEpS0Km2lzROVk7z9Kpu+nxcOSYGI0B5197RIAF+Lszul4fn6sdrqL86L31t7GGmWxlHTGGBSGwGi6s=
1LBUqhwVyUZ8QZw8UCEbgFQjDFjikL1CSB HFWLeeyWNSYSpZh/opcT5A0YJ1txEtqMrhK44JnyNqy6ZT/xjHBB4wcs7FxNVcqYh5oRYwJnxspJaSHhiiiwv90=
1MUzEx65ycYArLPPhxecjKBj4pzMmmjfsu HGRuRXr+qnleuYfHnETab1tBEBhu33WRUqD670RhIwK2G5swvENDeIZ77sz2PkNCYCH+KcbEZQds+XZLkk4Rp5o=
15RJkhWxG3PP5AzfR1AHVWovZxFt3nFysN GwAewIecx9Hga24RwasCbhkNFqxDX/tswwmIkYzmNFKCCnz/g7BeHBXKQ3Fhhv49VlH0rL16P5CaFQjrUWsO4Wg=
1HTUif11qDAwse9fAXwcdM6o4QPx1hqrio GzmTb2eEUh3P3ePbliRkiRz0uSy5m0To0b4WxdWIfox0IxhJbr/qrgpnTl5LhTrzwZ8bBmeA/xOW+k0Mp4BPlEQ=
1EuHqvmmDA6dFRmDyu4rzk8b7VkAmEn7Vq Gx9YsNS1xOoVxnRVt0oDn908n003eUkuIhT2YqgnBFcbWcXYRCKxW3l3C9RvlNL2Su+7vVEeYMuNEam38C3TdvQ=
1FTtHk9sc29yJXWcxKJdKz8C6YHyAQMgwU G2wVjSHOSrbAMgeRA+QLgSVAN5Dwmobuy3GqCu7UrFdwWSvhv0f2hM0kCy57M3woue2T5wEkIKr/vb0/AsVP/XA=
1NVTcGUYSP6s4zH95ex86ctATzv8peV5mR G3U3R3twYs+p8MYMO7VpTZkUORp4lANO7MTeyeRCGDwQQ6tp+3BFsmvZWlAlUDXNNswhfAC6Y3LrZDAV8PfoH+s=
1BzknixNDGfyesGcTbFuyEiD2nyCgEY6rS HBPPuUg6JtzZ6XFERjdH1n7PqNbW21WPMhNc1TPe3EYCX/jY+eKrCwGV4B5MEXC8lH2As4q+QfLqqoo5Gc3CiEc=
1LBmJDqhNboEbyJveb8jB5TNKW5GW7qboN G3ZFQGi8bxCSo5J1lI+ADqXnTRBqMfWFDnFoQ8r1AxK9CXxQudK0+guVtxmJ0IIeOaHkbPhlg0n93DWNxxHiFgE=
1GgLxr81StVBpRQPNQKnSF25kyEcpHCnz5 HGE9wCVVY7Nq0x4Prcn2mrX5EjCxwxEz52QYzFgCfd5HWkBKLzOQhHnUy9GeOGOFfRSo2m66h4h4SPxTc/ATTXU=
1CpkvbaAhn81Vc4vbx1yr9jGuETvetutBj HD5PjDblrRPV3F/Y2ytk+TFzhYkBjX6DHapxpvh5BCtvUDs+nh99KnUx4OOOeOWLBRwhJYOeVEGHW0vN+xRBTCA=
14CmMfkbvkfzM1cU68wZMVBwJuSE3iN7Ns HFk8XjSiW/hgTipH+NhOnxWKBVVFEfn7D0nEO9SGiGHEesT8Co0EPXlJG3rmk2mhFqdwLcWMwEnN9F/J4Ilr070=
12KFCJLu9D7PzbZgBLuNMj2MpfgzdDJ7kR HCMmCr3x8fHBBycHp+Y8j/jC0Uw9iLWKEVfBZVJSrUqAZZyO9AIiIcb+5MFi9wGPV5Pq3oJhLgvAoj8R1npry1w=
1HRhFWoCspCQWfnotkHPc7Joi4XHjRBi8Z G3AKmnUMj+f10ohpIMyeOPMozT5D76IyXxniNyrE99vxMmeuSyf0fjhr/cvuOKkRDtEe+W1d1ewDRzZu4WpXpEw=
1NdmEC5HxfLSH6Z5xoxQUC8h3sfFoTSSRD HAG7DNJCxIBulW1M8nvDz3pL3ai9YtRS0rxmPMJP2gZoUKF+1bj/PbUG7RAwmfbXPt79heEYFT541HbaXw9ltbM=
1LXUhX4tXfWGekjucDASYWSsPzYLhYM282 GyBAds1VFj3pyvXU9tnwA58qM84J7VbEWr6MozxbDHZpKKEtkgDH6pJvN14iuSF8fHULWDUO13Es+ZtFpe+JnOc=
1LK8dnWdxZWxLcdTCpqHRebGwwVcMAPo6X G19eMW8TBD3ydxcMEgQq2cyW583Ap+envXwhSr91QpvUYc6GZ3s33+UNVpfwzmmHk/sGgrR0111OkyuOTifqH+A=
14RdV6JPBrTVeV5MfFqhGgfsZhMhCFotoQ G1Hc8RbnPmKHC5NImRBOCSiKnxhrrf/bItYXlksal4i8ZVr4/ddZyalTsjWiQuVF979uvfuai85lKjYtXAeQW20=
1MNaNPHzju2KWAoPshfDBxknSSC5dWkfy G2TzOBfKWIqjxFVLg0aLNr8xWmiqaiX7fi6VyQ4nVuZwSEdLDfMv7rqS5r1h/jWJxw0nPkwrOqCm7sd3AK0d0g4=
1Kynn7w9MF8hUvqdaHRKY4KLWtwnGdH2Uo HC0iBvFELRkL5F44iHnEuhimwjVhODxqfXnp/3ol2fzIb5bTuybCej4iou/PWZI1YrvMzVtP3eINQlVocahf+r8=
17u34144cabkgraRhwLuzKUANYzf7UB5Jq G29Sny2O2kb0HvuO1BxtjRhwKH/zTv4MOIcy5bLC20GOE9tXfLWrgjibEaFwFryxo4PVXlVsBX/Q3C6j6VU9/Jw=
1HtMsYAjGKqnehgCXpTz8UkAw44ZLGdAJf GzMrJK3FGglC+/13xUECSTwP6yLkjYsYrq3wRmUYt0IMfjbdHAmBehcXrWOq3+1cwFfgGaqH3QagO4Jr4k82B3s=
1MwWRaka2dQySercEFgZDenBvWpHw3kvCz GwpG+CF8Tq/wBoamXpqri4fIuf0F2SmMcywnkEU8w+jrIndO/3EHSu4Q+S2lgvx4rsb0yGrImS8aYb8Ow4HP45k=
1C6BG4rqDdnaC3t3mzapNu46j9yVv1x4Eo G2vbVNEcAVE3SAD7L3o16o9BiPbK26Ui4OaJQB4ObMJYIfRZyc+imKNFjbWv38ijr3EVGpz2+j8Nor39zaCyppI=
1Ba8UQfeUVjSRw8uHNSJ9wZqAZCSqweP19 G1Q1bOxDzEm1FmlOKa9BPdULQtIMTWXfnjsI6G0hdAWzGTOpttXF87dRCqfWucjfRhX2lKa/7zhp16gCouFIYYU=
17gzLQ924bNxXBHjgJVBaJEQAKVYTqzaR2 G2kPIBc+B9zIRiIns8yrO/ZISDQaO/HWnF2MhW2tMX/4Ewss0VAPZFwQYuS9z4xkh63FWDTFXXqhVlkAwp3pXPU=
13jEwgtkahPdHQkPTtbHwFm6mvC4Vq71Tj HDJXeN/WZY1JgIJTxgUgyA0T0S5l/md39PVMQ041QyIOYf6KrDpisTgH3y00dwyW+ZkKZ5b+j2l1Cmzsa6VnEmE=
1X5NfjvcBzdidakWzw37YQPXkBqXr4e6X HFpb4dJ2NgnMm1Fa8ruWTn7bAu+N2WGYrO0l1cOXHNzpKyBwKeCt1wrr9g4x+Fqr3YlRDxppd6LZztZVDOungXk=
12CTHhyJtr49LgoUShbWgebLBviLAFj6nj G2uKsafGyQ2CJXUFng2UO0FRNDiqRQECprRrQizEDKSBLMd1gkYYRgGso3BuJu1X4XEFaiyd3w0MDd072p+wfuc=
1M2iLUvkkm12zE1EjARx46XXA1EZzsfxos HEjA9638ejTC3sTlKJsyNReyWj8MFPK/0RkiwkS/8f5IYhyecaubXSm9NQuMSmPisch1wTt+pNhohA9vsenAVEc=
16TqRUQtrBRv9jnpuyVFEH43SRKZhqrCQ7 HHO0qeL68W3s0bZOhak/y45ZFQaF6A+dj7qzfJfK54UnfG1cBz2AkkIg3VENJyfaA75CfqyLPbQMRSSUZHbOH5I=
1BPo3xfuLWD5xZRVU61o9bEbW2XXyWLduY HFHdkW89u7fEFFxQ8DwoyzZ+bwJOEnM7kHGKTjt1TIkLC8EC2cGKUW86kXmPouw8tPr7ezuc7qGhlJWvVp/MT/w=
17fH8bs2eBSxYC4fLQgVPWXw2cV5bNrpon Gzpt/gIIDG8VgJooa4fcNWMAtgGafpOj/dfV2MiZVKsNDWLLNisTOenYu+c0kHLgEVZEr32oEZjkPczCvBTjPEo=
1DkxqjACGihnBHhiWGuJUMVRco6LHFpovT HHGpTe2EUGLJMblEK2s+BmsGrKXxjAcD5Z/gXrCXOo4aMeokz7Dau+LIqGaTw2KZYFUfqzUYoeCx++ZycaX9wb0=
1AfE9BbPDPGx8egt5qRBo5vLDiy4RrLNeV G21/DkWw97yrenst9GSrzufOXA4HnU/Y/RrX18yhQoB+ZGu7KECTo8xfYloRBvaIy9sQCuckyTKox5Sly0gquPY=
1NqxEQi9pgmoCzi5vh43ByT9EgAbQqcW2o HDOpFkigKPt89N7Tqx+iRVRAEtw41mRyQqV9xwt5bC2CFdCpxQYBM5lVIfioyH6fhiQ4Zvj6dh9WadkgHmQt/m0=
1DpuecprK8vV6A4FtHU6VLqkUs4D2P59PU GzZIwDnUGfdmV40o8PFxVR32vqoBdxg4gNA3LYPXAZ5yCu28uqA6HUFSTTPKZhj4T7KUu+HpEUUJgCRyVGvxmHE=
14ZiwXFoDVKoxVyKjeZjdtSHsYnJxSRFSH HAOvCgi/gg/EYsUQ/VlwmIceGMpS8Q4vEaVTKuQWfXZrBK7ZNhoPHTtmVoXBJvdD+d3bu0yawIO1t1eLUuM4Lng=
1PwaHB72F5nb7hurX8jmC93MUDtMqHgdCY HBuUjHTftGJ4Uo1FyI2Hr9wJeUVRdSfVN0P+qkZHeN8fA6bbqynmqKqnS1sGfQXBlXuaCUQj3WjAZxinA+6bvNg=
1LWFZazDBRt6bGDb8ukkCo4H9o297S8pma GyD+PWQhv+FgT7CMzqvGL0YgpyvkEzOoMJUq3L68FcvWTOYHhjayIK0m4YlcZx1T+Z6NbDat8u3bjddQavgk++A=
15zQPNWD3uAa812THBgQP4rVSiYCBRpZ3N GwuB2X0yvDZyRKByFx+WCKxOWGwowdARIa3DvRh4/+hEH6ZKArxTaeSjGLgWfveeM4kEcEDxgUfcIsNF+/GEb3g=
1KkajS3KDciJbfKk2Vg2SjUE6eKdiMktAa G11n06GPTfu496tqY80f7zZl7R8jc/3XG9kt66r35xi6fnZBCFpft3rlJpUyyMJX55CB/yPeG8tFbouAycSiX5c=
1FxyVmPEsnqnVS8baCjyuTDsdFHB7reTam G0kmATyO3OiPrS5PB91ppUkyMQH3IFVdTdfhO+kuvVRpXRZUJJUB6kleP+WGhybFZhADGKJLhdXA5ci/yBqYKl0=
1HenciVLZmE9ugshcrW3GtZttP1bqr8W3s G1LB4aWZ4Gop6pM2z8HKg6IL4JbdudTEpBTHTxoF4j1QDmWLwj7ZztY+OBIOMMfYd9jxKDscS4kyuqQtLjcvIdo=
12jaQdf2C29Cobh3XZHj4WoPk8o91MK4jy HAeKKuTPOMLValY0uFRrl3kcDucYdCqs6vW6zogMwTOgIu6A/EpY2YsTelcGE4jwSOsKDeoA/9+qds7vq+VYghE=
1MhpaS75Xxxyqvcv3CLBwz2L76gDDpysJm GyL0dD7HbKAyszpt6Rq88WNzfrvpNLSFSnwsguF1wKLBB0JvEWgZGfnwgK1zAIwxHv20wRPGA3WoJmRgmIe7Ly0=
1KF7rv8hTcC88MHeYzKwBuACoecWaQJ91m G2lWwfRfUoENZcSRUSYYWCGQQKgn71FGnbzQpHe5/xngEU/c9WkDctbygqm/g3MdrlU2/N9DHwVPy126BZviioE=
1Ey9QHtKgcY6aLDLW2xBoMxPJbaXxZcyAK HHFeDZvHHHfPPEYRJ8mvIR3CGS68Vqoi09Lri6S5kbewM+0SXet4Q0nUKO4v3Vbs0hfLuWbjfg2xvF9TiukTVF8=
16BBCJoyBBuyk2bKM64EGCADgiacdpBsKP HDd0M73oo/hsoj0v9tZkq9b0Kv08iOIJaTv5AWxE3n6/TMT9zM+Th5v5Zny7CM/h5IUE5jqEU1Rn9AjJqejRasY=
1VketozRRbdwxygHPRh4BL4jQgnH3xPWt G3xl2R1pw9jH6yywbzClGc+r4SGox6Rx2I6BKWHi/u+hZifBPmUlR0KHoaWKSdSaYKRi9DWes/dv9qJBnepxKOM=
18DfVFHfCAVFBhbmBLYxsE3HZqpaSu1Wvw HHgcWuomf7hkZU+kWfS+7WL43nk+ihTUGFZUSa/tSBw7M3zOWNg+BG410BjiTNHQNGJaAonXySaIiCfPBVJ21J4=
1F39FW9NU8tuSCVhxVstd7piVSNw4YVGxY Gwan8+QOUsvmuCFrqMdSAWhAj2QYg5CO13yLOi4QWL4nMKy7Nzb5wNTrIXOZ+pekK6X1V8oyKxZlBhdMzkcIna0=
17iZXQzMYjxBxRbThhs36fmgR3cRKuD1yP G0+mVmvc5Inil3/uCff0tYKd3HdK8yoXWsXkUHqDNF4jIKuufz/KboTxQnhvbdlS8Dx9b00GuHSxoHolY2NdMgs=
1C4Ym7bZZffCCjtRwcwvR6phVzCwQDyEK7 HDBhqpzzKvJzqnWFf71ggIov/4n2l2w3MJySmp/3wz3tCJ2k3fLb6xlc3ZxpGHLF4/31xsAkxLbEcqlpujsUM1M=
18qJJUcMRWyXhMXR3F18vJXaHJRPYrxwYm Gy2uk46aI7OzkeSuyUWK8XWBQxF4BxghoLGUM8LU0kTWfKOOS4HjOwPdXt2nZTugOgInKob2r5XTTvzEb3Pf9xQ=
1LHgE4M96DyCt7J5H2wzcVPWNJt9zD1U5f HECNWlWVrdt+DpW/Lv6J1HrHlqzZfMPeBa2u7f9AcYaDJ82c8qfnIVW6+JokRKSp3ybX3arESOS+2Q4YYtMBiZE=
13forcak6Mv1ZYBo9wv3zeWB8UhDwBJr5S HHBL5hJgIRpWJBTCahSAlWZ9gEGQs5dUZG43d2DLPcNSaX9ISo6ORVPr26wBDBQI/LQpj/+AgR+SBEtlJdROGCA=
1LVWSzpeQyoHYPzDuYVktPuH8qJqBiskUF GwUCu+7Yjpkpb+w3TP+4JcJxv31wBEi50twcYzosoihRfZl5uVOlhD3Tge/bNAbO3YReEYmxmoRwZl7gMDDgMao=
1MTMH8rnXtfTkPrNt9xpZVy2D95sKf8hYy G2xsi59nC+gv/xiNgRrL0IoXh299XTtawYW0ECtkaPcAeV7g8Bc7o36pzF/Cu8cHJySkTegqrabIaXMkqj4B980=
12vQPdDVU8KHeXMSXBY7e4rRierNjWETLi Gzy6+cwDzBw5TI2PTIMV9DnfFBj3dEl2iGOJ19fMid+bAt7bxxdYkeChaYjyZEtsxmR6ctuXjIWerGFfmmM2mv4=
1KH2yPhaxPKKh53Vqkghjn2jfXDJWHRpbJ GytNo239pLFRhEIJybhezJFbGZt9X97nGN72rxkOHHfVBK+45Ib41PNFQvVayfEbWWXRbOav0qsPZy9/QwDVAzU=
1HGHEhR1tFjiF895SC2PHgRiZyGjpTV5dg GxIazGZo5RrCVEc2EW8WIWPMyFv6YFVYsX+oTw+1Xn7uY2QEecYklgYfKmUYqK6Hcq3hcjUN2Dynhcsdi/93dl0=
1LpCzHxxWasKBUCqbyXRUsKn1RSvNaRupT HH66nlu/fDDK83dQx5nm3zOoh1qcYZ2TfStoSb//SiRkZQjmvkkCBHh3YkEg4Jr2r2SjoAi5Ugh40RYzzWVMYzQ=
1EwiVkDkBLVUaoPuFVzW9NA82iaUUPZruU HAFBEtMmLiIIRoq8zS4WL58pqV4/e/pxOIxYrECmq24KE6h2MHgeOD2MxG5Z13cxDRUfQHer2D42MJXTEPs8ArY=
13PaeVWHFvEVWjUJiCAono12o39CLeBEEd HF2gVCM52aZiHKGeyjFVCIqiWBJ4GgPLA466QjBd04uUalJG4T0hbpno/80d3fm5G1Vxsb7QIkfRz+ms2Ba7ah8=
1HhHqRamECC7y4qfSEeYNvLJKCRUkxBY1u HCZOuJcNg3bzYmsT6jLMqsrzj75b0SwaaKq2vrvFkel1WyhQYCmiPAgpoNaEaUYLOMZC5bqEePASUx3hxTCUDM4=
1GwaiUArAF6MfSPV8SwCnp5LKEEbu9qrQ9 G3i/C3cv7qIADjcbElUleX4EGcQWJAEcw7BbxN2YtNfxbdv6HD34PSpzEl0SiEHmDGPgQ7MKtyOscRjWukLDFKs=
1zo1ifkrGNggtBKPhCn4486xHaaWBbXUd HAPVvSdnOwAzvOlRBUk7libQVApJ/dEpq3n+tdbJq+MmVK2DVyYpeQ7L8z4Cc7ubdFCU1mWCDuFVR5wCt9zVHPY=
12Ft7JjoqV6fTzUA3mRnosDYtJekVqnZpT HEAtPUiRtchUHe606ekal3/zwBHqli4DiR/YjGtfREYcA+Bpv6xv4jn+YZYf+fsln1kFXMqsUAQy9QbuyoeKbMU=
18pxRfY6BgE4W4gSfog6FFZBwGs1fcEre5 HGO4tv7FcpeoV80Lz/1txUTe4xIhLrDc3VF7szMrNhCUdwdgseiByBf1ipHunQFVA+4F0CfPhKCw1a/XpLH9oPA=
1H6ou5ZVaKzyoV3ujeiSqQHncJv831RTcz Gz+ODw8bgLYeAdRz3n8OqUpHDcrciSYtklZl/qyQkjbuTScjaGCudxlkGhlh7Cb8r3c14iZ5JeM4ZGEFeZteixY=
12MZnJfu7GNrC8bSPuZhgNDr9otmUZnALu HEMq2txrk+/tUOlNHgn6u7FNWPchBXi301YDydjp6YRYL2NNYvj06+cxvWSLit8KbYiJLuD7djeN/5+/oPUkGqU=
1P5itXj2ET31bwGTwFx4Xb6EMaGaMRgTtP HGw3jesxjC0P7UPVC9tCKWYrqy7t1C5k8UZMonaFtnbrZKJrfjX+9Gu+gdGGOOzuG1u5PMzwx5sBpMyJOtn2LWg=
1D1Ci72Bhde38avQjP2Gyy6ZGhP2mgvoik HH1S7IBW1wJ2LfdJocEous01HU0LzDoYFKIrtwHCiLtkXWrQYCaiFkrWS179QDSkRdECg6LviHlm3ttRyEe0m20=
1FUjNePwqBv2gcGZFTkCM88jTqD2gWL4NA HB86CK2qHZdZ0+ExIy7W3y1e6TbWEz6c+wLAf6LJwMKBD1meVwNJaHKbeqvUW0uQn89PmDeyFj3e33iEz+/5ejY=
15mVDLozNmscibeBCy33yYyH7AKdsuAcKe HGpueuO3hyGJ+c+sfA6XWRzgUHLzGdzRR3ihgNS9bOk1Du2HiET/OWizI9CzK4mKgfVWTVBA0MBiUoWNlH9Rgjs=
15StD6n2ZTygoc7PM2bY13aAkwybNBUwn8 GxlPS1rma4jk80i48NbsyFVJH4aepdvD6N3SPCkRcuXvezw7TwBA5OZWZKxZWHc5oy9WHkfATF84wxXIxFvafUU=
19bf2fMfCt1b3MLbHwahJfdUNoZXTxYd5D HCC2LTC/mLxcxEYXXQsALb59gkK/3nViPKo/IDW0I7GIE11s4+lg/TYXeq2SkNnMtAojnxn0MIY/d9qKF2vCaYs=
1PDUuvJfhoiijbqnGeHZZwXRJoBCsaQSr9 G3g8yLT8aPizLxP8OoHE3TfQilAyN6pFxmc29ZXNwVLQW+yE4eOaoIcc2bpghMzTZCExZZkcU74J+ZqFCun+0/I=
1NChqEan8XUff1YPtgPYC9q2prfR1rXu9L HCAS1bJyKpjkvwbauKMA5pdLVnk2difOmRDW4HcO4zm+FHNZiNiz+CE4zuEaqR9/fnGj5//GvaOjRveTYxIoziI=
1BQqVjRAGndm8tRrwQNwdgJR8yhhDxXzE7 G3FKtXSq158Inzs57LDLM6adlxPZ12+WgYHWtRuNsnhQIFHfh4dPE/G5XiW4GAoVhV+x8G2x+LcsfLniE4005GM=
1KC2mZujBHLTD2NPQycfDowSfni895pXL9 HB29hksJj1lkGQWCt6bu4XZ2KEELss/b1gDSIMOcEF8AfSVkja/nUI2DmgQ29K+Glz5IAl+WjCSaTnFh6PgvcJs=
12isdcKgXGQt1F42tCYHPevErL7rsax4Uc HA760pESyOfcmBfNElQrFddqbW22aGIxcQmjMEl1YVSvGkjxMijg4FT0wq+4RYylAO3EvJaeaQIfEv8Lg+iFu+w=
1BPqcdb4kzgoPyjpyrL9xzhmMsJS5eQqvw HEPVEaue0Zx0cc2tMMJbMLJlJCX4462xiZA8BpfcqisPciavk0QEZaB8lcFQEo9XFovN8kHoXRMR8OWAUo2bRQw=
1CdZDnukUZ4QK3Ynjk5hukupczV2zzrXPh HGkNHGeauIqN2RJOqq5Sw0kZRl7L4DabKwr+wTNA5nvcCs+LUfVlM9sD2QhDmq9tkUxL7QzIzrG2b2xh0x+xPKw=
12JMQYae1sR4FMupqHYafeGqJUY3kf4A3M HEyR3VK5EdsSt7K+4wfLzl+d36JVQDXofrsxT16x1d2jKTKUWz/oXYR0/Eqb7PP6Zd5I3XuZlblszAzW1yWmnto=
1B8tBmGzxLynfxop38RpNaJ8SM5wr3oj4W HDQcnkzZCyYh+j2kYnPQ4XeWLxtZBSTTLQKEyi756L/zHj002tc5EqNzXN0KtPjRjobkH5FbZYWidDlQcbmDiU0=
1EpU3v1wRsPxBkpCsZCiA8QGa8jYXSREi8 G3PvWED5d7eJErO94CzEjcSpobfT1EAiS/rl9FA3TKLyZVaCIdMl1tWmOR3BX5QELmtfGECa3Rt3awGkqOMpPSI=
1BMnca8dAqphg9e98ALoZyJch2NmDirvyY G0fybNv1Mj3IJrj1Ltl2TdX7SpE3M4FNnIopAEf9EIU3CoNioVFIujIlyH0H4FKnfj0h6Gmjg7dRfmm6VjxNF08=
17WSviRk42u6vUbLg1xUixCQfC5t1zgjQX Gxn24C8jvBmy1vSUpdiTcti4VFQte9OhACKFrUEplSgeJ7QQDzx2iRQxzCynKI6dnagvAHPrSr3GYSSIE/I0ddk=
12KFrqyEEtdvrSvfWvXYtieKoFZgoSgbXi HAvxX3Y9RP4Z2lAkqQ8DYPRH+QbyThNqlcSWi42zcCbjPyfMrwgbnnWwGbSrUSxIKaL7puHnfYmQ5RShhk+I9Fo=
1Q9mvLQSHc4if71KZPG43re568u65ikQo1 GyEBHQ8I3+h6zawNF5MFQUUEJDsnaXtaXRKVbimTxHEPUyT3Rp8IMWANHemHUWbFhz2DEmajHzlkjeUiAsW4m8g=
1NcXJKwGAbsSBCi86zjgFsLCT8HoT9nVTW GzDsnS6A3EqGZdBYfN6pJP9Md2kpB8sb3t4ENEoFrTU+QttYLS6uoNjKbxLOnTK0HlrhFN62Ag2eY39c383aXE8=
1JqT7snx8i7zmx748FYJbXfXEeXdMgWr6d G07kxYGwQrf1OwJWVgzL7u0HcpZKTGtD0UEXhlVprzrSNjHQ01upUKPibyRK7dUtuHPGVYPAXba+FvVnaV1nY0E=
1HCvxY4EW8P7EpXCYpRTLrrNuRfEdb4wuV G1fMnA/KQAIalR8Iilk+DWWEomfgZ36E0AAGmWreyBfKP2GmJa28uwnO3rAc/XsaXHfUFq9Lh6X/Vqv212PpRGU=
17KSkVatkQBSRDJukfMtgbYFQ2M3uvBL59 HB39ktvivQSMAFOg+qI6y5xfG/JnbHW7eP7PdqOOf6jVUN+ZOxIwH4Wyy5fOgVsin8AgQqtTZ5bPnlE0GBapRzo=
1EmRU4xtkAsisWyALP7cJnRcWkkWHs9DvW Gw4mWV3SAf2+GW7IFqnC/koT657WwKMK3YsZ42VPhcSCap8jFaY2BxBxv8GPc3wu1WHXFKy7JbROPSRgkrVmPJI=
1JaKriNjceGmggKYQkURmatQv6LXyvUiAB Gzyzrkz/iN5SKCDLZmHy6duoWk4cxMo8cDA8mGGI3m5sa/Nd7d5+PooVbLygMI0bTp7b+GDXXJ3ptZEe/x3/dho=
1MraZtUepR19wk9Nti8dTnfUKDmXZUigT5 HE8o5sxGx0+9hDiimjKIIRViONRYTmX41Xx2wqrPUEr1QVW8tlYWIFaRnlOxps4P0AlDM0mR0CMV1kD8E+KlMWk=
16TGQooBCkfV68AKPEKJ8HG4dUEecmSckv HA9X3EhjCam2HP6sBUD/9hf5+xctcgtUmKzs4CJ3jckOUElQ4b7WOl8OC8EHfVJVNWxZMsd+5Lh8ZN/Qj/CSINU=
18sxpzUF2QK3WBiaNUt5oyFV7fcuL9xRo4 HCIyvlzVhtWSrETmggxrgBPFJTecsdCybHlWUDvw5d/EWyZfC8JwhhcFqUyPy0fdzGkBtaZcVZf/Y6+yMasllLw=
1VaPTvD7fn6dYN9ka9WUi3jN9mBiGnWF1 G3iCZ9uQYAvVOphWJfsQLKxFM9XEHqO2FeMQ88NMXI5Abzhwodm35OQM+N5FT4tFtA6X7l57tuN90T3rQ3AjIeE=
1MjLPVSZBZ7YWjdMrf4DUus4DVAFkpgAmD G09DwuqBer/8+RUEw6unToXgClQ70F9IHG03KUn64kzORhERYl/JalINL5JZl24MRf/eN5gOX+q1wCQOm7w6z2M=
19TfJPQDTFT4uZj8vYn4ff3rxRxBTBELu G0Zt3RGvn1wJ7AP1R9+eRqccSW4Z/YwhYmW0R8Pa/4kGOuehLKD1y23EHQ/EL9cUtqpXxvqVZ2lk03/tVOyEUSg=
1LJc6PhvkmLvcqg8wcjJw29kXXm6rfFGMi HHYSHpHjdX0HpwMwjSFxHL6BHATby+FWFXA6P+hIHYIRCRCgaKI9HtKI0c/LA4CowfStoyS78nS271P/7ABgnQY=
151iVadZ37FF6JLSZzjGyM21U3pBv8tyt2 G2tTMZaaGoX9wnTtgoypxVmI4VoIy68pzeetVeCNr4GrGoPXnKIpt1tuvoGdS2o3DlMndmnzuyoHTeWHoWHTD5w=
1FVD5rzMP6tR8JuubgYSFLopiP33HnSGkZ Gwe73HSdL8lxCIUuzrAMnqz2/A8oIXlgf1OeQtVvrpnxL+8qC/UTC5l73XLOn/Pjti3Jx/1I7HTPrGFFhK+a4Dc=
15JM7KfaXPwhYRpDkAeE6YxVhC5bRusWk5 HDfEMFZarf0GgCjXIkA8w73VbJQmaSAA9yAsvDl2uhtMf6i04+uM1lthqOPv0T4syDoI4QTHWKzRQJMgXOEhUA4=
1Bn5U322mFuMKyoC9jKayfzbrpe3T3QscR HEd7kcenHjnY8xmR/8o+AvZjZZKUmYogUe9dxK4Wc5wGJHmA6BmVbwgirtfO9+hvqcM0LAzACa589lvRxV6RYik=
1Mfjtt7aJEkwcoocokQxLNE1jDEqh6LFKF HDWLZ+v7qBPOLC7WQOlwUYW2JW/J4KKonD5n8BEVUpSeRkB15K9GfZ/e1sL6CdCZ0s+HWx3jytKYMZGPUeYfa2k=
1BByuLe4598R4cxG163Y4g2th5yu5D2x98 GxFdmf3lv0iufEWIf4s3aT3CZRuJh1p5kUxUTe0XYMqkPjcSjMMEUOXegpKKFVIr6UgoVaTvlsZOI0dCsIvy3kc=
1yKCpySRz2YQCGoovGSW7wASo9Jp7yhEF HGq9D9hkkZKb0fdtcS/cbeAohtUWIbXdzgOXJq2GoS/WDDZKklFbQxpyUB65nx4WwA1ye2YWKxE6GTgy+YhFXYA=
15yfaq9UKSvPFTpP2q3VHwMfW8edwrxV7z HHZ+u5GiqL72bECgPdxuL9EPGPZqroyFSMk2kM4go5ybHFo60VRSABQz2EgQs3P5Qfi5CpjdKf3zEWe2On7H3Ag=
1Mc9yttKMqBVWeUUzAHgvq6gzmgLLyELhY HD88+pt1Gap65L/ZXUfdgguI0q0vKk5pQTKFzzQZkVqEOSi7TKLz788YbIOdstcoloNPx50eqW4Nu/oTSfXaACE=
19aXsBvYyGeiFnAbCaGWtmeQwiFFxzH3mZ HEDwarZzRcNMb/wMcShKBfbsd2xIN6xzjecfSfqVcxGqI9YWY536yBdLgpP9AKS4ERS0CCgK8f3PEy13Nm9KUS8=
1Bh4Vari8LcDcdH2qWJVK5sN4dA4vWfQe3 HHWt5PgzBbm3/tWpRxH1qVWX892oYzt+SyTOZvDKCfXvVxGIDWBkxSW2VDV3ZzkImryah9w0xrdLFXjUkn0oLng=
153w6WiJW1Z2uKYegDVVbbBYYhzps6VmWr GxUbCr/3bPT3JoPjZp1Ht5aZretb+uHRBphwRbQnzkaXduQIHkr5+C5diHWh8zNKwiiIxQqrG7xTsWi6/hXs6eU=
1CoFNuTemGzFPHqkuz2Ai5ZaweM7zfPJE6 HB5uvDgk5V/wACZijbAx3T9UwZJAat6nhuWX4JMrDBcTQJFyh9Gua0iqazHUMDtTEUV3AcU2aLBoejV33mfBS08=
1JMPLmKGdgD9Dtz3a4b4HpQzxZ69uVvUbS HGfzuCj7gUAWrMM2oxu26TUrwl/D4+Akd37g9ESq8cMHM4KKNvYZ28fsUoA55YDw6BTaUCl5d1LdfPTAgJKD/8Q=
1FXcjyxCRuJkY72zrLxBjtEReQdv4f89pc Gx7Vwu84vSmsXaHPJR9K8ZdZ3UoYEaYy+f7VipjksGhfAiaa08YSpMnKgEIdW7WeSpfgczXWO/IB55ccxS3Pr/g=
12Q8NX5RdYYAf8gA9NM5DALzWWtU5dZHxW HDvLawvkRgMEICu6G4tovodCJOlQVF9m0KTE6USF3aslVFVIDZGLGQlSXEk95E7gNuiUKsr1d/cJokrmo9Qb7yg=
1Gd6DBfutYmwr6Z7CtV8pQiRXG3ZGhw8GX HHHzLxNi66bYrxptwRenw40ZlKrxJBLCwFMOKL7nGMTGATK2WP4f79czk2hcFIVcB0bsWJa1JMIjoeS7bcj0MuM=
1PLU3ytAptPgHXWujCrcxLzqg4LdFX2bu2 G3ZOLqSI7l88qEmrVW5p3yGppAevDYNxDVu1mRcXdicqX79/uxzWAO5cDXaUVTJd50qXm3gOkAJ18MNprRz4n4k=
1DYXvem7TuGT3oLgF2RsWyVc5ec1sJ82tH Gxk3l4M9ck5T6TsFgqvVflWDmHa4OO8sN1/dw3fyxRPVFJ9AIHhkqlFaNMn5Eu6F+G2iXGVoERDMEtaGoURzyiA=
1Ef6TCo7MMqMepWZ6tKAAEUyigTqJWpjPT HHOjA+/onmIiG5jpL3yGT36kXuKBFlN6S4R2Nrr7vWr3S5t004ltYIdwqvl0mlQSHbxdAOl6IWKLwWWUvPzW2FU=
1L85SkdcRjMuLYuiKKq5QPywxHUs4GertE GyWqvfVq1BzUlq6GkK1QkO7qe5ur/m//VFDigiCxfFX8Cj9CkeKKbfP8QMK9l7B+tD5hciMHgX66Qjb9vdtc+rY=
1PGZSrRhYbDDDJPiZHW47ffSFUGTkch2n5 HEZ0gaJI+zvOAQRlFD7fYIYHqQXLk/rVtnSxgAMtGA4yAkULuBiYX3dT1yTttw6dFkbjyiUkRmt0wHJbGW45sQ8=
1Q3HYAZwnooayQZWEkYSThT353KcbpFF3P HG7rYGHFDwYWZjVXFGX6Wy+VhQzVkQGwpeFVR4C9ptUzG2AiNSMPD91YHIP0QH/ymeZESnt+l3G8jw12Vapa1l4=
1FDs6tF2wxAPhPKgkT4eCd51WWqYuFdXXR GxW8URZz/Z9FCruTSxCMPq6xtpyf35l/Pdk4CZpCc8nVV6/IuIZx6eamMooBaaaX9dwU3HwcQ8r8p24vwJVcp1Q=
189k1PT89s9tUMigeJxHoccu44QRwEc2Tf Gz6NDQvpxicXdwxZnS95bJlPyji4QLbMT8p72RIqbTJ9a5YQZZRAfYhoSErdVdtvsA06gFNpY8A13hp2R6bTLck=
1FuF5iWcHnEPMAhpk5cH7bzdZqjvKTdwka G2sKTdTeEQXxe4XLxRuVFfmp4QU8zWg9ZeQsQC3QRX+oCIkcTLri5MJ/rVD76rbFW6OMyHG7nU9WQkw4Prw/T5I=
1LfgsdyXxa59sggxG7iHC2jZdy26fWqBij HEpXgWMUlQMIuiPCDfINIIMLa1t2ppE7U6cDG+NQqgYOMtHEyQqQIO4gA3XNN1cDd+NtmshpIrAZPQ7+1NF2C0c=
1LTXYmotcmkwp65Zv1UtcKaRNRrFQYmduP G17YIs4I1UUlS2+VgigtLH4fMc7E50j2cfLt60TT2RnsOo7ogyrMfTi0p6W5duzUkJxYZsKxeNtepc/sdTmmtAA=
1LsZpodgMzW8bzHiSQS1kpZu9JzpdVLPB9 HFgEichnJiZr7K3r8Dm+8TEqNWF0oUPsKHukejwDD8crdmnDDfjOMnqOVKpwYeU4Jh6HrMTyNOAIU3wIKLmjsY4=
1MRHrSxnmtUTv48UpxorA9PX2nSEC9yndi G24cpYefSw4ZqxLORiazQkoM4Or5KFUwTKO7ICVfU49VQiAcCI/0CBBWvCsaJBeB4Ne2fJ5tCnEghbPBPTFu5IQ=

Source
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
October 30, 2021, 09:34:28 AM
#14
It looks like that Craig Wright Faketoshi shillers are getting ready for Kleiman Case trial that should start soon (November 1st I think), and I saw they organized some prayer groups for him, because it's a cult with him as their messiah  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6320
Crypto Swap Exchange
October 30, 2021, 08:08:14 AM
#13
But with all the math being discussed here nobody has come out and said it in this post Craig Wright is NOT Satoshi
Anyone who thinks he is will get scammed and loose money.
With enough time you can come up with a lot of bizarre combinations to give some oddball proof that has no real meaning about addresses & keys.

Now I hand it back to others to continue to discuss the math.

-Dave
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 7340
Farewell, Leo
October 30, 2021, 08:03:54 AM
#12
So we can say, that if you can sign with (1LZtnC7Ck37V9uLGGXFmaVkeaLyzFLvf6W) then you have the private key of Satoshi's key.
Yeah. If you knew the private key of - 1LZtnC7Ck37V9uLGGXFmaVkeaLyzFLvf6W - you'd be one step far from calculating this sought after Satoshi's address. It's simple elliptic curve maths.

If k1G + k2G = k3G then (k1 + k2)G = k3G  →   k1 + k2 = k3.

Beautiful, isn't it?
full member
Activity: 233
Merit: 253
October 30, 2021, 05:49:18 AM
#11
Rather simple.
You start in reverse meaning instead of adding random public keys to the starting pubkey, you find the final key and then start working your way backwards by subtracting the pub key (of the private key you already have) from the starting public key (which you don't have the private key of).

If I substract this one with Satoshi's public key I'll get:
Code:
x: bd0b9e81abc8ed978bc0873b9b5d44e00e889983c60bb722354793df732cb849
y: 1ddce6233aea09569c65b37c2cf6e1dc6d8fb721de29c4abc1053c94c2801b28
(1LZtnC7Ck37V9uLGGXFmaVkeaLyzFLvf6W)

Thank you, I've calculated it with other examples and it works.

But that means, that we still don't have the private key for (1LZtnC7Ck37V9uLGGXFmaVkeaLyzFLvf6W) what we publish in the list. So we can say, that if you can sign with (1LZtnC7Ck37V9uLGGXFmaVkeaLyzFLvf6W) then you have the private key of Satoshi's key.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 7340
Farewell, Leo
October 30, 2021, 03:52:44 AM
#10
Can you sign a message with that public key?
And the result has been signed. How can one add addresses and sign with the sum/result? I would be grateful if you explained it here with examples.

Sorry, let me rephrase my sayings;

I can generate bunch of addresses whose public keys once summed with satoshi's public key will give you an address whose private key will be known by me.




Using pooya's way:

Take Satoshi's public key:
Code:
x: 678afdb0fe5548271967f1a67130b7105cd6a828e03909a67962e0ea1f61deb6
y: 49f6bc3f4cef38c4f35504e51ec112de5c384df7ba0b8d578a4c702b6bf11d5f
(1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa)

And a random private key:
Code:
10caf0ec1511da37effb3e4e8de7d217a039e4315a444694af1afccd1073e5a4

Increase the random key by 1 and get:
Code:
10caf0ec1511da37effb3e4e8de7d217a039e4315a444694af1afccd1073e5a5

Public key equal with:
Code:
x: baef4f70d27372f96f5ae699720080fa17a353448af8a67cb49ac7742f31604b
y: a749e7fab667291958f3ddfdbe3c1e739cea5917f04856ddd60f7520ee926fcc

If I substract this one with Satoshi's public key I'll get:
Code:
x: bd0b9e81abc8ed978bc0873b9b5d44e00e889983c60bb722354793df732cb849
y: 1ddce6233aea09569c65b37c2cf6e1dc6d8fb721de29c4abc1053c94c2801b28
(1LZtnC7Ck37V9uLGGXFmaVkeaLyzFLvf6W)

Simplified equation:
Code:
Our known public key  - 1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa's public key = 1LZtnC7Ck37V9uLGGXFmaVkeaLyzFLvf6W's public key

Thus, our known public key will be the addition of those two. But, I know the private key of my known public key, it's:
Code:
10caf0ec1511da37effb3e4e8de7d217a039e4315a444694af1afccd1073e5a5

Or in WIF:

Code:
5HwgXfRgFjZayTa3Umv8mNFnWBAbjhcDfVyEjc6RKH6vB5kESnr

With address: 1J2jrkkXrHp3To3VFDo6QVQKhWQt3L7nDG

Code:
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Bazinga!
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1J2jrkkXrHp3To3VFDo6QVQKhWQt3L7nDG
G0gG9OuK8/7bq9pRnymVJQN4O4VznzXx6Gtoy1IeP/UQNFjIVX9Ujy4VxsdH8M/sfViAHTpno8OVrtTq8iM1aH8=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
member
Activity: 1218
Merit: 49
Binance #Smart World Global Token
October 30, 2021, 03:28:42 AM
#9
Just goes to show how far the BSV shills can go to try and spread the lies. If Craig had the private Keys to the Bitcoin addresses, Why wouldn't he sign directly from about 5 of them. It doesn't one to have knowledge of Rocket science to do so. As pointed out by odolvlobo, someone already signed a message with pubkeys of the early BTC address using the same procedure. Don't just religiously believe anything you see on the internet.

You ae right. Now, if Craig Wright is the rightful owner of that wallet where a great value of Bitcoin can be found, the best thing to do is to use the private keys and move that Bitcoin thereon to another wallet and maybe even sell some millions to a centralized exchange like Binance and then have everything documented via video. Unfortunately, Craig Wright has proven himself time and time again to be not right but wrong. I don't understand why there remains to be people who are following him and taking his words and actions to be worthy like a crypto leader.
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 10611
October 30, 2021, 02:00:28 AM
#8
It's a trick, similar to the one in this thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoin-address-linked-to-bitcoin-genesis-address-5367558

I don't know how it is done, but the fact that the second characters of the addresses are "C", "W", "r", "i", "g", "h", "t" means nothing.
Rather simple.
You start in reverse meaning instead of adding random public keys to the starting pubkey, you find the final key and then start working your way backwards by subtracting the pub key (of the private key you already have) from the starting public key (which you don't have the private key of).

A simple example would be like this:
The first public key is a pubkey from blockchain that we do NOT own its private key. Lets use the one posted by OP (called pub1):
Code:
04d285c703648887f226137be3f3868a95ca562f70fa1654f19d530d134cbc00edf6f5827b367d9b358b4ea00f32486b19e630603f5f8708d068c2ba759dec9665

It can be converted to the following address: 1C7X4UWpSa4GteWHaRBm49fMCC2SNvJQF

Then we create a random private key. I used SHA256 hash of my username (SHA256("pooya87)) to show that it doesn't mean anything and it is truly random.
Code:
5KivUXF2GxYN4aY9ebpY9Yif4J7VJ3QXyPUB7ozA2HtRcNyTjwa
This key will be modified and will be the final key we use to sign a message and its public key (after we modify it) will be the result of adding all the intermediary pubkeys.
Call this privX and pubX

Now decide what dumb letter you want in your second address. Lets say it is "W" similar to OP.
I will use 3 keys in total to keep the computational cost to minimum since I don't want to waste my time but the idea is the same, you keep going backwards (t > h > g > i > r > W > C) you can add more to say "CW is a scammer and BSV is a shitcoin" Smiley
The letter we want are:
1. C (from origninal pubkey posted above).
2. W (what we want to get in the mid pubkey). Call this pub2
3. Random letter that doesn't matter.


Code:
LOOP:
  Compute pub2 = pubX - pub1
  Compute address of pub2 and check if it starts with W
    return if true
    change privX to privX+1
END;

If you repeat the above loop 24 times you end up with the following mid public key:
Code:
04456541df8a1bd19f0ae85da3c73baa3812a537a8fa7b02f22d853828bb3053e4bad7b79fdfaf1f8136f2b052a89f55f0af5c248d5ea9c4d9d1094dc58b26299f
That has the following address starting with the dumb letter W:
1WMrgrfEpJ9HWkWU4azaj4iLSCq3gnyQ1

And you have the private key to the modified privX that is the original + 24 which you can use to sign a dumb message!
Code:
PrivateKey((SHA256("pooya87)) + 24) = 5KivUXF2GxYN4aY9ebpY9Yif4J7VJ3QXyPUB7ozA2HtRf9dm6bK
address = 1JvcCdiQFT7Fogx1ZPkKDqcAooqxi4hEs4

Code:
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Craig Wright is a scammer and BSV is a shitcoin.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1JvcCdiQFT7Fogx1ZPkKDqcAooqxi4hEs4
AXJDSv4B2XWOmEoDB49evN4CYGl9o1jpXnLcUQ7SeXQyYv4EX+0jJcvW7CZGSlOmmRTd9MA569fuW7WBgj4ICzY=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----


Wanting to acquire more intermediary pubkeys will add more computational complexity but the principle is the same.
copper member
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1814
฿itcoin for all, All for ฿itcoin.
October 30, 2021, 01:48:45 AM
#7
Just goes to show how far the BSV shills can go to try and spread the lies. If Craig had the private Keys to the Bitcoin addresses, Why wouldn't he sign directly from about 5 of them. It doesn't one to have knowledge of Rocket science to do so.

As pointed out by odolvlobo, someone already signed a message with pubkeys of the early BTC address using the same procedure

Don't just religiously believe anything you see on the internet.
legendary
Activity: 4466
Merit: 3391
October 29, 2021, 10:04:07 PM
#6
It's a trick, similar to the one in this thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoin-address-linked-to-bitcoin-genesis-address-5367558

I don't know how it is done, but the fact that the second characters of the addresses are "C", "W", "r", "i", "g", "h", "t" means nothing.
full member
Activity: 233
Merit: 253
October 29, 2021, 06:48:38 PM
#5
Okay, so you've generated seven addresses whose public keys once summed in secp256k1 give you a public key whose address has bitcoins. So what? I can do this too and form a fancy saying using dozen of addresses whose public keys once summed in secp256k1 will give you satoshi's public key.
Can you sign a message with that public key?

In the OP example there is a valid signature. That means someone has (or had) the private key for the public key.
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
October 29, 2021, 03:19:33 PM
#4
... So what? I can do this too and form a fancy saying using dozen of addresses whose public keys once summed in secp256k1 will give you satoshi's public key.
The result is the ECC sum of 7 pubkeys from which 2 are early (2009) addresses. And the result has been signed. How can one add addresses and sign with the sum/result? I would be grateful if you explained it here with examples.

At least learn first how signed message works, and how it can be verified using tools (signature verifier). Provide wallet address, message (signed message) with date, and the signature. What you show is just wallet address and random characters (public keys) you're calling signature or what?.
(Edited the 1st post. The signature was in the code box.)
I checked the signature, it is working. (https://www.verifybitcoinmessage.com/)
copper member
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1305
Limited in number. Limitless in potential.
October 29, 2021, 11:27:15 AM
#3
C Wright - signed message - Bitcoin
https://pastebin.com/mNcAPrRv
[...]

2 early mined blocks (2009):

1st Bitcoin address in the list
1C7X4UWpSa4GteWHaRBm49fMCC2SNvJQF
Bitcoin block 6629 (03/07/2009)

2nd Bitcoin address in the list
1W7PDetXCcAbXnN6YQyWmAdz65WZecJs5
Bitcoin block 18111 (26/06/2009)
At least learn first how signed message works, and how it can be verified using tools (signature verifier). Provide wallet address, message (signed message) with date, and the signature. What you show is just wallet address and random characters (public keys) you're calling signature or what?.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 7340
Farewell, Leo
October 29, 2021, 11:20:24 AM
#2
What's the signed message? I can only see a signature and seven public keys.

Also, what is this suppose to mean?
Code:
2nd chars of the addresses: CWright

1C7X4UWpSa4GteWHaRBm49fMCC2SNvJQF
1W7PDetXCcAbXnN6YQyWmAdz65WZecJs5
1r7VRs5hwFNaqWSMdAGZVoQ7uQhsesRqG
1i7JYfJiXf5ARAysJaRaECLLcnrx1Gcuw
1g7nBFZkyET8TPXBoxzBYA83XPJzwDCVT
1h7djfQ2MjojsRJQdvn6jNuJZZB9oFYLm
1t7MqxnqwmwooDjKnvV9AFkiktqUvvxkq

Okay, so you've generated seven addresses whose public keys once summed in secp256k1 give you a public key whose address has bitcoins. So what? I can do this too and form a fancy saying using dozen of addresses whose public keys once summed in secp256k1 will give you satoshi's public key.
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
October 29, 2021, 11:08:08 AM
#1
C Wright - signed message - Bitcoin
https://pastebin.com/mNcAPrRv

Code:
Pubkeys and Bitcoin addresses

04d285c703648887f226137be3f3868a95ca562f70fa1654f19d530d134cbc00edf6f5827b367d9b358b4ea00f32486b19e630603f5f8708d068c2ba759dec9665
1C7X4UWpSa4GteWHaRBm49fMCC2SNvJQF

04b0f7845182d287fa5896b9cdac747726564a6aa4db97f5a84e4884a5af2b16f5a5637f889292add9c51415f9ff30caba43e637b2251f143b5bd73d57dd120fad
1W7PDetXCcAbXnN6YQyWmAdz65WZecJs5

04379abc41da6ba6a1d9494aa0c345658d1d67d9900e04344683f9de4255a29cf0a8d20b0e1e59f1ab9bc08537c57c72485600ab7e4edd866c0b2434d3a5235af7
1r7VRs5hwFNaqWSMdAGZVoQ7uQhsesRqG

04f8c0244bfe78228c7eee52ee1842e6092b5bff2b907575f5dd9fe1d0c3b45645ba9d301fb45407aaa1a9a4a54547bbfa5b861f007ed7e5bc97c6697d57b17621
1i7JYfJiXf5ARAysJaRaECLLcnrx1Gcuw

04ab022c4b71590a621ba06dd78ccc8b41d8d741c29d0486ba79527cbcd16a788920cdee7d02a80bd67f85e930f6182f0cccc41a2bf67665f6e03776a05bea797e
1g7nBFZkyET8TPXBoxzBYA83XPJzwDCVT

04dd2e147a2d489d5afa2331e3adaf27a8bf2ce5176b574cc3f15d254475c3bac96361776d17560d019981a70f31e246aa6632428e57f787ef6915ebae19f04e1c
1h7djfQ2MjojsRJQdvn6jNuJZZB9oFYLm

04876ca85b08d1adb23639410084ea4953cfda40c676f8e10be5dd08eefee5065527ff2580ee182aa46f1bde2fa3a3c80bde963e7fba24a1e60f4d81d1cf9a03ea
1t7MqxnqwmwooDjKnvV9AFkiktqUvvxkq


2nd chars of the addresses: CWright

1C7X4UWpSa4GteWHaRBm49fMCC2SNvJQF
1W7PDetXCcAbXnN6YQyWmAdz65WZecJs5
1r7VRs5hwFNaqWSMdAGZVoQ7uQhsesRqG
1i7JYfJiXf5ARAysJaRaECLLcnrx1Gcuw
1g7nBFZkyET8TPXBoxzBYA83XPJzwDCVT
1h7djfQ2MjojsRJQdvn6jNuJZZB9oFYLm
1t7MqxnqwmwooDjKnvV9AFkiktqUvvxkq


ECC sum of the 7 pubkeys:

041cdced0646879da917d4d9eba9669329c8feb29425d5b192f722a00eebc0d216a4969ce2061614087ba4a631618f322cbda3dddaf79205db95bba4d24939701e
17mZRodKy5ufNqJVsyKg1bEt81AnRkkh9L


1st Bitcoin address in the list
1C7X4UWpSa4GteWHaRBm49fMCC2SNvJQF
Bitcoin block 6629 (07/03/2009)

2nd Bitcoin address in the list
1W7PDetXCcAbXnN6YQyWmAdz65WZecJs5
Bitcoin block 18111 (26/06/2009)



Bitcoin signature:
Signed message:
CWright?
Signature:
G/3yr8ouR8jhC+Bv5K+q/vGHuwX/hp9Kx7pQ6Coxt3a/Wmd2yif6e2nf8Srnx/dpR1rIFUpV8qf+rW6B+ktKjTk=
Bitcoin address:
17mZRodKy5ufNqJVsyKg1bEt81AnRkkh9L


2 early mined blocks (2009):

1st Bitcoin address in the list
1C7X4UWpSa4GteWHaRBm49fMCC2SNvJQF
Bitcoin block 6629 (03/07/2009)

2nd Bitcoin address in the list
1W7PDetXCcAbXnN6YQyWmAdz65WZecJs5
Bitcoin block 18111 (26/06/2009)

3rd - 7th addresses: no transactions found

The sum of these 7 addresses (ECC) :
Pubkey:
041cdced0646879da917d4d9eba9669329c8feb29425d5b192f722a00eebc0d216a4969ce206161 4087ba4a631618f322cbda3dddaf79205db95bba4d24939701e
Address:
17mZRodKy5ufNqJVsyKg1bEt81AnRkkh9L

Signature:
Signed message:
CWright?
Bitcoin address:
17mZRodKy5ufNqJVsyKg1bEt81AnRkkh9L
Signature:
G/3yr8ouR8jhC+Bv5K+q/vGHuwX/hp9Kx7pQ6Coxt3a/Wmd2yif6e2nf8Srnx/dpR1rIFUpV8qf+rW6B+ktKjTk=
Jump to: