Graphics are approximately meaningless to me.
A coin which can survive has at least the following properties.
1. The dev is not anonymous. If a coin has an anonymous dev, it's about three times more likely to be a scam than not. Further, if the dev is not anonymous, there are things you can legally do if it does turn out to be a scam and if the dev is anonymous there aren't.
2. It doesn't halve its remaining coin supply more often than it can double its value. That's kind of hard to predict, but at this point I think the double-value time for cryptourrency is up to about a year, maybe two. It'll get longer until it catches up to double-value period for the rest of the economy, which is 7 to 15 years depending on the industry. This is important because whenever the block reward goes down, the hash rate goes down in the same proportion; and when the hash rate gets too low, the blockchain becomes vulnerable to an attack which can destroy its value completely. Expect any coin that mines out its coin supply too fast, to collapse. I think even Bitcoin is going to be too fast in the long run; there'll come a point when its double-value time is slower than its block-reward halving time and alts will start sucking up the hashing power making bitcoin vulnerable to attacks.
3. It isn't an IPO where you're supposed to "buy" coins for some other form of money. A few of those are honest, but most turn out to be scams.
4. The dev actually knows how to fix problems in the software. This is hard to judge straight out of the gate.
5. There's a point. To put it gently, in order for it to be reasonable for someone who's not scamming to release an altcoin, there has to be something wrong with Bitcoin and they have to believe that they can do better. In order to believe any altcoin has a long-term future, there has to be something wrong with Bitcoin and that altcoin has to be able to survive where Bitcoin cannot. Anytime there's an alt, ask what it does that bitcoin cannot do. Then ask, does that enable it to survive where bitcoin cannot?
6. Don't be taken in by talk of philanthropy. Money, when functioning as money, has no morals whatsoever, good or bad. It flows in the reverse direction of the profitable allocation of resources. Any money that attempts to do anything else will cause market distortions that cripple the economy it's working in and ultimately cause it to function less well than its competition.
7. If there's a premine, be sure that the devs are absolutely honest about the premine. If they claim that it'll be used for the good of the community, then the community is entitled to know how every last dime of it gets spent.
8. If there is any difference at all between the block reward structure they advertise and the one they implement, stay away.
Sounds like you should take a long hard look at Myriadcoin
