Crazy efficiency for 7970 | Bitcointalksearch.org

cmg5461

sr. member

Activity: 369

Merit: 250

Quote from: AzN1337c0d3r on April 28, 2012, 12:42:58 AM

I actually thread the molex connector out the watercooling tubing holes then I just cable-tie them together and let them hang out the back. If I wanted to make them look even neater I'd prolly buy a sleeving kit.

I'm a jerk when I go to LAN parties and run all 4 of my Ultra Kaze on the radiator at 3000 RPM then put on my noise-cancelling headphones

Good idea, but I have my fans connected to my pwm ports :p 2k rpm fans are alittle loud to sleep with.

AzN1337c0d3r

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice

I actually thread the molex connector out the watercooling tubing holes then I just cable-tie them together and let them hang out the back. If I wanted to make them look even neater I'd prolly buy a sleeving kit.

I'm a jerk when I go to LAN parties and run all 4 of my Ultra Kaze on the radiator at 3000 RPM then put on my noise-cancelling headphones

cmg5461

sr. member

Activity: 369

Merit: 250

Quote from: AzN1337c0d3r on April 27, 2012, 10:52:36 PM

I like your radiator setup. I have a similar quad radiator setup on top of my Antec P280

Personally, I wish it would fit in the case :p

But it will do. Waiting for the "what the hell is that monster" stare I'll get when I move out of my dorm :p

Also, how do you recommend I thread my fan cables inside of my case? This case was build for an internal skinny 240 rad, lol.

AzN1337c0d3r

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice

I like your radiator setup. I have a similar quad radiator setup on top of my Antec P280

cmg5461

sr. member

Activity: 369

Merit: 250

Adding more pictures for those who are interested.

cmg5461

sr. member

Activity: 369

Merit: 250

Quote from: AzN1337c0d3r on April 27, 2012, 12:52:15 AM

Ah makes sense. Forgot you were reading off on-card power measurement devices. Thanks.

No problem

AzN1337c0d3r

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice

Quote from: cmg5461 on April 27, 2012, 12:45:16 AM

Quote from: AzN1337c0d3r on April 27, 2012, 12:41:42 AM

Quote from: cmg5461 on April 25, 2012, 05:44:00 PM

factoring in 15% loss in power
580/(99.484*1.15) = 5.069 Mhash/W o.o

Why factor out 15% again?

Psu Efficiency

Ah makes sense. Forgot you were reading off on-card power measurement devices. Thanks.

cmg5461

sr. member

Activity: 369

Merit: 250

Quote from: Buckwheet on April 26, 2012, 10:56:04 PM

Nice photos. When you can, would you mind going over what you used to change the mem clocks?

I'm using afterburner beta 15. Set clocks to what you want, then go into cgminer and adjust the memory clock to < what you have set in after burner. I usually type 300 in afterburner then 300 in cgminer.

cmg5461

sr. member

Activity: 369

Merit: 250

Quote from: AzN1337c0d3r on April 27, 2012, 12:41:42 AM

Quote from: cmg5461 on April 25, 2012, 05:44:00 PM

factoring in 15% loss in power
580/(99.484*1.15) = 5.069 Mhash/W o.o

Why factor out 15% again?

Psu Efficiency

AzN1337c0d3r

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice

Quote from: cmg5461 on April 25, 2012, 05:44:00 PM

factoring in 15% loss in power
580/(99.484*1.15) = 5.069 Mhash/W o.o

Why factor out 15% again?

Buckwheet

full member

Activity: 169

Merit: 100

Green Mining 85% Cheaper

Nice photos. When you can, would you mind going over what you used to change the mem clocks?

cmg5461

sr. member

Activity: 369

Merit: 250

Quote from: ice_chill on April 25, 2012, 09:48:36 PM

According to WIKI hardware comparison you can squeeze 820Mhash if you overclock to 1290 core.

You need a massive increase in voltage though :p

I'm at .985v atm. It's stable at .955, but I figure a little extra juice wont hurt.

ice_chill

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

According to WIKI hardware comparison you can squeeze 820Mhash if you overclock to 1290 core.

cmg5461

sr. member

Activity: 369

Merit: 250

Quote from: ice_chill on April 25, 2012, 05:58:06 PM

Have you measured from the wall or rely on software reading ?
Also wouldn't Diablominer give you around 650Mhash ?

I have not measured from the wall; however, HWiNFO64 has been known to be pretty reputable. Remember the 7 series performs at it's peak with lower temps. (less leakage - superconductor theory)

Here are some pictures:

scifimike12

sr. member

Activity: 303

Merit: 250

You should try the latest version of CGMiner (or DiabloMiner). Like ice_chill said, you should be getting a little more hashing speed.

Out of curiosity, how are you getting 700MHz memory? The lowest I'm able to force it to is 800. Tried CGMiner, MSI Afterburner (with unofficial overclocking enabled), and CCC.

ice_chill

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250