I don't think it is the critics that are at fault here. Steem set themselves up for the well deserved criticism.
Whether it be the sketchy instamine-like month long PoW launch in which several insiders gained a huge percentage of the tokens, or the flawed economics that make up the Steem ecosystem. Both are valid criticisms.
It was not an "instamine" or sketchy in any way...
The PoW launch was deliberately oblique for US legal reasons...
And you needed excellent tech skills to get in on the mining.
They were actually begging people to mine STEEM on the Bit-whatever Forum.
Call it what you want, but one of the biggest turnoffs of Steem is the initial distribution. I am not the only one that feels that way, because I have seen the same complaint repeated from numerous people since its inception. It was definitely sketchy.
The PoW thread was meant to be oblique = textbook example of how to go 1000x and get rich on launches, also see NXT launch, IOTA launch, etc
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annsteempow-no-ipo-no-premine-no-instamine-relaunch-1410943
Begging for miners on Bitshares Forum:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,22125.75.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forget about STEEM, it was always a dead end because amateur blogging has ZERO value...
So STEEM was always a "solution in search of a problem".
The one to watch with real life utility (and exploding daily users) is POSW... it's gone 55x since I started buying it in March...
BUT at only $10 million cap and a built-in exchange that will do serious volume... POSW could still go another 5-10x easy
Real problems solved (maybe) for 1st time:
(a) convenient staking
(b) pooled POS staking
(c) 500-600 users typically online = instant liquidity for exchange