I don't think I'd like the idea of not using kyc with exchanges though, even cash in hand deals without kyc can be risky. Kyc on exchanges does help the exchange to work out who hacked them if they get hacked and if they didn't have kyc, many financial institutions can still block them.
It’s for the better as many scammers now uses it for their own goods and finding ways to scam people. The more adoption happens, the more the security should be tighten. As long as we know what website and project we are doing KYC with then it’s fine. At this time we must know how to choose the project and know whether we’re doing the right process. This is the cons of the price increases and we need to embrace the consequences if we want not to be a victim of scammers. We just need to be careful.
You have just explained the Implication and importance of KYC. Of course, there is considerable significance in requiring KYC in exchanges, as it is not too rare that online exchanges are getting the victim of hacking. You know, A well-known exchange in Japan has hacked a few days ago, they immediately transferred their assets to a cold wallet and froze the hackers' accounts. Through KYC documents, they may take legal action against the hackers.
But here he is willing to know the anonymity of cryptocurrency. I agreed with him that Cryptos has become less anonymous now. Not only in exchange but also it becomes less anonymous country-wise. You know El Salvador has accepted cryptos legally and regulating their people's funds, Cuba is also walking in the same way. It is a matter of real concern that with the recognition of Bitcoin by various countries, the anonymity of Bitcoin has come down drastically.