This happens to be case in China, but anywhere else in the world you can still get your ICO going as far as I know. Even if all major countries banned the issue of liquidity via ICO, there would always be ways to circumvent these limitations if the investor was really interested in a project.
I think the ICO model has been demonized beyond belief due the massive amount of scams happening under it, but is it unfortunate that some of the projects, which are legitimate and bring value to the table, get trapped in this situation of being rejected at sight only because it was issued as an ICO. We should find some common ground. Legitimate projects tat use the ICO model cannot be suffering from being lack of liquidity. So we either let everyone have their ICO, or have some sort of regulatory mechanism, but in general I don't like anyone else choosing for me, I want to be able to choose what is or isn't an scam. If i like the idea, I will invest on the ICO, and I don't want someone to tell me not to. Im not an expert of anything that has to do with economics and so on, but it would suck if a good project gets banned in my country and I can't invest on it only because someone else decided for me.