Topic: Crypto Insurance and B.SURE - [ are very suspicious projects ] (Read 157 times)
They gave up the idea of starting an ICO, they found another source of financing (some insurance company supported them) and launched a project without any tokens.
November 29, 2018, 09:41:49 PM
Kristina Kitaeva ( Business development )
but on the site: https://cryptoins.io/team They do not mention her name, which is very strange.
but on the site: https://cryptoins.io/team They do not mention her name, which is very strange.
It's not weird to me. I saw some projects just listing their most important people in their company.
these sites that monitor ICOs are not credible, so I do additional research
Yep, we still need more proofs for this case.
November 29, 2018, 02:07:56 PM
I have just researched about both projects. Mr. Timofey Volkov seems to quite actively work and be featured in many news in Russia.
I also saw this and I was asking myself many questions and I did not find the answer, for example:
https://www.linkedin.com/company/cryptoins/
https://www.linkedin.com/search/results/people/?facetCurrentCompany=%5B%2218867775%22%5D
Kristina Kitaeva ( Business development )
but on the site: https://cryptoins.io/team They do not mention her name, which is very strange.
It seems that B.SURE ICO failed because ICObench often shows amount of fund raised if ICO succeed. Im not sure about that. If they failed and they try to launch another, I think it's ok as long as they refunded in previous ICO.
these sites that monitor ICOs are not credible, so I do additional research
November 29, 2018, 11:14:33 AM
I have just researched about both projects. Mr. Timofey Volkov seems to quite actively work and be featured in many news in Russia.
https://warfiles.ru/151432-timofey-volkov-vozmozhno-chast-pomoschi-sredney-azii-prodaetsya-v-afganistan.html
http://www.insur-info.ru/overviews/22/
...
It seems that B.SURE ICO failed because ICObench often shows amount of fund raised if ICO succeed. Im not sure about that. If they failed and they try to launch another, I think it's ok as long as they refunded in previous ICO.
https://warfiles.ru/151432-timofey-volkov-vozmozhno-chast-pomoschi-sredney-azii-prodaetsya-v-afganistan.html
http://www.insur-info.ru/overviews/22/
...
It seems that B.SURE ICO failed because ICObench often shows amount of fund raised if ICO succeed. Im not sure about that. If they failed and they try to launch another, I think it's ok as long as they refunded in previous ICO.
November 29, 2018, 09:17:38 AM
Crypto Insurance
ANN Thread: CRYPTOINS | Crypto Insurance ( archive )
Profile: @lexPavl ; @Crypto Insurance
Website: https://cryptoins.io/team ( archive )
TEAM:
Timofey Volkov ( Founder & CEO )
there are many members on the team, but I will speak only about the founder because it is connected to both projects
B.SURE
ANN Thread: [ANN] B.SURE - THE CRYPTO ASSETS INSURANCE COMPANY. ( archive )
Profile: @BSURE ; @Timofey Volkov
Website: not work
TEAM:
Timofey Volkov ( Founder & CEO )
there are many members on the team, but I will speak only about the founder because it is connected to both projects
PS: as the B.SURE site does not work, then this link will serve to prove that Mr. Timofey Volkov is the founder of B.SURE:
https://icobench.com/ico/b-sure ( archive )
First online service of insurance for personal accounts on cryptocurrency exchanges and in wallets.
But they did an ICO:
WHAT IS B.SURE
B.SURE IS THE CRYPTO ASSETS INSURANCE COMPANY - we intend on creating reliable infrastructure to provide insurance protection for crypto assets.
B.SURE IS THE CRYPTO ASSETS INSURANCE COMPANY - we intend on creating reliable infrastructure to provide insurance protection for crypto assets.
Honestly. I do not really understand how compensation for damages in the insurance business on the chain of blocks actually works. You can not be presented to a court if something happens. The state does not recognize such systems.
The legislative system in crypto-business is not perfect yet worldwide, but the situation is rapidly changing. We are starting our project now to be one of the first who work out best business practices which will then can be a basis for lagging legislation.At the moment we intend to solve all the issues without legal actions. The main thing is that it does not influence directly on our decision to pay indemnity. The fact of payment is based on making our professional decision that an insurance event has occurred (an exchange collapse). In order to support our decision we are arranging partner relations with good experts in cyber security and anti-fraud areas. We will ensure our right of recourse against the guilty party, and we will seek any opportunities to implement it.
And after the ICO the site of them disappeared, nobody says anything and neither in the thread of them there are no comments of how the ICO was, fact is that after months they appear with same project but with different name, that is why I think very suspicious
Jump to: