Topic: Cryptocurrency CITU with elements of direct and parliamentary democracy (Read 48 times)

Cryptocurrency CITU has an electoral system and a parliament and direct democracy.

http://localhost:8082/miningblock only http

http://localhost:8082/checkValidation if false, it means you have an uncorrected version of the blockchain, unsubscribe here

my https://discord.gg/MqkvC3SGHH
my telegram https://t.me/citu_coin
my web http://194.87.236.238/


Этa чacть кoдa paбoтaeт нa лoкaльнoм диcкe, и вы мoжeтe мaйнить cpaзy, oнa пoдключaeтcя к cepвepy, иcxoдный кoд кoтopoгo тaкжe дocтyпeн, и oдин тaкoй cepвep yжe пoднят.
https://github.com/CorporateFounder/unitedStates_final

storage
https://github.com/CorporateFounder/unitedStates_storag

Hello friends, I would like to draw your attention first of all in terms of politics and society.
I have always been inspired by the US Constitution and Parliamentary systems and primarily by libertarian ideas and wanted to create something new. The whole web is written from scratch by me, but inspired by all of you.

By creating a single economic zone, we can reduce the risk of new wars.
Let me give you an example: the USA consists of 50 states and the District of Columbia, but we cannot imagine that tomorrow Texas can declare war on California, as there is a federal government and a single economic zone. The same goes for the European Union. Before the advent of the European Union, Europe was one of the most warlike zones on earth. Even alliances that are not fully democratic, such as the USSR, rarely declare war within an alliance. Now imagine if this system is developed, then in the future we will be able to create a single currency in the world, which will reduce the risks of wars, since this system works similarly to the US and the European Union. And the electoral system should reduce the intensity of passions, reducing the polarization of society, since this system was developed taking into account the fact that those laws will be adopted and those representatives will be elected that cause the least rejection of society and create conditions for the development of centrist views.

I want you to evaluate the charter (constitution) of the system and offer your ideas now my friends are swinging the coin.
I used four types of voting here to get the most proportional votes, the voting system was completely created by me, but inspired by single transferable vote and also elements of direct democracy. The subtraction system from YES - NO, made to get a more centric system, I also study political science, macroeconomics and related disciplines for a long time.
  This system promotes large centrist and liberal views. I want to hear your opinion, you can also write to me on the discord or here, I will answer all your questions. First of all, consider this system not as a simple coin, but as an analogue of the new digital democracy.

The Council of Shareholders is needed so that the voices of large miners and investors of the system, or large businesses on which the development of the system depends, are also heard.

How is the Legislation going now?
There are four groups of people who are elected and vote differently.
1. Independent members, each time you mine a block you are given 200 digital dollars and 200 digital shares.
Every time you vote for a law, the law gets as many votes as you have shares, but with some nuances.
Imagine you voted YES for 2 laws and NO for 4 laws and you have 100 shares. Then the laws you voted YES
will receive 50 votes according to the formula (YES/2), the same for NO/4=25. But it doesn't end there. Next, we summarize the votes of all participants cast for a particular law. Separately sum YES and separately NO and subtract from YES - NO and the result
must be greater than 1.

2. Board of Shareholders. The Board of Shareholders consists of 1500 members with the largest number of shares. But only those accounts that were active during the year are taken into account.
One score equals one vote. We also Sum for each law separately all YES and all NO and also subtract from YES - NO and the result should be 10 or more.

3. The Board of Directors is an analogue of the House of Representatives.
Consists of 301 elected members. Members are elected by independent members and the 301 accounts that receive the most votes become members of the board of directors. One score is equal to one vote, and like with the Board of Shareholders, for each law we add separately YES and NO and subtract from YES - NO and the remainder must be 10 or more.

4. And the last fourth group, these are fractions, fractions consist of 100 accounts and are elected similarly to the Board of Directors, but their
votes are equal to their share. For example, if a Faction received 23% of the votes from 100 participants, then its vote is 23%.
So every time a faction votes for a law, we go through the same procedure as for the others. Namely, we summarize separately all YES and NO and subtract from YES - NO and the result should be more than 10%.

For all participants, only votes from which no more than four years have passed are taken into account. The votes change dynamically with each block, taking into account how many shares the independents hold or retain or the officials hold. A law is valid if it
more than 1 vote from Independent Participants.
10 or more votes from the Board of Shareholders.
10 or more votes from the Board of Directors
and 10% or more from fractions. But the law must be approved by all four groups.


The system also has a negative rate.
Why is she needed? imagine that you are mining a coin that reduces its production every four years, which means that in order for you to remain profitable, the value of the coin must double every four years and this is simply not possible mathematically, since you do not affect the value of the coin and this is in can eventually crash the system. There are other coins that have lifted the mining cap, but they are subject to high inflation. So that the total number of coins does not grow, I
made such a system. If every half a year we withdraw 0.1% of digital dollars and 0.2% of digital shares from all accounts, then at some point we will come to the conclusion that the created coins will be equal to the destroyed ones and this will limit the total number of coins.