Author

Topic: Cryptocurrency Investors Try to Turn Private Islands Into Blockchain Utopias (Read 177 times)

sr. member
Activity: 882
Merit: 403
This is pretty common regardless of era. Even if crypto currencies never showed up it will happen. Most rich people specially those born rich will always want to have unique things to own or spend on. The more expensive the better. Still there are quite a few that does so for the sole purpose of comfort or as a form of investment rather than flaunting riches.
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1402
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
People with shady reputation making and then unlisting their marketing video, and claiming they'll build a crypto utopia on an island that is still listed for sale? That looks like a scam to me, not like a tendency of investors turning to private islands. Moreover, since Satoshi Island barely has info available about it, I wouldn't have high hopes for it either. I acknowledge that there are crypto island projects, but I don't expect them to be successful. I think that small countries adopting Bitcoin can mean much more for adoption and this model is also more likely to succeed because there are governments, institutions and at least some basic infrastructure that is already available.
hero member
Activity: 2114
Merit: 603
Amazing.

Notice how these news started coming only after blockchain came into existence. I mean yes buying the islands is old stuff for riches but see how it’s blooming these days at the alarming rate. There is bonus or chance of having their own crypto environment and no government to interfere with the same. One can literally create amazing ecosystem.

Now imagine hundreds of islands connected each other with the “Intra-Crypto” transaction system so that whatever peeps living on them would transact only in crypto.

It’s more or less starting or reinventing the earth 🌏 into new infra. Better and faster world.

Imagine this happening and we seeing the world presented in the image below. Cool isn’t it.


INTRA-crypto Islands
*image is for representation only and is a screenshot of a game.
legendary
Activity: 2366
Merit: 1624
Do not die for Putin
There have been tries of "pure cyrpto place" for years, hell it was even an idea way early in bitcoins life and its 2022 and it is still a topic. Let's face the fact that it will eventually happen one day, some crazy rich person will give it a shot, it will fail, and that's about it.

This is not a great idea, just leave it be, just live the world we always live but instead of stocks or forex or anything like that, invest into crypto and instead of 40 years, you will retire in 20 years (probably) by keep putting money aside every month into a crypto portfolio and growing it. That's it, that is all people should do at this point, we are not even using them to buy something most of the time, it just became investment.

There are two possibilities for "Bitconia" to actually become a real place in the real world. One of them is a group of crypto millionaires that decide that it is worth getting their own piece of land and turn it into a country. That is quite a task in itself as you would need to actually be able to create a government and legislation as well as gain some international recognition as a true country. Possibility number two is that actually a country decides to create the perfect ecosystem for crypto self-governance.
hero member
Activity: 2632
Merit: 787
Jack of all trades 💯
So you do not actually own the piece of land, but you own a NFT token linked to a piece of land that might or might not be registered by the local Land registry... right. It is a lot like selling a piece of land on the Moon or Mars, because you will most probably never set your foot on it.
That's basically it, this scheme is just like that Moon guy selling millions of sqm of land on the Moon, this is just a money making opportunity for the person behind the idea since the boom of NFT is still going on and they try their best to cash out as much as they can from poor suckers who believe that they can get something out of it.

This is like grabbing the opportunity while the fame of Crypto and NFT is still there since the owner could earn millions of dollars for this plan and I think for sure many will got an interest on this knowing crypto is good word to be heard by certain investors and for sure many will buy some slot since they think that they can earn more from it to its next buyer. Well its really best to cashout when profit is there since maybe in future NFT hype will die and those people who keep holding their bought NFT's might lose their money for hoping something huge.
sr. member
Activity: 1666
Merit: 426
So you do not actually own the piece of land, but you own a NFT token linked to a piece of land that might or might not be registered by the local Land registry... right. It is a lot like selling a piece of land on the Moon or Mars, because you will most probably never set your foot on it.
That's basically it, this scheme is just like that Moon guy selling millions of sqm of land on the Moon, this is just a money making opportunity for the person behind the idea since the boom of NFT is still going on and they try their best to cash out as much as they can from poor suckers who believe that they can get something out of it.
hero member
Activity: 2702
Merit: 672
I don't request loans~
Well, the rich have their own way of splurging their money, and honestly going for an investment of something "new" to the ears of other people would always seem like an opportunity for them. After all, if it booms, the returns are rather big on their side. Doesn't mean that it would succeed though, it's honestly like at this point they are just trying out whatever idea they could while connecting it to crypto without any real concept or content that would actually make people want it. It's like we're getting farther and farther away from what crypto was initially.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 1165
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
There have been tries of "pure cyrpto place" for years, hell it was even an idea way early in bitcoins life and its 2022 and it is still a topic. Let's face the fact that it will eventually happen one day, some crazy rich person will give it a shot, it will fail, and that's about it.

This is not a great idea, just leave it be, just live the world we always live but instead of stocks or forex or anything like that, invest into crypto and instead of 40 years, you will retire in 20 years (probably) by keep putting money aside every month into a crypto portfolio and growing it. That's it, that is all people should do at this point, we are not even using them to buy something most of the time, it just became investment.
hero member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 577
This land NFT is extremely risky if it's not recognized by government, and I doubt that any government would want to allow anonymous decentralized market for its land. Plus there are lots of problems with hacking/lost private keys, so tying land to NFT is really not the brightest idea - lots of downsides and no upsides.

I thought they are digital lands that has no business with real land that will generate issues from the government, I really don't see how the government can become a problem in satoshi island since it is only digital, besides some other projects already selling decentralized lands to investors so why this will be different !

There will always be Hacking or an attempt to hack but that should not be a problem, besides, I believe that those who will have the opportunity to buy this lands are already familiar with taking care of their keys, if you read the requirements to participate you would understand.
legendary
Activity: 3542
Merit: 1965
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
So you do not actually own the piece of land, but you own a NFT token linked to a piece of land that might or might not be registered by the local Land registry... right. It is a lot like selling a piece of land on the Moon or Mars, because you will most probably never set your foot on it.

The real libertarians wants real land that are not under government control and profits that are not taxed. Why is this even considered? Is the thinking... "If we cannot succeed with our libertarian goals in real life, we take it digital" ??
full member
Activity: 1134
Merit: 140
Maybe it is good for the countries who sell it, generate incomes and jobs for the locals. No government would sell an Island if there were some good stuffs there for sure so they were just selling maybe Islands that good for vacation points only and privacy purposes.
Only the problem is security, if the thugs knew you were some kind of millionaire then you must be prepared and hire bunch of trusted guys to protect you.
You are right, that would be another serious issue. Maybe if they will be able to pay for security and get them to be on the island , and patrolling the waters as well, to make sure that the visitors to the islands arrives and leaves safely, then it would be a plus.

Because, when thieves or pirates finds out that there is such an island, and knowing very well that such a place would be visited or occupied by crypto millionaires/billionaires, they will try to be attacking those who are coming to such islands and stealing from them, even to the extent of kidnapping them. So, security should be top notch in such a place, To avoid such things from happening.
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1192
If I remember right, this island trend began in 2017 when vanuatu offered citizenships for sale in bitcoin.

Since then we've had el salvador embrace bitcoin. Akon city in africa. And many migrating to puerto rico to benefit from its 4% income tax.

Now the latest trend -- island resorts which propose to generate development funding through the sale of NFTs. I'm not certain if the the business strategy is a sound one. Its very similar to metaverse offerings which sell digital real estate. Maybe too similar. The market could become too heavily saturated with supply greatly exceeding demand.

Private islands are not always high dollar properties. There are many private islands which sell for $50,000 to $400,000. The real cost with islands is transportation and cost of supplies and amenities. I'm not certain if barebones lot NFTs could accumulate value without the support necessary to comprise a total package.

Interesting read, although it's hard to trust anything Vice puts out these days as they like to dramatize everything to draw in viewers. In reality this started long before cryptocurrency and stems back to citizenship for sale. Most of these small islands became tax havens until they started getting pressured by the USA and Europe, so they had to hunt for new business. It seems like cryptocurrency is the next target and they'll happily take any payment in any format in return for special benefits. They are very useful for setting up companies that are opaque, which typically get used for washing criminal money or simply storing it offshore from wherever it was looted.
hero member
Activity: 1890
Merit: 831
Maybe it is good for the countries who sell it, generate incomes and jobs for the locals. No government would sell an Island if there were some good stuffs there for sure so they were just selling maybe Islands that good for vacation points only and privacy purposes.
Only the problem is security, if the thugs knew you were some kind of millionaire then you must be prepared and hire bunch of trusted guys to protect you.




Some countries like Indonesia have so many islands that people can actually buy and live there, start their own companies and do whatever they like, it does not mean that they do not have something good on the island perse but it just means that there are so many and selling them might bring the government profits. At the same time converting an island into crypto friendly place would be a good start they could also connect all the other islands around and could start their own companies plus it would be a great place for mining using renewable sources of energy like tidal energy which would not only be cost efficient but it would also be a greener alternative as well. I think it's a good idea for sure.
legendary
Activity: 3024
Merit: 2148
This land NFT is extremely risky if it's not recognized by government, and I doubt that any government would want to allow anonymous decentralized market for its land. Plus there are lots of problems with hacking/lost private keys, so tying land to NFT is really not the brightest idea - lots of downsides and no upsides.
full member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 110
SOL.BIOKRIPT.COM
Maybe it is good for the countries who sell it, generate incomes and jobs for the locals. No government would sell an Island if there were some good stuffs there for sure so they were just selling maybe Islands that good for vacation points only and privacy purposes.
Only the problem is security, if the thugs knew you were some kind of millionaire then you must be prepared and hire bunch of trusted guys to protect you.


legendary
Activity: 2366
Merit: 1624
Do not die for Putin
The Island sales have always been around, and there are a few dedicated sites as well for them:
https://www.privateislandsonline.com

It is only but normal that people with too much money too spend look for stuff like that, but I wonder how many of the buyers actually consider that owning an Island is not only an expensive purchase, but also something that you actually need to maintain. Even most of these Islands for sale do belong to countries, many are not precisely known for having a great security so your shopping list may look like:

- Buy island.
- Go to IKEA for furniture
- Hire a small army.
legendary
Activity: 2562
Merit: 1441
Quote
Cryptoland and Satoshi Island believe they'll become paradises where the cryptoeconomy can flourish.

For as long as cryptocurrencies have existed, libertarians have dreamed of using them to create communities, seasteads, and cities free from the prying eyes of the state and its tax collectors. We’ve seen crypto-inspired attempts to claim disputed lands as tax havens, use UFOs and fireworks to christen a new tax-free Bitcoin town, build cities with DAOs, and establish communities inside of U.S. colonies to avoid taxes. But there’s now a wave of attempts to buy entire islands and build the next crypto “paradise.”

The first one to look at is “Cryptoland,” founded by Max Oliver and Helena Lopez, who reportedly have a checkered history with the Spanish YouTuber community mired in allegations of doxxing and the resulting boycott of an awards show linked to the pair. Cryptoland burrowed into the public’s mind when its unlisted 18-minute animated sales pitch was found on YouTube in December. It features three sections littered with bombastic rhetoric about what is to come, a manifesto of sorts, a memorial to Bitconnect—arguably the most infamous scam in Bitcoin history—and promises to “make crypto enrich a harmonious co-existence with the world energy of its surroundings.”

Since going viral, Cryptoland has taken down its unlisted sales pitch but a shorter public version is still available to behold.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jf3ajS5me78
CRYPTOLAND

The first section is a minute-long introduction to Cryptoland as a "paradise made by crypto enthusiasts for crypto enthusiasts” and its three proposed main areas: Cryptoland Bay, House of DAO, and the Blockchain Hills. The Bay can be best thought of as a massive theme park for any and every meme that has ever existed that is related to crypto—the video promises it’ll include a beach, resort, “working hub,” and more. The DAO promises to be a startup village that will incubate the future of blockchain technology. The Hills will be the "crown jewel" as an exclusive residential area that you can only access if you purchase a one-acre parcel of land available as an NFT.

The video continues with a 10-minute long animation that is best described as an unhinged fever dream driven by a talking Bitcoin tour guide, a miserable amount of crypto jokes every step of the way, a strange dance number, and more. It’s a full-on suffocation by blockchain meme; the toilets on the island are called “SHITCOIN” and the toilet paper is made of dollar bills and labelled “WIPE PAPERRR” (which, for the blissfully uninitiated, is a tortured play on the term “white paper” and the stimulus meme “money printer go brrrr”).

It’s hard to also overstate how important the creators of Cryptoland see this widely-mocked video as being to their mission.

"We quickly realized that it was practically impossible to convey this all with a PDF or something because it's so abstract,” Oliver says in the video. “You have to see it rather than read it like the lambos, the Bitconnect scam memorial, the Crypto Kitties, things that we know people will get it if they see it. So after a lot of brainstorming we came up with the idea of creating a 3D animation video. The film had to be awesome but also very accurate at the same time because we must be sure we can deliver."

As The Next Web pointed out in its dive into the island and Wikipedia editor Molly White in a Twitter thread sharing her research into the project, there are a few problems that stick out even beyond Cryptoland's wild marketing video. Take the fact that the island mentioned in its "Why Paper"—an island in Fiji named Nananu-i-cake— is still for sale on at least two websites, despite the project’s website claiming that it has secured an “island purchase agreement.”  And then there’s the island’s small size compared to the grandiose plans: it’s just 600 acres, or less than one square mile. Or eyebrow-raising tweets: when one Twitter user asked Cryptoland what the age of consent would be, Cryptoland’s Twitter account replied “Mental maturity should be more than enough! Wink

One thing that is certain, though, is that Cryptoland is selling NFTs. They feature the video’s talking Bitcoin mascot and fall into two types of NFTS. King Cryptolander NFTs that cost 319 ETH (just over $1 million), of which there will only be 60. The remaining 9,940 will be standard Cryptolander NFTs that cost on average about 0.11 ETH (about $350). If you are planning on splurging on a King Cryptolander NFT, you may want to slow down as you have to confirm you are not a US citizen when purchasing them.

"We have been victims of what seems to be a planned attack to harass, vilify and twist our work," Cryptoland said in a statement responding to the waves of criticism after the presentation went viral. "We condemn all the false information and false accusations being spread about Cryptoland and invite those who are truly interested, to make their own research and politely ask us if they want to know anything about this amazing project."

Cryptoland did not respond to Motherboard’s request for comment.

Cryptoland isn’t alone. Satoshi Island is another crypto utopia supposedly in the works, featuring a 32 million square foot island (approx 1.1 square miles) in Vanuatu—an archipelago of islands between Australia and Fiji. It’s slightly larger than Cryptoland, but has substantially less information available on it.

Its website states that the island is owned by Satoshi Island Limited, but there’s no information on who runs the company or how beyond a Team section listing some individuals involved. It also claims to have "a green light from the Vanuatu Ministry Of Finance and all approvals in place.” Motherboard reached out to various Vanuatu offices to confirm this, but has not heard back. Satoshi Island told Motherboard they have owned the island for some years, but when asked about the company’s ownership said “Some of the public team and advisors have legal control of the company” and pointed at the Team section.

Running the "master planning and development process" is James Law Cybertecture, a Hong Kong architecture firm animated by the belief that "our work can alleviate suffering for all segments of society." While the founders and main backers are obscured, Law is held up as one of the public faces in press releases and on the site which promises to design the island according to his vision.

"Modular development is the future of city building, instead of decades they will be completed within a few short years,” reads one quote from Law prominently emblazoned across a website. What does that mean? Well Law's designs feature modular units that can be "combined and placed into hundreds of positions to create unique homes, apartments, amenities and offices." Imagine see-through shipping containers with softer edges.

To help pay for this, there will be two types of NFTs that, similar to Cryptoland, are not yet available: Citizenship and Land NFTs. The Citizenship section’s first words are a disclaimer warning “Satoshi Island Citizenship NFTs have no relation to citizenship of Vanuatu.” 21,000 Citizenship NFTs will be minted with the first edition granted via airdrop to early investors, the project says, and Citizenship NFTs automatically whitelist the owner for early access to future NFT mints and airdrops, such as Land NFTs. They'll also be the first allowed on the island and gain access to "advanced NFT security features” that establish beneficiaries if wallet access is lost and trustees meant to halt unauthorized transactions by enlisting wallet addresses as co-signers. Citizenship NFTs will also grant voting rights: In a weird blend of Athenian democracy and universal suffrage, each wallet can only have one Citizenship NFT which grants one vote. "One NFT. One vote," the site proudly declares.

This brings us to Land NFTs, which are distinct from Citizenship NFTs. Satoshi Island told Motherboard that it will split each of its 2,100 lots of land into10 individual NFTs, for a grand total of 21,000 NFTs split across 7 collections. The first collection—the South Wing Land collection—will comprise 5,620 individual NFTs and is supposed to launch sometime in January or February. A recent press release hints at a process by which they can convert into a Non Fungible Property Token (NFPT) at which point the holder will need the island’s help to convert this NFPT into a traditional deed logged on Vanuatu’s land registry.

It’s important to note that, for both islands, almost none of this exists yet. It’s not clear if any of it will ever exist, as the details offered are not only relatively scant and nebulous, but it’s not clear if it's possible even if tens of millions are not raised through NFTs and other means. And, given that Cryptoland and Satoshi Island are just two examples of a growing trend, it’s starting to look like bespoke crypto-utopias are another bubble within a bubble.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/z3n38x/cryptocurrency-investors-try-to-turn-private-islands-into-blockchain-utopias


....


If I remember right, this island trend began in 2017 when vanuatu offered citizenships for sale in bitcoin.

Since then we've had el salvador embrace bitcoin. Akon city in africa. And many migrating to puerto rico to benefit from its 4% income tax.

Now the latest trend -- island resorts which propose to generate development funding through the sale of NFTs. I'm not certain if the the business strategy is a sound one. Its very similar to metaverse offerings which sell digital real estate. Maybe too similar. The market could become too heavily saturated with supply greatly exceeding demand.

Private islands are not always high dollar properties. There are many private islands which sell for $50,000 to $400,000. The real cost with islands is transportation and cost of supplies and amenities. I'm not certain if barebones lot NFTs could accumulate value without the support necessary to comprise a total package.

Jump to: