If a company implements its own private blockchain, it won't differ from usual database with many backups on different servers.
I like it that you agree with me and not with the "detailed analysis' you have made.
Those 3.1t in market cap will not exist. Companies that implement the block chain as a solution won't inflate the market cap of coins as there is not going to be a coin in the first place, not even talking about a public traded one.
And if I dig deeper into this, let's assume as per your model shares will be replaced by tokens.
This doesn't mean wow, new tokens, new crypto.
It will still be Walmart and Boeing, not walmartcoin, and the value of those tokens will not have anything to do with the chaotic market we have now.
I didn't agree with you) I said that IT services will partly depent on public blockchains, and cryptocurrencies will be needed to utilize benefits of those public blockchains.
Also, my model has no suggestion about shares will be replaced by tokens. It's only about utility value of public blockchains.
Oh yes you did.
While in the "detailed analysis" you said:
If you don't realize what is wrong and what is the contradiction between those two then you should work on the analysis. You can't calculate the marketcap of utility by throwing around percentages.
Second, it seems you have quite a hard time understanding that the blockchain can be used without cryptocoins or tokens. There are a lot of projects there that don't use any.
No, I didn't
I will change
"10% of IT and financial services will be improved with the help of blockchain technology and will depend on blockchain in the future"
to
"10% of IT and financial services will be improved with the help of blockchain technology and will depend on public blockchain in the future"
since it's not obvious for you)