Author

Topic: CryptoDiffer - aggregator of TOP EXPERTS opinions and ratings about TOP ICOs (Read 143 times)

newbie
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
I like the idea with highlights, that`s awesome, don`t need to watch long videos anymore. TY guys.

Thanks!
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
I like what you do in general. That's great tool because I don't need to search the Internet for ratings and other information about ICOs anymore.

UP!
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
I like the idea with highlights, that`s awesome, don`t need to watch long videos anymore. TY guys.
newbie
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
Hello everyone! On February 9th, CryptoDiffer.com (Telegram: t.me/cryptodiffer) was launched, the main purpose of our resource is to aggregate the opinions of top ico experts (not just ratings-numbers, the emphasis is made on comments from the expert) on various ICO projects in one place.

In less than month we succeed to gather more than 4 000 people in our telegram channel.

We take the most up-to-date and verified information from the following sources (sites, experts, bloggers): Ian Balina, ICODROPS, OhHeyMatty, TheGobOne, CryptoBred, HACKED, CrushCrypto, Picolo Research, Lendex, CryptoBot, ICORating, Sergio, Liu Cryptos, DiddyCarter, ICOHotSheet.

We are now being approached by other expert agencies asking to add them too, that is why we need your help to choose the most trustworthy (please do not hesitate to leave comments).

Also we are interested in your opinion on Highlights on AMAs of Experts.
Moreover, right now we are working on CryptoMap, about the importance of this tool you can read here: https://cryptodiffer.com/cryptodiffer-special/

To make long story short, we create categories for existing and upcoming projects in order to make list of real competitors for each project.
You can become a part of this section. Here https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1FtUYw7h136wRfMSpWrTISm-7bv9_gp1bPiOmV-7rYR4/edit?usp=sharing  you can comment on already added projects and leave your opinion for the addition of new ones.

We are looking forward for any feedback and constructive criticism;D
Jump to: