Author

Topic: Cryptonight claymore10.2 versus xmr-stak-amd (Read 278 times)

newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
December 11, 2017, 07:41:05 PM
#3

Claymore on the other hand is faster, in average 100 h per gpu. But it is far from stable, rigs with same settings can reboot every 2 minutes or so.


I use MSI to change & control my GPU settings and get Claymore do only the mining.  I also issue -tt 0 so it will not monitor the cards at all (for I had issue with GPU monitor thread hang).  with those settings im able to have my rigs run for weeks without issue.   Most of my downtime is user created for I wanna mess with something.
jr. member
Activity: 208
Merit: 3
December 11, 2017, 04:58:24 PM
#2
I have played a bit with mining xmr,etn etc.

I have found that xmr-stak-amd miner is a solid. Crashes almost never occur. It can go for days/weeks without a reboot.

Claymore on the other hand is faster, in average 100 h per gpu. But it is far from stable, rigs with same settings can reboot every 2 minutes or so.

So now comes a question does anyone have solution to this. I mean either speed up xmr, either help claymore to be more stable.

p.s. I have played with core, memory, voltages, h and i parameter. Nothing seems brings me closer to reasonable solution Smiley
Try sgminer or Gateless Gate Sharp ... they are very fast. Grin
sr. member
Activity: 366
Merit: 250
December 11, 2017, 04:37:31 PM
#1
I have played a bit with mining xmr,etn etc.

I have found that xmr-stak-amd miner is a solid. Crashes almost never occur. It can go for days/weeks without a reboot.

Claymore on the other hand is faster, in average 100 h per gpu. But it is far from stable, rigs with same settings can reboot every 2 minutes or so.

So now comes a question does anyone have solution to this. I mean either speed up xmr, either help claymore to be more stable.

p.s. I have played with core, memory, voltages, h and i parameter. Nothing seems brings me closer to reasonable solution Smiley
Jump to: