Whether the subject is 911, 5G, or vaccines, the word "nano" is sacred to the myth of a government conspiracy of evil.
The prefix 'nano' is antisemitic. Obviously.
On the first day of life they take a baby into a back room and inject two things. 20,000 times as much 'vitamin K' as is normal WITH a detergent called polysorbate-80. Cell membranes rely on lipids (fats) to exclude undesirable things from passing. A detergent damages this ability.
Along with the 'vitamin K' shots the newborn gets 'hepatitis B vaccine' which is fairly ridiculous because a baby basically cannot get the virus (unless the mother is infected) and by the time it is sharing needles with and doing anal sex on the street, the vaccine has long worn off.
What the Hep-B shot has is a good load of aluminum nano-particles. Often enough, Merck's 'AAHSA' (amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate.) I know from research into my own situation that Merck has licensed this out several decades ago to the likes of LG Biosciences who makes 'euvax' Hep-B. For years they claimed the adjuvant was 'aluminum hydroxide'. Recently they have changed the label and admitted that it was Merck's nano-particles all along.
My analysis of the various scientific papers, and my observation of the ridiculousness of the 'protocol' under the excuse given lead me to believe that this is a focused effort on getting neurons and glia cells within the brain to contain quantities of these aluminum nano-particals, and the most likely reason would seem to me to be to make humans more reactive to electromagnetic stimuli.
It should be relatively obvious that when the medical staff take the newborn into the back room alone to do certain things to it, they don't necessarily have to do the same thing to every child. They could easily prepare different 'batches' of substance for different 'classes' of people. Not that it would be any sort of 100% thing, but if some administrative staffs in some hospitals were playing games like this, the statistical result would be observable in performance differences between groups.
It is worth note that when a group dominated by a certain tribe meet to discuss vaccines and they say that '
everyone' needs to be
vaccinated for the future of 'our children', it could mean different things to different people. When someone in the same group 'jokes' that the solution to '
vaccine hesitancy' is to '
get rid of white people' in the U.S., it does say something about the mindset. Something nasty, and something which is very common among certain factions of this highly ethnic supremacist tribe.
Did you ever hear of a microscope? Debunking your own statement that you are some kind of medical researcher, right?