Author

Topic: Dangers of securing bitcoin on windows? (Read 2782 times)

full member
Activity: 188
Merit: 100
July 30, 2013, 01:35:03 PM
#19
I can run linux - Barely. Of my friends, about 15% could do the same. But I'm not sure I could use Bitcoin while running Linux. Guess I'll have to give it a try. Still, if we can't have secure BitWallets while running Windows on internet connected machines, how can I expect the 85% to adopt Bitcoin? The barriers remain a bit too high for widespread adoption, I think. Hope this changes. Is membership in teh Geek species mandatory? Am I offbase? Are we DOOMED?

Secure hardware wallets are coming to rescue. For example, Trezor. Trezor can be used with untrusted computer and it's safe.

Thanks. I get that it's an arms race, like predator-prey evolution. Maybe it can be fun...
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1024
To start with, don't even try to secure your bitcoins on a computer that is connected to the Internet.

Offline wallets are a minimum requirement when it comes to securing bitcoins.

+1

I'm quite confident that any system that has a significant user base is a target for private and governmental exploits.


ya.ya.yo!
legendary
Activity: 1511
Merit: 1072
quack
I can run linux - Barely. Of my friends, about 15% could do the same. But I'm not sure I could use Bitcoin while running Linux. Guess I'll have to give it a try. Still, if we can't have secure BitWallets while running Windows on internet connected machines, how can I expect the 85% to adopt Bitcoin? The barriers remain a bit too high for widespread adoption, I think. Hope this changes. Is membership in teh Geek species mandatory? Am I offbase? Are we DOOMED?

Secure hardware wallets are coming to rescue. For example, Trezor. Trezor can be used with untrusted computer and it's safe.
full member
Activity: 188
Merit: 100
I can run linux - Barely. Of my friends, about 15% could do the same. But I'm not sure I could use Bitcoin while running Linux. Guess I'll have to give it a try. Still, if we can't have secure BitWallets while running Windows on internet connected machines, how can I expect the 85% to adopt Bitcoin? The barriers remain a bit too high for widespread adoption, I think. Hope this changes. Is membership in teh Geek species mandatory? Am I offbase? Are we DOOMED?
hero member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 501
Firewall
AntiVirus
Wallet offline
Encrypt Wallet

Dual boot -» WIN to Mining , Linux to Wallet.

sr. member
Activity: 437
Merit: 255
Encrypt your wallet and spread it over some cloud spaces in the internet
sr. member
Activity: 290
Merit: 250
A. Put your wallet.dat file in a folder called 'want to play a game' with 1,000,000 other copies of a wallet.dat.
B. See how long it takes them to try out all the wallets.
sr. member
Activity: 403
Merit: 251
Simple solution: Disable updates

Nooo... malware will try to fetch your wallet more vigorously than MS. (or evil government)
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Yeah, sorry the NSA doesnt give a fuck about your bitcoins.

Dragnet surveillance doesn't differentiate. Why bother with filters?

donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
I've said too much.  Cool

If by "too much" you mean complete nonsense well your right.  All the editions of windows server come from the same codebase.
full member
Activity: 235
Merit: 100
July 15, 2013, 09:12:01 PM
#9
I've said too much.  Cool
member
Activity: 71
Merit: 10
July 15, 2013, 09:10:19 PM
#8
Windows Datacenter editions are solid.

..?
full member
Activity: 235
Merit: 100
July 15, 2013, 09:06:26 PM
#7
Windows Datacenter editions are solid.
newbie
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
July 15, 2013, 05:37:05 PM
#6
Yeah, sorry the NSA doesnt give a fuck about your bitcoins.
hero member
Activity: 905
Merit: 1033
BTC: the beginning of stake-based public resources
July 15, 2013, 05:11:44 PM
#5
To start with, don't even try to secure your bitcoins on a computer that is connected to the Internet.

Offline wallets are a minimum requirement when it comes to securing bitcoins.

+1
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1013
July 15, 2013, 12:42:02 PM
#4
To start with, don't even try to secure your bitcoins on a computer that is connected to the Internet.

Offline wallets are a minimum requirement when it comes to securing bitcoins.
legendary
Activity: 905
Merit: 1000
July 15, 2013, 12:37:30 PM
#3
Quote
Personally, if I were any foreign government or corporation, I'd stop using all Microsoft products immediately for fear of America spying on me. Nothing can be secret.  - John C. Dvorak

Windows and Google cannot be trusted.
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
July 15, 2013, 12:22:48 PM
#2
Simple solution: Disable updates
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
July 15, 2013, 07:18:04 AM
#1
Many people here would say that it's safer to secure bitcoin on Linux. Are the Microsoft NSA revelations further proof in the affirmative? Is it possible for 3rd parties to surreptitiously access files on NSA-compliant windows systems?

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2421733,00.asp

Jump to: