Why not let him have his say to explain himself? I thought the post of his you deleted was very reasonable.
They are quoting one persons rant and trying to push blatantly false information. My response to Drak and his false claims are below, and highlights why this smear attempt is happening. I've always been totally transparent, and anyone who takes the time to read that VIA thread and not just the silly post above will see what's really going on.
"Oh dear god. You just spent who knows how long trying to blast me, and completely avoided some very simple and important questions. Drak you basically just did a 600 btc coin grab and rather than attempting to be honest with your community about that you choose instead to spend your time blasting me, making up stories, hoping that somehow this will distract your community from what's really happening. You do however point out occassional truths in hopes that this will somehow make the rest of your false claims more believable. (yes I'm on a crypto Foundation, and yes I was a successful poker player).
You can say I'm vengeful all you want, but if anyone looks back closely at these posts, really ALL i have done is call you out on the 600 btc ICO funds and ask you to let your community know what happened to it and what you plan to do with it moving forward and maybe have some controls in place to ensure it's being used for what it was originally presented which is to advance the coin. If anyone has started any kind of smear campaign to try and hurt anyone else, it should be very evident from your recent post which one of us that is."
