Topic: Dear ICO Teams, stop hiring illiterate bounty managers (Read 172 times)

Among ICO boom I prefer real projects, not an idea but working business. For example NCRYPTO. Trusted team, transparent goal of ICO. This is kind of the project to invest.

i agree with you, audience is important beside the quality of the content. the most important is impact from your article to the project, if you have a good website that have many audience i think you will be approve

Some ICO bounties require those articles to be posted somewhere with a good amount of followers (if you post it on medium) or any other audience, managers expect to get some income from your article. Beside the quality of your english bounty managers still have to analyze the quality of the content you write. Not everyone can be a self made quality journalist. It would be nice if you could show us some of your articles.
P.S. Did you send a PM to those bounty managers? If yes I'm curious to see their respond.

Now, indeed, many people lack the advertising or marketing to become more popular and attract more investors. And if we speak for the developers, then of course it's partly the fault of them, but if we were to logically they were formerly the same investors, and this is a new experience for them and problems begin.

Yes, it disappoints a lot when your good work doesn't get appreciated in the community just because bounty managers cannot judge them and allocate the stakes according to them and article's and blog campaign is one of the big campaigns which needs a professional manager to Judge the articles. I think this problem will be solved soon once the ICO projects leaders will read this post and take this matter in a serious way. The best way to choose the good manager is requesting them to give a small test and reviewing their track record and by this way, we will get some good Bounty Manager for sure.

Most often in a campaign with a complaint, the campaign manager's job is difficult but they should be doing well.

Just like you, ICO projects will be very serious in getting a good campaign manager, not always late in the stake week.
It is wise to listen to the complaints of the participants so that a campaign can be organized and successful

I think recruiting bounty managers needs more experience, at least don't understand anything. You need to know which posts are useful and which are not. Do not know what is useful to the team and the project, and those are useless.

Looks like you have hit the Stone Age. Lol. To be honest there is no way we can control the ICO projects from hiring the manager, it is done with their will and the deal is between the managers and them. If they higher manger which can not tell the difference between high quality English and poor quality English then that is their problem not yours, or it is their solution to get cheap mangers hired. This process is decentralised so you can not do anything about that.

The only thing you can do is, get yourself enrolled into bounty campaigns which are being run by some of the high quality managers. I would say there ar great number of managers like Yahoo, Sylon, ALU team and much more to count on.

I'd say someone like Lauda and her team. I always read and comply with the article rules. Honestly I've often written the objectively best article for many campaigns and been rejected.

I completely agree. Some bounty managers can't even construct a good bounty announcement post.
But most of the time, those are already warning signs and red flags that you should not even be joining those bounties.

So, could you share with us who is the best bounty manager right now? I also curious about it.
Regarding your problem: Did you read the article rules carefully? Every campaign manager has his own strict rule.
Your article will be rejected, no matter how good your articles grammar.

We need an ico for bounty managers 😂 But ok ya they need better managers. However I think that serious companies will use serious bounty managers with good track record.

At first - some part of managers could be not a from UK or USA.
At second - teams hire all people who can help for them for free)

I cannot count the number of times my content article has been the only one in the spreadsheet that's been written by a native English speaker. Most of the time (80% or so) my articles are rejected outright or receive the lowest staking award. When I then contact the team to clarify the staking received, they usually agree it is too low and they subsequently correct the bounty managers staking decision.

The only explanation I can think of as to why bounty managers would give broken English articles maximum staking, yet high word count native English articles that actually have a little character to them no/lowest staking, is that they themselves aren't that familiar with the English language. To them, they can't tell the difference.

So my advise to project teams is this: Hire bounty managers that can at least tell the difference between high quality and shit English articles, so they can allocate staking correctly. Heck, I'll offer to manage bounty campaigns personally if you're interested since I cannot get over how vastly incompetent and idiotic every bounty campaign manager here on this forum seems to be, perhaps apart from the established leaders here. The rest? Utter shit.

So if you're a new team, consider me. Or if you don't, at least make sure your bounty manager isn't a complete moron.