Author

Topic: del (Read 405 times)

member
Activity: 98
Merit: 26
del
November 02, 2017, 11:35:17 PM
#3
I'm guessing that they create an unspendable output with an OP_RETURN which allows you to embed arbitrary data in a transaction. So, they can aggregate a bunch of individual hashes into a single hash, then submit a Bitcoin transaction to an unspendable output with OP_RETURN that contains the literal bytes of the aggregated hash. So, for the cost of about 70-80 bytes or so (assuming compressed signatures), you can embed an unbounded number of hashes into a Bitcoin block, thus timestamping all of those hashes with that block.
sr. member
Activity: 770
Merit: 305
October 30, 2017, 05:07:30 AM
#2
I.e. If I wanted to re-implement this myself what would I need to do?
I think you should hire Peter Todd or ask him what to do.  Grin

Quote
but still dont know how open timestamps actually works.
Hmmmm...
Have a look to https://app.originstamp.org/home
Let us call it "close timestamps" contrary to "open timestamps"
I think it is not very hard to compare these two projects and understand the technique.
If no, you must give up and switch to something else.
sr. member
Activity: 277
Merit: 257
October 30, 2017, 03:18:06 AM
#1
del
Jump to: