Author

Topic: delete (Read 10645 times)

legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
November 09, 2011, 11:48:46 AM
#90
"Gravely mistaken"Huh Do you really think that altcoins of any flavor are important enough to label them "grave"? They are an alternate that is in its infancy. Unluckily for this particular baby, it was born into a village that likes to fuck around with it, with each other, with the rules, with the code, and with the ways to twist a profit out of anything we touch. Your guy created an alt that he, or his vainglorious non-profit Rangeroos can control utterly and completely. I will give credit that his marketing stays on topic- his is maniacal in staying on-message. Unfortunately that message is that his sliced bread is somehow magically better in every conceivable way, and in fact represents a complete re-invention of the concept of bread, and anyone who enjoys bread should immediately flock to his, because it will destroy all other slices in the universe by the very fact of its existence.

It is exactly the message and the delivery of that message that turns people off. Some find the misrepresentations about releasing the code to be the issue that drives their criticism, others look to the gross mis-statements about non-centralized control nodes which are in fact exactly the opposite, to be a turn-off. SC has a horrible poster child, and he scares anybody legitimate off. SC will never enjoy any significant market adoption because the self proclaimed messianic goofball who runs it is such a complete and utter failure at interpersonal communication. He is a liar, me is an arrogant braggart, and he is an unrepentant simpleton who thinks that screaming at the world will convince the world that he is right, either in person or through proxies.

You choose to be one such proxy- Yay, you! You are a savvy investor who watches and plays the markets closely. Yay, you! You want to preach the gospel of how wrong the rest of the world is because we don't fall into lockstep with you on following the screaming fuck-wit rowing the wrong way on your slave galley of fools. Yay, you, you have found purpose in the world! Dial back the vitriol, muzzle your mouthy little bitch-in-charge and the world might be able to consider SC on it's own merits without a headache from the incessant noise. Many who have taken a look at it have determined that it doesn't fit their needs, and many of those have decided to share their reasoned criticism with the world. Your shilling and pimping is not going to change facts, regardless of how many times you scream "troll" Chicken Lemon. The only sky that is falling is your own credibility for representing a really crappy batch of snake oil.

 Kiss
sr. member
Activity: 291
Merit: 250
BTCRadio Owner
November 09, 2011, 01:35:13 AM
#89
"Gravely mistaken"Huh Do you really think that altcoins of any flavor are important enough to label them "grave"? They are an alternate that is in its infancy. Unluckily for this particular baby, it was born into a village that likes to fuck around with it, with each other, with the rules, with the code, and with the ways to twist a profit out of anything we touch. Your guy created an alt that he, or his vainglorious non-profit Rangeroos can control utterly and completely. I will give credit that his marketing stays on topic- his is maniacal in staying on-message. Unfortunately that message is that his sliced bread is somehow magically better in every conceivable way, and in fact represents a complete re-invention of the concept of bread, and anyone who enjoys bread should immediately flock to his, because it will destroy all other slices in the universe by the very fact of its existence.

It is exactly the message and the delivery of that message that turns people off. Some find the misrepresentations about releasing the code to be the issue that drives their criticism, others look to the gross mis-statements about non-centralized control nodes which are in fact exactly the opposite, to be a turn-off. SC has a horrible poster child, and he scares anybody legitimate off. SC will never enjoy any significant market adoption because the self proclaimed messianic goofball who runs it is such a complete and utter failure at interpersonal communication. He is a liar, me is an arrogant braggart, and he is an unrepentant simpleton who thinks that screaming at the world will convince the world that he is right, either in person or through proxies.

You choose to be one such proxy- Yay, you! You are a savvy investor who watches and plays the markets closely. Yay, you! You want to preach the gospel of how wrong the rest of the world is because we don't fall into lockstep with you on following the screaming fuck-wit rowing the wrong way on your slave galley of fools. Yay, you, you have found purpose in the world! Dial back the vitriol, muzzle your mouthy little bitch-in-charge and the world might be able to consider SC on it's own merits without a headache from the incessant noise. Many who have taken a look at it have determined that it doesn't fit their needs, and many of those have decided to share their reasoned criticism with the world. Your shilling and pimping is not going to change facts, regardless of how many times you scream "troll" Chicken Lemon. The only sky that is falling is your own credibility for representing a really crappy batch of snake oil.
Amen.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
November 09, 2011, 01:31:58 AM
#88
"Gravely mistaken"Huh Do you really think that altcoins of any flavor are important enough to label them "grave"? They are an alternate that is in its infancy. Unluckily for this particular baby, it was born into a village that likes to fuck around with it, with each other, with the rules, with the code, and with the ways to twist a profit out of anything we touch. Your guy created an alt that he, or his vainglorious non-profit Rangeroos can control utterly and completely. I will give credit that his marketing stays on topic- his is maniacal in staying on-message. Unfortunately that message is that his sliced bread is somehow magically better in every conceivable way, and in fact represents a complete re-invention of the concept of bread, and anyone who enjoys bread should immediately flock to his, because it will destroy all other slices in the universe by the very fact of its existence.

It is exactly the message and the delivery of that message that turns people off. Some find the misrepresentations about releasing the code to be the issue that drives their criticism, others look to the gross mis-statements about non-centralized control nodes which are in fact exactly the opposite, to be a turn-off. SC has a horrible poster child, and he scares anybody legitimate off. SC will never enjoy any significant market adoption because the self proclaimed messianic goofball who runs it is such a complete and utter failure at interpersonal communication. He is a liar, me is an arrogant braggart, and he is an unrepentant simpleton who thinks that screaming at the world will convince the world that he is right, either in person or through proxies.

You choose to be one such proxy- Yay, you! You are a savvy investor who watches and plays the markets closely. Yay, you! You want to preach the gospel of how wrong the rest of the world is because we don't fall into lockstep with you on following the screaming fuck-wit rowing the wrong way on your slave galley of fools. Yay, you, you have found purpose in the world! Dial back the vitriol, muzzle your mouthy little bitch-in-charge and the world might be able to consider SC on it's own merits without a headache from the incessant noise. Many who have taken a look at it have determined that it doesn't fit their needs, and many of those have decided to share their reasoned criticism with the world. Your shilling and pimping is not going to change facts, regardless of how many times you scream "troll" Chicken Lemon. The only sky that is falling is your own credibility for representing a really crappy batch of snake oil.

sr. member
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
November 09, 2011, 12:37:54 AM
#87
"Gravely mistaken"Huh Do you really think that altcoins of any flavor are important enough to label them "grave"? They are an alternate that is in its infancy. Unluckily for this particular baby, it was born into a village that likes to fuck around with it, with each other, with the rules, with the code, and with the ways to twist a profit out of anything we touch. Your guy created an alt that he, or his vainglorious non-profit Rangeroos can control utterly and completely. I will give credit that his marketing stays on topic- his is maniacal in staying on-message. Unfortunately that message is that his sliced bread is somehow magically better in every conceivable way, and in fact represents a complete re-invention of the concept of bread, and anyone who enjoys bread should immediately flock to his, because it will destroy all other slices in the universe by the very fact of its existence.

It is exactly the message and the delivery of that message that turns people off. Some find the misrepresentations about releasing the code to be the issue that drives their criticism, others look to the gross mis-statements about non-centralized control nodes which are in fact exactly the opposite, to be a turn-off. SC has a horrible poster child, and he scares anybody legitimate off. SC will never enjoy any significant market adoption because the self proclaimed messianic goofball who runs it is such a complete and utter failure at interpersonal communication. He is a liar, me is an arrogant braggart, and he is an unrepentant simpleton who thinks that screaming at the world will convince the world that he is right, either in person or through proxies.

You choose to be one such proxy- Yay, you! You are a savvy investor who watches and plays the markets closely. Yay, you! You want to preach the gospel of how wrong the rest of the world is because we don't fall into lockstep with you on following the screaming fuck-wit rowing the wrong way on your slave galley of fools. Yay, you, you have found purpose in the world! Dial back the vitriol, muzzle your mouthy little bitch-in-charge and the world might be able to consider SC on it's own merits without a headache from the incessant noise. Many who have taken a look at it have determined that it doesn't fit their needs, and many of those have decided to share their reasoned criticism with the world. Your shilling and pimping is not going to change facts, regardless of how many times you scream "troll" Chicken Lemon. The only sky that is falling is your own credibility for representing a really crappy batch of snake oil.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
November 08, 2011, 04:48:49 PM
#86

Not centrally controlled by design, stop jerking off to the rhetoric.  It has a small amount of centralized economic consolidation, which is planned to be controlled by a non-profit.


Not centrally controlled by design? Are you stupid?  

Ok Viper Lemon Bitch I will *pretend* that central control was accidental LOL, but it is still centrally controlled, thank you for explaining.

Small amount of control? Again Are you stupid?

Coinhunter recently demonstrated that he could totally force any code change he wanted no matter how many of the peasant miners objected. Case in point, (IRC logs below) Ahimoth one of the top SC "co-conspirators" was complaining about not knowing no more than 3 minutes in advance of the block reward change from 32 to 5. A lot of the inner circle chimed in and basically RS said "Tough Shit". CH/RS confirms he didn't ask, discuss or need anyone's permission to change his block chain.

It doesn't matter if it is CH/RS, A Non Profit or God himself, Central Control is just that, no matter who or what wields it. This is nothing more than Paypal without any of the good and no real merchant system will trade with a system that can be stopped, can be manipulated or hijacked at will, at any time by a single entity, no matter who it is.

~BCX~



IRC Logs showing CH/RS demonstrating his total control
[23:36] <@RealSolid> FlipPro: no one except ahimoth knew about the 5SC change
[23:36] blobber_: why not now?
[23:36] <@RealSolid> and he only knew about it 3 minutes before i told the channel
[23:36] I know this
[23:36] Thats a PROBLEM
[23:36] thats part of the problem
[23:36] yea...
[23:36] <@RealSolid> no its good



The King changes the rules of the game, the peasants must obey and conform Wink

You don't argue with his lordship, King RealSolidScam.
member
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
November 08, 2011, 01:08:55 PM
#85
makes you lot sound like you're in some troll cult fan club organization.

 Do you have any sense of irony ? At least a basic self-awareness ?
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
November 08, 2011, 11:29:36 AM
#84
You sir are gravely mistaken...

Quote
Check the source, it installs pre-hacked. Central control can do anything they want with your coins, your account and you ability to do anything about it. And has.
Not centrally controlled by design, stop jerking off to the rhetoric.  It has a small amount of centralized economic consolidation, which is planned to be controlled by a non-profit.

RS has the private keys of all 10 control accounts.  The control accounts decide what gets accepted.  If RS wants to change something, he changes the code on the control nodes - and if you don't follow suite you have no recourse.  Without more 'control accounts' from legitimate 'sc millionaires' to override the 12m+ premine RS gave to himself, there is *nothing* to prevent RS from doing what he wants.

You're better at math than I am Viper, how long will it take for 13m solidcoins to be mined?  And that's only meeting the theoretical threshold.

That's not talking about the tax and where it goes.  That's talking about the core mechanics themselves are enforced by one person, who has already seen fit to change mechanics at will.

You sir are gravely mistaken,

That's complete centralization.

Edit:  Also Viper, you should be less concerned with whatever 'lies and rhetoric' are on bitcointalk forums.  If you don't like it, you're more than welcome to leave.  However note the ironic privilege you enjoy here, being able to 'correct' others - while your dear leader censors most correction.
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
November 08, 2011, 09:35:16 AM
#83
its possible, should the SC network grow in size and power then the trusted nodes would become redundant.... they were only really needed because of the asses that would destroy a new alt chain while its starting out.

You don't honestly believe that do you?

You think it is a coincidence that King RealScam owns 100% of the control nodes (they have nothing to do w/ trust).
You think it is a coincidence that the network can't operate without consent of the control nodes.
You think it is a coincidence that after giving himself 12M+ coins and then early adopter cronies another 2M in "broken" difficulty adjustment the reward was cut 87%.

The control nodes will never go away.  They exist for the purpose of allowing a single person complete and never ending control over the network.

At the current rate of generation the network will only produce roughly 1M coins a year.  The network follows the decision of 51% of control money so to take the network out of King RealSolid hands would require ~12M new control nodes.  Lets just say roughly a decade.  It is never going to happen.
sr. member
Activity: 518
Merit: 250
November 08, 2011, 05:03:53 AM
#82
its possible, should the SC network grow in size and power then the trusted nodes would become redundant.... they were only really needed because of the asses that would destroy a new alt chain while its starting out.
sr. member
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
November 08, 2011, 03:19:56 AM
#81
I can only wonder how a coding class would make anyone accept the concept of "trusted nodes" which should actually be called "co-conspirator nodes"? Even if the proverbial 10,000 monkeys put together the most streamlined, crisp, never breaks at all wonder-code for sc, nothing can change the fact that the concept is fatally flawed. Who wants something where one person can dictate changes and values at will? It doesn't work in this model. Perhaps there is a community of intellectual troglodytes somewhere on the planet who have need of a value transfer mechanism that can be manipulated by a single sociopath. And maybe they can use those tokens to buy rides on a short bus to the head shop, or a ticket to see pigs fly, but here in the real world? Shortbus coins are as useless as tits on a boar. And about as desirable.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
November 08, 2011, 03:09:15 AM
#80
I can't read source code.

I know, otherwise you would never have made such a ludicrous statement.
If we are wrong about the trusted nodes, you could prove it by posted filenames and linenumbers of the relevant code.
Too bad you can't read the source to know what to post.  Roll Eyes

All the code for the trusted nodes is there. If you don't find it, you should take a coding class.
sr. member
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
November 08, 2011, 02:56:04 AM
#79

I keep hearing about this fail but I'm not seeing it....
127 btc worth of market cap on the largest exchange compared to 350 for ltc. It may be currently valued higher, but that's artificial price support by those who benefit from free pre-mining and unlimited free coins.
Quote
SC hasn't been hacked
Check the source, it installs pre-hacked. Central control can do anything they want with your coins, your account and you ability to do anything about it. And has.
Quote
Price is pretty stable (and higher than all other alt currencies except NMC.)
Price is a minimal sample size and irrelevant to other altcoins. Each stands on its own merits or failings. Nmc actually have a purpose, ltc has a theoretical purpose, sc, gg, tbx, and fbx are get-rich-quick schemes by their various founders. At least the brix and gg are honest about it, and are trying to retroactively find a raison d'etre.
Quote
Development is still happening rapidly. (Improved qt based client in the works.)
Rapid bug fixes that create new bugs to cover up for falsehoods, fraud and extremely poor coding do not count as development, regardless of how much the developer claims his time is worth per hour. There are literally hundreds of useful bitcoin and altcoin features in the works. Open source, which sc does not enjoy, actually encourages development. Closed source, especially closed source based on pirated software inhibits development.
Quote
Even some merchants have started to come on board. (Head shop today!)
A single Head Shop, regardless of how critical that is to your personal economy, is not widespread merchant adoption. Think about the model of sc, and honesty answer yourself... if I was running a widget market, and my customers wanted to pay in a p2p crypto currency, would I prefer the world standard and those based on that format, or some buggy uncertain scam that is controlled by one emotionally unstable person who is beyond my jurisdiction in terms of enforcement of anything I hope to get from his coin? It hasn't happened, it isn't happening, and it isn't going to happen. That's just plain, cold, hard facts.
Quote
I know it's a little different to the other coins and doesn't conform totally to the decentralised dream, but failing it 'aint.
Let's take this one in parts- it's not "a little different" it is the antithesis of what altcoins are all about. It is the complete and intentional opposite championed by shouting fans who want to attract more victims so they can break even and get out of the pyramid before the world sees that the emperor is buck ass naked. Oops, too late. And he's is certifiable at the same time. Then, "doesn't conform totally to the decentralised (sic) dream". The very foundational concept of p2p crypto coins is to provide a anonymous decentralized model for value transfer. What sc does is give you nothing but centralized control, governed by a sociopath with enormous mood swings and delusions of grandeur. Saying it "doesn't conform totally..." is like saying Stalin had a couple of bad days at the office. He slaughtered his own population by the millions. Its that kind of power imbalance.

Is it alive? Yes. If that is your definintion "ain't failing" I concede the point meets your less than stringent standards of evidence. Will it ever be accepted outside of a very tiny, incestuous micro-society of mutual parasites feeding off each other, and one or two purveyors of alternate lifestyle accessories? No. Why would any legitimate business person even consider it? Because some jacked up Visual Basic cut and paste code thief says it is the most secure thing, and well on the way to parity with btc, ready to take over prominence any moment now? Please, get a grip on reality.

Have fun in your little clubhouse, you guys can knock yourselves out minting those wacky little shortbus coins and pretending that the world will someday care what Doctor Ding Dong feeds you as gospel. That's a big ain't.

sr. member
Activity: 324
Merit: 250
November 08, 2011, 12:18:16 AM
#78

Eventually the shock factor of SC's spectacular fail will die down and their trolls won't have a leg to stand on anymore.  Just ignore them, move along, and be sure to only post if it contributes to the discussion.

I keep hearing about this fail but I'm not seeing it....
SC hasn't been hacked
Price is pretty stable (and higher than all other alt currencies except NMC.)
Development is still happening rapidly. (Improved qt based client in the works.)
Even some merchants have started to come on board. (Head shop today!)
I know it's a little different to the other coins and doesn't conform totally to the decentralised dream, but failing it 'aint.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
November 07, 2011, 10:30:05 PM
#77
That or the mods could actually do their fucking job and get rid of the little pricks once and for all.

 Hear that mods ? Do your fucking job or promote other people so they are able to clean these forums of the shit that's clogging it.

 Getting tired of it all and it's really starting to make this place look bad.

The mods have cleaned up.  I think the only reason alt currencies have their own forum is because Off-Topic was becoming flooded (i might be wrong).

Eventually the shock factor of SC's spectacular fail will die down and their trolls won't have a leg to stand on anymore.  Just ignore them, move along, and be sure to only post if it contributes to the discussion.
member
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
November 07, 2011, 10:12:01 PM
#76
That or the mods could actually do their fucking job and get rid of the little pricks once and for all.

 Hear that mods ? Do your fucking job or promote other people so they are able to clean these forums of the shit that's clogging it.

 Getting tired of it all and it's really starting to make this place look bad.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
November 07, 2011, 06:41:41 PM
#75
I can't read source code.

I know, otherwise you would never have made such a ludicrous statement.
If we are wrong about the trusted nodes, you could prove it by posted filenames and linenumbers of the relevant code.
Too bad you can't read the source to know what to post.  Roll Eyes
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
November 07, 2011, 06:33:32 PM
#74
We are probably never going to actually read or understand the already published trusted node source code.

Corrected it for you Smiley
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
November 07, 2011, 05:25:05 PM
#73
In all fairness, it'd be impossible to 'prove' what code the control nodes are running. In order to bridge the gap from believing the same source we have is the source the majority of control nodes are running, it takes trusting in people who have zero accountability.
We know that the trusted nodes are synchonized somehow, so that only one is signing blocks at any given time. I'm not sure if this would require any changes to the client itself - possibly not - but the software to do this synchronization definitely isn't public.

Which is an interesting case: RS previously stated that the CPF would be used to legally pursue control account operators if they act 'malicious'.  That would be fine and dandy if there were some kind of public, notarized contract (with legalese I can't even begin to imagine), signed by 10 different real, verifiable people, who would take financial responsibility for anything their control account, of the initial 10, puts/denies into the network.

POLL: Who here who has looked at the source would sign that contract? Roll Eyes
I certainly wouldn't. In fact, that seems like a seriously bad idea.

The King controls the land and castles ( trusted nodes ). The peasants ( miners ) only bow down to his majesty. All hail King RealScam !!!

We are probably never going to see the trusted node source code.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 564
November 07, 2011, 01:11:22 PM
#72
In all fairness, it'd be impossible to 'prove' what code the control nodes are running. In order to bridge the gap from believing the same source we have is the source the majority of control nodes are running, it takes trusting in people who have zero accountability.
We know that the trusted nodes are synchonized somehow, so that only one is signing blocks at any given time. I'm not sure if this would require any changes to the client itself - possibly not - but the software to do this synchronization definitely isn't public.

Which is an interesting case: RS previously stated that the CPF would be used to legally pursue control account operators if they act 'malicious'.  That would be fine and dandy if there were some kind of public, notarized contract (with legalese I can't even begin to imagine), signed by 10 different real, verifiable people, who would take financial responsibility for anything their control account, of the initial 10, puts/denies into the network.

POLL: Who here who has looked at the source would sign that contract? Roll Eyes
I certainly wouldn't. In fact, that seems like a seriously bad idea.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
November 07, 2011, 05:51:02 AM
#71
heh, just noticed im in the logs, OMG IM MTV FAMOUS NOW Cheesy

What logs ?
sr. member
Activity: 291
Merit: 250
BTCRadio Owner
November 06, 2011, 09:32:45 PM
#70
heh, just noticed im in the logs, OMG IM MTV FAMOUS NOW Cheesy
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
November 06, 2011, 09:11:05 PM
#69
Well, I didn't but even if I did the focal point is CH's BS replies.


Once again I've noticed that since the release of the source you no longer try to attack many of the previously denied claims but do the only thing you can, try and deflect.

The partial source code release has outted Solidcoin for what it really is.

How is the source code release "partial"  Huh
It compiles and runs just fine, looks quite complete to me.

He didn't release the code for the trusted nodes or the 2.0 release.

In all fairness, it'd be impossible to 'prove' what code the control nodes are running. In order to bridge the gap from believing the same source we have is the source the majority of control nodes are running, it takes trusting in people who have zero accountability.

Which is an interesting case: RS previously stated that the CPF would be used to legally pursue control account operators if they act 'malicious'.  That would be fine and dandy if there were some kind of public, notarized contract (with legalese I can't even begin to imagine), signed by 10 different real, verifiable people, who would take financial responsibility for anything their control account, of the initial 10, puts/denies into the network.

POLL: Who here who has looked at the source would sign that contract? Roll Eyes

But then, what of control accounts from 'legitimate' SC Millionares?  They've signed no such contract.  It's back to zero accountability.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
November 06, 2011, 09:10:39 PM
#68
Well, I don't play games sonny. I'm too old for that. What are you, like 17 ? Keep on playing your childish games all day and you will get very far in life very fast.

I'm a very siccessful 41 year old and I play video games as a hobby.

How is gaming any different than scrap booking, which my sister does, or volleyball, which my brother does, or knitting, which my step sister does?  Just a way to pass time.  Playing video games occupies the mind a lot more than watching TV.

Define "siccessful" ( sic ) for me please.

Success would be different to different people.  I play some games (at 44), but nothing especially modern.  So some random measures could be:
 - I'm still married (25 years), alive, and my daughter is attending university next year.
 - I've done well in business, well enough to pay off my house, travel a bit and still have money in the bank.
 - My hobbies are a bit expensive (mainly my car for track purposes), and computer stuff.
 - We help keep various people alive and/or provide support to different causes (more my wife's organising than mine)

Also, I would tend not to write "buggy" or messy code, and if I promised source was supposed to be released, I'd stick by that.  I struggle to see how Solidcoin, and the people behind it measure their success as it is still struggling to gain traction.  Obfuscation and distraction generating a bunch of annoyed people doesn't seem to be very successful outcome.

I would also really like it if Ten98 could look up the definition of troll and use the term properly.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
November 06, 2011, 08:41:43 PM
#67
Well, I didn't but even if I did the focal point is CH's BS replies.


Once again I've noticed that since the release of the source you no longer try to attack many of the previously denied claims but do the only thing you can, try and deflect.

The partial source code release has outted Solidcoin for what it really is.

How is the source code release "partial"  Huh
It compiles and runs just fine, looks quite complete to me.

He didn't release the code for the trusted nodes or the 2.0 release.
sr. member
Activity: 327
Merit: 250
we are legion
November 06, 2011, 08:37:01 PM
#66
Well, I didn't but even if I did the focal point is CH's BS replies.


Once again I've noticed that since the release of the source you no longer try to attack many of the previously denied claims but do the only thing you can, try and deflect.

The partial source code release has outted Solidcoin for what it really is.

How is the source code release "partial"  Huh
It compiles and runs just fine, looks quite complete to me.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
November 06, 2011, 08:10:18 PM
#65
Define "siccessful" ( sic ) for me please.

"Siccessful" was a typo.  If you look on your keyboard, you'll see the i and u right next to each other.  Smiley
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
November 06, 2011, 07:48:20 PM
#64
Well, I don't play games sonny. I'm too old for that. What are you, like 17 ? Keep on playing your childish games all day and you will get very far in life very fast.

I'm a very siccessful 41 year old and I play video games as a hobby.

How is gaming any different than scrap booking, which my sister does, or volleyball, which my brother does, or knitting, which my step sister does?  Just a way to pass time.  Playing video games occupies the mind a lot more than watching TV.

Define "siccessful" ( sic ) for me please.
member
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
November 06, 2011, 06:53:07 PM
#63
Oh BCX made a new account called "foxit"  Grin

 This post advances the thread how ? Speculative at best. Please try to refrain from making useless posts and baseless accusations.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
November 06, 2011, 06:45:27 PM
#62
Well, I don't play games sonny. I'm too old for that. What are you, like 17 ? Keep on playing your childish games all day and you will get very far in life very fast.

I'm a very successful 41 year old and I play video games as a hobby.

How is gaming any different than scrap booking, which my sister does, or volleyball, which my brother does, or knitting, which my step sister does?  Just a way to pass time.  Playing video games occupies the mind a lot more than watching TV.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
November 06, 2011, 05:41:09 PM
#61
Coinhunter is finally starting to try to answer questions from new SC people. I cannot believe the absolute BS he says, does he think people cannot read, nor observe for themselves?

*He says he hasn't spent a single coin from the CPF as the left overs from SC1 are still very plentiful.

* No one is "born" as an SC millionaire (Guess he forget about the 12 million pre-mine)

* Repeats that 112 million is unspendable (Guess he forgot he released the source)

http://solidcointalk.org/topic/429-yet-another-topic-with-questions/page__view__findpost__p__4202

Oh BCX made a new account called "foxit"  Grin
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
November 02, 2011, 01:09:45 PM
#60
Game playing only stops when you give up looking at the world with the eyes of a child.
You when you don't have enough time Sad I wish I could still play...
sr. member
Activity: 313
Merit: 251
Third score
November 02, 2011, 01:06:37 PM
#59
Hey stop that ageism! I'm 52 and damn proud of my standing in my Clan. Game playing only stops when you give up looking at the world with the eyes of a child.

Thanks for the age mentioning Loup, I'll send your post to my wife. I won't let her complain for another 7 years when I'm playing CSS Wink. I hope you'll still be around at that time to re-establish the age threshhold.

Cheers! from another young old man.
sr. member
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
November 02, 2011, 12:41:56 PM
#58
Hey stop that ageism! I'm 52 and damn proud of my standing in my Clan. Game playing only stops when you give up looking at the world with the eyes of a child.
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
November 02, 2011, 12:36:03 PM
#57
Well, I don't play games sonny. I'm too old for that. What are you, like 17 ? Keep on playing your childish games all day and you will get very far in life very fast.

Today that makes about as much sense as saying "I don't watch movies I am too old.  What are you a kid?"

Video games generate more revenue than the movie industry today and are still growing.  Most games are purchased and played by adults.  Just like movies, books, and other forms of entertainment.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
November 02, 2011, 11:34:52 AM
#56
Well, I don't play games sonny. I'm too old for that. What are you, like 17 ? Keep on playing your childish games all day and you will get very far in life very fast.
It's part of surgery training, duh Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
November 02, 2011, 11:18:56 AM
#55
@sd

I think Viper Lemon Bitch is a true believer. Even though it is clearly obvious that Coinhunter is pissing all over him he 100% believes it's just raining because CH tells him so.

What about me ? Did you managed to confirm I am not RS yet ? Thank you !


Puhleese...........gimme a break and just release the source.

So you were not able to dox my account Huh I want you to confirm I am not RS. I stopped trolling for SC long time ago.

Dude, You do know that ALOT of modern games (namely BF3) Is allowed to Ban you for trolling right? That how pissed off the world is at trolls, And you were Trolling for fucking RS and his SC's
We dont like you.

Well, I don't play games sonny. I'm too old for that. What are you, like 17 ? Keep on playing your childish games all day and you will get very far in life very fast.
hero member
Activity: 950
Merit: 1001
November 02, 2011, 10:56:26 AM
#54
It's impossible to confirm that anyone ISN'T RS, only possible to confirm someone IS RS. For all you guys know, everyone on this forum is the same really busy guy.  Tongue
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
November 02, 2011, 10:34:56 AM
#53
Dude, You do know that ALOT of modern games (namely BF3) Is allowed to Ban you for trolling right?
One of the reasons why I stopped playing DRM-ed games. They abuse the DRMs to enforce censorship. So they can eat dust and drop dead, as far as I'm concerned.
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
November 02, 2011, 10:25:54 AM
#52
@sd

I think Viper Lemon Bitch is a true believer. Even though it is clearly obvious that Coinhunter is pissing all over him he 100% believes it's just raining because CH tells him so.

What about me ? Did you managed to confirm I am not RS yet ? Thank you !


Puhleese...........gimme a break and just release the source.

So you were not able to dox my account Huh I want you to confirm I am not RS. I stopped trolling for SC long time ago.

Dude, You do know that ALOT of modern games (namely BF3) Is allowed to Ban you for trolling right? That how pissed off the world is at trolls, And you were Trolling for fucking RS and his SC's
We dont like you.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
November 02, 2011, 06:46:39 AM
#51
@sd

I think Viper Lemon Bitch is a true believer. Even though it is clearly obvious that Coinhunter is pissing all over him he 100% believes it's just raining because CH tells him so.

What about me ? Did you managed to confirm I am not RS yet ? Thank you !


Puhleese...........gimme a break and just release the source.

So you were not able to dox my account Huh I want you to confirm I am not RS. I stopped trolling for SC long time ago.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
November 01, 2011, 04:38:39 PM
#50
@sd

I think Viper Lemon Bitch is a true believer. Even though it is clearly obvious that Coinhunter is pissing all over him he 100% believes it's just raining because CH tells him so.

What about me ? Did you managed to confirm I am not RS yet ? Thank you !
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
November 01, 2011, 10:19:12 AM
#49
@sd

I think Viper Lemon Bitch is a true believer. Even though it is clearly obvious that Coinhunter is pissing all over him he 100% believes it's just raining because CH tells him so.

I think it might be a case of being the #2 man in the turd kingdom is better than being a nobody in a much larger project like Bitcoin.  I was curious about the reaction to 80% revenue drop for the pesants so I checked the ScamCoin forums.  Two people were logged in.  One was the glorious leader and the other was Viper.

I think as flawed as it is he thinks he will ride the coatails to something of significance. My guess is when it crashes and burns he leaves crypto-currency scene completely and becomes one of those people writing illogical rants about Bitcoin.
sd
hero member
Activity: 730
Merit: 500
November 01, 2011, 04:51:50 AM
#48
Ten98 is not a Coinhunter sock puppet. His name is John Eddowes and he lives in in the UK, works for Tesco...
This guy: http://en-gb.facebook.com/people/John-Eddowes/595051435

He looks like a loon, but I'm having trouble believing anyone who devotes his life to supplying good quality groceries and other delicious items at very reasonable prices can be an internet troll.

Yes that is him. Honestly outside of his Solidcoin jerkness he seems like an alright sort of guy.

After searching google for his username I see he lives in Welwyn Garden City ( nice place, if somewhat boring ), has a wide taste in music, and uses an iphone 3gs. He also eats sweet and sour lion at the Tesco canteen, yum! He really does seem like a perfectly normal guy. Sooner or later he will figure out that the SC RS paid him to troll these forums are worthless and he will give up.

Hopefully that viper lemon party clown will give up too.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
October 31, 2011, 11:34:15 PM
#47
I figured SC stopped using the bulanula account when it got banned from the btc-e chat.
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
October 31, 2011, 07:00:04 PM
#46
What "aims" was that?  I just thought you found out the Kool-Aid was rancid and got disillusioned.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
October 31, 2011, 06:49:56 PM
#45
So then you are not going to take up on the offer it seems ?
sr. member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 250
October 31, 2011, 05:15:19 PM
#44
Ten98 is not a Coinhunter sock puppet. His name is John Eddowes and he lives in in the UK, works for Tesco...

This guy: http://en-gb.facebook.com/people/John-Eddowes/595051435

He looks like a loon, but I'm having trouble believing anyone who devotes his life to supplying good quality groceries and other delicious items at very reasonable prices can be an internet troll.


Yes that is him. Honestly outside of his Solidcoin jerkness he seems like an alright sort of guy.

Thanks. You on the other hand are a rather offensive individual.
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1077
October 31, 2011, 04:11:39 PM
#43
Ten98 is not a Coinhunter sock puppet. His name is John Eddowes and he lives in in the UK, works for Tesco...

This guy: http://en-gb.facebook.com/people/John-Eddowes/595051435

He looks like a loon, but I'm having trouble believing anyone who devotes his life to supplying good quality groceries and other delicious items at very reasonable prices can be an internet troll.

Is siding with solidcoin equivilant to being an "internet troll" now? The sentiment is opposite at solidcointalk.
sd
hero member
Activity: 730
Merit: 500
October 31, 2011, 01:54:43 PM
#42
Ten98 is not a Coinhunter sock puppet. His name is John Eddowes and he lives in in the UK, works for Tesco...

This guy: http://en-gb.facebook.com/people/John-Eddowes/595051435

He looks like a loon, but I'm having trouble believing anyone who devotes his life to supplying good quality groceries and other delicious items at very reasonable prices can be an internet troll.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1006
October 31, 2011, 11:34:57 AM
#41
This didn't actually happen.
Come on CoinHunter at least try and keep your sockpuppets identies seperate.

How would you know unless you are CoinHunter/RealSolid?  RealSolid is never in IRC when you aren't?

I asked on meta if we could get these stupid sockpuppets banned and never got a response.

CoinHunter - pretending to be a total moron isn't a good disguise for you, you are already a total moron so your sockpuppets look and act exactly like you. No-one believes SolidCoin has a snowball's chance in hell of getting you rich. You can't code, you can't design, and no-one likes you.

If BCX is right about you being Daniel Parnell you should know you look like a freak. Have a wash, a shave, get a proper job, and stop trolling projects you don't understand.


Well wow, this is going to be strange but I am going to have to defend Ten98.

Ten98 is not a Coinhunter sock puppet. His name is John Eddowes and he lives in in the UK, works for Tesco. I doxxed him by following his IP trail to Tesco Broadband eventually connecting that to Facebook page which was plastered with Bitcoin, Solidcoin and cryptocurrency crap as well as referring to himself as Ten98. He has since removed it from FB. He has a very man beast looking girlfriend. Definitely a pork connoisseur.

Coinhunter is definitely Daniel Parnell. I nailed him by cross matching the address on SC whois to billing information in iTunes. Simply looking at the massive online rantings of Mr. Parnell especially that he considers himself a coding god, left no doubt. However, his taste in women is far better than Ten98.

Ten98 aka Beastmaster lives in the UK and Coinhunter aka 8======D lives in Melbourne, Australia.

Unfortunately Ten98, I have been booted or banned call it what you will, four separate times. Somewhere in these threads other people witnessed it and posted about it. CH is a coward.



lmao, doxxed.

i guess since you have access to itunes, you can easily doxx people. not a good thing, but hey.
sd
hero member
Activity: 730
Merit: 500
October 31, 2011, 09:26:16 AM
#40
This didn't actually happen.
Come on CoinHunter at least try and keep your sockpuppets identies seperate.

How would you know unless you are CoinHunter/RealSolid?  RealSolid is never in IRC when you aren't?

I asked on meta if we could get these stupid sockpuppets banned and never got a response.

CoinHunter - pretending to be a total moron isn't a good disguise for you, you are already a total moron so your sockpuppets look and act exactly like you. No-one believes SolidCoin has a snowball's chance in hell of getting you rich. You can't code, you can't design, and no-one likes you.

If BCX is right about you being Daniel Parnell you should know you look like a freak. Have a wash, a shave, get a proper job, and stop trolling projects you don't understand.
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
October 31, 2011, 09:10:57 AM
#39
BTCEX: We'd love to see you in there using your real nick for once instead of coming in using fake names...

HAHA The three times I have, RealSolid bans in less than a minute even though I have never posted once.


This didn't actually happen.

Come on CoinHunter at least try and keep your sockpuppets identies seperate.

How would you know unless you are CoinHunter/RealSolid?  RealSolid is never in IRC when you aren't?
sr. member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 250
October 31, 2011, 09:07:51 AM
#38
BTCEX: We'd love to see you in there using your real nick for once instead of coming in using fake names...

HAHA The three times I have, RealSolid bans in less than a minute even though I have never posted once.


This didn't actually happen.
hero member
Activity: 950
Merit: 1001
October 30, 2011, 02:05:18 AM
#37
I think that would be a fun read! You should post the log here if you do it.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
October 29, 2011, 11:23:38 PM
#36
I challenge RS to an open debate in IRC about Solidcoin.

Nothing good comes from debating zealots and megalomaniacs. They are not logical and quick to anger when their authority is challenged and/or confronted with facts that don't fit their paradigm.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
October 29, 2011, 03:12:01 PM
#35
they're digging their own grave guys, just let them. its not hard to see them walking slowly off the cliff. it's just a matter of time. hopefully the smart ones will dump and profit now before it's too late.

Can you even move the coins around now to do that last I heard there was transaction bug which prevented it.

yea, i think the exchanges have to update to some beta code that god knows what other bug will introduce. any business man with common sense is going to stay away from buggy closed code that could be doing who knows what. If I were an exchange or pool, I wouldn't be hosting that software, no way.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
October 29, 2011, 01:10:13 PM
#34
they're digging their own grave guys, just let them. its not hard to see them walking slowly off the cliff. it's just a matter of time. hopefully the smart ones will dump and profit now before it's too late.
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
October 29, 2011, 09:15:29 AM
#33
So sp0tter is a troll?

Solid Coin Troll definition: anyone who disagrees with or points out legitimate criticism of the glorious leader.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
October 29, 2011, 08:33:26 AM
#32
I guess you were just screwiing with me, make that four times now banned instantly by Realsolid on sign in.

Usually only trolls get banned :-)

In Solidcoin IRC simply saying anything RS disagrees with gets you banned. The same way sp0tter got banned last night for simply calling him out on BS. RS is one of the biggest cowards on the internet.
It's true, I looked at the log, BTCEX was banned almost immediatly

So my statements remains: trolls get banned ^^
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
October 29, 2011, 07:49:15 AM
#31
I guess you were just screwiing with me, make that four times now banned instantly by Realsolid on sign in.

Usually only trolls get banned :-)

In Solidcoin IRC simply saying anything RS disagrees with gets you banned. The same way sp0tter got banned last night for simply calling him out on BS. RS is one of the biggest cowards on the internet.
It's true, I looked at the log, BTCEX was banned almost immediatly
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
October 29, 2011, 05:48:44 AM
#30
I guess you were just screwiing with me, make that four times now banned instantly by Realsolid on sign in.

Usually only trolls get banned :-)
donator
Activity: 1654
Merit: 1350
Creator of Litecoin. Cryptocurrency enthusiast.
October 28, 2011, 09:27:07 PM
#29
BTCEX: We'd love to see you in there using your real nick for once instead of coming in using fake names...

HAHA The three times I have, RealSolid bans in less than a minute even though I have never posted once.

Ten98, I'm surprised you even suggested this. I assume you hang out in #solidcoin all the time. You should know that RealSolid bans us the moment we log in with our username or our IP. And anyone dares say anything bad about solidcoin or complain about it, they get banned pretty quickly. #solidcoin is run by a tyrant, and it's the opposite of "free for anyone to come in and chat to us, even trolls are welcome". If you want a real free chatroom, come visit #litecoin and talk about SC if you want. Everyone is welcome even you, Ten98. I won't ban anyone, except for spammers. So far, I have not banned a single person.
Coblee, it looks like you are not banned from #solidcoin right now.

I figured I'd take up on Ten98's offer and try again. I haven't been banned yet.
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1077
October 28, 2011, 09:24:55 PM
#28
BTCEX: We'd love to see you in there using your real nick for once instead of coming in using fake names...

HAHA The three times I have, RealSolid bans in less than a minute even though I have never posted once.

Ten98, I'm surprised you even suggested this. I assume you hang out in #solidcoin all the time. You should know that RealSolid bans us the moment we log in with our username or our IP. And anyone dares say anything bad about solidcoin or complain about it, they get banned pretty quickly. #solidcoin is run by a tyrant, and it's the opposite of "free for anyone to come in and chat to us, even trolls are welcome". If you want a real free chatroom, come visit #litecoin and talk about SC if you want. Everyone is welcome even you, Ten98. I won't ban anyone, except for spammers. So far, I have not banned a single person.
Coblee, it looks like you are not banned from #solidcoin right now.
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1002
October 28, 2011, 08:49:04 PM
#27
Dude, RS said his goal with 1) to make a currency 2) which is stronger than governments 3) to take over the world.

I'm not a legal expert by any means, but that is some crazy shit.  Crazy shit that I wouldn't want anyone to get wrapped up in due to ignorance.

If you think SC is clean from liability, great.  I don't.

Why are you constantly bringing this up? "Making a currency which is stronger than governments and taking over the world" is not bad advertisement at all. Smiley
donator
Activity: 1654
Merit: 1350
Creator of Litecoin. Cryptocurrency enthusiast.
October 28, 2011, 08:40:45 PM
#26
BTCEX: We'd love to see you in there using your real nick for once instead of coming in using fake names...

HAHA The three times I have, RealSolid bans in less than a minute even though I have never posted once.

Ten98, I'm surprised you even suggested this. I assume you hang out in #solidcoin all the time. You should know that RealSolid bans us the moment we log in with our username or our IP. And anyone dares say anything bad about solidcoin or complain about it, they get banned pretty quickly. #solidcoin is run by a tyrant, and it's the opposite of "free for anyone to come in and chat to us, even trolls are welcome". If you want a real free chatroom, come visit #litecoin and talk about SC if you want. Everyone is welcome even you, Ten98. I won't ban anyone, except for spammers. So far, I have not banned a single person.
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
October 28, 2011, 02:18:14 PM
#25
It doesn't mean a thing. That statement was in relation to Liberty Dollar, who clearly tried to make a currency that resembles the US dollar.

The last time I looked, the solidcoin logo was still purple.


+1 and i hate SC,

That nicely written peice of Legal document does not affect us.
I touch only bitcoins.

+1 and I am 100% convinced ScamCoin is worthless.

LibertyCoin was a case of fraud and counterfiting.  Nothing more.  It has absolutely nothing to do with Bitcoin, ScamCoin, or any other alt-coin unless you decide to launch "FederalReserveCoins" and make statement indicating it is legal tender and guaranteed by the US Federal Reserve to be good for all debts public and private.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
October 28, 2011, 01:04:27 PM
#24
Not too sharp yet are we?  Taken econ 101 yet?
No, that would be a waste of my time. But you obviously haven't either, otherwise you wouldn't be a SC worshiper.
The dollar isn't a proper reserve currency.[...]
Happy now?
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
October 28, 2011, 12:41:56 PM
#23
I'll just leave this here:
Note use of future tense in the very last sentence.
I wonder if those intelligent people are the same who said in September "hey, 18M max coins isn't enough, let's make that infinite and premine 13M already!" and then a few days ago "wow, we're making far too many coins, we should make new blocks worth 1/7th of what they used to!" Oh, well...

Maybe one day, some currency will replace the US dollar as a reserve currency, it could even be based on crypto technology.
The dollar isn't a reserve currency. Gold is. Because it, unlike any printed or computed money, has an intrinsic value.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 500
October 28, 2011, 12:24:37 PM
#22
Btw, what is the connection between SolidCoin and Al-Qaeda?
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
October 28, 2011, 11:57:34 AM
#21
Maybe one day, some currency will replace the US dollar as a reserve currency, it could even be based on crypto technology.

How cool would that be. Suddenly the entity controlling the money wouldn't be the only one printing the money.

There are too many US dollars anyway...
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
October 28, 2011, 11:44:21 AM
#20
It doesn't mean a thing. That statement was in relation to Liberty Dollar, who clearly tried to make a currency that resembles the US dollar.

The last time I looked, the solidcoin logo was still purple.



Hey, maybe your right.  But... maybe I'm right.

The US has a funny way of interpreting laws and precedents - and SC put itself in that test chamber.  Don't be stuck holding the bag.

Every post you make you discredit yourself further. I wonder if anyone actually listens to you.

Dude, RS said his goal with 1) to make a currency 2) which is stronger than governments 3) to take over the world.

I'm not a legal expert by any means, but that is some crazy shit.  Crazy shit that I wouldn't want anyone to get wrapped up in due to ignorance.

If you think SC is clean from liability, great.  I don't.
sr. member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 250
October 28, 2011, 11:34:50 AM
#19
It doesn't mean a thing. That statement was in relation to Liberty Dollar, who clearly tried to make a currency that resembles the US dollar.

The last time I looked, the solidcoin logo was still purple.



Hey, maybe your right.  But... maybe I'm right.

The US has a funny way of interpreting laws and precedents - and SC put itself in that test chamber.  Don't be stuck holding the bag.

Every post you make you discredit yourself further. I wonder if anyone actually listens to you.
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
October 28, 2011, 11:26:18 AM
#18
It doesn't mean a thing. That statement was in relation to Liberty Dollar, who clearly tried to make a currency that resembles the US dollar.

The last time I looked, the solidcoin logo was still purple.


+1 and i hate SC,

That nicely written peice of Legal document does not affect us.
I touch only bitcoins.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
October 28, 2011, 11:24:43 AM
#17
It doesn't mean a thing. That statement was in relation to Liberty Dollar, who clearly tried to make a currency that resembles the US dollar.

The last time I looked, the solidcoin logo was still purple.



Hey, maybe your right.  But... maybe I'm right.

The US has a funny way of interpreting laws and precedents - and SC put itself in that test chamber.  Don't be stuck holding the bag.
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
October 28, 2011, 11:21:40 AM
#16
It doesn't mean a thing. That statement was in relation to Liberty Dollar, who clearly tried to make a currency that resembles the US dollar.

The last time I looked, the solidcoin logo was still purple.

full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
October 28, 2011, 11:21:16 AM
#15
If you think that is the same as mining a SolidCoin, you are dead wrong. And besides, if SolidCoin *is* found guilty in some way of "undermining the US Dollar" (lol) the exact same charge could be brought against Bitcoin.

No.  Bitcoin is open source, and no one in development has ever stated their intent is to subvert governments.  That was fucking retarded on RS's part.

RS screwed up bigtime.

I suggest to anyone who holds/mines SC inside of the US to GET RID OF ANY AND ALL TRACE you ever even had SC on your machine.
sr. member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 250
October 28, 2011, 11:18:18 AM
#14
What does this mean for people in the US who hold/mine/use SolidCoin?

Quote
“Attempts to undermine the legitimate currency of this country are simply a unique form of domestic terrorism,” U.S. Attorney Anne Tompkins said. “While these forms of anti-government activities do not involve violence, they are every bit as insidious and represent a clear and present danger to the economic stability of this country.”

“We are determined to meet these threats through infiltration, disruption and dismantling of organizations which seek to challenge the legitimacy of our democratic form of government,” Tompkins said.


I live in the US.  The above is some scary shit. RS fucked up.

It means that U.S. Attorney Anne Tompkins isn't getting enough pussy and feels the need to make grandiose statements to raise her own profile while winning an open-and-shut counterfeiting case.

If you're trying to compare Liberty Dollars to Solidcoin you really won't get very far. Here's what the person she's talking about, Bernard Von NotHaus, was charged with:

"Von NotHaus designed the Liberty Dollar currency in 1998 and the Liberty coins were marked with the dollar sign ($); the words dollar, USA, Liberty, Trust in God (instead of In God We Trust); and other features associated with legitimate U.S. coinage. Since 1998, NORFED has been issuing, disseminating, and placing into circulation the Liberty Dollar in all its forms throughout the United States and Puerto Rico. NORFED’s purpose was to mix Liberty Dollars into the current money of the United States. NORFED intended for the Liberty Dollar to be used as current money in order to limit reliance on, and to compete with, United States currency."

Source: http://www.fbi.gov/charlotte/press-releases/2011/defendant-convicted-of-minting-his-own-currency

If you think that is the same as mining a SolidCoin, you are dead wrong. And besides, if SolidCoin *is* found guilty in some way of "undermining the US Dollar" (lol) the exact same charge could be brought against Bitcoin.

Lrn2facts.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
October 28, 2011, 11:05:10 AM
#13
What does this mean for people in the US who hold/mine/use SolidCoin?

Quote
“Attempts to undermine the legitimate currency of this country are simply a unique form of domestic terrorism,” U.S. Attorney Anne Tompkins said. “While these forms of anti-government activities do not involve violence, they are every bit as insidious and represent a clear and present danger to the economic stability of this country.”

“We are determined to meet these threats through infiltration, disruption and dismantling of organizations which seek to challenge the legitimacy of our democratic form of government,” Tompkins said.


I live in the US.  The above is some scary shit. RS fucked up.
sr. member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 250
October 28, 2011, 10:34:54 AM
#12
Standard policy for most channels that have nothing to hide is daily posting of the logs so people can have a searchable record of past conversations.

"Standard Policy"?? Beg pardon? Whose standard exactly? I don't believe there are a council of elders that govern what people do on IRC, but I could be wrong?

Hmmm, I betcha, That if i walk in, And RealSolid is there, I'll beable to bitch about SC's source code not being out, And i'll get banned.

How much longer is this drabble going to go on for? Just leave solid coin and it will die.

-snipped some rude and hateful comments!-


Jeez, well with an attitude like that mister grumpy face you will get banned!

The IRC channel is a place for nice people to discuss ideas about SolidCoin and try to help one another, not to ask for the Source Code over and over and over in new and increasingly less interesting ways. You will get your god damn Source Code, just chill buddy.

legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
October 28, 2011, 10:13:26 AM
#11
Hmmm, I betcha, That if i walk in, And RealSolid is there, I'll beable to bitch about SC's source code not being out, And i'll get banned.

How much longer is this drabble going to go on for? Just leave solid coin and it will die.

I dont see Anyone Liking it, Just a bunch of Dicks trying to "grab alot of SC's then sell them when their worth something"
And so honestly, If the whole SC market is people like RealSolid, Do you actually expect to earn money off this? Seriously?

Fuck for all he cares he'll start a New chain the second someone gets more coins than he owns. and ban anyone who bitches
and then make a public statement of "there was a bad bug in SC's chain and it needed to be reset, Sorry"
sr. member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 250
October 28, 2011, 09:58:10 AM
#10
Guys guys guys, I know that the

#SolidCoin channel on IRC (freenode.net, right next door to the #Bitcoin channel, in case you were wondering)

is a really cool place to hang out and chat to the creator of SolidCoin and other cool guys (like me  Cool) but do you really need to post the logs every day? It's free for anyone to come in and chat to us, even trolls are welcome. I mean, if people want to read this stuff they can just come into the channel for themselves?

BTCEX: We'd love to see you in there using your real nick for once instead of coming in using fake names...

It's true that people are getting impatient and frustrated waiting for the Source Code to come out, we have so many people eager to help us create the world's #1 CryptoCurrency it's not surprising that people really want to get started as quickly as they can.

Guys, just have patience, we will get there Grin
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
October 28, 2011, 03:31:30 AM
#9
I don't hold any SC 2.0, nor have I installed it on any machine.  So I'm clean  Wink

edit: it also may be a liability for bitcointalk.org
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
October 28, 2011, 03:30:09 AM
#8
Am I the only one who sees that holding SC just became a huge liability?

I'm not super clear on laws, but I'm pretty sure holding a currency whose intentions are to subvert governments is frowned upon, legally.  Depending on where you live, of course.

Maybe you should forward this to your congressmen if you really are concerned! It doesn't help to protect the country if just publish it in a small niche forum...
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
October 28, 2011, 03:16:46 AM
#7
Am I the only one who sees that holding SC just became a huge liability?

I'm not super clear on laws, but I'm pretty sure holding a currency whose intentions are to subvert governments is frowned upon, legally.  Depending on where you live, of course.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
October 28, 2011, 03:13:45 AM
#6
Hey retard, Ahimoth was the only person other than Ch to know about the block reduction and to have the source. I think that qualifies as inner circle. His own people are calling SC dead if he continues to lead it.

Could you please mark the according sentences above? As "retard" I am not able to get your points  Smiley
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
October 28, 2011, 03:06:06 AM
#5
This is his inner circle of devs supposedly, normally he would just ban anyone else.

If you really think that a PUBLIC IRC channel which can be joined by anyone (besides the banned accounts) is the inner circle  Grin

You can also get there and discuss about SC2 if you like  Smiley
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
October 28, 2011, 02:48:16 AM
#4
Yeah, CH is now actively saying he's trying to subvert governments and take over the world.  I mean, this is just nuts.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
October 28, 2011, 02:42:27 AM
#3
I'll just leave this here:





legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1015
October 28, 2011, 02:01:40 AM
#2
legendary
Activity: 1210
Merit: 1024
October 28, 2011, 01:25:44 AM
#1
delete
Jump to: