good to see that fat slob turning up to bring DOCTORED quotes and taking them out of context as If i went to his thread and posted that ... when really this is a part of a quote that is corroborated by observable instances of deliberately trying to derail and prevent open debate of my initial post.
How did you quote this I deleted the topic already. Anyway locking this since we will deal with the rule breaks that seem above the law here by other means if possible before troubling others that are of no trouble to ourselves for the most part. Or we will approach it in a more diplomatic manner.
If people want to make their on topic and relevant case relating to the OP and then if validated want to make a claim that is observably correct. Then that is different.
This is NOT what they are doing. They are appearing and ADMITTING to not reading the OP and trying to derail and stop open debate of the central points contained.
Now fuck off before you debunk your own argument and get to look foolish and humiliated all over again. We tired of defeating fat weak minded slobs that can't even avoid running to the cookie jar every 2 mins. We want REAL debate with individuals that have some form of capacity for critical thinking and sensible reasoned debate. You obviously would not fit that description.
Now stop quoting posts we deleted since we deleted them for a reason.
Also we understand you are in idiot but I am sure quickseller does not support you having that banner and we are sure he is not paying for you to wear it.
Therefore your point is as useful as most that you try to make on this forum. AKA fucking net negative.
Topic: delete it (Read 209 times)
We notice lately a LOT of CHIPMIXER spammers, spamming our threads with OFF TOPIC LOW VALUE POSTS. There are others sponsors too but this one seems the primary sponsor for this behavior.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/merit-stats-road-to-legend-zero-to-hero-i-wanna-be-merit-source-too-5181755
HERE IS ONE SUCH THREAD NOTICE THE CHIPMIXER SPAMMERS POSTS THESE ARE CLEARLY OFF TOPIC AND LOW VALUE.
Should we be contacting CHIPMIXER to ask what kind of measure they are going to put in place to STOP SPONSORING OBSERVABLY UNTRUSTWORTHY TROLLS AND SPAMMERS? ARE CHIPMIXER ALSO SPONSORING SCAMMER SUPPORTERS??
Really I think CHIPMIXER are sponsoring a lot of people who are breaking the boards rules and spoiling the entire atmosphere here.
Dark_star is actually not that bad for a DT member and seemingly rather fair. HOWEVER should he be making greater efforts with members here to ensure CHIPMIXER is not associated with sponsoring spammers, trolls, scam supporters and sneaky racist sock puppet scum bags?
What are the credentials required to be sponsored by CHIPMIXER??
Dark_star do you think people flagrantly break the boards rules, that come to thread derailing ADMITTING THEY WILL NOT READ THE OP and rather just spam off topic and irrelevant noise?
Also you seem to be sponsoring a moderator here that gives merit to these kinds of posts, and refuses to delete other off topic sexual explicit slurs that are off topic and irrelevant.
We would like to hear from campaign managers what they think about this and if they are happy paying members to post these kinds of things and support proven scammers?
Should you really be associating your projects with these kinds of members?
We are open to full and transparent debate. This is not a self moderated thread. Feel free to present your case and explain your decisions to pay people for these kinds of posts.
We want to hear your side before starting any kind of stronger threads on this matter.
Also do you actually manually analyse the posts quality of these people. How do you asses the quality of their posts? Do you take the ABUSED OLD TRUST SYSTEM into account? Do you manually review their trust they have given and received and investigate the claims made on there?
It is time to stop battling from the bottom up. Time to take the discussion to the projects and the moderation level first. Cut the snakes head off rather than chipping away at the tail.
Paying people to break the rules and spam and troll whilst observable and undeniably trust abusing other members accounts seems to be worry for the projects that will be soon answering for sponsoring those kinds of behaviors.
Let's all discuss the payment and sponsorship of these types of behaviors.
Look forward to open and transparent discussions where you can bring your observable instances to corroborate your statements and opinions on many aspects of the systems of control, the moderation here, the sponsorship and sig scampaigns and many other important issues.
Time for us all to be responsible for our behaviors no more hiding behind weight of numbers of fellow scammers, and scam facilitators. Your days are done here. The gravy train is about to make its final stop and you guys are all getting off. haha
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/merit-stats-road-to-legend-zero-to-hero-i-wanna-be-merit-source-too-5181755
HERE IS ONE SUCH THREAD NOTICE THE CHIPMIXER SPAMMERS POSTS THESE ARE CLEARLY OFF TOPIC AND LOW VALUE.
Should we be contacting CHIPMIXER to ask what kind of measure they are going to put in place to STOP SPONSORING OBSERVABLY UNTRUSTWORTHY TROLLS AND SPAMMERS? ARE CHIPMIXER ALSO SPONSORING SCAMMER SUPPORTERS??
Really I think CHIPMIXER are sponsoring a lot of people who are breaking the boards rules and spoiling the entire atmosphere here.
Dark_star is actually not that bad for a DT member and seemingly rather fair. HOWEVER should he be making greater efforts with members here to ensure CHIPMIXER is not associated with sponsoring spammers, trolls, scam supporters and sneaky racist sock puppet scum bags?
What are the credentials required to be sponsored by CHIPMIXER??
Dark_star do you think people flagrantly break the boards rules, that come to thread derailing ADMITTING THEY WILL NOT READ THE OP and rather just spam off topic and irrelevant noise?
Also you seem to be sponsoring a moderator here that gives merit to these kinds of posts, and refuses to delete other off topic sexual explicit slurs that are off topic and irrelevant.
We would like to hear from campaign managers what they think about this and if they are happy paying members to post these kinds of things and support proven scammers?
Should you really be associating your projects with these kinds of members?
We are open to full and transparent debate. This is not a self moderated thread. Feel free to present your case and explain your decisions to pay people for these kinds of posts.
We want to hear your side before starting any kind of stronger threads on this matter.
Also do you actually manually analyse the posts quality of these people. How do you asses the quality of their posts? Do you take the ABUSED OLD TRUST SYSTEM into account? Do you manually review their trust they have given and received and investigate the claims made on there?
It is time to stop battling from the bottom up. Time to take the discussion to the projects and the moderation level first. Cut the snakes head off rather than chipping away at the tail.
Paying people to break the rules and spam and troll whilst observable and undeniably trust abusing other members accounts seems to be worry for the projects that will be soon answering for sponsoring those kinds of behaviors.
Let's all discuss the payment and sponsorship of these types of behaviors.
Look forward to open and transparent discussions where you can bring your observable instances to corroborate your statements and opinions on many aspects of the systems of control, the moderation here, the sponsorship and sig scampaigns and many other important issues.
Time for us all to be responsible for our behaviors no more hiding behind weight of numbers of fellow scammers, and scam facilitators. Your days are done here. The gravy train is about to make its final stop and you guys are all getting off. haha
Great to see cryptohunter in top form again and tackling the serious issue of spoiling the forum atmosphere:
You are a fucking scum bag croatian dog.
Not sure how this nuked noob is involved here though.
BTW I'm sponsored by Quickseller so blame him for anything you think I'm doing wrong.
decided not to trouble those that have not directly troubled us ...
delete this thread.
should really be an option to delete your own thread if nobody has replied on it as yet.
delete this thread.
should really be an option to delete your own thread if nobody has replied on it as yet.
Jump to: