I like those people trying to share their knowledge about strategy in dice gambling, even though we know that it is clearly dice gambling don't have strategies and that is based on your luck. I am in favor of this technique(not a strategy) but you need a huge fund to cover up your losses. Because low chances of winning from bankrolls will result also a low chances of winning. Nevertheless, I tried these tecniques so many time in Windice, it works for me for a while.
Yes, it is good to see the Op share the technique found on observation and experimenting. This technique won't be successful with every user and for a long time as mentioned. Dice scripts won't be the same with each and every dice website. Also with dice fund is the one that is much more important to recover loss and increase the winning probabilities.
Topic: Dicing Strategy - 7% Winning chance | Run Over 15 Hours, Try it! (Read 212 times)
October 23, 2019, 09:57:45 AM
I like those people trying to share their knowledge about strategy in dice gambling, even though we know that it is clearly dice gambling don't have strategies and that is based on your luck. I am in favor of this technique(not a strategy) but you need a huge fund to cover up your losses. Because low chances of winning from bankrolls will result also a low chances of winning. Nevertheless, I tried these tecniques so many time in Windice, it works for me for a while.
Yes, it is good to see the Op share the technique found on observation and experimenting. This technique won't be successful with every user and for a long time as mentioned. Dice scripts won't be the same with each and every dice website. Also with dice fund is the one that is much more important to recover loss and increase the winning probabilities. October 23, 2019, 09:34:54 AM
I like those people trying to share their knowledge about strategy in dice gambling, even though we know that it is clearly dice gambling don't have strategies and that is based on your luck. I am in favor of this technique(not a strategy) but you need a huge fund to cover up your losses. Because low chances of winning from bankrolls will result also a low chances of winning. Nevertheless, I tried these tecniques so many time in Windice, it works for me for a while.
October 23, 2019, 09:25:53 AM
Its a psychological game op.
Example : People try to convince themselves that they can win more by choosing a 1.01x multiplier and feel confident that they can never lose in the long run and end up screwing themselves.
The percentiles don't really matter(7% winning chance, 98% winning chance etc) obviously which is why all these strategies are pointless. Instead, just choose a 2x multiplier and go all in(Yolo gambling) which I feel is a better strategy in the short term.
Back in the days where i do really hope for this kind of strategy where even 1.01x multiplier would give you out that endless greens since losing percentage is into its minimal.Example : People try to convince themselves that they can win more by choosing a 1.01x multiplier and feel confident that they can never lose in the long run and end up screwing themselves.
The percentiles don't really matter(7% winning chance, 98% winning chance etc) obviously which is why all these strategies are pointless. Instead, just choose a 2x multiplier and go all in(Yolo gambling) which I feel is a better strategy in the short term.
One loss will really takes time for you to recover or to make up and hitting up a loss is not possible as long there's an edge you are really bound to hit it up unless if you are way
too lucky on playing dice and able to stop while you are winning then good for you but if you do let your greed control over your mind then stopping wouldnt be an option for you.
October 23, 2019, 06:59:34 AM
Kindly enlighten me, i am not sure if i am calculating this correctly
I have the chance of hitting 125/125 losses at 1/10,000 rounds
So technically for every 10,000 round of 125 Bets, i have chance of 1 over the 10,000 for hitting a loss in streak of 125
Thus, when i bet over 125*10,000 single games = 1,250,000 single bet = I am having a close to 100% losing chance
I have the chance of hitting 125/125 losses at 1/10,000 rounds
So technically for every 10,000 round of 125 Bets, i have chance of 1 over the 10,000 for hitting a loss in streak of 125
Thus, when i bet over 125*10,000 single games = 1,250,000 single bet = I am having a close to 100% losing chance
You might be misunderstanding what a "chance" is. You can hit 125 losses immediately. The low chance doesn't mean it won't happen, and it doesn't mean it needs 10,000 tries to happen. On a larger scale, if you play for example 1 million rounds then your number of 125-loss streaks should be around ~100 but there is always variance.
In other words, you will lose, and sometimes you will lose very quickly, so any "strategy" expecting a win just means that will lose in frustration.
October 23, 2019, 03:30:14 AM
I tried these kinds of strategies before, but it seems you need a lot of capital on this. Quite risky but that's how dice gambling works.
I had set 5% chances of winning against the house edge and got 43 losses in a row but after that, boom, I'd won and quit. That is a very simple strategy, don't play a long time in dice gambling because the more time you spend the more chances of losing.
However, this dice gambling is based on luck. If you did not win after how many rolling the dice. Just quit and relax, comeback in the next day when you are ready. Anyway, good sharing OP I will try that one.
I had set 5% chances of winning against the house edge and got 43 losses in a row but after that, boom, I'd won and quit. That is a very simple strategy, don't play a long time in dice gambling because the more time you spend the more chances of losing.
However, this dice gambling is based on luck. If you did not win after how many rolling the dice. Just quit and relax, comeback in the next day when you are ready. Anyway, good sharing OP I will try that one.
October 23, 2019, 03:23:21 AM
I think that these strategies may work for a really short amount of time and you can’t escape the doom of losing all of your bankroll if you keep playing.Up until now no one has been able to win in the long run and consistently against the house.When that happens casinos would cease to exist.
October 23, 2019, 03:11:53 AM
Its a psychological game op.
Example : People try to convince themselves that they can win more by choosing a 1.01x multiplier and feel confident that they can never lose in the long run and end up screwing themselves.
The percentiles don't really matter(7% winning chance, 98% winning chance etc) obviously which is why all these strategies are pointless. Instead, just choose a 2x multiplier and go all in(Yolo gambling) which I feel is a better strategy in the short term.
Example : People try to convince themselves that they can win more by choosing a 1.01x multiplier and feel confident that they can never lose in the long run and end up screwing themselves.
The percentiles don't really matter(7% winning chance, 98% winning chance etc) obviously which is why all these strategies are pointless. Instead, just choose a 2x multiplier and go all in(Yolo gambling) which I feel is a better strategy in the short term.
This one seems to be an impatient roller. That is so me when I begin to get bored of waging small bets. I'd rather end up with nothing or all.
I'm done experimenting on winning chances. And whether you go for 98% or 2% chance of winning, the end will always be the same-- the house wins. I prefer playing either with 50% winning chance or x2 payout. At least the feeling is that the game is fair even though the house still has the edge over you.
October 23, 2019, 02:31:35 AM
People try to convince themselves that they can win more by choosing a 1.01x multiplier and feel confident that they can never lose in the long run and end up screwing themselves.
they feel confident because the chance of loosing is small versus to winning but the winning is only small and the amount that you loose is till big . itll only make the game longer which is a waste if battery to your gadget and energy to yourself . its okay to play with this strategy if you have a different purpose and not mainly for the profits .The percentiles don't really matter(7% winning chance, 98% winning chance etc) obviously which is why all these strategies are pointless. Instead, just choose a 2x multiplier and go all in(Yolo gambling) which I feel is a better strategy in the short term.
percent does matter . people usually go for high percent of winning than to low percent but winning big but for me 2x is better because the result are instant .
October 23, 2019, 02:02:29 AM
Its a psychological game op.
Example : People try to convince themselves that they can win more by choosing a 1.01x multiplier and feel confident that they can never lose in the long run and end up screwing themselves.
The percentiles don't really matter(7% winning chance, 98% winning chance etc) obviously which is why all these strategies are pointless. Instead, just choose a 2x multiplier and go all in(Yolo gambling) which I feel is a better strategy in the short term.
Example : People try to convince themselves that they can win more by choosing a 1.01x multiplier and feel confident that they can never lose in the long run and end up screwing themselves.
The percentiles don't really matter(7% winning chance, 98% winning chance etc) obviously which is why all these strategies are pointless. Instead, just choose a 2x multiplier and go all in(Yolo gambling) which I feel is a better strategy in the short term.
October 22, 2019, 06:57:59 PM
I'm always love seeing people share their strategy in dice game like this. Actually i always do rough calculate like this, on 7% win chance / it has 14.14x if you hit that, so the streak losses could be more / around 140x (14.14x10), you need to make sure your balance can cover until 140 losses. But it's rarely happened, just like OP said, i only had around 125-130 losses while i running on dicebot. There will be always a chance to lose more than 140 streak losses though.
October 19, 2019, 10:30:50 PM
"You will lose the 3.5 XRP if you hit a losing streak of – 125 Losses in Row
Risk of hitting 125 Losses in Row at 93% Lose Chance is 0.0115% ~ which also means 1/10,000"
Risk of hitting 125 Losses in Row at 93% Lose Chance is 0.0115% ~ which also means 1/10,000"
That bolded statement. That's only 125 losing streak, what if you experience more than that because of bad luck? I'm sure you will be busted and won't even had a chance to run if for over 15 hours. I don't know if you guys have experienced in on line dice gambling, but this strategy doesn't look good to me, specially that we all know that sooner or later the house edge will kick in and the longer you play, your chances of losing multiply exponentially.
I agree with the point where the longer you play, your chances of losing multiply exponentially
Kindly enlighten me, i am not sure if i am calculating this correctly
I have the chance of hitting 125/125 losses at 1/10,000 rounds
So technically for every 10,000 round of 125 Bets, i have chance of 1 over the 10,000 for hitting a loss in streak of 125
Thus, when i bet over 125*10,000 single games = 1,250,000 single bet = I am having a close to 100% losing chance
Thus, if i actually got busted at the 125,000th Bet, i am actually hitting the 10% losing chance?\
Not sure if i am calculating this correctly
As i am currently running another method with 8%, the profit over time seems better in the short run but the risk expose is higher hmm
October 19, 2019, 04:57:14 PM
"You will lose the 3.5 XRP if you hit a losing streak of – 125 Losses in Row
Risk of hitting 125 Losses in Row at 93% Lose Chance is 0.0115% ~ which also means 1/10,000"
Risk of hitting 125 Losses in Row at 93% Lose Chance is 0.0115% ~ which also means 1/10,000"
That bolded statement. That's only 125 losing streak, what if you experience more than that because of bad luck? I'm sure you will be busted and won't even had a chance to run if for over 15 hours. I don't know if you guys have experienced in on line dice gambling, but this strategy doesn't look good to me, specially that we all know that sooner or later the house edge will kick in and the longer you play, your chances of losing multiply exponentially.
October 19, 2019, 12:18:50 PM
"You will lose the 3.5 XRP if you hit a losing streak of – 125 Losses in Row
Risk of hitting 125 Losses in Row at 93% Lose Chance is 0.0115% ~ which also means 1/10,000"
Good point, the OP has achieved a profit of 0.9 XRP in over 100,000 bets, while statistically he should have already hit at least 1 loss streak
that would enact a loss of 3 XRP, so over the long run he has clear negative expected value with this strategy by far,
and in my opinion the OP can at least attempt more aggressive grid strategies that can give you better reward to risk in the short run...
Yeah the luck is beyond the statistics
Anyhow yeah
Gambling winning streak doesn't last as house always win in the long run
Still trying with tons of numbers and somehow luck is really something that no one can explain statistically when it go along/go against you
sooner or later you would really wipe out that entire balance of yours if you do decide to take it too long to run automatically but since the test amount isn't really that big to consider then it isn't really that a bad idea to make up some testing.
October 19, 2019, 11:10:49 AM
"You will lose the 3.5 XRP if you hit a losing streak of – 125 Losses in Row
Risk of hitting 125 Losses in Row at 93% Lose Chance is 0.0115% ~ which also means 1/10,000"
Good point, the OP has achieved a profit of 0.9 XRP in over 100,000 bets, while statistically he should have already hit at least 1 loss streak
that would enact a loss of 3 XRP, so over the long run he has clear negative expected value with this strategy by far,
and in my opinion the OP can at least attempt more aggressive grid strategies that can give you better reward to risk in the short run...
Yeah the luck is beyond the statistics
Anyhow yeah
Gambling winning streak doesn't last as house always win in the long run
Still trying with tons of numbers and somehow luck is really something that no one can explain statistically when it go along/go against you
October 19, 2019, 11:07:38 AM
https://dicing.xyz/7-percent-strategy/
Had made a run over 15 hours
Settings, result and facts are written in the post
Feel free to try out
Requirement: 3.5 XRP
Potential Profit(Daily) : 0.9 XRP
Kindly run and tell me how long did you manage to run until you lose your entire balance
You seem to have run into a small winning streak so congratulations on that Had made a run over 15 hours
Settings, result and facts are written in the post
Feel free to try out
Requirement: 3.5 XRP
Potential Profit(Daily) : 0.9 XRP
Kindly run and tell me how long did you manage to run until you lose your entire balance
But everyone knows this winning streak will not last forever and I dont think many people will want to play for 15 hours
I hope you continue winning at the dice game but there isnt enough profits for me with your strategy
October 19, 2019, 11:06:21 AM
"You will lose the 3.5 XRP if you hit a losing streak of – 125 Losses in Row
Risk of hitting 125 Losses in Row at 93% Lose Chance is 0.0115% ~ which also means 1/10,000"
Good point, the OP has achieved a profit of 0.9 XRP in over 100,000 bets, while statistically he should have already hit at least 1 loss streak
that would enact a loss of 3 XRP, so over the long run he has clear negative expected value with this strategy by far,
and in my opinion the OP can at least attempt more aggressive grid strategies that can give you better reward to risk in the short run...
October 19, 2019, 10:16:26 AM
Do people really need to wait for them to bust up? XRP amount required isn't really that much so playing with this strat isn't bad either.
From the article which been mentioned;
"You will lose the 3.5 XRP if you hit a losing streak of – 125 Losses in Row
Risk of hitting 125 Losses in Row at 93% Lose Chance is 0.0115% ~ which also means 1/10,000"
This always been proved out that sooner or later, the house will just simply bust out your entire bankroll.
From the article which been mentioned;
"You will lose the 3.5 XRP if you hit a losing streak of – 125 Losses in Row
Risk of hitting 125 Losses in Row at 93% Lose Chance is 0.0115% ~ which also means 1/10,000"
This always been proved out that sooner or later, the house will just simply bust out your entire bankroll.
October 19, 2019, 05:45:19 AM
https://dicing.xyz/7-percent-strategy/
7% Low Profit Strategy
Run Time: 15 Hour
Feel free to try out
Break Even on Day 4 if able to run the first 3 Day successfully
Requirement: 3.5 XRP
Potential Profit(Daily) : 0.9 XRP
https://dicing.xyz/8-percent-strategy/
8% Big or Home
Run Time: 23 Hour
Break even on Day 2(In Case Loss) if able to run successfully on Day 1
Higher potential Profit
Low requirement as low as 3 XRP
Requirement : 3 XRP
Potential Profit(Daily) : 3.3 XRP
https://dicing.xyz/dicing-strategy-statistic-vs-luck/
9% Statistic Vs Luck? - 8 Hour Run and hit a losing streak
Run Time: 8 Hour
Got hit on losing streak
Gambling is always meant to be entertaining and for fun purpose, don't ever think off making money in the long run
Kindly run and tell me how long did you manage to run until you lose your entire balance
7% Low Profit Strategy
Run Time: 15 Hour
Feel free to try out
Break Even on Day 4 if able to run the first 3 Day successfully
Requirement: 3.5 XRP
Potential Profit(Daily) : 0.9 XRP
https://dicing.xyz/8-percent-strategy/
8% Big or Home
Run Time: 23 Hour
Break even on Day 2(In Case Loss) if able to run successfully on Day 1
Higher potential Profit
Low requirement as low as 3 XRP
Requirement : 3 XRP
Potential Profit(Daily) : 3.3 XRP
https://dicing.xyz/dicing-strategy-statistic-vs-luck/
9% Statistic Vs Luck? - 8 Hour Run and hit a losing streak
Run Time: 8 Hour
Got hit on losing streak
Gambling is always meant to be entertaining and for fun purpose, don't ever think off making money in the long run
Kindly run and tell me how long did you manage to run until you lose your entire balance
Jump to: