SO That people that are like you cannot use to learn,
Anyway im just about done here..
Anyway im just about done here..
I know the secret to the universe....
.. but i'm not telling.
Topic: Did I do it right this Time, Analysis (Read 9037 times)
I know the secret to the universe....
.. but i'm not telling.
SO That people that are like you cannot use to learn,
Anyway im just about done here..
Anyway im just about done here..
Good job you removed your image. Awww why? It was so beautiful! LOL
Wow, the latest is hard to analyse, i think i agree with zby
That 'complex correction pattern' makes it hard to decide if it is indeed V or maybe it is just a III. The jump to 8.3 is more then 25% increase, a drop to 5.7 is less then 15%. Both make me think that being a bull is safer now.
If wave v of my 1 is not complete then 8.30 is the target. But i think 1 is finished with a fall to 5.90 - 5.70
COMMENTS PLEASE. DID I DO IT RIGHT THIS TIME. DAMN IT KEEPS CHANGING. GO WIT THE FLOW,
Ya! we did complete this full cycle, but now we have no idea what to do next 
Rinse, repeat
Ya! we did complete this full cycle, but now we have no idea what to do next
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtKADQnjQmc&t=1m10s
from the start to 2 USD there should be completed this for a full cycle
Ya! we did complete this full cycle, but now we have no idea what to do next
I don't know a thing about economics, but are you telling me the market is likely to crash?
Up to (3)
or B down to [2] C.
no such thing as crash. normal.
YES look at my B ,see lines up with 3,4 of the 5th of major 1.
and the A at 1,2 of the 5th.
And using these secret fib targets say major 3 isnt strong enought to be.
So i believe we are in a c up for B. and correction major wave 2 is not complete.
otherwise my B would be wave 1 of major 3. currently subwave 3 of 1
and the A at 1,2 of the 5th.
And using these secret fib targets say major 3 isnt strong enought to be.
So i believe we are in a c up for B. and correction major wave 2 is not complete.
otherwise my B would be wave 1 of major 3. currently subwave 3 of 1
I don't know a thing about economics, but are you telling me the market is likely to crash?
MYSELFs FUTURE BEHOLD IT IS HERE , FROM THE MYSTERIOUS PROPHET FOR GREEDY FUCKTARDS TO LOSE PROFIT. GIVE TO THE NEEDY, ,,,FREEDOM
TWO OPTIONS CLEAR
THIRD = JAPANESE TRICK
FOURTH = GOVERNMENT = $0
pic
Move is up
mmmm .... InverseFisher... Someone thinks like me .. Move is up
I wonder how many people caught in this bear trap ...I would imagine we've been picking up a hell of a lot of shorts in this never ending 4.90 -5.10 trading loop.
this is why i think the longer we stay at these levels the more explosive the rally will be once we get going.
I think the opposite. The longer we stay at these levels the more explosive the panic will be once we get going. Having said that, I don't think any rally or sell-off will be as intense as we've seen in the past. Bitcoinica nipped that in the bud.
pic
Move is up
mmmm .... InverseFisher... Someone thinks like me .. Move is up
I wonder how many people caught in this bear trap ...I would imagine we've been picking up a hell of a lot of shorts in this never ending 4.90 -5.10 trading loop.
this is why i think the longer we stay at these levels the more explosive the rally will be once we get going.
+10
pic
Move is up
mmmm .... InverseFisher... Someone thinks like me .. Move is up
I wonder how many people caught in this bear trap ...I would imagine we've been picking up a hell of a lot of shorts in this never ending 4.90 -5.10 trading loop.
this is why i think the longer we stay at these levels the more explosive the rally will be once we get going.
pic
Move is up
mmmm .... InverseFisher... Someone thinks like me .. Move is up
I wonder how many people caught in this bear trap ...
pm me why
Move is up
Ok we go somewhere else now....
Maybe we'll finally test that famous $3.80 area. I've moved my bids further down.
Ok we go somewhere else now....
secret timeframe takeoff rocket attempt 1 5,4,3,2...
that pattern looks familiar
I know you are learning so one little fix...your ABC of X would be another wxy since you are working with a 333 and neither a 335 flat nor a 535 zigzag corrective off W.
I know you are learning so one little fix...your ABC of X would be another wxy since you are working with a 333 and neither a 335 flat nor a 535 zigzag corrective off W.
Alot alike
I like the yellow count better but it doesnt mean it goes the way i like
only 20k BTC to $5.20 [ :
A nice dailly cross buy signal on
the mac D .....
RSI relative strength index is bullish in the 40-50 range 50 + better.
Stochastic is oversold but can stay there, it doesnt mean a selloff is going to happen and you need to sell now.
Which one?
your choice Last pic has a bearish pic on bottom. or a different combo.
B wave up right now? from X --- A
For an introduction start here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourier_transform
Ok math sucks, but still that is the tool to do such jobs.
Frankly, I doubt it will help. It gives you the waves of the past, not those of the future.
But as this is your approach, go ahead.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourier_transform
Ok math sucks, but still that is the tool to do such jobs.
Frankly, I doubt it will help. It gives you the waves of the past, not those of the future.
But as this is your approach, go ahead.
How? explain. What do i need
This stuff was invented almost 100 years ago and you still didn´t get it worky?
Put in some data mining power to analyse the Fourier Transfroms, should easily give you the parameters.
... provided the math underneath it isn´t bullshit.
Put in some data mining power to analyse the Fourier Transfroms, should easily give you the parameters.
... provided the math underneath it isn´t bullshit.
Im just about ready to go back to my original formula, top secret.
Me too!
I was doing fine before I knew different various TA's! But, now that I've learned them, I wish I could un-learn some of them. I find my self second guessing a decision because I see another indicator that contradicts my previous decision.
Really, this market is too small for TA to be very useful. It is gamed too easily for it to work, at least for any length of time once an indicator is found to work well.
Nice what just happened, its always more obvious to count the waves after they occur
so they lag just like technical indicators. So Elliot wave works it lags bad.
profits without elliotwave and indicators 60% guessing and using chart patterns.
profits with elliotwave and indicators blah, too much learning, lagging , but it is
a fun experience and may help you long
term with elliotwave , and indicators can be useful to follow other players, also, i really
havent put it to play yet, as while i learn i dont bet much, but when i do get back
into the groove ,
i will put into play trendlines, indicators , and more into my trading experience.
I really have to say all this drawing sometimes takes away from an instinctive trade, but it takes some of the fear of loss away from the equation, knowing the likelihood of the bottoms. I just now have to work it all together with timing. Which timeing is the hardest part.
Im just about ready to go back to my original formula, top secret.
so they lag just like technical indicators. So Elliot wave works it lags bad.
profits without elliotwave and indicators 60% guessing and using chart patterns.
profits with elliotwave and indicators blah, too much learning, lagging , but it is
a fun experience and may help you long
term with elliotwave , and indicators can be useful to follow other players, also, i really
havent put it to play yet, as while i learn i dont bet much, but when i do get back
into the groove ,
i will put into play trendlines, indicators , and more into my trading experience.
I really have to say all this drawing sometimes takes away from an instinctive trade, but it takes some of the fear of loss away from the equation, knowing the likelihood of the bottoms. I just now have to work it all together with timing. Which timeing is the hardest part.
Im just about ready to go back to my original formula, top secret.
i'm sorry for myself not aknowledging the existence of this topic earlier
Last one to the bottom loses. lol.
Many losers! But, some more than others.
Last one to the bottom loses. lol.
Looks like a head and shoulder then a rebottom.
To the moon.
They got us again, fucking aliens
Looks like a head and shoulder then a rebottom.
Looks like a head and shoulder then a rebottom.
The good thing about self-fulfilling prophecies is, no need to care for. They do it themselves. 
As yes I have almost 2 months experience, im still playing. My main window is 30m to 4hr. set up
30 120
60 240
and flip flop
30 120
60 240
and flip flop
EW int try to apply EW to anything
for them the wave 3 was from '70, i dont see EW to be the solution for everything
for them the wave 3 was from '70, i dont see EW to be the solution for everything
I saw that too and the fifth wave is now over right, so doom is coming right , collapse maybe..
The worst depression?
I keep Mac on all , the first indicator i learned.
use Rsi , thanks for that article waveaddict. and on the moving averages... but somethings I disagree with you with as i try to keep it simpler, I always try to simplify.
bollinger bands and squeeze in samechart. but not on just to check.
use Rsi , thanks for that article waveaddict. and on the moving averages... but somethings I disagree with you with as i try to keep it simpler, I always try to simplify.
bollinger bands and squeeze in samechart. but not on just to check.
I have sierra with three chartbooks, each with 3 or 4 timeframes.
Yes correct I misphrased them, sorry i know what they were and i was doing something else at the time and noticed after typing but didnt feel like correcting myself, thanks for the support.....
0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5 , 8 , 13 , 21, and phi. but,, the golden ratio. and you probably can predict your death with these numbers.... dunno. or when the world blows up.. but go figure, dont chase it to far, like...you might find out the real deal..or not, maybe just wind up on the weird side of youtube.
Munehisa Homma... I give you break on rice today..... but tomorrow you pay more. The weather is going to be bad. lol..
Thanks wave, I find your info useful for learning......
dont forget multiple timeframes all open at once....
0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5 , 8 , 13 , 21, and phi. but,, the golden ratio. and you probably can predict your death with these numbers.... dunno. or when the world blows up.. but go figure, dont chase it to far, like...you might find out the real deal..or not, maybe just wind up on the weird side of youtube.
Munehisa Homma... I give you break on rice today..... but tomorrow you pay more. The weather is going to be bad. lol..
Thanks wave, I find your info useful for learning......
dont forget multiple timeframes all open at once....
Everything has its place when used properly:
1) EW is 'most useful' for limiting risk
2) Fibs are 'most useful' when searching for quick reversal areas
3) MACD, RSI, OBV, ADX, etc. along with MAs are 'most useful' when searching for tops, bottoms, and consolidating regions in both the long and short term
However, the true art of investing comes from blending all three
1) EW is 'most useful' for limiting risk
2) Fibs are 'most useful' when searching for quick reversal areas
3) MACD, RSI, OBV, ADX, etc. along with MAs are 'most useful' when searching for tops, bottoms, and consolidating regions in both the long and short term
However, the true art of investing comes from blending all three
I just leave that here
just like sales of million dollar automobiles are up, 23% to 100%, fibonnacci numbers, while the poor suffer, how did they do that.
Sir, do you even know what Fibonacci numbers are? 23 and 100 are certainly not examples of such numbers!
In fact, you're calling PERCENTAGES Fibonacci numbers! That boggles my mind!
Perhaps you should consider doing some research before accusing others of ignorance, though he poorly phrased them as Fibonacci numbers rather than retracement levels. The percentages are based off of the fact that as the Fibonacci sequence approaches a large n, the n value is about 61.8% of the n+1 value. Take a guess of what 61.8% of 61.8 is.... and 61.8% of 38.2. Obviously 50% has nothing to do with Fibonacci as such, but it is a useful retracement as well.
just like sales of million dollar automobiles are up, 23% to 100%, fibonnacci numbers, while the poor suffer, how did they do that.
Sir, do you even know what Fibonacci numbers are? 23 and 100 are certainly not examples of such numbers!
In fact, you're calling PERCENTAGES Fibonacci numbers! That boggles my mind!
Thanks Hunterbunter,
Some just do not know , and I know its real thats why I try to learn. Im doing better than most, and
I know that by how much im makeing in a % , it happens to be a fibonnacci number,
just like sales of million dollar automobiles are up, 23% to 100%, fibonnacci numbers, while the poor suffer, how did they do that.
Some just do not know , and I know its real thats why I try to learn. Im doing better than most, and
I know that by how much im makeing in a % , it happens to be a fibonnacci number,
just like sales of million dollar automobiles are up, 23% to 100%, fibonnacci numbers, while the poor suffer, how did they do that.
As if you could tell the future by looking into the past.
This is a tenet of all science. By establishing cause and effect, in a repeatable situation, you can use that information for other effects. We discovered once that mixing petrol vapor and air in a certain % mixture ignites powerfully enough to push a piston. We use that information to build an engine. We predict that every time we have the same % mix of air and fuel, we'll get an exact explosion.
All sciences begin as arts; for example, alchemy was a precursor to chemistry. Psychology is an attempt to identify the patterns in the human brain, and thus make it predictable. Just because it is complex does not mean it won't ever be understood. Once psychology is understood economic tasks will be trivial (or perhaps vice versa).
How about this set of technical analysis for sore eyes? can't you see PROFIT in there?
whats the news please
Someone invented the First bitcoin You're Mama joke
"You're Mama is so stupid, she thought he had to sell her bitcoin on mtgox to get money to pay for a bitcoin t-shirt"
LOL
As if you could tell the future by looking into the past.
As if you could tell the minds of people by looking at their coffee mug.
Yesterday I had to check an embedded nondestructive testing equipment which goes back and forth driven by some pinions. This bastared laughed about me all the time claiming: No way! ... once I could hunt and smack the bug it caroled: hoo...ray.
What drugs is he now on?
Nothing specific, just be aware of your brain. It tries to grasp a regularity even in white noise.
As if you could tell the future by looking into the past.As if you could tell the minds of people by looking at their coffee mug.
Yesterday I had to check an embedded nondestructive testing equipment which goes back and forth driven by some pinions. This bastared laughed about me all the time claiming: No way! ... once I could hunt and smack the bug it caroled: hoo...ray.
What drugs is he now on?
Nothing specific, just be aware of your brain. It tries to grasp a regularity even in white noise.
As if you could predict the action of people based on theyr past activity
corrected
i play games on monday, so you can "predict" that next monday i'll play games too (but there's still the possibility, that i'm ill and laying in my bed)
but if you bet on many mondays you'll mostly be right if you say, that im playing games.
As if you could tell the future by looking into the past.
As if you could tell the minds of people by looking at their coffee mug.
Yesterday I had to check an embedded nondestructive testing equipment which goes back and forth driven by some pinions. This bastared laughed about me all the time claiming: No way! ... once I could hunt and smack the bug it caroled: hoo...ray.
What drugs is he now on?
Nothing specific, just be aware of your brain. It tries to grasp a regularity even in white noise.
As if you could tell the minds of people by looking at their coffee mug.
Yesterday I had to check an embedded nondestructive testing equipment which goes back and forth driven by some pinions. This bastared laughed about me all the time claiming: No way! ... once I could hunt and smack the bug it caroled: hoo...ray.
What drugs is he now on?
Nothing specific, just be aware of your brain. It tries to grasp a regularity even in white noise.
This last time is not allowed per Elliott Wave guidelines. Wave A's subwaves 1 and 4 are overlapping. And also, the proportions don't look right.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Hero VIP ultra official trusted super staff puppet
whats the news please
Someone invented the First bitcoin You're Mama joke
"You're Mama is so stupid, she thought he had to sell her bitcoin on mtgox to get money to pay for a bitcoin t-shirt"
Here are some basic instructions for you.
- Go into kitchen
- Find blender
- Take off pants
- Insert penis into blender
- Make sure blender is plugged in
- Shoot yourself in the head
whats the news please
Someone invented the First bitcoin You're Mama joke
"You're Mama is so stupid, she thought he had to sell her bitcoin on mtgox to get money to pay for a bitcoin t-shirt"
why so many dips... didn't you hear the news?
Another how I see it, Im rolling with the green....
Just messing with the red
I just use what I see. logic , math. proportions.. The angles
im comparing the last 1, and 2 and the percentages.
Together we will all take a ride on the surfboard of dollars
This graph certainly shows the current price to be significant, if the last low was significant. Did $2 seem equally significant when the $32 mountain came crashing down? Were there lines saying "Yep $2 must be the minimum because look at these lines here"?
Genuine question...I wasn't paying attention at the time.
Genuine question...I wasn't paying attention at the time.
+1 -- good question; I wouldn't say I wasn't paying attention at the time, but my knowledge of tech analysis and markets in general were not nearly as astute back when we were playing around $2. So yeah... What were the lines saying around that $2 era? I hadn't bought into the S3052 subscription service at that point...
edit: started new thread with this info/graph
This graph certainly shows the current price to be significant, if the last low was significant. Did $2 seem equally significant when the $32 mountain came crashing down? Were there lines saying "Yep $2 must be the minimum because look at these lines here"?
Genuine question...I wasn't paying attention at the time.
Genuine question...I wasn't paying attention at the time.
+1 -- good question; I wouldn't say I wasn't paying attention at the time, but my knowledge of tech analysis and markets in general were not nearly as astute back when we were playing around $2. So yeah... What were the lines saying around that $2 era? I hadn't bought into the S3052 subscription service at that point...
This graph certainly shows the current price to be significant, if the last low was significant. Did $2 seem equally significant when the $32 mountain came crashing down? Were there lines saying "Yep $2 must be the minimum because look at these lines here"?
Genuine question...I wasn't paying attention at the time.
Genuine question...I wasn't paying attention at the time.
good chart. prices need to quickly move above 5 $ to keep this the active count.
So what happens if it doesn't break $5 quickly? What is the time frame? is the alternative a stagnant blah or a drop?
good chart. prices need to quickly move above 5 $ to keep this the active count.
i think you mean to say. price will move quickly when it does
i need to sleep COME ON BREAK 5$ already!
good chart. prices need to quickly move above 5 $ to keep this the active count.
Yep , gotta color code it like speaker wires or computer parts.
Oh yes and I appreciate all the pieces of the puzzle im given
Oh yes and I appreciate all the pieces of the puzzle im given
impressive Posts: 23
you've been watching us closely
its not wrong. but nothing is ever simple.
when people say KISS its because the thing they are working on is so F'ing complicated they need to KISS to understand it themselves
you've been watching us closely
its not wrong. but nothing is ever simple.
when people say KISS its because the thing they are working on is so F'ing complicated they need to KISS to understand it themselves
Jump to: