Topic: Different between Bitcoin-QT and Multibit (Read 3744 times)
I like that it's easy to have separate wallets with Multibit, one for small change, one for spending money, one for long term savings. Feels like a letdown every time I open Litecoin-qt or Namecoin-qt and only have the one, single wallet on screen. I'd happily uninstall all the other clients if there was a Multibit equivalent for the other altcoins I use.
I would really recommend you to NOT use Multibit or other Clients then Bitcoin-QT, especially if you are a newbie.
I had experienced some problems with Multibit and Armory, I had to reinstall them and at least reboot the computer once for getting my old wallets being recognized again after I tried to used a second wallet. They simple have to much bugs.
Bitcoin-QT seems like being the most stable Client, though it might take some time to download the whole Blockchain.
I had experienced some problems with Multibit and Armory, I had to reinstall them and at least reboot the computer once for getting my old wallets being recognized again after I tried to used a second wallet. They simple have to much bugs.
Bitcoin-QT seems like being the most stable Client, though it might take some time to download the whole Blockchain.
Because Multibit stores the blockchain in their proxy servers to sync and Bitcoin - QT stores the blockchain on your hard-drive.
I have used both Bitcoin-QT and Multibit but I have yet to find a difference other than that of Bitcoin-QT needing to download the entire blockchain before being able to be used.
Is there any other difference or is that it; also why does Bitcoin-QT need to download the block chain first and Multibit doesn't?
Is there any other difference or is that it; also why does Bitcoin-QT need to download the block chain first and Multibit doesn't?
Jump to: