Topic: "Dig Bicks" you should prove your negetive feedback. (Read 538 times)

I think his extremist opinions he posts are valuable to the diversity of viewpoints around here but have been beyond appropriate in his feedback ratings.
Even though he called me/all of us sig-spammers while we were applying for chipmixer (yeah I saw that before they were deleted)...

I hope he continues to bust balls because their is half truth to much of what he says, and it's funny, but @Dig Bicks you extending your rampage to the trust system is going to be detrimental to whatever message you are trying to put out. So stop it..


lol nice wealth creation  
Admit I'm jealous though if that's true, but luck, not like you added real wealth to the world by solving a few captchas.

@Dig Bicks, if you have any legitimate proof that they scammed someone (that isn't the situation where someone did a double spend attack on them and had their original deposit returned or any game-protect crap), I'd be happy to remove my positive trust and leave a negative. Back your claims with proof.

Well, marlboroza already asked you question about it, I don't want repeat it. Just answer to him.

So according your logic you should first tag to DT member  DarkStar_ and iluvbitcoins , because they have left positive feedback to sportsbet.io . Because he is the owner , not I am. Also you was problems previously with ChipMixer that I already mention it on OP. However no one will trust your feedback so you can leave more who are ask to join Sportsbet campaign.

Seen his name floating around in a lot of threads and showing no mercy with what he is saying towards other people. The good news is his claim towards you being a scammer is with no basis, you won't get tagged negatively by a DT member for sure. Marlboroza is also right to say that you are the only one tagged which is part of the sig campaign which I think he is doing only as he thinks that he has issues with you.

So why do you make difference?
Take your time, go trough 900 posts here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/cfnp-sportsbetio-signature-campaign-up-to-01-btcweek-4509006 and tag all accounts.


This is based on what exactly?

As I posted before https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.48543328

Sportsbet.io is a known scam casino, anyone wearing a signature which promotes a scam should be red trusted.  Same goes for Yobit.

The old trolls or the old legitimate members?  I'd imagine the earliest members made a fortune and really have no use for bitcointalk anymore, especially given how spam-infested it's become since signature campaigns came into existence.  I don't think most of them are ever coming back.  As far as the trolls go, the ones I listed could tend to be very annoying and they wore out their welcome very quickly--except mixan, who just had a mental breakdown toward the end and finally just quit. 

I respect a good troll, but you have to have some language skills to be effective, and unfortunately the influx of new members looking for the bounty gold rush have no inclination to be pests nor could they manage an ounce of coherency if they tried.  Part of me misses MPOE-PR, even though he/she was pretty much gone by the time I arrived.  He/she was intelligent and wrote some of the most biting posts I've ever seen. 

Anyway OP, Dig Bicks isn't likely to respond to this thread just like he didn't to mine, so you ought to lock it up.  I'm sure he's getting a kick out of all the replies and attention he's getting.

They sure as hell aren't. Digaran's trollness could be spotted from miles away. Dig Bicks is just a dick. Digaran was a troll but was never really a dick. I should stop saying dick. 

Man do i miss those good ole troll days... Everyone just loves to leave this forum, because it just becomes shit as time passes. I remember smooth used to be such a troll and loved pissing off TF, and other people.

We should keep a campaign for bringing back the old users, the actual geeks.._{(Irony intended )}

Hate to agree with this, but I do.  That's why I miss idiot trolls like mixan, codishmumu, fwdxlsh, and even digaran was amusing when you could understand what he was trying to say.  Too much trolling gets very annoying very quickly, but Dig Bicks is in that "sweet spot" zone where he's trolling just enough and just right to be amusing.  Those aren't meant to be words of encouragement to him, because I don't think leaving unwarranted feedback is cool and he's done that.

I'm wondering about this myself, but Dig Bicks seems to have a lot better grammar than digaran did, and I have a feeling they're not the same person.

I can add more fun to the topic, I got a PM from him the other day regarding my avatar

Just ROFL-ed

I know #3 in the Rules is Not Trolling, but without the trolls this place won't be the same. They add this little spicy feeling, otherwise life will be too dull, don't you think so?

Oh, didn't knew that the big D is his nickname . It's interesting where he's gone now. Well, it's really possible that Dig Bicks is his new account, but I'm not sure.
If he would have valid reasons to call you scammer, he would provide something in reference in trust feedback. But he didn't provided anything, so, probably he is just angry at you for some unclear reasons.

As far as that goes, he needn't have worried, because I don't give retaliatory feedback like that.  He could have left me a wall of negs and I still wouldn't have left any feedback whatsoever.  In fact, I rarely check my own trust so I wasn't even aware that he left me a neutral.

No, it's not wrong.  And as far as the feedback you got from Dick Brains, you can just ignore it like any other feedback from untrusted members unless they provide a valid reference link and have a valid point.  The guy is just a troll and his feedback is meaningless.  Also, when you embark upon a career as a scam buster, be prepared for retaliatory negative trust because you're going to get it.  Lots of it.  My suggestion would be to look at it as a badge of honor, proof that you're doing the right thing.

Forget about it.  I created a thread in Reputation asking him to come have a chat about the thread he created in which he insulted me and then locked it.  He never came to my thread to back up his words.  Don't expect a response from him--he's just trying to get a rise out of you, just like he was trying to get a rise out of me and I made the error of taking the bait.  Should have known better.  Just keep up the good work and don't let the trolls get to you.

Ah yes--I was wondering where digaran went off to.  He was making it his mission to stir the pot around here, and then suddenly he disappeared.  And then Dig Bicks appeared.  Interesting.

Oh! my bad... I thought everyone knew him. It's THE digaran. Petty that he gave up (my guess) from his original account (last active September 01, 2018). I personally used to enjoy his nonsense humours

I don't think it's a fan, I am positive that IT IS him LOL

I can't remember even I replied on his thread or something like that. I know him once he sent me PM few days ago. I think he have problem with exposed scam. Who know may be he is one of them.

Because I want to expose him and ask question why he called me scammer. (D) digaran offline from long time, may Dig Bicks is fan of him  

Someone who send negative feedback with comment "shilling for scam gambling company" should leave the same feedback to all sportbet's signature participants or not send it at all. Other part is speculation/guessing/trolling/you name it, I don't know what happened between you two but obviously they have something against you - I just don't see any other explanation.
Just ignore feedback and user.

Why do you care about feedback that he left. He isn't DT member, so his rating doesn't affect your trust score. People aren't paying attention usually to such feedbacks, same like to these feedbacks that you got after exposing scams.
Who is the great D?

Dig Bicks (Big Dicks) is a troll. Ignore him is my best advice to you. For some reasons his trolling reminds me the great D  
digaran

I have got many negative (untrusted) feedback, because I have exposed many scam ICO's and scammer. So never mind they angry to me and left negative feedback.

But just now I have seen Dig Bicks left me a negetive feedback. He had PM me also few days ago probably once I applied for CipMixer campaign first time. So I just ignore and deleted msg. But today again left negetive feedback to my profile by mention scammer. His post about ChipMixer and Gambling is here. Lets see his feedback.


He left neutral feedback to The Pharmacist to avoid get negative tag (IMO).

That's true I have joined gambling signature campaign. Is it wrong ? Forum have a sub board for gambling so why can't wear signature?

Another point is trying to gain trust by busting scammer. And that's why he mention me scammer. It's true I am exposing may scammer but I got only negative feedback instead of positive feedback. Did I stop exposing ? So how you mention I have exposed scam only gain trust. Still I am exposing and it will continue until I am in forum.

Just clear me in which point you have mentioned me scammer. You should prove it with evidence.

I will not bother left negative feedback to you if DT not bother about it. You are lying about others. Helping forum by exposing scam means I am real scammer ?