Author

Topic: Digitalcoin double spend attack proof? (Read 663 times)

hero member
Activity: 906
Merit: 1034
BTC: the beginning of stake-based public resources
August 06, 2013, 05:23:28 PM
#3
Can someone explain to me how Digitalcoin actually defends against double spending attacks?

I don't see how a block generation time of 20 seconds stops an entity with >50% of the network hashing power building the block chain faster than the rest of the network, no mater the time interval..?

Simple, it doesn't.  It simply is "marketing".  The blockchain DOES prevent double spends (once sufficiently confirmed) unless the attacker has enough hash power to rewrite the chain.  Then again all blockchains do, that is the purpose of them.

Then again a 20 sec block time that should be the first clue as to the knowledge of the developer(s).

Ok, that's what I thought, it's just not true. Shame.

I asked because the MetaLair decentralised exchange has a mechanism to defend against double spending attacks within a pre-agreed window based on a proof of work mechanism; I thought perhaps Digitalcoin had come up with a similar design based on proof of work.
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
August 05, 2013, 07:03:44 PM
#2
Can someone explain to me how Digitalcoin actually defends against double spending attacks?

I don't see how a block generation time of 20 seconds stops an entity with >50% of the network hashing power building the block chain faster than the rest of the network, no mater the time interval..?

Simple, it doesn't.  It simply is "marketing".  The blockchain DOES prevent double spends (once sufficiently confirmed) unless the attacker has enough hash power to rewrite the chain.  Then again all blockchains do, that is the purpose of them.

Then again a 20 sec block time that should be the first clue as to the knowledge of the developer(s).
hero member
Activity: 906
Merit: 1034
BTC: the beginning of stake-based public resources
August 05, 2013, 06:52:48 PM
#1
Can someone explain to me how Digitalcoin actually defends against double spending attacks?

I don't see how a block generation time of 20 seconds stops an entity with >50% of the network hashing power building the block chain faster than the rest of the network..?
Jump to: