Anyway, this is interesting. I've always though the winter was just mainly due to all the dust ejected into the atmosphere. We really learn something new everyday. This reminded me of a TV series I saw, I believe it's called Big History. So many what-ifs.
And well, here we are. So it wasnt "worst" from my point of view.
True. It's only worst from a dinosaur's point of view and they're not around now to whine anyway that the impact mostly affected them and so it was speciest.
Prior to this, mammals were mostly shrew-like animals. Without the extinction event, mammals could have not found any vacant niche to occupy.
The way I understand it, flood basalt eruptions combined with drastic reductions in seal level had already caused a large decline in plant and animal populations of the Cretaceous period. The asteroid impact was likely a blessing in disguise - accelerating the extinction event that was already underway. Maybe it was "best" for all involved and all yet to be... provided that the plants and animals of that period were capable of paired comparison analysis.
Yes, heard of that before. The asteroid didn't directly cause much of the damage, save for the areas near impact. What it did definitely was exacerbate the existing problems. I didn't remember this basalt thingie but I remember it was said that there was a change in the climate which caused plants to fail, which then spread to the rest of the system.
I believe most of the dinosaurs wouldn have still died off without the impact, specifically the larger carnivores. The crash hastened the collapse though and also left little time for them to adapt.