Author

Topic: Divisible by 1 billion (Read 253 times)

full member
Activity: 2520
Merit: 214
Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!
December 20, 2020, 10:19:42 AM
#10
So btc ain't gonna run out.

The new smaller unit , to be called 'Roger'.

If you get paid in 'roger', you're being rogered.
Am i missing something here? ROGER 'Rabit' ? Lol ..

Satoshi is even Smaller why need to another lower Unit?

Maybe if Bitcoin already reached a Million Dollar then Something like this will gonna happen but for now, Lets Enjoy the Name of our Creator in the Smallest Value of Bitcoin.

Don't rush things we are just Going to Break 30k lol.
hero member
Activity: 2520
Merit: 568
Payment Gateway Allows Recurring Payments
November 23, 2020, 05:55:49 AM
#9
Will there be consensus for that Roger?  Roll Eyes
It's already been set and there's already a label for the smallest unit of bitcoin. That will never happen unless satoshi tells that it's going to be the smallest unit but that's impossible to happen.
How'd you come up with that Roger? I understand it as a joke.  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 2017
November 23, 2020, 04:45:04 AM
#8
LOL.

It is divisible by any amount (apart from 0, which isn't exactly an amount). So, it isn't going to run out because an smaller unit can always be created.

Great post OP! Did you come up with it while you were taking a shit or something?
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 10611
November 23, 2020, 12:57:49 AM
#7
If you get paid in 'roger', you're being rogered.
then you suddenly realize that what you have received is not even bitcoin, it is a shitcoin called bcash Wink
hero member
Activity: 1442
Merit: 775
full member
Activity: 317
Merit: 110
November 22, 2020, 09:14:23 PM
#5
So btc ain't gonna run out.

The new smaller unit , to be called 'Roger'.

If you get paid in 'roger', you're being rogered.

Do you have any url supporting your argument ?? Plus why would someone name the smaller unit in *Roger*?? Plus no one who gets paid this small would even take the job. You have to understand the fact that this won't happen overnight , we are not even using the unit : Satoshi yet , it's there but it's not that practical. Thus we have to first encompass the point where we can use *Satoshi* practically and then think about this new unit you believe is going to come. By the way I believe we might have much more efficiency if we name the unit differently.

We can very easily use the units already in the use instead of giving them different names .


(Taken from google)

Things like micro-btc etc.. would be more logical.

In case you haven't noticed BTC is a new animal, Hence new names like 'satoshi', the 'roger'' is my twisted idea of a joke. If someone offered you 100 'roger' to do a job, then you've been 'rogered'.
Anyway the point of my OP is that BTC isn't going to run out as some dufus media are reporting.
sr. member
Activity: 1890
Merit: 300
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
November 22, 2020, 10:55:59 AM
#4
I don't think we'd be transacting a fraction of satoshi anytime soon, mostly due to fees on the original bitcoin network.
Lightning network, a proposal to ease the bitcoin network with pseudo transaction does use millisatoshi as 1/1000 of a satoshi as they are already making payments using 1 satoshi and that could further be decreased. Never heard of Roger and if they plan to bring a fraction of Satoshi, hope it won't be called that.
hero member
Activity: 2702
Merit: 716
Nothing lasts forever
November 22, 2020, 10:45:37 AM
#3
Do you have any url supporting your argument ?? Plus why would someone name the smaller unit in *Roger*?? Plus no one who gets paid this small would even take the job. You have to understand the fact that this won't happen overnight , we are not even using the unit : Satoshi yet , it's there but it's not that practical. Thus we have to first encompass the point where we can use *Satoshi* practically and then think about this new unit you believe is going to come. By the way I believe we might have much more efficiency if we name the unit differently.

We can very easily use the units already in the use instead of giving them different names .

Things like micro-btc etc.. would be more logical.
Very well said. Getting paid in less than a Satoshi doesn't make any sense as of now. And why does it has to be called "Roger" at first place?
Sounds like it represents Roger Ver in some way. What @fiulpro said about the units makes more sense acutally.
Using terms like micro-btc would sound more appropriate for such conditions.
For example : It seems appropriate to use the term nano-btc instead of Roger.
hero member
Activity: 1890
Merit: 831
November 22, 2020, 10:36:36 AM
#2
So btc ain't gonna run out.

The new smaller unit , to be called 'Roger'.

If you get paid in 'roger', you're being rogered.

Do you have any url supporting your argument ?? Plus why would someone name the smaller unit in *Roger*?? Plus no one who gets paid this small would even take the job. You have to understand the fact that this won't happen overnight , we are not even using the unit : Satoshi yet , it's there but it's not that practical. Thus we have to first encompass the point where we can use *Satoshi* practically and then think about this new unit you believe is going to come. By the way I believe we might have much more efficiency if we name the unit differently.

We can very easily use the units already in the use instead of giving them different names .


(Taken from google)

Things like micro-btc etc.. would be more logical.
full member
Activity: 317
Merit: 110
November 22, 2020, 09:54:23 AM
#1
So btc ain't gonna run out.

The new smaller unit , to be called 'Roger'.

If you get paid in 'roger', you're being rogered.
Jump to: