I cannot accuse Dlike.io in scammers, but after studying their technical documentation I see breach of copyright. Information from Wikipedia and Steam was used without reference to the source. I think, that negative mark should not be left, instead the addition in the technical documentation should be made.
I left neutral feedback for them.
It is possible that someone else will find more violations.
Profile Link: [BOUNTY] https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bounty-dlikeio-1000000-dlike-token-for-bounty-5123517
Archived: http://archive.fo/7wWlk
Profile Link: [BOUNTY] https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dlike-twitter-bounty-100k-dlike-tokens-giveaway-weekly-750-dlike-tokens-5127129
Archived: http://archive.fo/odwwq
Website: https://dlike.io/
Archived: http://web.archive.org/web/20190409105241/https://dlike.io/
Whitepaper: https://dlike.io/docs/dlike-paper.pdf
Archived: http://web.archive.org/web/20190409105423/https://dlike.io/docs/dlike-paper.pdf
Domain Name: DLIKE.IO
Registry Domain ID: D503300000103067496-LRMS
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.namecheap.com
Registrar URL: www.namecheap.com
Updated Date: 2019-03-05
Creation Date: 2018-05-28
Registry Expiry Date: 2019-05-28
Copied part of the text from wikipedia.org in his whitepaper: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockchain
Archived: http://web.archive.org/save/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockchain
Left on the photo - DLIKE.IO, on right - WIKIPEDIA.ORG
Copied part of the text with Steem.com in its whitepaper: https://steem.com/SteemWhitePaper.pdf
Archived: http://web.archive.org/web/20190409110643/https://steem.com/SteemWhitePaper.pdf
Left on the photo - DLIKE.IO, on right - STEEM.COM
