When governments of the world and big corporations are trying, but failing to discourage people from a particular thing, do they use different ways like articles from respected people and companies to try and subtly discourage people from that thing?
This article in question is against "Gold and bitcoin". It called gold and bitcoin "useless assets".
Gold and bitcoin are both useless asset classes.
I wouldn't have had any trouble if he spoke against bitcoin alone because I see articles daily shit-talking bitcoin, but including gold defeats his purpose. It was funny because he couldn't even say anything reasonable against bitcoin, not to talk of gold.
His main and I think only point is that these assets are investments for punters (gamblers). it's just a classic case of a person talking too much without actually saying anything.
When people are against or have hate on a thing they don't get tired of reemphasizing about the disadvantage of it how bad it is even when it has overwhelming advantages that makes the disadvantage irrelevant. The only people right that they can deceive against bitcoin with their brainwashing are only those who have chosen to be deceived by virtue of their laziness to do their own research and have made themselves to be a dump-site where anyone can dump opinions and theories on them.