Topic: Do you think that Scotus has too much power? (Read 273 times)

you will not take control of our bodies.

http://www.infowars.com/supreme-court-says-mandatory-vaccinations-dont-violate-childrens-constitutional-rights/

IN GOD WE TRUST.

(with the Amish)

There are 2 cases, I think that every MEMBERS OF THE FORCES must know, that we will kill, torture, and extract everything in case something goes wrong, it will be horrible and not tragical.

However inside the cocoon, my body, my choice.

((we aren't in for the money, but for the victory)).

One thing that I like the most about the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, is the STATES. In the sense that each state can let the PEOPLE living there express their PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS the way they see fit. for example some nyers don't want to see carry ar15 on the alley of central park, however in Arizona it doesn't pose a problem. For me patricularly I like the fact that PEOPLE that want to use a plant in California, or other state can do it. Equally I like the concept of drytown. the most powerful group in the story of the world (aka MADD), can legislate and impose the exile of the People from the town to the next bar (poor Homer), however the Scotus, under a tyranical regime may always be tempted by forced unification. I am strongly against it. I think that local authorities (not in the sense of tyrants) but in the sense of managing daily common affairs (red light means to stop) are better prepared to maintain the UNION long term. As such I think that those justices (that didn't applaud the Pope, and tried to maintain a fake sense of moral superiority) are dangerous.

I wanna GAMBLE in Nevada. I don't care if you don't like it. So this unification eurotrash like is DANGEROUS. what do you think?

(you see I didn't abord the LGBT agenda...)

P.S. Supreme Court Of The United States < US CONSTITUTION AND BILL OF RIGHTS