Topic: “Does America want a creepy porn lawyer as president?” (Read 155 times)

americans will be diverse in their oppinnions a two party system then will deliver a cointhrowing election with 50.000001% winner....

entire world will then like vultures circeling around social media decisions in the united states. to manipulate the elections to their advantage.

i am afraid the americans will learng to hate their democracy in painful way, and wish to have some security oriented communist dictatorship.

lol

Daniels is making money from her being a stripper, likely a lot, and she is publishing a book detailing her 2006 encounter with Trump that is set to be released next month.

By this logic there's no difference between someone who sees a murder, and is paid to keep quiet, and the murderer, who was paid to do the job and keep quiet.

Since you want to be all technical, Daniels wasn't paid anything for sex (AFAIK)... the money she received was hush money... she had to sign a NDA in order to receive the money.

This is exactly the same thing as O'Reilly's case... both were out of court settlements where the woman was paid to keep quiet about sexual encounters with someone

I don't know if there were any accusations, but in either case it is a mute point.  Without a guilty verdict from a judge/jury, accusations mean nothing.  They were both paid to keep silent.

That's a sexual harassment out of court settlement.

I am referring here to simply sex for money.

Daniels wasn't harassed.

Not even close... Fox paid $32 million to silence one woman about Bill O'Reilly
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/10/report-fox-settled-32-million-harassment-case-vs-oreilly.html

I don't think 150000$ is the highest; there hv been costlier ones.

But she has alot more to be paid, potentially.

It certainly looks that way. Otherwise he'd answer the questions.


She's likely the best paid whore on the planet.

Tonight on Tucker Carlson tonight, Tucker Carlson debated Michael Avenatti, who he commonly refers to as "Creepy Porn Lawyer" (some may say this is an accurate description), you can watch it here.

In the segment, Carlson accuses Avenatti as exploiting Stormy Daniels because she is performing in "seedy" strip clubs while Avenatti's relationship with Daniels is allowing him to get free air time on Cable news (some say is worth millions of dollars), and a shoe in a potentially new career, with the potential to run for president.

I believe that people should be able to earn a living however they want, as long as what they are doing is not hurting anyone, and Stormy Daniels is not hurting any third parties by performing in strip clubs. However the argument is that Daniels is performing naked in strip clubs while people throw things at her, and that people would probably not be performing in these clubs if they were not desperate. I don't believe the clubs she has been performing in are upscale.

Carlson also brought up the point that Daniels didn't appear to have been harmed by President Trump, as the relationship appeared to be consensual and was paid at its conclusion. He asked Avenatti how she was harmed, but he did not give what I consider to be any kind of direct answer.

Watch the clip above, it is entertaining.

Is Avenatti exploiting Stormy Daniels? Has Daniels been harmed in any real way by Trump?

edit: Here is a youtube link to the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoS2lDhD3RA