IMO There must be a huge amount of redundant addresses left out there with money on.
Someone in Ether world may have a solution to rectify this?...
Money value stays there, unnecessarily IMO.
Someone in Ether world may have a solution to rectify this?...
Money value stays there, unnecessarily IMO.
The same you got say about millionaires and billionaires keeping their money locked away from public, not being invested not being used to develop benefits for society and people. It's private property as far as I know so yeah it's your opinion and that's it.
But no I don't think there are an amount of redundant adresses with money on it. I use etherwallet and I have send from it and there's currently nothing in it. empty.
Just correct me if I am wrong.
If you open up your wallet on MyEtherWallet.
You go to make a transaction.
Unless knowing to the fact, your transaction will be denied, you will be prompted you must hold 0.01 ETH in address for any future transactions.
Any transaction you attempt must be minus 0.01 ETH. Correct?
Small figures, I know, but just trying to figure out if my initial thought is correct, and a lot of redundant money held on addresses, unnecessarily out there.
Simply asking the question
