I don’t understand why the gang above are so defensive. I didn’t mention any name to avoid drama yet you guys keep changing topic on attacking my account instead of focusing the discussion on topic.
Is there anything wrong to what I say here? Or am I just feeding spammers to have +1 post for quota by attacking my account which is the easiest course.
Since you like background check,
I do check your post history and both of you fall under the category of not a good poster on gambling board but you gain merit on contest and other board. Sorry to hit the nerve.
Lock. I think I will just received same opinion above if I continue this topic due to my account. I will let other established user continue this topic if they find this interesting to discuss.
Topic: Does merit always the right basis to determine good poster? (Read 80 times)
If you're not happy with the outcome of a campaign selection which you probably applied and wasn't accepted why not just forget about it and apply some other time and if eligible to the managers qualifications you would be accepted.
From your trust feedback it shows you're probably not happy over a campaign selection that you felt you would be selected but got disappointed. mate it's nothing to kill yourself about the forum a big sea/ocean it's enough for everyone.
If you don't like any managers decision just send a PM to them directly speaking your mind but for the record, it's not your decision to choose who will work for the manager and who will not. If you're not accepted your are not, and there is no two ways about that.
From your trust feedback it shows you're probably not happy over a campaign selection that you felt you would be selected but got disappointed. mate it's nothing to kill yourself about the forum a big sea/ocean it's enough for everyone.
If you don't like any managers decision just send a PM to them directly speaking your mind but for the record, it's not your decision to choose who will work for the manager and who will not. If you're not accepted your are not, and there is no two ways about that.
Speaking of campaign participants selection, all campaign managers has his own criteria for selecting whom to promote for them. It can be as regards to number of merits earned, or those earned in a certain amount of days, good poster and an active board member. What ever decisions they take is theirs to make.
I wonder why you are so interested in campaign participants selection??? For a newbie account hmm.. except this isn't your main account and it's just a way to show your disapproval of a selected campaign participant.
I wonder why you are so interested in campaign participants selection??? For a newbie account hmm.. except this isn't your main account and it's just a way to show your disapproval of a selected campaign participant.
When talking about accepting signature campaign participants, it's always the manager's discretion regardless of what matters to others as long it follows its rules and requirements, you may call it bias, but it is what it is.
Recently, I just saw a participants selection on signature campaign. I notice that the user got accepted out of many participants doesn’t seem so good when it comes to gambling board.
He just has a good amount of merit received on different board. With this case, is the total amount of merit received is the right choice? I knew the guy is not the one who has the highest amount of merit among all applicants but I’m sure his merit is one of the factor considered on his application since his post is not that good on gambling board.
I didn’t mention any name to avoid drama of throwing unnecessary feedback when my opinion gets under his/her skin. The discussion is purely for clarification on what’s happening in the forum.
He just has a good amount of merit received on different board. With this case, is the total amount of merit received is the right choice? I knew the guy is not the one who has the highest amount of merit among all applicants but I’m sure his merit is one of the factor considered on his application since his post is not that good on gambling board.
I didn’t mention any name to avoid drama of throwing unnecessary feedback when my opinion gets under his/her skin. The discussion is purely for clarification on what’s happening in the forum.
Jump to: