Does the 200K BTC discovery by MtGox affect it's bankruptcy protection?

WhatTheGox

legendary

Activity: 812

Merit: 1000

Quote from: de_xt on March 22, 2014, 07:09:02 PM

Quote from: clownius on March 22, 2014, 04:45:41 PM

Quote from: de_xt on March 22, 2014, 02:44:57 PM

The only problem is, depositors are not the same as creditors, so this money won't go to replenish people's wallets but to pay MtGox lawyers and loans.

Depositors are in fact creditors. Just not the ONLY ones.

I wish that were true. But seems it's not. According to this Fortune article, the only way depositors could partially recover their assets is through a lawsuit.

http://finance.fortune.cnn.com/2014/03/06/mt-gox-bitcoin-bankruptcy/

wtf, what if mtgox find 80% of the coins are you saying will still dont see our money? i just dont believe this

T.Stuart

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 500

One Token to Move Anything Anywhere

Has anyone put this question to the call centre?

I find it hard to believe a court would not recognise holders of Gox accounts as some kind of creditor but obviously this needs to be clarified.

de_xt

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 535

Account hacked from Oct 11th to Nov 1st 2017

Quote from: clownius on March 22, 2014, 04:45:41 PM

Quote from: de_xt on March 22, 2014, 02:44:57 PM

The only problem is, depositors are not the same as creditors, so this money won't go to replenish people's wallets but to pay MtGox lawyers and loans.

Depositors are in fact creditors. Just not the ONLY ones.

I wish that were true. But seems it's not. According to this Fortune article, the only way depositors could partially recover their assets is through a lawsuit.

http://finance.fortune.cnn.com/2014/03/06/mt-gox-bitcoin-bankruptcy/

clownius

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 254

Quote from: de_xt on March 22, 2014, 02:44:57 PM

The only problem is, depositors are not the same as creditors, so this money won't go to replenish people's wallets but to pay MtGox lawyers and loans.

Depositors are in fact creditors. Just not the ONLY ones.

rikkejohn

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 500

Quote from: de_xt on March 22, 2014, 02:44:57 PM

The only problem is, depositors are not the same as creditors, so this money won't go to replenish people's wallets but to pay MtGox lawyers and loans.

But it's not money or even property in the traditional sense, it's BTC (electronic), and it does not belong to MtGox. We know who it belongs to.

Maybe this will make a difference, or maybe not.

de_xt

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 535

Account hacked from Oct 11th to Nov 1st 2017

The only problem is, depositors are not the same as creditors, so this money won't go to replenish people's wallets but to pay MtGox lawyers and loans.

clownius

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 254

It means they now have more demonstrated assets that are available for payment to creditors. Its a good thing for the creditors.

At least a partial recovery is quite likely.

lorix

full member

Activity: 148

Merit: 100

Hopefully someone with knowledge of legal precedents can respond to this question:

With the "convenient" discovery of 200,000 BTC in a "previously forgotten" wallet by MtGox, does this affect the status of their current bankruptcy protection ruling in Japan, USA and anywhere else they might have one?

Could there have been a perverse incentive to secure a bankruptcy protection ruling based on the claimed total loss of funds and then suddenly "discover" a portion of the missing funds later?

Topic: Does the 200K BTC discovery by MtGox affect it's bankruptcy protection? (Read 2527 times)