The DCA doesn't need too much lecture or the use of software or any third party. Going the extra mile to do it is part of how to measure the weakness of people as they often depend on external things for everything. Just divide your money into say 10 equal parts and invest at some prevailing time and price of the asset. This is what any primary school pupil could do with ease.
The main goal is for an investor not to miss out on whether the price of an asset will be favourable or advantageous, such a person using the DCA will be able to average their risks of striking the asset through this approach.
I agree with you that DCA is not complicated, and it probably has been around for a long time before it was even called DCA, especially for anyone who might want to ease into or out of a position if they have a lump sum or just as a way for someone who does not have a lump sum to still be able to invest in order to accumulate as if he had a lump sum.. just takes a bit longer than the one who is able to get straight into an investment with a lump sum.
It seems that for several years, another thing that I like to do is to get someone to compare his her BTC performance, whatever that has been, if it has been anything other than DCA. So in the end it might not matter very much, but if someone has been in BTC for a while.. let's say 6 years or longer, and they are claiming that forum members should trade and blah blah blah other BTC accumulation tactics, and then if we measure his performances to what it would have had been for DCA, then how many times would that guy be able to beat DCA? And even if he is able to beat DCA, how much had he beaten it by in order to make it worth it for a newbie to follow some technique other than DCA.. especially when first building his/her BTC investment position.
By the way.. maybe going back to @OP. DCA only works for BTC, and it does not work for those shitcoins, even though the charts might show wonderfully good results for various shitcoins.
DCA and long term investing of 4-10 years or more only works when there has been a fundamental analysis that the coin or project is likely to be trending upwardly and that it is going to end up being worth more in the long run. So even using the terms investments when it comes to shitcoins seems very problematic, even though people can do whatever they like when it comes to shitcoins, but I would not want to be suggesting that DCA works with any of them.. unless you might be able to conclude that such shitcoin has enough staying power to have generally upwardly trending prices..
It is a trading strategy and the conditions for its use may differ from one user to another and from time to time. If I had $17,000 and I had the option to invest now and buy half a Bitcoin, or to invest 1k/month for 17 months, then inevitably investing $17,000 now and buying half a Bitcoin would achieve a higher return than the investment. This amount is spread over several months, and this text will vary completely according to the market situation.
DCA is an excellent strategy and achieves a good return on investment, but it is not the best strategy for all times.
DCA is the best strategy for most people because many do not have lump sums, such as $17k, even though they surely might be able to conjure up $1k per month for the next 17 month.
If you have the $17k (or the lump sum) then probably lump sum is going to outperform DCA in a decent variety of circumstances, and especially if the BTC price has bee relatively down rather than being at a top and creating new ATHs on a regular basis.
Even a person like Robert T. Kiyosaki eventually sees that Dollar Cost Averaging is good for long term investment.
Here is
his tweet.Gold dropped $10 today. Silver 14 cents. This is where “Dollar Cost Averaging” pays off. Rather than pretend to be Warren Buffet picking bottoms I am an average investor “accumulating” the asset I want for the long term. I have been accumating gold, silver, BC and real estate for years. My first gold coin cost $50. Today that same coin is worth $2000. You can become rich by being an average investor, using dollar cost averaging to get rich. Take care.
Though "Dollar Cost Average method might be a very good way to accumulate more coins over a long period of time, but the only problem about it is your ability to predict when the price value will of your asset to "Fall" so as to sell high and buy back low when the price value have fallen, while doing that consistently, of which it only takes for anybody to be successful as a DCA investor, he/she needs to have good knowledge of about how the price movement of bitcoin works. Hence, making "hodling" the best and primarily way to invest in Bitcoin, for those who have little or no knowledge about how Bitcoin works.
That is not true about needing to be able to predict BTC prices. The exact opposite is true, including that DCA can largely be a blind strategy when comes to price, even though if someone has established their DCA budget, they might choose to try to buy on the dips, but hopefully having some restrictions in place that just compel buying after a certain point if the BTC price does not dip within a relatively short period of time that is set aside to try to find a dip...
One aspect of DCA is that you do not need to know anything about bitcoin or the price dynamics. You buy BTC regularly based on your own budget wether that is weekly, bi-weekly, monthly or some other regular increments.
And if you have a cashflow that varies between $800 and $2k per month, but you have around $1k of expenses every month, then you have to figure out how much you have available each week or month in order to figure out how much you want to invest - and presumably you have extra cash on hand to account for cashflow variations and also an emergency fund.. 3-6 months of a expenses is generally around the minimum amount that people would have when they are investing so that they do not have to dip into their investment at any time that is other than completely their own choosing.