Author

Topic: Double-spends in the wild? (Read 1304 times)

sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
August 26, 2011, 02:17:27 PM
#10
dude what's the point??

it's old news, it doesn't work, don't be a crook.

It would work if someone delivers the non-returnable goods after 0 or 1 confirmations. It gets harder as the amount of confirmations goes up (and even with the slump so far, the Bitcoin network is still powerful enough that it's non-trivial to even do with one confirmation).

It's not that it doesn't work, it's that the payoff is probably not worth the amount of effort required to do it. No one moving a sizable amount of money is going to not wait for confirmations and the longer they choose to wait the harder the attack gets.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
August 26, 2011, 01:22:21 PM
#9
dude what's the point??

it's old news, it doesn't work, don't be a crook.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1008
August 26, 2011, 01:02:23 PM
#8
I can't say as I've ever seen one...I'm certainly not aware of any (legitimate) reports of someone being robbed by a double spend.  I suspect many people new to bitcoin have attempted a naive double spend attack however (where you open two instances on the same wallet and try to spend at the same time).  I'm not sure if you would want to count that as a double spend attack since it's utterly ineffective if you wait for one confirmation or if you monitor the network for a few seconds after receiving the transaction.
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
August 26, 2011, 11:27:30 AM
#7
Wasn't a real double-spend attack.

Wasn't really a double-spend attack at all - MtGox doesn't give discrete addresses or let the users control them in any way. MtGox was an internal accounting screw up that had zero effect on the security of the protocol as a whole.

Exactly, the 'hack' didn't even touch the network.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
August 26, 2011, 11:26:53 AM
#6
If I could do it, my son, I would be retired from these forums by now, and in my yacht.
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
August 26, 2011, 10:36:27 AM
#5
Wasn't a real double-spend attack.

Wasn't really a double-spend attack at all - MtGox doesn't give discrete addresses or let the users control them in any way. MtGox was an internal accounting screw up that had zero effect on the security of the protocol as a whole.
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
August 26, 2011, 10:30:11 AM
#4
No, never

The Mt. Gox's hack was a double spend attack / create fake bitcoins / crap attack (though internally in their system) 



Wasn't a real double-spend attack.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 251
Bitcoin
August 26, 2011, 10:02:30 AM
#3
No, never

The Mt. Gox's hack was a double spend attack / create fake bitcoins / crap attack (though internally in their system) 

legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1280
May Bitcoin be touched by his Noodly Appendage
August 26, 2011, 09:47:10 AM
#2
No, never
full member
Activity: 123
Merit: 101
August 26, 2011, 07:55:45 AM
#1
Has anyone seen a confirmed double spend attack?

Mybitcoin doesn't count.

Jump to: