Seriously, I'm not looking into who you are, but the moment I do (and only if warranted) I WILL PM you first.
BTW, I'm not pulling back, but drilling deeper. Somebody has to lead in putting a stop to the improprieties associated with Bitcoin, and it might as well be me, donning a tutu or not, for it sure the hell ain't the dudes guarding the hen house, soon be renamed the coxshouse (.com: "Good news, this domain is available").
Phinnaeus, don't get me wrong, I applaud your efforts to promote bitcoin, and some of your causes are great, but doxxing is doxxing (please drop the innocence act, you know it, I know it, everyone else knows it, your starting to look foolish), and to do so carelessly without direct reason can lead to harm (Dorian anyone?).
The guy was just expressing his views in a post, there is no great harm going on in that, to set presidents that everyone risks being exposed for just having an opinion is not a good thing, it just leads to people being afraid to talk, just in case something comes out of their past like a marijuana "incident" from 10 years back or something (just an example).
You like being compared to superhero's (a bit odd IMO), so remember, as the great Stan Lee said;-
"With great power comes great responsibility"
Neil
I kind of like having a resident conspiracy theorist but doing that to random people is a bit over the top.
Look, guys, I truly wasn't doxxing. I clearly shown that the entity providing the news is controlled - literally - by the entity making the news. That's what I was trying to get across, albeit my own special way, but not by doxxing some innocent entity - far from it.
Hell, do you consider the following doxxing as well?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoin-forecast-458658 (Post 1 and Post 2 are by the same guy)
will pay bitcoin.
my site is: coinforecasts.com
Welcome to offer!
Hell, in that same thread, it's littered with both entities replying to one another as if they don't know each other and, ironically, they're providing the same service these dudes are.