Author

Topic: [DPOS] Delegate voting system - applied to Lisk (Read 259 times)

full member
Activity: 245
Merit: 124
We love blockchain !
October 23, 2017, 03:02:17 AM
#5
On all DPoS coins, I wish there is a link giving bio (not identity) of each candidate, their ranking and how much they control.  Most important is their position on current issues that influences where the coin is heading.

I like the option/capability to split holding vote though I honestly think 101 votes is an overkill.  This is only relevant if the coin holders know all the contenders (see 1st comment above).

Of course, I prefer DPOS system where the are less vote : let's say 51 votes for a total of 101 delegate in forging position.
Or another option is to vote for more than the total active delegate.

Exemple :
- the DPOS coin has 101 delegate.
- let's vote for 201 ! So everyone has a chance to be in active position !
full member
Activity: 350
Merit: 122
On all DPoS coins, I wish there is a link giving bio (not identity) of each candidate, their ranking and how much they control.  Most important is their position on current issues that influences where the coin is heading.

I like the option/capability to split holding vote though I honestly think 101 votes is an overkill.  This is only relevant if the coin holders know all the contenders (see 1st comment above).
full member
Activity: 245
Merit: 124
We love blockchain !
Thanks dude Smiley

Nice reply !  Grin

See you in january 2018 ...
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Hello everyone !

For those who are DPOS aware, could we start a discussion about the delegate voting system ?
What do you thing about that ?

Exemple :
- Lisk : 101 delegates, each wallet can vote up to 101.
- Ark : 51 delegates, each wallet can only vote for 1.
- Rise : 101 delegates, each wallet can only vote for 1.
- Oxy : 201 delegates, each wallet can vote up to 51.

Wich scenario is the best ? For what reason ?

-> Spread the crypto token via this mechanism is really respected ? When some delegates barely share "nothing" with their voters ?

Let's open the debate !

Vitalik explained why DPoS sucks and is not secure nor resilient (unless you trust some whales)!
full member
Activity: 245
Merit: 124
We love blockchain !
Hello everyone !

For those who are DPOS aware, could we start a discussion about the delegate voting system ?
What do you thing about that ?

Exemple :
- Lisk : 101 delegates, each wallet can vote up to 101.
- Ark : 51 delegates, each wallet can only vote for 1.
- Rise : 101 delegates, each wallet can only vote for 1.
- Oxy : 201 delegates, each wallet can vote up to 51.

Wich scenario is the best ? For what reason ?

-> Spread the crypto token via this mechanism is really respected ? When some delegates barely share "nothing" with their voters ?

Let's open the debate !
Jump to: