I was keep trying to use this but my anti virus keep deleting this dstm zcash miner no dev fee.
Can you make a dstm which is not detected by antivirus or make dstm clean because i couldn't run the miner its keep deleting. .
Topic: dstm's ZCash Miner 0.5.7 NO DEV FEE (Read 2198 times)
Let's use our brains here for a second....
New user with 11 posts, goes out of his way to take a miner to remove 2% dev fee and make it free to download for you, "cause he wants to stick it to the man" yet doesn't release source and claims he is not making any money off of it.
People are monitoring ports and noticing all sorts of sketchy stuff....
If it walks like a duck.....
Just pay the damn 2% fee to DSTM you greedy bastards. Don't like it? Don't use it. Use a different miner.
Don't like the other miner? Use something else.
Don't like that other one? Make your own.
Can't make your own? Quit fkn complaining about giving someone $0.02 for every $0.98 you earn.....
New user with 11 posts, goes out of his way to take a miner to remove 2% dev fee and make it free to download for you, "cause he wants to stick it to the man" yet doesn't release source and claims he is not making any money off of it.
People are monitoring ports and noticing all sorts of sketchy stuff....
If it walks like a duck.....
Just pay the damn 2% fee to DSTM you greedy bastards. Don't like it? Don't use it. Use a different miner.
Don't like the other miner? Use something else.
Don't like that other one? Make your own.
Can't make your own? Quit fkn complaining about giving someone $0.02 for every $0.98 you earn.....
no devfee , devfee for nekidtruth 
Then i suggest try this one. No scam. Running on my 16 rigs 
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dstm-found-a-fee-remover-for-dstm-zm-miner-2800586
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dstm-found-a-fee-remover-for-dstm-zm-miner-2800586
summary
http://f6.s.qip.ru/qpjF8UJd.png
http://f6.s.qip.ru/qpjF8UJd.png
Hi guys, I've tested this "NO DEV FEE" shit.. here is 2 monitoring with original dstm 0.5.7 and this shit
https://bitcoinz.miningspeed.com/workers/t1gRR8K43v4c564tXUU1kZTpVeveUZoMCRq - original
https://bitcoinz.miningspeed.com/workers/t1XwjML1ExtQ8Rx1WtriwR8e5Dd2mREhPCN - nofee
http://f2.s.qip.ru/qpjF8UJ1.png
http://f2.s.qip.ru/qpjF8UJ2.png
looks like a topic starter is scammer and try to scam us for 4%, as you can see in pictures
I've tested on 1 gigabyte 1066, running both miners with same average sols
http://f3.s.qip.ru/qpjF8UJ3.png
YOU'RE WARNED!
https://bitcoinz.miningspeed.com/workers/t1gRR8K43v4c564tXUU1kZTpVeveUZoMCRq - original
https://bitcoinz.miningspeed.com/workers/t1XwjML1ExtQ8Rx1WtriwR8e5Dd2mREhPCN - nofee
http://f2.s.qip.ru/qpjF8UJ1.png
http://f2.s.qip.ru/qpjF8UJ2.png
looks like a topic starter is scammer and try to scam us for 4%, as you can see in pictures
I've tested on 1 gigabyte 1066, running both miners with same average sols
http://f3.s.qip.ru/qpjF8UJ3.png
YOU'RE WARNED!
suckaboss posted code to create a custom library and after compiling and trying it, I did see a new worker called "n" where my devfees were being redirected to.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.28399173
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.28399173
Hi guys, I've tested this "NO DEV FEE" shit.. here is 2 monitoring with original dstm 0.5.7 and this shit
https://bitcoinz.miningspeed.com/workers/t1gRR8K43v4c564tXUU1kZTpVeveUZoMCRq - original
https://bitcoinz.miningspeed.com/workers/t1XwjML1ExtQ8Rx1WtriwR8e5Dd2mREhPCN - nofee
http://f2.s.qip.ru/qpjF8UJ1.png
http://f2.s.qip.ru/qpjF8UJ2.png
looks like a topic starter is scammer and try to scam us for 4%, as you can see in pictures
I've tested on 1 gigabyte 1066, running both miners with same average sols
http://f3.s.qip.ru/qpjF8UJ3.png
YOU'RE WARNED!
https://bitcoinz.miningspeed.com/workers/t1gRR8K43v4c564tXUU1kZTpVeveUZoMCRq - original
https://bitcoinz.miningspeed.com/workers/t1XwjML1ExtQ8Rx1WtriwR8e5Dd2mREhPCN - nofee
http://f2.s.qip.ru/qpjF8UJ1.png
http://f2.s.qip.ru/qpjF8UJ2.png
looks like a topic starter is scammer and try to scam us for 4%, as you can see in pictures
I've tested on 1 gigabyte 1066, running both miners with same average sols
http://f3.s.qip.ru/qpjF8UJ3.png
YOU'RE WARNED!
2_Poisenninja: How did you achieve 7.19 sols/W on 1080ti? I have 4 of them (on water) and my are all doing just 3.5~ish.. 1070ti doing 4.0.. but 7.19 is insane.. Can you share what mod did you do to your card?
So the dev fee is closer to 4% than 2%. I have no plans releasing a tool for this. I dont Care about mining. Just want to let you know what the fee is. Everyone wants more. The card have mined for 4 hours on the picture. Dont look at the 500 sol/s i connected the miner by mistake to flypool when i started it. But ofc the right offer could change my mind
A friend asked me about this dev fee. Took me 5 min to redirect to myself. This is a 1080ti mining zencash. Dstm 5.8. 720 sol/s and dev free is redirected to myself. I mine zencash but i redirect the zcash fee to myself. No need to do crazy stuff. Just some brain and a little fix.https://imgur.com/a/0yvId
After blocking even more ip's and domains exept the ones from nanopool.
2018-01-02 05:05:16|# connected to: zec-eu1.nanopool.org:16666
2018-01-02 05:05:46|connect failed
What happens here is that the program secretly wants to connect to a dev fee pool waits 30 second for timeout and than shuts down
2018-01-02 05:05:16|# connected to: zec-eu1.nanopool.org:16666
2018-01-02 05:05:46|connect failed
What happens here is that the program secretly wants to connect to a dev fee pool waits 30 second for timeout and than shuts down
so.. Is this legit or not?
Still going to use dstm's miner that i already have.
Id rather support the community and its developers by paying dev fees. Just my view.
Id rather support the community and its developers by paying dev fees. Just my view.
for me dev fee it's to zcash to pay it...
they win cash from it & on us.
we work for zcash , where you see worker pay boss to get work ?
not really logic...
but i dont think like this, all i see it's get my money back from hardware buyed / pay my electricity
when it donne im ok for pay fee. ....
If the same people who made/create the coins made the miners, Id agree.
Without 3rd party mining programs.... where would we be?
LOL.
Claymore make 1M+ on month.
Dstm is still at 200K - https://zcash.flypool.org/miners/t1NEpmfunewy9z5TogCvAhCuS3J8VWXoJNv
Claymore make 1M+ on month.
Dstm is still at 200K - https://zcash.flypool.org/miners/t1NEpmfunewy9z5TogCvAhCuS3J8VWXoJNv
think about this for a sec.... your "laughing" at a guy who's making 3 mil a year....
LOL at anyone running closed source .exe for mining
I do not trust such offers. First is copyright infringement. Secondly you don't know what is written in this miner. Possible with the help of this software, hackers get access to your wallet or mined coins. You will lose more. Why when hackers break wallets people are outraged but when they climbs into other people's pockets, they forget about what is bad.
The original isn't copyrighted it's just a closed source .exe with anything in it, it's not open source so same risk with that miner as this After blocking even more ip's and domains exept the ones from nanopool.
2018-01-02 05:05:16|# connected to: zec-eu1.nanopool.org:16666
2018-01-02 05:05:46|connect failed
What happens here is that the program secretly wants to connect to a dev fee pool waits 30 second for timeout and than shuts down
2018-01-02 05:05:16|# connected to: zec-eu1.nanopool.org:16666
2018-01-02 05:05:46|connect failed
What happens here is that the program secretly wants to connect to a dev fee pool waits 30 second for timeout and than shuts down
so what you are saying is, this "no dev fee" doesn't even work and there is no other way to remove the dev fee from the original dstm miner?
LOL.
Claymore make 1M+ on month.
Dstm is still at 200K - https://zcash.flypool.org/miners/t1NEpmfunewy9z5TogCvAhCuS3J8VWXoJNv
Claymore make 1M+ on month.
Dstm is still at 200K - https://zcash.flypool.org/miners/t1NEpmfunewy9z5TogCvAhCuS3J8VWXoJNv
think about this for a sec.... your "laughing" at a guy who's making 3 mil a year....
After blocking even more ip's and domains exept the ones from nanopool.
2018-01-02 05:05:16|# connected to: zec-eu1.nanopool.org:16666
2018-01-02 05:05:46|connect failed
What happens here is that the program secretly wants to connect to a dev fee pool waits 30 second for timeout and than shuts down
2018-01-02 05:05:16|# connected to: zec-eu1.nanopool.org:16666
2018-01-02 05:05:46|connect failed
What happens here is that the program secretly wants to connect to a dev fee pool waits 30 second for timeout and than shuts down
And we have to block
213.32.74.230
213.32.29.150
94.23.20.210
213.32.29.150
94.23.199.191
188.165.195.21
and the range
213.32.0.0 To
213.32.255.255
This causes the miner to go in Server not responding - retrying mode.
So without flypools server's online this stupid miner does noting
213.32.74.230
213.32.29.150
94.23.20.210
213.32.29.150
94.23.199.191
188.165.195.21
and the range
213.32.0.0 To
213.32.255.255
This causes the miner to go in Server not responding - retrying mode.
So without flypools server's online this stupid miner does noting
We also have to block 192.99.33.207 3443 seems to be another server of flypool that this program wants to connect with
I can confirm that all the unencrypted mining.submit shared goes to my own wallet entered. But there is an encyptred TLS connection to flypool and i'm not yet sure what it does. It looks for now that no big data that can include share's is going to flypool but i have to monitor for maybe 12+ hours to be sure.
There is some good news, let's mine on nanopool with flypool on 192.99.160.185 3443 blocked. And we will see in a few days if a 1070 can make the reported 505H/s without dev fee.
I advise to keep a good copy of this patched version of zm cos nekidtruth will patch this fix.
Greetingz From,
Dikke Hans Jansen
I advise to keep a good copy of this patched version of zm cos nekidtruth will patch this fix.
Greetingz From,
Dikke Hans Jansen
I analysed this program
While mining on nanopool and blocking flypool in windows firewall(192.99.160.185) an error comes up: connection closed by server r:2
This means one of the developers is still taking fee from me or at least there is always an active keep alive connection to flypool.
I have been mining for 2 days now and avg did go down from 490H/s to 456.5H/s
See image for proof
https://image.ibb.co/fpdNwb/Naamloos.png
While mining on nanopool and blocking flypool in windows firewall(192.99.160.185) an error comes up: connection closed by server r:2
This means one of the developers is still taking fee from me or at least there is always an active keep alive connection to flypool.
I have been mining for 2 days now and avg did go down from 490H/s to 456.5H/s
See image for proof
https://image.ibb.co/fpdNwb/Naamloos.png
Crazy how people can be greedy, altering someone else work just to earn 2% more, if you don't like the 2% fee simply go back to EWBF or any other miner
No more greedy and the devs of these mining programs, th devs are more greedy than you think. There work isn't worth what they charge us, maybe you should do some math over just 6 months of dishing out dev fees. It's disgusting, and how much these guys make is just bs, take claymore for instance you know he makes well over 100k a month between all his miners and his ass could easily reduce his fee to 1 percent and still make a killing, but does he fuck no, why because he is greedy. So before you start to bitch and complain about miners being greedy why don't you bitch and complain about the devs doing it too
The irony in the story is that it's a classic case of the pot calling the kettle black.
I bet he's mining for the love of the community... Money and greed have absolutely nothing to do with it, right?
Crazy how people can be greedy, altering someone else work just to earn 2% more, if you don't like the 2% fee simply go back to EWBF or any other miner
No more greedy and the devs of these mining programs, th devs are more greedy than you think. There work isn't worth what they charge us, maybe you should do some math over just 6 months of dishing out dev fees. It's disgusting, and how much these guys make is just bs, take claymore for instance you know he makes well over 100k a month between all his miners and his ass could easily reduce his fee to 1 percent and still make a killing, but does he fuck no, why because he is greedy. So before you start to bitch and complain about miners being greedy why don't you bitch and complain about the devs doing it too
I tested one day. The average speed on the pool remained exactly the same as when using the original file. The author takes the commission, but veiled it, Maybe he takes it every 6, 12 hours. This author is a fraudster.
Hi.
I tried you're version for 3 days. It works well but my hashrate went from 1.8kh to 1.69 on flypool. Either it doesn't work or... You take more fees !
I tried you're version for 3 days. It works well but my hashrate went from 1.8kh to 1.69 on flypool. Either it doesn't work or... You take more fees !
I made it for my own, now tried to explain for this, i added some notes on github, plz check.
no more words about this.
no more words about this.
what tool did you use to decompile the zm.exe?
Sounds dishonest and sketchy.
Mega probably sniffed out the trojan you put in there.
Mega probably sniffed out the trojan you put in there.
not working for me ,
no minnig , dont work with flypool....
removed it , put original zm.exe ,woking fine after 2 minutes, see it on pool ..
no minnig , dont work with flypool....
removed it , put original zm.exe ,woking fine after 2 minutes, see it on pool ..
LOL.
Claymore make 1M+ on month.
Dstm is still at 200K - https://zcash.flypool.org/miners/t1NEpmfunewy9z5TogCvAhCuS3J8VWXoJNv
Claymore make 1M+ on month.
Dstm is still at 200K - https://zcash.flypool.org/miners/t1NEpmfunewy9z5TogCvAhCuS3J8VWXoJNv
I do not trust such offers. First is copyright infringement. Secondly you don't know what is written in this miner. Possible with the help of this software, hackers get access to your wallet or mined coins. You will lose more. Why when hackers break wallets people are outraged but when they climbs into other people's pockets, they forget about what is bad.
The program has to be copyrighted for there to be a copyright infringement, and I garentee there not copyrighted
Crazy how people can be greedy, altering someone else work just to earn 2% more, if you don't like the 2% fee simply go back to EWBF or any other miner
No more greedy and the devs of these mining programs, th devs are more greedy than you think. There work isn't worth what they charge us, maybe you should do some math over just 6 months of dishing out dev fees. It's disgusting, and how much these guys make is just bs, take claymore for instance you know he makes well over 100k a month between all his miners and his ass could easily reduce his fee to 1 percent and still make a killing, but does he fuck no, why because he is greedy. So before you start to bitch and complain about miners being greedy why don't you bitch and complain about the devs doing it too
Crazy how people can be greedy, altering someone else work just to earn 2% more, if you don't like the 2% fee simply go back to EWBF or any other miner
pay my fee then if it's nothing for you .....
you dont pay hardware ? electricity ?
Crazy how people can be greedy, altering someone else work just to earn 2% more, if you don't like the 2% fee simply go back to EWBF or any other miner
Still going to use dstm's miner that i already have.
Id rather support the community and its developers by paying dev fees. Just my view.
Id rather support the community and its developers by paying dev fees. Just my view.
for me dev fee it's to zcash to pay it...
they win cash from it & on us.
we work for zcash , where you see worker pay boss to get work ?
not really logic...
but i dont think like this, all i see it's get my money back from hardware buyed / pay my electricity
when it donne im ok for pay fee. ....
If the same people who made/create the coins made the miners, Id agree.
Without 3rd party mining programs.... where would we be?
Still going to use dstm's miner that i already have.
Id rather support the community and its developers by paying dev fees. Just my view.
Id rather support the community and its developers by paying dev fees. Just my view.
for me dev fee it's to zcash to pay it...
they win cash from it & on us.
we work for zcash , where you see worker pay boss to get work ?
not really logic...
but i dont think like this, all i see it's get my money back from hardware buyed / pay my electricity
when it donne im ok for pay fee. ....
Still going to use dstm's miner that i already have.
Id rather support the community and its developers by paying dev fees. Just my view.
Id rather support the community and its developers by paying dev fees. Just my view.
thank's for sharing.
but here , im waiting for feedback about it
before using it , im no able to check it ....
but here , im waiting for feedback about it
before using it , im no able to check it ....
same here ,
i have difficult to trust you ,
why made 1 exe for this ?
here im using 0.5.5 a way faster than 56 & 57 for me..
you say it's proxy (why no made like nodevfee 8.0 ? )
windows spying tcp & show us when you catch fee for redirect it ?
miner as big 140k and your file more than 1 mo .....
devfee 8.0 is 216k for a tcp analyser/mod ....
im totaly newbie here ..but more than suspicious
i have difficult to trust you ,
why made 1 exe for this ?
here im using 0.5.5 a way faster than 56 & 57 for me..
you say it's proxy (why no made like nodevfee 8.0 ? )
windows spying tcp & show us when you catch fee for redirect it ?
miner as big 140k and your file more than 1 mo .....
devfee 8.0 is 216k for a tcp analyser/mod ....
im totaly newbie here ..but more than suspicious
Never use devfee 8.0 before, but it seems works in same way, I'll check and learn. Thanks.
The proxy dll is large, because it compiled with /MT option, and contains a hook lib.
I dont want to write another dll injector, so I made them to 1 EXE.
This is how this patch works:
Monitoring stratum protocol, when it see mining.submit protocol, replace worker name to your wallet - from command line.
It's just like https://github.com/BScrk/zecproxy.
So it have to write some code and, use a packer to bundle EXE and patch code, that's why the EXE larger than before.
Monitoring stratum protocol, when it see mining.submit protocol, replace worker name to your wallet - from command line.
It's just like https://github.com/BScrk/zecproxy.
So it have to write some code and, use a packer to bundle EXE and patch code, that's why the EXE larger than before.
I don't trust 
The EXE is also way larger than the original
I do not trust such offers. First is copyright infringement. Secondly you don't know what is written in this miner. Possible with the help of this software, hackers get access to your wallet or mined coins. You will lose more. Why when hackers break wallets people are outraged but when they climbs into other people's pockets, they forget about what is bad.
malware found: Win32/Fuery.A!cl
reported maybe? who knows. might wanna put it on google drive and post link too
link doesn't work
link updated.
BTW: Why mega cancel my share files?
link doesn't work
Awesome. Hahahha
I've patched last version of DSTM miner, removed the dev share.
Tested for several hours, it's works fine:
Update some pics & notes on github, please check.
Download from Github: https://github.com/Nekidtruth01/dstm-miner-NoDevFee
Tested for several hours, it's works fine:
Code:
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 496.0 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.0 I/s: 266.3 Sh: 3.72 1.00 60 +
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 506.1 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.3 I/s: 266.0 Sh: 3.61 1.00 60
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 504.0 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.6 I/s: 265.8 Sh: 3.51 1.00 60
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 496.5 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.6 I/s: 266.3 Sh: 3.49 1.00 60 +
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 494.7 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.6 I/s: 265.7 Sh: 3.72 1.00 59 ++++
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 493.7 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.5 I/s: 265.8 Sh: 3.62 1.00 59
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 493.4 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.5 I/s: 266.2 Sh: 3.68 1.00 60 ++
> GPU0 57C Sol/s: 498.5 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.5 I/s: 266.2 Sh: 3.59 1.00 60
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 491.9 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.4 I/s: 266.4 Sh: 3.58 1.00 61 +
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 505.2 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.7 I/s: 266.5 Sh: 3.63 1.00 61 ++
> GPU0 57C Sol/s: 497.3 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.7 I/s: 266.5 Sh: 3.62 1.00 60 +
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 499.9 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.8 I/s: 265.9 Sh: 3.54 1.00 60
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 496.7 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.8 I/s: 265.6 Sh: 3.66 1.00 60 +++
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 502.6 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 496.0 I/s: 266.0 Sh: 3.71 1.00 60 ++
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 491.4 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.9 I/s: 265.3 Sh: 3.69 1.00 61 +
> GPU0 57C Sol/s: 488.6 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.7 I/s: 265.7 Sh: 3.80 1.00 63 +++
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 500.9 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.8 I/s: 266.0 Sh: 3.78 1.00 63 +
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 502.5 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 496.0 I/s: 266.6 Sh: 3.89 1.00 60 +++
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 505.0 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 496.1 I/s: 266.5 Sh: 3.87 1.00 61 +
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 494.2 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 496.1 I/s: 264.5 Sh: 3.85 1.00 61 +
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 498.9 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 496.2 I/s: 264.8 Sh: 3.89 1.00 60 ++
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 495.6 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 496.1 I/s: 265.7 Sh: 3.82 1.00 60
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 484.9 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.9 I/s: 266.0 Sh: 3.75 1.00 60
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 494.7 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.9 I/s: 266.4 Sh: 3.68 1.00 60
> GPU0 57C Sol/s: 497.8 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 496.0 I/s: 266.2 Sh: 3.67 1.00 61 +
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 499.9 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 496.0 I/s: 266.5 Sh: 3.71 1.00 61 ++
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 498.5 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 496.1 I/s: 265.8 Sh: 3.75 1.00 61 ++
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 498.1 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 496.1 I/s: 265.9 Sh: 3.74 1.00 60 +
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 497.5 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 496.1 I/s: 265.8 Sh: 3.73 1.00 62 +
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 484.6 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.9 I/s: 265.1 Sh: 3.67 1.00 62
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 500.0 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 496.0 I/s: 265.5 Sh: 3.65 1.00 60 +
> GPU0 57C Sol/s: 496.6 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 496.0 I/s: 264.6 Sh: 3.60 1.00 60
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 491.7 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.9 I/s: 264.6 Sh: 3.59 1.00 62 +
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 496.3 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.9 I/s: 266.0 Sh: 3.58 1.00 60 +
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 494.2 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.9 I/s: 265.8 Sh: 3.53 1.00 60
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 497.0 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.9 I/s: 265.7 Sh: 3.52 1.00 61 +
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 491.6 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.9 I/s: 266.1 Sh: 3.55 1.00 62 ++
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 491.0 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.8 I/s: 266.4 Sh: 3.50 1.00 62
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 489.1 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.7 I/s: 265.5 Sh: 3.45 1.00 62
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 504.9 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.8 I/s: 265.9 Sh: 3.45 1.00 61 +
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 498.9 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.9 I/s: 265.7 Sh: 3.48 1.00 61 ++
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 489.9 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.8 I/s: 265.4 Sh: 3.43 1.00 61
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 492.9 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.8 I/s: 265.1 Sh: 3.47 1.00 62 ++
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 494.2 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.7 I/s: 263.9 Sh: 3.46 1.00 61 +
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 492.6 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.7 I/s: 264.8 Sh: 3.49 1.00 63 ++
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 494.8 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.7 I/s: 264.3 Sh: 3.49 1.00 61 +
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 493.0 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.7 I/s: 264.4 Sh: 3.48 1.00 60 +
GPU0 57C Sol/s: 499.1 Sol/W: 1.94 Avg: 495.7 I/s: 264.4 Sh: 3.48 1.00 62 +
Update some pics & notes on github, please check.
Download from Github: https://github.com/Nekidtruth01/dstm-miner-NoDevFee
Jump to: