You're the one making the extortion claim. You're gonna need to prove it.
I already posted the copy of the letter, that was received on our email and added that
I'm not sure if it was sent by him or just by a scammer But looking into the history of DT2 members behavior on this forum
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/laudatmanminifrijironmarvel2owlcatz-extortion-attempt-1764757 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=138940 it is more likely that cryptodevil sent that letter.
You posted a bunch of retaliatory ratings without any proof. It doesn't make your scheme any less of a scam.
As I mentioned before, this topic is
not about bitconnext and we are
not discussing here if that project is a scam or not. We are discussing here the behavior of cryptodevil, who tagged bounty participants profiles
without any reasons and ruined them. Also we are discussing here some of DT2 members that were involved it extortion and pedophilia cases.
All DT2 members are pedophiles without question.
I never said that. I just provided a link to website, where
VOD was exposed as a pedophile and that accusation was confirmed by his former co-workers.
https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/martin-lawrence/select-stateprovince/martin-lawrence-vodmlawrence-pedo-bitcoin-st-albert-edmonton-st-albert-alberta-1158255If these bounty participants were warned
They were never warned, because I deleted all messages from that
crazy internet cop immediately after posting.
he's a cocky cocksucker
That's true !
I do not care about the opinion of yours regarding our project. I care about people that signed up for a bounty campaign without any bad intentions and get red tagged by crazy dude, who thinks he is a internet robin hood. As I mentioned above
there were and are dozens of
real ponzi projects on this forum (you can see the links in my first post) Non of OP's of that projects were tagged. Cryptodevil must remove red tags from bounty participants because they did not know anything about the project and they do not care if the project is a scam or not.